Sir Keir Starmer has been urged to promote fresh talent to the shadow cabinet in a reshuffle that is widely expected to take place on Monday.
The Labour leader has been told that now is the time to be “bold” in shaking up his top team ahead of next year’s general election – but it is unclear at this stage whether Sir Keirintends to make only limited changes or will carry out a more substantial shake-up.
There are two schools of thought regarding what form the reshuffle could take.
The first is that all posts outside of Sir Keir’s five key missions could be up for grabs, or that the reshuffle could be minor and possibly mirror changes in government departments – for example, to cover posts such as secretary of state for science, innovation and technology which is occupied by Michelle Donelan but does not have a Labour counterpart.
However, senior Labour sources who spoke to Sky News said Sir Keir should use the reshuffle as an opportunity to promote new names into the shadow cabinet – which they said would de facto make it a significant re-organisation.
One Labour adviser told Sky News: “It’s time to shake things up and get the talent in where it belongs. We need to show the country how we will transform Britain.”
Another source added: “Keir talks a lot about being ruthless – he should stick to that.
Advertisement
“This isn’t just the next shadow cabinet, it’s potentially the next government. People shouldn’t just stay because he’s afraid to rock the boat. He’s in his strongest possible position – it’s a waste if he doesn’t act now.”
Among the names of those have been tipped for a possible promotion include Darren Jones, who currently chairs parliament’s business and trade committee, and shadow policing minister Sarah Jones.
Mr Jones has been widely tipped for months to take on the role of shadow science, innovation and technology secretary – a position that is currently vacant and is also said to be coveted by Lucy Powell, who currently holds the culture brief.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:08
Starmer unveils Labour ‘missions’.
Sources said Ms Jones, the MP for Croydon Central, could take on the brief of Northern Ireland secretary due to her background in policing.
That role could be vacated by the incumbent, Peter Kyle, who sources said would be well-placed to take on the environment, food and rural affairs brief due to the “political capital” that can be made due to the current crisis of sewage in rivers and seas.
Mr Kyle, the MP for Hove, is viewed by one member of the Labour frontbench as ideal for the role.
“It’s not seen as a top job, but he could really land blows on Tories,” said one Labour MP. “Especially in coastal and rural areas where we’d like to win seats.”
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
Alison McGovern, the current shadow minister for work and pensions, was described by one Labour source as the “obvious” choice to take on the culture brief given her advocacy for women’s football in the year of the Women’s World Cup.
However, Thangam Debbonaire, the current shadow leader of the House, has also been mentioned for the role given her background as professional cellist and as MP for Bristol West, a constituency known for its creatives.
Other names that could be vulnerable to being moved are Louise Haigh in transport, Jo Stevens in the shadow Wales office and shadow mental health minister Rosena Allin-Khan – who could be replaced by Liz Kendall.
Key players staying put
While the reshuffle could see movement around the margins, shadow cabinet ministers orientated around Sir Keir’s five missions are expected to stay put.
It means that shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves, shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper, shadow health secretary Wes Streeting, shadow education secretary Bridget Phillipson and shadow climate change secretary Ed Miliband are likely to stay in post until the next election.
But there are questions about other heavy hitters, including shadow levelling up secretary Lisa Nandy – who has been rumoured for a demotion or possible move out of the entire shadow cabinet – and Angela Rayner, with whom relations have been strained.
Image: Labour party deputy leader Angela Rayner.
While Ms Rayner cannot be moved from her role as deputy leader given it is an elected position, she occupies an array of other roles including the shadow chancellor of the duchy of Lancaster and shadow secretary of state for the future of work which some of Sir Keir’s aides are reportedly keen to move her from.
There are fears that the future of work brief occupied by Ms Rayner could be watered down or scrapped entirely amid fears that it requires too much input from trade unions.
Her allies have remained tight lipped about any move – but past briefings have suggested that Ms Rayner could be moved to Ms Nandy’s role in a bid to move her away from the levers of the future Cabinet office.
However, some question the logic of moving Ms Rayner to a brief where she could become the “voice of the North” in Westminster and challenge the Treasury on spending decisions.
It could, they suggest, also allow her to build up a rival power base along with other metro mayors, as well as forge close ties with local constituency parties needed for a potential leadership bid.
Image: Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge starts on Monday at 7pm
Sources also pointed out that Sir Keir would not want to see a repeat of the chaotic 2021 reshuffle, in which he sacked Ms Rayner as party chair and national campaign co-ordinator only to appoint her to the roles she occupies currently.
At this stage the one thing that stands out is the desire for Sir Keir to make his biggest power play yet – but whether he will remains uncertain.
Upbit operator Dunamu reported a surge in profitability for the third quarter of the year, posting 239 billion won ($165 million) in net income.
The figure marks an increase of more than 300% compared to the same period last year, which stood at $40 million, local news outlet Chosun Biz reported, citing regulatory filings with the Financial Supervisory Service.
The filing reportedly showed strong momentum across all key metrics. Consolidated revenue climbed to $266 million, up 35% from the previous quarter, while operating profit rose 54% to $162 million. Net income also jumped 145% quarter-over-quarter from $67 million.
The company attributed its improved performance to rising trading activity as global digital asset markets rebounded through 2024 and 2025.
Dunamu said investor confidence received a boost following regulatory developments in the United States, including the passage of the Genius Act, the Clarity Act and the Anti-CBDC Bill. These measures, the company said, contributed to renewed institutional participation and steadier market conditions.
Dunamu has faced heightened reporting requirements since 2022, when it was added to the list of corporations subject to external audit due to having more than 500 shareholders.
Notably, several major crypto firms experienced a revenue increase last quarter. Bitcoin mining company TeraWulf and Singapore-based cloud Bitcoin miner BitFuFu doubled their third-quarter revenue from the previous year.
As Cointelegraph reported, Naver Financial, the fintech arm of South Korea’s largest internet company, is preparing to acquire Dunamu. Naver reportedly plans to bring Dunamu in as a subsidiary through a share swap, with board approvals expected soon.
Upbit Korea is the largest crypto exchange in South Korea in terms of trading volume and customer base, according to CoinMarketCap.
Many Labour MPs have been left shellshocked after the chaotic political self-sabotage of the past week.
Bafflement, anger, disappointment, and sheer frustration are all on relatively open display at the circular firing squad which seems to have surrounded the prime minister.
The botched effort to flush out backroom plotters and force Wes Streeting to declare his loyalty ahead of the budget has instead led even previously loyal Starmerites to predict the PM could be forced out of office before the local elections in May.
“We have so many councillors coming up for election across the country,” one says, “and at the moment it looks like they’re going to be wiped out. That’s our base – we just can’t afford to lose them. I like Keir [Starmer] but there’s only a limited window left to turn things around. There’s a real question of urgency.”
Another criticised a “boys club” at No 10 who they claimed have “undermined” the prime minister and “forgotten they’re meant to be serving the British people.”
There’s clearly widespread muttering about what to do next – and even a degree of enviousness at the lack of a regicidal 1922 committee mechanism, as enjoyed by the Tories.
“Leadership speculation is destabilising,” one said. “But there’s really no obvious strategy. Andy Burnham isn’t even an MP. You’d need a stalking horse candidate and we don’t have one. There’s no 1922. It’s very messy.”
More on Labour
Related Topics:
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:54
Starmer’s faithfuls are ‘losing faith’
Others are gunning for the chancellor after months of careful pitch-rolling for manifesto-breaching tax rises in the budget were ripped up overnight.
“Her career is toast,” one told me. “Rachel has just lost all credibility. She screwed up on the manifesto. She screwed up on the last two fiscal events, costing the party huge amounts of support and leaving the economy stagnating.
“Having now walked everyone up the mountain of tax rises and made us vote to support them on the opposition day debate two days ago, she’s now worried her job is at risk and has bottled it.
“Talk to any major business or investor and they are holding off investing in the UK until it is clear what the UK’s tax policy is going to be, putting us in a situation where the chancellor is going to have to go through this all over again in six months – which just means no real economic growth for another six months.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
After less than 18 months in office, the government is stuck in a political morass largely of its own making.
Treasury sources have belatedly argued that the chancellor’s pre-budget change of heart on income tax is down to better-than-expected economic forecasts from the Office for Budget Responsibility.
That should be a cause of celebration. The question is whether she and the PM are now too damaged to make that case to the country – and rescue their benighted prospects.
People granted asylum in the UK will only be allowed to stay in the country temporarily, in sweeping reforms expected to be announced on Monday.
Modelled on the Danish system, the aim is to make the UK less attractive for illegal immigrants and make it easier to deport them.
Planned changes mean that refugee status will become temporary and subject to regular review, with refugees removed as soon as their home countries are deemed safe.
Under current UK rules, those granted refugee status have it for five years and can then apply for indefinite leave to remain and get on a route to citizenship.
In a social media video trailing her announcement, Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood said: “We will always be a country that gives sanctuary to people who are fleeing danger, but we must restore order and control.”
She called it “the most significant changes to our asylum system in modern times”.
An ally of the home secretary said: “Today, becoming a refugee equals a lifetime of protection in Britain.
More on Denmark
Related Topics:
“Mahmood will change that, making refugee status temporary and subject to regular review. The moment your home country is safe to return to, you will be removed.
“While this might seem like a small technical shift, this new settlement marks the most significant shift in the treatment of refugees since the Second World War.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:15
UK looks to Denmark for tougher immigration policy
Time and money ‘wasted’ on Rwanda scheme
While the number of asylum claims across Europe has fallen, numbers in Britain have risen.
Ms Mahmood said the previous government had had “years to tackle this problem” but had “wasted” time and money on the £700m Rwanda scheme.
Some 39,075 people have arrived in the UK after making the journey across the Channel so far this year, according to the latest Home Office figures.
That is an increase of 19% on the same point in 2024 and up 43% on 2023, but remains 5% lower than at the equivalent point in 2022, which remains the peak year for crossings.
Other changes expected to be announced on Monday include requiring judges to prioritise public safety over migrants’ rights to a family life, or the risk that they will face “inhuman” treatment if returned to their home country, the Telegraph has reported.
Denmark’s tighter rules on family reunions are also being looked at.
Denmark has adopted increasingly restrictive rules in order to deal with migration over the last few years.
In Denmark, most asylum or refugee statuses are temporary. Residency can be revoked once a country is deemed safe.
In order to achieve settlement, asylum seekers are required to be in full-time employment, and the length of time it takes to acquire those rights has been extended.
Denmark also has tougher rules on family reunification – both the sponsor and their partner are required to be at least 24 years old, which the Danish government says is designed to prevent forced marriages.
The sponsor must also not have claimed welfare for three years and must provide a financial guarantee for their partner. Both must also pass a Danish language test.
In 2018, Denmark introduced what it called a ghetto package, a controversial plan to radically alter some residential areas, including by demolishing social housing. Areas with over 1,000 residents were defined as ghettos if more than 50% were “immigrants and their descendants from non-Western countries”.
In 2021, the left of centre government passed a law that allowed refugees arriving on Danish soil to be moved to asylum centres in a partner country – and subsequently agreed with Rwanda to explore setting up a program, although that has been put on hold.
Changes will prevent refugees from ‘integrating into British life’
While some research has suggested that deterrence policies have little impact on asylum seekers’ choice of destination, but a 2017 study said Denmark’s “negative nation branding” had proved effective in limiting asylum applications.
The number of successful asylum claims has fallen to a 40-year low in Denmark, with 95% of failed asylum seekers deported from the country.
But some believe the changes could damage future generations seeking a haven from war, persecution and violence.
Enver Solomon, chief executive of Refugee Council, said: “These sweeping changes will not deter people from making dangerous crossings, but they will unfairly prevent men, women and children from putting down roots and integrating into British life.
“Refugee status represents safety from the conflict and persecution that people have fled.
“When refugees are not stuck in limbo, they feel a greater sense of belonging, as full members of their new communities with a stable future for themselves, their children and generations to come.
“We urge the government to rethink these highly impractical plans, which will also add to the backlog and chaos that the Home Office is tackling.
“Instead, they should ensure that refugees who work hard and contribute to Britain can build secure, settled lives and give back to their communities.”