Connect with us

Published

on

Hate speech continues to flourish on the messaging service formerly known as Twitter, according to the Center for Countering Digital Hate.

The CCDH said Wednesday that X fails to remove posts that contain hate speech despite being notified that the content violates the company’s current hateful conduct guidelines.

The CCDH’s report comes a little after one month after X sued the nonprofit over allegations that some of the group’s previous research was derived from unscrupulous methods, including the use of illegally scraped Twitter data.

CCDH CEO Imran Ahmed declined to comment about the specifics of the lawsuit, but said the CCDH did not use data-scraping tools to conduct its latest research and instead “simply went in and had a look.”

For this report, the CCDH collected 300 posts spread from 100 accounts that contained hateful content, such as posts urging people to “stop race mixing” and messages stating that Black people are intrinsically violent. About 140 of those 300 posts contained antisemitic content, including images of Nazi swastikas, messages supporting Holocaust denial and notes promoting conspiracy theories related to Jews.

The CCDH said it reported the posts to X via the company’s user-reporting tools on Aug. 30 and 31. When the researchers followed up a week later, they found that X had only taken down 41 posts, meaning that 259 posts containing hateful content were still active, including one that that referred to Adolf Hitler as “A hero who will help secure a future for white children!” Additionally, 90 of the 100 accounts that were responsible for sending the posts were still active.

Major companies like Apple and Disney ran online ads on X that appeared next to the hateful content, the CCDH report said. One ad from Walt Disney World ran below a post that insulted Black Americans while an Apple ad was displayed above a post insinuating Holocaust denial. Another ad from the corporate server company Supermicro was sandwiched between two pro-Nazi posts that contained images of a swastika.

“What this shows is that it takes out any excuses of this being about capacity to detect problematic content,” CCDH’s Ahmed told CNBC. “We’ve done the detection for you, and here’s how you responded, or here’s how we can see that you responded.”

Ahmed added, “Leaving up content like this is a choice, and that invites the question: Are you proud of the choices you’re making?”

While X’s process for users to report hateful content is “straightforward,” Ahmed said, “the problem is that people on the other end of the alarm bell either aren’t listening, they’ve got earplugs in and they’re ignoring everything, or they are being incredibly selective in what they choose to respond to.”

X did not respond to a request for comment, and instead pointed to a post saying that “based on the limited information we’ve seen, the CCDH is asserting two false claims – that X did not take action on violative posts and that violative posts reached a lot of people on our platform.”

“We either remove content that violates our policies or label and restrict the reach of certain posts,” the company said in the X post, adding that it would review the report when it is released and “take action as needed.”

While he didn’t comment on the specifics, Ahmed told CNBC that he believes X’s lawsuit was intended to place a financial burden on the CCDH, and that he estimates it will cost the nonprofit “half a million just to defend it.”

X attorneys have previously said that the CCDH’s prior research was an attempt to “to drive advertisers off Twitter by smearing the company and its owner.”

Last week, Elon Musk said that he was considering filing a defamation lawsuit against the Anti-Defamation League, which he claimed was “trying to kill this platform by falsely accusing it & me of being anti-Semitic.” Musk attributed a 60% decline in X’s U.S. advertising revenue to a pressure campaign from the ADL.

ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt soon responded by saying that Musk was merely issuing a “threat of a frivolous lawsuit” and said that the billionaire’s behavior was “flat out dangerous and deeply irresponsible,” referring to Musk engaging with “a highly toxic, antisemitic campaign” that helped foster the #BanTheADL campaign to trend on the messaging service.

Last Friday evening, X CEO Linda Yaccarino wrote a post on X saying that “X opposes antisemitism in all its forms” and that “Antisemitism is evil and X will always work to fight it on our platform.” Yaccarino’s post also pointed to a corporate blog post detailing the ways X is addressing antisemitic content on its platform, including improving automatic enforcement and providing training support for its “frontline moderators.”

Watch: If you don’t have the whole cloth of Musk you won’t get the innovation

Continue Reading

Technology

Oracle set to report quarterly results after the bell

Published

on

By

Oracle set to report quarterly results after the bell

Larry Ellison, Oracle’s co-founder and chief technology officer, appears at the Formula One British Grand Prix in Towcester, U.K., on July 6, 2025.

Jay Hirano | Sopa Images | Lightrocket | Getty Images

Oracle is scheduled to report fiscal second-quarter results after market close on Wednesday.

Here’s what analysts are expecting, according to LSEG:

  • Earnings per share: $1.64 adjusted
  • Revenue: $16.21 billion

Wall Street expects revenue to increase 15% in the quarter that ended Nov. 30, from $14.1 billion a year earlier. Analysts polled by StreetAccount are looking for $7.92 billion in cloud revenue and $6.06 billion from software.

The report lands at a critical moment for Oracle, which has tried to position itself at the center of the artificial intelligence boom by committing to massive build-outs. While the move has been a boon for Oracle’s revenue and its backlog, investors have grown concerned about the amount of debt the company is raising and the risks it faces should the AI market slow.

The stock plummeted 23% in November, its worst monthly performance since 2001 and, as of Tuesday’s close, is 33% below its record reached in September. Still, the shares are up 33% for the year, outperforming the Nasdaq, which has gained 22% over that stretch.

Over the past decade, Oracle has diversified its business beyond databases and enterprise software and into cloud infrastructure, where it competes with Amazon, Microsoft and Google. Those companies are all vying for big AI contracts and are investing heavily in data centers and hardware necessary to meet expected demand.

OpenAI, which sparked the generative AI rush with the launch of ChatGPT three years ago, has committed to spending more than $300 billion on Oracle’s infrastructure services over five years.

“Oracle’s job is not to imagine gigawatt-scale data centers. Oracle’s job is to build them,” Larry Ellison, the company’s co-founder and chairman, told investors in September.

Oracle raised $18 billion during the period, one of the biggest issuances on record for a tech company. Skeptical investors have been buying five-year credit default swaps, driving them to multiyear highs. Credit default swaps are like insurance for investors, with buyers paying for protection in case the borrower can’t repay its debt.

“Customer concentration is a major issue here, but I think the bigger thing is, How are they going to pay for this?” said RBC analyst Rishi Jaluria, who has the equivalent of a hold rating on Oracle’s stock.

During the quarter, Oracle named executives Clay Magouyrk and Mike Sicilia as the company’s new CEOs, succeeding Safra Catz. Oracle also introduced AI agents for automating various facets of finance, human resources and sales.

Executives will discuss the results and issue guidance on a conference call starting at 5 p.m. ET.

WATCH: Oracle’s debt concerns loom large ahead of quarterly earnings

Oracle's debt concerns loom large ahead of quarterly earnings

Continue Reading

Technology

Nvidia refutes report that China’s DeepSeek is using its banned Blackwell AI chips

Published

on

By

Nvidia refutes report that China's DeepSeek is using its banned Blackwell AI chips

Jensen Huang, chief executive officer of Nvidia Corp., outside the US Capitol in Washington, DC, US, on Wednesday, Dec. 3, 2025.

Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Nvidia on Wednesday refuted a report that the Chinese artificial intelligence startup DeepSeek has been using smuggled Blackwell chips to develop its upcoming model.

The U.S. has banned the export of Nvidia’s Blackwell chips, which are considered the company’s most advanced offerings, to China in an effort to stay ahead in the AI race.

DeepSeek is reportedly using chips that were snuck into the country without authorization, according to The Information.

“We haven’t seen any substantiation or received tips of ‘phantom datacenters’ constructed to deceive us and our OEM partners, then deconstructed, smuggled, and reconstructed somewhere else,” a Nvidia spokesperson said in a statement. “While such smuggling seems farfetched, we pursue any tip we receive.”

Read more CNBC tech news

Nvidia has been one of the biggest winners of the AI boom so far because it develops the graphics processing units (GPUs) that are key for training models and running large workloads.

Since the hardware is so crucial for advancing AI technology, Nvidia’s relationship with China has become a political flashpoint among U.S. lawmakers.

President Donald Trump on Monday said Nvidia can ship its H200 chips to “approved customers” in China and elsewhere on the condition that the U.S. will get 25% of those sales.

The announcement was met with pushback from some Republicans.

DeepSeek spooked the U.S. tech sector in January when it released a reasoning model, called R1, that rocketed to the top of app stores and industry leaderboards. R1 was also created at a fraction of the cost of other models in the U.S., according to some analyst estimates.

In August, DeepSeek hinted that China will soon have its own “next generation” chips to support its AI models.

WATCH: Nvidia selling H200 AI chips to China is net positive, says Patrick Moorhead

Nvidia selling H200 AI chips to China is net positive, says Patrick Moorhead

– CNBC’s Kristina Partsinevelos contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Technology

‘Greetings, earthlings’: Nvidia-backed Starcloud trains first AI model in space as orbital data center race heats up

Published

on

By

‘Greetings, earthlings’: Nvidia-backed Starcloud trains first AI model in space as orbital data center race heats up

The Starcloud-1 satellite is launched into space from a SpaceX rocket on November 2, 2025.

Courtesy: SpaceX | Starcloud

Nvidia-backed startup Starcloud trained an artificial intelligence model from space for the first time, signaling a new era for orbital data centers that could alleviate Earth’s escalating digital infrastructure crisis.

Last month, the Washington-based company launched a satellite with an Nvidia H100 graphics processing unit, sending a chip into outer space that’s 100 times more powerful than any GPU compute that has been in space before. Now, the company’s Starcloud-1 satellite is running and querying responses from Gemma, an open large language model from Google, in orbit, marking the first time in history that an LLM has been has run on a high-powered Nvidia GPU in outer space, CNBC has learned.

“Greetings, Earthlings! Or, as I prefer to think of you — a fascinating collection of blue and green,” reads a message from the recently launched satellite. “Let’s see what wonders this view of your world holds. I’m Gemma, and I’m here to observe, analyze, and perhaps, occasionally offer a slightly unsettlingly insightful commentary. Let’s begin!” the model wrote.

Starcloud’s output Gemma in space. Gemma is a family of open models built from the same technology used to create Google’s Gemini AI models.

Starcloud

Starcloud wants to show outer space can be a hospitable environment for data centers, particularly as Earth-based facilities strain power grids, consume billions of gallons of water annually and produce hefty greenhouse gas emissions. The electricity consumption of data centers is projected to more than double by 2030, according to data from the International Energy Agency.

Starcloud CEO Philip Johnston told CNBC that the company’s orbital data centers will have 10 times lower energy costs than terrestrial data centers.

“Anything you can do in a terrestrial data center, I’m expecting to be able to be done in space. And the reason we would do it is purely because of the constraints we’re facing on energy terrestrially,” Johnston said in an interview.

Johnston, who co-founded the startup in 2024, said Starcloud-1’s operation of Gemma is proof that space-based data centers can exist and operate a variety of AI models in the future, particularly those that require large compute clusters.

“This very powerful, very parameter dense model is living on our satellite,” Johnston said. “We can query, it and it will respond in the same way that when you query a chat from a database on Earth, it will give you a very sophisticated response. We can do that with our satellite.”

In a statement to CNBC, Google DeepMind product director Tris Warkentin said that “seeing Gemma run in the harsh environment of space is a testament to the flexibility and robustness of open models.”

In addition to Gemma, Starcloud was able to train NanoGPT, an LLM created by OpenAI founding member Andrej Karpathy, on the H100 chip using the complete works of Shakespeare. This led the model to speak in Shakespearean English.

Starcloud — a member of the Nvidia Inception program and graduate from Y Combinator and the Google for Startups Cloud AI Accelerator — plans to build a 5-gigawatt orbital data center with solar and cooling panels that measure roughly 4 kilometers in both width and height. A compute cluster of that gigawatt size would produce more power than the largest power plant in the U.S. and would be substantially smaller and cheaper than a terrestrial solar farm of the same capacity, according to Starcloud’s white paper.

These data centers in space would capture constant solar energy to power next-generation AI models, unhindered by the Earth’s day and night cycles and weather changes. Starcloud’s satellites should have a five-year lifespan given the expected lifetime of the Nvidia chips on its architecture, Johnston said.

Orbital data centers would have real-world commercial and military use cases. Already, Starcloud’s systems can enable real-time intelligence and, for example, spot the thermal signature of a wildfire the moment it ignites and immediately alert first responders, Johnston said.

“We’ve linked in the telemetry of the satellite, so we linked in the vital signs that it’s drawing from the sensors — things like altitude, orientation, location, speed,” Johnston said. “You can ask it, ‘Where are you now?’ and it will say ‘I’m above Africa and in 20 minutes, I’ll be above the Middle East.’ And you could also say, ‘What does it feel like to be a satellite? And it will say, ‘It’s kind of a bit weird’ … It’ll give you an interesting answer that you could only have with a very high-powered model.”

Starcloud is working on customer workloads by running inference on satellite imagery from observation company Capella Space, which could help spot lifeboats from capsized vessels at sea and forest fires in a certain location. The company will include several Nvidia H100 chips and integrate Nvidia’s Blackwell platform onto its next satellite launch in October 2026 to offer greater AI performance. The satellite launching next year will feature a module running a cloud platform from cloud infrastructure startup Crusoe, allowing customers to deploy and operate AI workloads from space.

“Running advanced AI from space solves the critical bottlenecks facing data centers on Earth,” Johnston told CNBC.

“Orbital compute offers a way forward that respects both technological ambition and environmental responsibility. When Starcloud-1 looked down, it saw a world of blue and green. Our responsibility is to keep it that way,” he added.

The risks

Risks in operating orbital data centers remain, however. Analysts from Morgan Stanley have noted that orbital data centers could face hurdles such as harsh radiation, difficulty of in-orbit maintenance, debris hazards and regulatory issues tied to data governance and space traffic.

Still, tech giants are pursuing orbital data centers given the prospect of nearly limitless solar energy and greater, gigawatt-sized operations in space.

Along with Starcloud and Nvidia’s efforts, several companies have announced space-based data center missions. On Nov. 4, Google unveiled a “moonshot” initiative titled Project Suncatcher, which aims to put solar-powered satellites into space with Google’s tensor processing units. Privately-owned Lonestar Data Holdings is working to put the first-ever commercial lunar data center on the moon’s surface.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has explored an acquisition or partnership with a rocket maker, suggesting a desire to compete against Elon Musk‘s SpaceX, according to The Wall Street Journal. SpaceX is a key launch partner for Starcloud.

Referring to Starcloud’s launch in early November, Nvidia senior director of AI infrastructure Dion Harris said: “From one small data center, we’ve taken a giant leap toward a future where orbital computing harnesses the infinite power of the sun.”

Continue Reading

Trending