Connect with us

Published

on

A plurality of experts believe the United States should create a new federal agency dedicated to artificial intelligence governance, according to a survey conducted by Axios, Generation Lab, and Syracuse University.

The survey polled 215 computer science professors across 65 of the most prestigious universities in the U.S. on topics related to AI.

According to the data, when asked “What is the best entity to regulate AI,” the majority of respondents answered either “new “Department of AI” government agency” (37%) or “global organization or treaty” (22%).

Only 16% answered “congress,” just two percent higher than the number of respondents who chose “irrelevant: AI cannot be regulated.” The final 10% of respondents split their answers between “the White House” (4%), “the private sector” (3%), and “none: AI should not be regulated” (3%).

Image source: Axios-Generation Lab-Syracuse University AI Experts Survey

The survey also contained questions about how the AI sector will affect the future of employment. The majority of respondents indicated that they would advise a young person to pursue a career in AI, engineering, and data science.

At the other end of the spectrum, 31% of the professors polled said they’d advise against seeking a career in media and 19% said the same about the arts when asked which fields young people should avoid. “None of the above” was the most common response with 42%.

Related: Crypto is in ‘arms race’ against AI-powered scams: Quantstamp co-founder

When asked if the respondents think there’s “a threshold in the evolution of AI after which humans cannot take back control,” the answers were split between “no, probably not” (41%), “yes, probably” (35%), “no, definitely not” (19%), and “yes, definitely (6%).

The overall sentiment of the experts seemed in juxtaposition with the general public and business leaders. Where the latter tends to poll bombastically about the potential for AI technology to rapidly change the economic and employment landscape in the near future, 73% of the professors said they believed that AI will be capable of performing less than 20% of tasks that humans do today at or above human-level.

Continue Reading

Politics

Binance seeks DOJ deal that could end 2023 compliance monitor: Report

Published

on

By

Binance seeks DOJ deal that could end 2023 compliance monitor: Report

Binance seeks DOJ deal that could end 2023 compliance monitor: Report

The DOJ is reportedly considering lifting a three-year compliance monitor imposed under Binance’s $4.3 billion settlement.

Continue Reading

Politics

Coinbase asks US DOJ to take steps to prevent state enforcement cases

Published

on

By

Coinbase asks US DOJ to take steps to prevent state enforcement cases

Coinbase asks US DOJ to take steps to prevent state enforcement cases

The company’s chief legal officer urged federal officials to push Congress for certain provisions in a pending market structure bill to prevent what it called “state blue-sky laws.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Setback to ‘one in, one out’ migrant scheme after man wins court bid to temporarily block removal

Published

on

By

Setback to 'one in, one out' migrant scheme after man wins court bid to temporarily block removal

An Eritrean asylum seeker, who arrived in the UK on a small boat, will not be deported on Wednesday under the government’s “one in, one out” pilot scheme.

It comes after the man, who cannot be named for legal reasons, won his High Court bid to have the removal temporarily blocked.

He had been due to be on a flight to France at 9am on Wednesday and brought a legal claim against the Home Office, asking the court for a block on his removal.

Lawyers acting on his behalf said the case “concerns a trafficking claim,” alleged he has a gunshot wound in his leg, and warned the High Court that the man could be left destitute if he was returned to France.

The Home Office defended the case, saying it was reasonable to expect the man to claim asylum in France when he first arrived there, before coming to the UK in August.

On Tuesday evening, Mr Justice Sheldon said: “I am going to grant a short period of interim relief.”

It came after a decision from the national referral mechanism (NRM) – which identifies and assesses victims of slavery and human trafficking – and the invitation from the NRM for the man to make further representations.

More on Asylum

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Migrant deal with France has ‘started’

Explaining his ruling, Mr Justice Sheldon added that the “status quo is that the claimant is currently in this country and has not been removed”.

However, he added: “This matter should come back to this court as soon as is reasonably practical in light of the further representations that the claimant… will make on his trafficking decision.”

The ruling is a setback to the government’s plan to return such migrants, with the man due to be the first person deported under the UK and France’s “one in, one out” returns deal signed in July.

Read more: How UK-France migrant returns deal works

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

UK-France migrant returns deal explained

That deal means the UK can send people back to France if they have entered the country illegally.

In exchange, the UK will allow asylum seekers to enter through a safe and legal route – as long as they have not previously tried to enter illegally.

It is a pilot scheme for now, in place until June 2026.

Read more from Sky News:
Another ex-Tory minister defects to Reform UK
UN Commission says Israel committing genocide in Gaza
‘Landmark’ Hillsborough Law finally introduced

In response to the ruling, shadow home secretary Chris Philp said that Labour’s returns deal “had failed to remove a single migrant, yet thousands more continue to arrive”.

The Conservative MP added that “the government must come clean on whether even one person has been sent to us from France in return”.

He then said he told Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood “that unless they disapply the Human Rights Act for immigration cases, this deal would collapse in court”.

“She refused, and here is the predictable result,” Mr Philip continued. “This is another failed gimmick from this weak government who seem think a press release is the same as action.”

Continue Reading

Trending