Grant Shapps has defended his appointment as defence secretary – saying the department “needs highly experienced cabinet ministers”.
There was a backlash after Rishi Sunak’s ally was moved into one of the top roles in government amid a war in Europe – despite having no military experience.
Grilled on how many ranks there are in the Army, he told Sky News he did not know the answer “off the top of my head”.
But he insisted: “Look, what the Ministry of Defence needs is the highly experienced cabinet ministers who can run a complex infrastructure-orientated department.
More on Grant Shapps
Related Topics:
“I’ve had a lot of experience of running very large budgets and complex departments.”
Mr Shapps added that “only two of the last 15 defence secretaries have had any military background themselves”.
Advertisement
He said: “It’s not usual in democracy where we actually pride ourselves on having civilians run all elements of government, including our military. What I do know is how to run the department.”
Ben Wallace, Mr Shapps’ predecessor and a former Army officer, had played a key role in galvanising international support to arm the Ukrainian military.
He resigned from cabinet last week with a warning that “over the next decade, the world will get more insecure and more unstable”.
In a parting shot to secure his department’s future, Mr Wallace also added: “I know you agree with me that we must not return to the days where defence was viewed as a discretionary spend by government and savings were achieved by hollowing out.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:53
‘What do you know about defence Grant Shapps?’
Asked if he would be as vocal as Mr Wallace, Mr Shapps suggested he would lobby for higher defence spending but said he’ll “do it in my own way” – adding: “I’ve spoken before about my desire to see a higher defence budget, well before being in this role.”
He said defence spending is already on the rise, with the aim of it going up to 2.5%.
“I fully support that,” Mr Shapps said. “I think it’s very important that we are protected as a nation, but also that we’re doing our part around the world to help the world be better protected.”
The transport secretary has ruled out installing airport-style security scanners in stations, following an alleged stabbing attack on a train on Saturday evening.
Speaking to Mornings with Ridge and Frost on Sky News on Monday, Heidi Alexander said the government did not want to make “life impossible for everyone”.
Chris Philp, the Conservative shadow home secretary, has called for “tough and radical action” to tackle knife crime, including rolling out live facial recognition technology in town centres and train stations.
The questions around security on public transport comes after 10 people were injured in an alleged mass stabbing attack on a high-speed train on Saturday, and a train staff member – hailed as a hero for confronting the attacker – remains in a critical but stable condition.
A 32-year-old man from Peterborough has been charged with 11 counts of attempted murder following the attack on the Doncaster to London King’s Cross LNER service near Huntingdon, and another at a station on London’s Docklands Light Railway (DLR), early on Saturday morning.
Image: Armed police officers patrolling at St Pancras International station on Monday. Pic: PA
Asked by Mornings presenter Sophy Ridge if airport-style scanners should be installed at railway stations to ensure public safety on trains, the transport secretary replied: “I don’t think airport-style scanners would be the way to go.
“I understand why you asked the question, and I understand why some of your viewers might be wondering about that.
“We have thousands of railway stations across the UK, and those stations have multiple entrances, multiple platforms. So what we can’t do is make life impossible for everyone.
“But we do need to take sensible and proportionate steps to make the public transport network safe.”
She also said there will be increased “visible” police patrols at train stations for “the next few days” to provide reassurance to the travelling public.
Will extra security be enough to calm the concern?
For commuters at King’s Cross station in London – one of the busiest in the country – it will have been hard not to think of Friday night’s incident in Cambridgeshire.
This morning, I caught the train with passengers heading into the capital, ready for a new week.
Pulling into the concourse, we were immediately met with a handful of police community support officers watching passengers as they spilled off the train.
Home to the Eurostar service, the presence of armed police is a familiar sight at King’s Cross and London St Pancras.
But today additional officers from the Met have been deployed to major stations.
The idea is to reassure passengers they are safe on the train network.
Outside the station, we met grandparents Tracy and Darren from Yorkshire who had travelled down on Saturday morning on the same LNER service that was affected on Friday for a Marti Pellow concert at the O2.
“We were absolutely terrified, we were both really scared,” Tracy told me.
“We got on the same train line that it happened the night before.”
Darren and Tracy are returning to Yorkshire this morning. They are among many who would welcome additional security on the railways.
Darren says: “I’m not going to lie, it makes you worry about like your safety. Are you safe on the trains? No, you’re not.”
Today’s additional police presence is meant to provide reassurance – but will just two days of extra security be enough to calm the concern?
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:14
Man charged over train stabbings
Ms Alexander went on to say that, while she does not want to minimise the “horrific” attack on Saturday, the trains in the UK are “some of the most safest [sic] forms of public transport anywhere in the world”, saying that for every million journeys, there are 27 crimes committed.
She added: “For me, one crime is one crime too many. So we will, after this, review all of our security measures, because that is the right thing to do.”
But Conservative shadow home secretary Chris Philp told Mornings with Ridge and Frost that there needs to be more “surge hotspot policing in high crime areas” to tackle knife crime, and the use of “live facial recognition to identify wanted criminals as they wander round, including as they go to train stations, so they can be arrested”.
“We also need more stop and search as well because stop and search takes knives off the streets,” he added.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:57
Philp calls for increased use of stop and search
Last week, the government released new data showing that knife homicides have fallen by 18% in a year, while knife crime overall has dropped by 5% – the first reduction in four years.
The Home Office attributed that to the use of hotspot patrols, knife arches that can detect knives in environments like schools, drones, and plain clothes officers, as well as partnerships with campaigners and charities.
Trump again denied ties to Binance co-founder CZ amid reports that the exchange helped facilitate a $2 billion stablecoin deal linked to his World Liberty Financial platform.
Lawmakers in France’s National Assembly have passed an amendment that would consider larger crypto holdings “unproductive wealth” and subject them to taxation.