Connect with us

Published

on

Another 1,332 redundancies at collapsed retailer Wilko have been confirmed despite a deal to snap up more than 50 of its branches.

It comes after administrators PwC confirmed on Tuesday that it had offloaded 51 of the chain’s 400 stores to budget retailer B&M.

But it also said 52 stores would shut down with the loss of 1,016 jobs. A further 299 staff at two distribution centres and 17 workers at Wilko’s digital operations department will be made redundant.

Sky News understands that the store closures and newly-announced job losses are not part of the B&M deal.

Some 24 of the branches will close on Tuesday 12 September, while the remaining 28 will shut down two days later.

The location of the affected shops will be publicly revealed on Wednesday.

The job cuts are in addition to the loss of 269 roles at the chain’s support centre in Worksop, Nottinghamshire, along with 14 roles at Wilko subsidiary Kin Limited, which were announced last week.

More from Business

At the time, PwC also warned further redundancies were to come at the distribution centres, but did not say how many.

Edward Williams, joint administrator at PwC, said on Tuesday: “In the absence of viable offers for the whole business, very sadly store closures and redundancies of team members from those stores are now necessary, in addition to the already announced redundancies at the support centre and distribution centres.

“We know this has been a deeply unsettling time for everyone concerned and would like to express our gratitude to all Wilko team members for the dedication and support they have continued to give the business in the most trying of circumstances.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

GMB national secretary Andy Prendergast speaks to Sky’s Ian King about the latest job losses at Wilko

A PwC spokesman added in a statement: “We continue to explore all interest in the remainder of the business and are actively working with potential buyers.”

GMB national secretary Andy Prendergast told Sky’s Ian King its members were angry at the “incompetence” of Wilko’s management, which he said had contributed to its collapse.

He said: “We’re still hopeful that there is a deal to save the majority [of branches], we are in some talks in relation to that… but I think what’s definitely the case, if you told us six months ago we’d be here, we would have been devastated about that.

“Ultimately, we have thousands of members facing a very uncertain future and we as a trade union will do everything we can for them.”

Sky News earlier reported on the expected announcement of the B&M deal, with City editor Mark Kleinman adding that hopes were fading for a wider rescue deal that would take in the vast majority of the chain’s stores and 12,500 employees.

Read more business news:
Bank of England’s ‘regrettable mistakes fuelled inflation’
Why September will be a momentous month for US industry
Birmingham City Council effectively declares bankruptcy

It was understood that HMV’s owner Doug Putman was now targeting around 200 sites following talks with Wilko’s suppliers, instead of the 300 for which he had initially arranged financing.

“The chances of a deal to avert mass redundancies now looks increasingly unlikely,” Kleinman warned.

He said of the B&M announcement: “That deal wouldn’t have been struck by PwC if the broader rescue deal with Doug Putman was on track and, as I understand it, that deal now looks like it’s being radically re-shaped.”

B&M European Value Retail’s statement to the stock market said it had paid £13m for the 51 sites.

It did not reveal the locations and it is unclear if any jobs will be saved as a result of the deal.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Aug: HMV close to rescue deal for Wilko

“The consideration is fully funded from existing cash reserves and the acquisition is not expected to be conditional on any regulatory clearances,” B&M added.

“An update on the timing of these new store openings will be provided in the… interim results announcement on 9 November 2023.”

The administrators have spent weeks in negotiations with multiple parties about a store carve-up.

The chain, which was established by the Wilkinson family in 1930, collapsed last month following a failure to find new investment.

Like many high street retailers, it had been hit by inflationary pressures and supply chain challenges.

Continue Reading

Business

British taxpayers’ £10.2bn loss on bailout of RBS

Published

on

By

British taxpayers' £10.2bn loss on bailout of RBS

British taxpayers are set to swallow a loss of just over £10bn on the 2008 rescue of Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) as the government prepares to confirm that it has offloaded its last-remaining shares in the lender as soon as next week.

Sky News can reveal the ultimate cost to the UK of saving RBS – now NatWest Group – from insolvency is expected to come in at about £10.2bn once the proceeds of share sales, dividends and fees associated with the stake are aggregated.

The final bill will draw a line under one of the most notorious bank bailouts ever orchestrated, and comes nearly 17 years after the then chancellor, Lord Darling, conducted what RBS’s boss at the time, Fred Goodwin, labelled “a drive-by shooting”.

Money latest: Brits urged to leave energy price cap

Insiders believe a statement confirming the final shares have been sold could come in the latter part of next week, although there is a chance that timetable could be extended by a number of days.

The chancellor, Rachel Reeves, is likely to make a statement about the milestone, although insiders say the Treasury and the bank are keen to simply mark the occasion by thanking British taxpayers for their protracted support.

A stock exchange filing disclosing that taxpayers’ stake had fallen below 1% was made last week, down from over 80% in the years after the £45.5bn bailout.

More from Money

The stake now stands at 0.26%, meaning the final shares could be offloaded as early as the middle of next week, depending upon demand.

Total proceeds from a government trading plan launched in 2021 to drip-feed NatWest stock into the market have so far reached £12.8bn.

Based on the bank’s current share price, the remaining shares should fetch in the region of £400m, taking the figure to £13.2bn.

In addition, institutional share sales and direct buybacks by NatWest of government-held stock have yielded a further £11.5bn.

Dividend payments to the Treasury during its ownership have totalled £4.9bn, while fees and other payments have generated another £5.6bn.

In aggregate, that means total proceeds from NatWest since 2008 are expected to hit £35.3bn.

Under Rick Haythornthwaite and Paul Thwaite, now the bank’s chairman and chief executive respectively, NatWest is now focused on driving growth across its business.

It recently tabled an £11bn bid to buy Santander UK, according to the Financial Times, although no talks are ongoing.

Mr Thwaite replaced Dame Alison Rose, who left amid the crisis sparked by the debanking scandal involving Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader.

Sky News recently revealed that the bank and Mr Farage had reached an undisclosed settlement.

During the first five years of NatWest’s period in majority state ownership, the bank was run by Sir Stephen Hester, now the chairman of easyJet.

Sir Stephen stepped down amid tensions with the then chancellor, George Osborne, about how RBS – as it then was – should be run.

Read more from Sky News:
Energy price cap to fall by 7%
Telegraph £500m sale agreed ‘in principle’

Lloyds Banking Group was also in partial state ownership for years, although taxpayers reaped a net gain of about £900m from that period.

Other lenders nationalised during the crisis included Bradford & Bingley, the bulk of which was sold to Santander UK, and Northern Rock, part of which was sold to Virgin Money – which in turn has been acquired by Nationwide.

NatWest declined to comment on Friday.

A Treasury spokesperson said: “We now own less than 1% of shares in NatWest which is a significant step towards returning the bank to private ownership and delivering value for money for taxpayers.

“We are on track to exit the shareholding soon, subject to sales achieving value for money and market conditions.”

Continue Reading

Business

Trump threatens EU with 50% tariff – as Apple faces 25% unless iPhones are made in US

Published

on

By

Trump threatens EU with 50% tariff - as Apple faces 25% unless iPhones are made in US

Donald Trump has threatened to impose a 50% tariff on the EU, starting from next month, after saying that trade talks with Brussels were “going nowhere”.

Mr Trump made the comments on his Truth Social platform.

It marks a fresh escalation in his trade row with the European Union, which he has previously accused of being created to rip off the US.

While the US has done deals with the UK and China to reduce their peak exposure to his trade war, the president’s EU threat, which would cover all EU imports to the US, would risk retaliatory measures from Brussels if carried through.

Money latest: Trump’s message to UK on energy bills

Mr Trump said of talks between his administration and the EU: “Our discussions with them are going nowhere! “Therefore, I am recommending a straight 50% tariff on the European Union, starting on June 1, 2025. There is no tariff if the product is built or manufactured in the United States.”

The European Commission was yet to respond to the remarks. Officials signalled there would be no comment until after a call between top US-EU trade figures due later on Friday.

Financial markets, however, were quick to take a view. European stock markets were sharply down across the board.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Explained: The US-UK trade deal

The FTSE 100 in London was more than 1.2% lower shortly after the Truth Social post appeared, while Germany’s DAX and the French CAC 40 were in the red to the tune of more than 2%.

US stock markets fell at the open on Wall Street. The tech-focused Nasdaq was down more than 1%.

The potential for damage to the global economy saw Brent crude oil sink by more than 1% to $63 a barrel.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘US is losing’ trade war

The dollar took a hit too, as the news only intensified existing market worries this week about the sustainability of US government debt levels.

The pound was trading at levels last seen in February 2022.

Mr Trump said earlier that Apple will be forced to pay 25% tariffs on its iPhones unless it moves all its manufacturing to the US.

Apple shares dropped more than 2% in premarket trading after the warning, also posted on Truth Social.

“I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or any place else,” wrote the president.

“If that is not the case, a tariff of at least 25% must be paid by Apple to the US.”

Production of Apple’s flagship phone happens primarily in China and India, which has been an issue brought up repeatedly by Mr Trump.

Read more:
Trump trade argument against UK doesn’t add up
Why Trump blinked in US-China trade war

On Thursday, the Financial Times reported Apple was planning to expand its India supply chain through a key contractor.

Taiwanese company Foxconn is planning to build a new factory in the Indian state of Tamil Nadu, according to the paper, to help supply Apple.

Sky News has contacted Apple for comment.

Continue Reading

Business

Trump’s latest phone negotiation tactic on tariffs likely to heighten EU retaliation threat

Published

on

By

Trump's latest phone negotiation tactic on tariffs likely to heighten EU retaliation threat

President Trump’s Friday flurry of pronouncements marks the return of negotiation by smartphone and may trigger another period of profound uncertainty for international trade and financial markets.

The threat of 50% tariffs against the European Union, issued hours before his trade representative met their European counterparts, is a show of presidential muscle surely designed to strongarm those on the other side of the table.

It is an escalation likely to heighten the threat of retaliation from Europe, and with a few keystrokes ends the brief period of calm that had returned to global trade and markets in recent days.

Money blog: Trump sends message to UK on energy bills

A red hat in Washington DC to support President Trump. Pic: AP
Image:
A red hat in Washington DC to support President Trump. Pic: AP

Talks in Switzerland between US and Chinese delegations a fortnight ago took the sting out of Sino-American hostility, negotiating three-figure tariffs that amounted to a mutual trade embargo down to manageable levels.

Financial markets had regained most of the losses sparked on ‘Liberation Day’ in April, when Donald Trump declared total trade war, and there was optimism that for all his bluster, there might be meaningful room for constructive compromise.

The UK even secured a deal of sorts, securing a reduction in auto tariffs in exchange for a reciprocal opening of agricultural markets.

More on Donald Trump

There will be no such deal for the EU in a hurry. A 50% tariff on all exports to the US is not only higher than the original threatened blanket tariff of 20% and double Mr Trump’s proposed 25% on European cars, it’s higher even than China.

European stocks predictably ended the week in decline, with car manufacturers including BMW, Volkswagen and Stellantis all down.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

12 May: US and China reach agreement on tariffs

It remains to be seen whether this threat will stick.

Read more:
Trump trade argument against UK doesn’t add up
Why Trump blinked in US-China trade war

Follow the World
Follow the World

Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday

Tap to follow

Mr Trump has repeatedly blinked first in the trade war he started, backing down on global reciprocal tariffs when bond markets rebelled before caving in Geneva to reach an accommodation with China.

His grievances with Europe appear to have an extra edge however, and the consequences of the uncertainty he’s sparked will be far-reaching.

If this was the only thing he had announced on ‘Liberation Day’ it would still have been huge.

Continue Reading

Trending