Connect with us

Published

on

Two men have been arrested under the Official Secrets Act amid reports that a parliamentary researcher spied for China.

The researcher has links to several senior Tory MPs and has been arrested on suspicion of spying for China, according to The Sunday Times.

He was arrested along with another man by officers on 13 March, the newspaper reported.

The researcher, who is in his 20s, is understood to have had links to security minister Tom Tugendhat, foreign affairs committee chairwoman Alicia Kearns and other senior Tory MPs.

The MPs he is linked to are privy to classified or highly sensitive information.

A senior Whitehall source told The Sunday Times: “This is a major escalation by China. We have never seen anything like this before.”

Officers from the Metropolitan Police’s Counter Terrorism Command, which oversees espionage-related offences, are investigating.

More from World

One of the men, in his 30s, was arrested in Oxfordshire on 13 March, while the other, in his 20s, was arrested in Edinburgh, Scotland Yard said.

“Searches were also carried out at both the residential properties, as well as at a third address in east London,” a statement from the force said.

Both men were held at a south London police station until being bailed until early October.

Mr Tugendhat is said not to have had any contact with the researcher since before he became security minister in September last year.

Ms Kearns declined to comment, adding: “While I recognise the public interest, we all have a duty to ensure any work of the authorities is not jeopardised.”

The researcher has links to Tory MP Tom Tugendhat, pictured. Pic: AP
Image:
The researcher has links to Tory MP Tom Tugendhat, pictured. Pic: AP

The Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China pressure group said it was “appalled at reports of the infiltration of the UK Parliament by someone allegedly acting on behalf of the People’s Republic of China”.

Downing Street said it does not comment on security matters.

The House of Commons has been contacted.

Conservative MP Iain Duncan Smith has tweeted: “If true, this is very serious and of great concern. It shows that we cannot afford to be complacent about the threat that the CCP [Chinese Communist Party] poses to the function of Parliament and our democratic way of life.”

China has ‘penetrated the UK economy’

In July, the Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) said China targets the UK “prolifically and aggressively” in a way that poses a “challenge” for British intelligence agencies.

The ISC, made up of cross-party MPs, published a report saying China had managed to “successfully penetrate every sector of the UK’s economy”.

In a separate case in January 2022, MI5 warned MPs that a Chinese government agent has been working in parliament “to subvert the processes”.

A letter was sent to MPs by Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle who said MI5 warned him a woman called Christine Lee has been “engaged in political interference activities on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party, engaging with members here at parliament”.

Lee, 59, who denies wrongdoing and is suing MI5, had donated almost £500,000 to Barry Gardiner, Labour’s former shadow international trade secretary.

Continue Reading

Politics

What is the loophole that allowed a family in Gaza permission to come to UK on a Ukraine resettlement scheme?

Published

on

By

What is the loophole that allowed a family in Gaza permission to come to UK on a Ukraine resettlement scheme?

A “loophole” that allowed a Palestinian family to be granted the right to come to the UK under a Ukrainian resettlement scheme was the subject of a lot of debate in the House of Commons today.

Both the prime minister and leader of the opposition criticised a decision by a judge to allow the family of six the right to enter the UK.

Sir Keir pledged to close the “loophole” after he was asked about it by Kemi Badenoch – but could not elaborate on what it was.

Sky News has read through the judgment given by Judge Hugo Norton-Taylor to understand what happened.

Politics latest: ‘Leak’ probe launched at Treasury

Why did the family apply?

The family of six, a husband and wife and their children aged 18, 17, eight and seven, lived in Gaza and their homes were destroyed after the 7 October attacks and subsequent conflict.

They ended up living in a humanitarian zone and then a refugee camp.

In January 2024, the family applied to come to the UK via the Ukraine Family Scheme form, in a bid to join one of the parent’s brothers, who is a British citizen and has lived in the UK since 2007.

While they acknowledged they were not eligible for the Ukraine scheme, the family chose to apply in an attempt to use the Home Office‘s policy on “applications for entry clearance outside the rules”.

The Home Office rejected the request, saying they were not satisfied there were “compelling, compassionate circumstances” to justify a request outside the rules.

They also noted the lack of a resettlement scheme for Palestinians.

Read more:
Judge ‘wrong’ to let Gaza family settle in UK
Palestinian family allowed to settle in UK

The appeals

Despite the Home Office saying there were no grounds to appeal, the family launched one against the decision on human rights grounds.

A judge then ruled that the initial rejection constituted a rejection of human rights, and so allowed an appeal.

Part of this appeal was under Article Eight of the European Convention on Human Rights – the right to a family life between the man living in Britain and his family in Gaza.

This appeal was rejected, with a lack of a Palestinian resettlement scheme noted as a reason.

An appeal was launched at a higher tribunal – and one of the arguments was that the case should be considered on its own merits and not allow the lack of a Palestinian resettlement scheme to outweigh other arguments.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

PMQs: War on immigration

The loophole

It is here that the “loophole” seems to have appeared.

At this point. Judge Norton-Taylor heard the case and allowed the appeal.

In his judgment, he stated that it was “wrong to have taken the absence of a resettlement scheme into account at all”.

The judge added that there was “no evidence” he had seen that the Home Office had made a deliberate decision not to implement a Palestinian resettlement scheme.

He also noted that the lack of immigration rules on a topic should not count against someone.

In layman’s terms, the argument seems to be that just because a scheme to resettle people does not exist it does not mean they are banned from coming to the UK via humanitarian routes.

The judgment said the absence of a “resettlement scheme was irrelevant” to their decision.

What next?

Judge Norton-Taylor went on to back the claim from the family in Gaza based on the ECHR and the right to a family life between them and their relative in Britain.

A Home Office spokesperson said: “The Ukraine Family scheme was clearly set out for Ukrainians. We have been clear that we do not agree with this judgment and we twice vigorously contested this case.

“As the prime minister made clear, article 8, the right to a family life, should be interpreted much more narrowly. It is for the government and Parliament to decide who should be covered by the UK’s safe and legal routes.

“We are pursuing all legal avenues to address the legal loophole which has been exploited in this case. The home secretary is urgently reviewing this case to ensure the correct processes are always followed and existing laws correctly interpreted.”

👉Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim on your podcast app👈

They added that there was no evidence to support the argument and that data from the government shows a “very small” number of Gazans have been allowed to enter the UK – equal to roughly 150.

Sir Keir said he was planning to close the loophole, but it is not clear what this will entail.

Continue Reading

Politics

Texas lawmakers refile Bitcoin reserve bill, adding room for more crypto

Published

on

By

Texas lawmakers refile Bitcoin reserve bill, adding room for more crypto

The bill “would make our state the first to establish a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and drive innovation, growth, and financial freedom,” said Senator Schwertner.

Continue Reading

Politics

South Korea to allow institutions to sell crypto donations in 2025

Published

on

By

South Korea to allow institutions to sell crypto donations in 2025

The country’s securities regulator will also allow 3,500 corporations and professional investors to open “real-name” accounts on cryptocurrency exchanges as part of a pilot program.

Continue Reading

Trending