Apple CEO Tim Cook attends the annual session of China Development Forum (CDF) 2018 at the Diaoyutai State Guesthouse in Beijing, China March 26, 2018.
Jason Lee | Reuters
Apple shares fell over 3% on Thursday, following a 4% decline on Wednesday, after several reports suggesting that Chinese government workers could be banned from using Apple iPhones.
The reported restrictions, which have not been publicly announced by the Chinese government, raise concerns that Apple’s products could get caught up in international tensions between the U.S. and China.
Greater China, including Hong Kong and Taiwan, is Apple’s third-largest market, accounting for 18% of Apple’s 2022 revenue of $394 billion. It’s also where the vast majority of Apple products are assembled. Apple declined to comment.
China has ordered officials at central government agencies not to bring iPhones into the office or use them for work, The Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday, although it was unclear how widely the bans were issued. The ban could spread to other state companies and government-backed agencies, Bloomberg News reported on Thursday.
While a ban on all government employees could reduce iPhone unit sales in China by as much as 5%, Bernstein analyst Toni Sacconaghi wrote in a Thursday note, it would be a larger threat to Apple if the bans sent a signal that everyday Chinese citizens should instead use electronics from Chinese companies.
“Perhaps more importantly, restricted use of iPhones among government employees could negatively impact sales among consumers (related family members; general populace) and could be part of a broader move by the Chinese government to promote usage of domestic technology,” Sacconaghi wrote.
Dan Niles, portfolio manager at Satori Fund, said on Thursday he sold his stake in Apple and is now shorting the company, citing the possibility of a government iPhone ban and increased competition from Huawei.
New competition
Last week, several Chinese retailers started taking orders for a new Huawei phone, the Mate 60 Pro, which quickly became a hot topic on social media in the country.
The phone starts at 6900 RMB, or about US$954, and uses a Chinese-manufactured chip from Huawei’s chip subsidiary, HiSilicon. Early tests suggest that the phone can access 5G speeds, although Huawei’s specification pages don’t mention it.
Huawei was placed on the U.S. entity list in 2019 over fears that its technology could give the Chinese government backdoor access to communications. The move requires U.S. companies like Google and Qualcomm to get permission from the U.S. government before supplying Huawei. The sanctions significantly hampered Huawei’s phone business, which was rising before the sanctions, forcing it in recent years to spin off some of its phone brands and contributing to a $12 billion shortfall back in 2020.
Huawei’s new phone has a chip, manufactured on China’s mainland, that uses the 7-nanometer production process. Smaller production processes tend to translate to faster and more efficient chips. This year’s upcoming iPhone is expected to use a 3nm process, manufactured by Taiwan Semiconductor, and Apple first went with a 7nm process to make its A12 chips, which were used in new iPhones in 2018.
But Huawei’s chip raises questions about how well separate restrictions on chip manufacturing technology, which aim to prevent Chinese companies from making cutting-edge processors, are working.
“From my perspective, what it tells us is that the United States should continue on its course of a ‘small yard, high fence’ set of technology restrictions focused narrowly on national security concerns, not on the broader question of commercial decoupling,” Jake Sullivan, U.S. national security advisor, said Tuesday in a briefing.
In Apple’s most recent quarter, ending in June, Greater China sales grew 8% on an annual basis to $15.76 billion. It was Apple’s fastest-growing region. On the company’s earnings call, Cook said Apple was seeing users switch from Android phones to iPhones, mentioning that was “at the heart” of Apple’s results.
“We continue to try to convince more and more people to switch because of the experience and the ecosystem that we can offer them,” Cook said.
Inside Horizon Quantum’s office in Singapore on Dec. 3, 2025. The software firm claimed it is the first private company to deploy a commercial quantum computer in the city-state.
Sha Ying | CNBC International
Singapore-based software firm Horizon Quantum on Wednesday said it has become the first private company to run a quantum computer for commercial use in the city-state, marking a milestone ahead of its plans to list in the U.S.
The start-up, founded in 2018 by quantum researcher Joe Fitzsimons, said the machine is now fully operational. It integrates components from quantum computing suppliers, including Maybell Quantum, Quantum Machines and Rigetti Computing.
According to Horizon Quantum, the new computer also makes it the first pure-play quantum software firm to own its own quantum computer — an integration it hopes will help advance the promising technology.
“Our focus is on helping developers to start harnessing quantum computers to do real-world work,” Fitzsimons, the CEO, told CNBC. “How do we take full advantage of these systems? How do we program them?”
Horizon Quantum builds the software tools and infrastructure needed to power applications for quantum computing systems.
“Although we’re very much focused on the software side, it’s really important to understand how the stack works down to the physical level … that’s the reason we have a test bed now,” Fitzsimons said.
Quantum race
Horizon Quantum hopes to use its new hardware to accelerate the development of real-world quantum applications across industries, from pharmaceuticals to finance.
Quantum systems aim to tackle problems too complex for traditional machines by leveraging principles of quantum mechanics.
For example, designing new drugs, which requires simulating molecular interactions, or running millions of scenarios to assess portfolio risk, can be slow and computationally costly for conventional machines. Quantum computing is expected to provide faster, more accurate models to tackle these problems.
A top executive at Google working on quantum computers told CNBC in March that he believes the technology is only five years away from running practical applications.
Still, today’s quantum systems remain in the nascent stages of development and pose many engineering and programming challenges.
Investment in the space has been rising, however, as major tech companies report technological breakthroughs. Alphabet, Microsoft, Amazon and IBM, along with the U.S. government, are already pouring millions into quantum computing.
Investor attention also received a bump in June after Nvidia chief executive Jensen Huang offered upbeat remarks, saying quantum computing is nearing an “inflection point” and that practical uses may arrive sooner than he had expected.
Nasdaq listing
Horizon Quantum’s announcement comes ahead of a merger with dMY Squared Technology Group Inc., a special purpose acquisition company. The deal, agreed upon in September, aims to take Horizon public on the Nasdaq under the ticker “HQ.”
The software firm said in September that the transaction valued the company at around $503 million and was expected to close in the first quarter of 2026.
The launch of its quantum computer also helps cement Singapore’s ambition to be a regional quantum computing hub. The city-state has invested heavily in the technology for years, setting up its first quantum research center in 2007.
Before Horizon Quantum’s system came online, Singapore reportedly had one quantum computer, used primarily for research purposes. Meanwhile, U.S.-based firm Quantinuum plans to deploy another commercial system in 2026.
Singapore’s National Quantum Strategy, unveiled in May 2024, committed 300 million Singapore dollars over five years to expand the sector, with a significant portion directed toward building local quantum computer processors.
In May 2024, the National Quantum Strategy (NQS), Singapore’s national quantum initiative, pledged around S$300 million over five years to strengthen development in the sector, with a significant portion directed toward building local quantum computer processors.
The moon vacuum, which was unveiled on Wednesday by Blue Origin at Amazon‘s re:Invent 2025 conference in Las Vegas, was built using critical technology from startup Istari Digital.
“So what it does is sucks up moon dust and it extracts the heat from it so it can be used as an energy source, like turning moon dust into a battery,” Istari CEO Will Roper told CNBC’s Morgan Brennan.
Spacecraft carrying out missions on the lunar surface are typically constrained by lunar night, the two-week period every 28 days during which the moon is cast in darkness and temperatures experience extreme drops, crippling hardware and rendering it useless unless a strong, long-lasting power source is present.
“Kind of like vacuuming at home, but creating your own electricity while you do it,” he added.
The battery was completely designed by AI, said Roper, who was assistant secretary of the Air Force under President Donald Trump‘s first term and is known for transforming the acquisition process at both the Air Force and, at the time, the newly created Space Force.
Read more CNBC tech news
A major part of the breakthrough in Istari’s technology is the way in which it handles and limits AI hallucinations.
Roper said the platform takes all the requirements a part needs and creates guardrails or a “fence around the playground” that the AI can’t leave while coming up with designs.
“Within that playground, AI can generate to its heart’s content,” he said.
“In the case of Blue Origin’s moon battery, [it] doesn’t tell you the design was a good one, but it tells us that all of the requirements were met, the standards were met, things like that that you got to check before you go operational,” he added.
Istari is backed by former Google CEO Eric Schmidt and already works with the U.S. government, including as a prime contractor with Lockheed Martin on the experimental x-56A unmanned aircraft.
Watch the full interview above and go deeper into the business of the stars with the Manifest Space podcast.
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang said he met with President Donald Trump on Wednesday and that the two men discussed chip export restrictions, as lawmakers consider a proposal to limit exports of advanced artificial intelligence chips to nations like China.
“I’ve said it repeatedly that we support export controls, and that we should ensure that American companies have the best and the most and first,” Huang told reporters on Capitol Hill.
Lawmakers were considering including the Guaranteeing Access and Innovation for National Artificial Intelligence Act in a major defense package, known as the National Defense Authorization Act. The GAIN AI Act would require chipmakers like Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices to give U.S. companies first pick on their AI chips before selling them in countries like China.
The proposal isn’t expected to be part of the NDAA, Bloomberg reported, citing a person familiar with the matter.
Huang said it was “wise” that the proposal is being left out of the annual defense policy bill.
“The GAIN AI Act is even more detrimental to the United States than the AI Diffusion Act,” Huang said.
Nvidia’s CEO also criticized the idea of establishing a patchwork of state laws regulating AI. The notion of state-by-state regulation has generated pushback from tech companies and spurred the creation of a super PAC called “Leading the Future,” which is backed by the AI industry.
“State-by-state AI regulation would drag this industry into a halt and it would create a national security concern, as we need to make sure that the United States advances AI technology as quickly as possible,” Huang said. “A federal AI regulation is the wisest.”
Trump last month urged legislators to include a provision in the NDAA that would preempt state AI laws in favor of “one federal standard.”
But House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-LA) told CNBC’s Emily Wilkins on Tuesday the provision won’t make it into the bill, citing a lack of sufficient support. He and other lawmakers will continue to look for ways to establish a national standard on AI, Scalise added.