Connect with us

Published

on

Heads, trunks, and limbs — More countries are concerned about the iPhone 12s EMF radiation profile France is pulling the mostly off-the-market phone and considering a recall.

Kevin Purdy – Sep 14, 2023 5:39 pm UTC Enlarge / The iPhone 12, a phone that Apple no longer actively sells, is under investigation in France for potentially violating one of two electromagnetic radiation standards.Samuel Axon reader comments 23 with

For many people, the iPhone 12 effectively disappeared from the market on Tuesday, when Apple introduced iPhone 15 models and stopped selling the 12, first released in October 2020. In Europe, however, the iPhone 12 remains a notable device, as a number of countries are following France’s lead in looking into the device’s electromagnetic profile.

What kicked off the unexpected concern about a nearly 3-year-old phone was France’s National Frequency Agency (ANFR). On the same day as Apple’s fall product announcements, the ANFR informed Apple that the iPhone 12 exceeds European Union regulations for Specific Absorption Rate (SAR), the rate at which a human body would absorb radiation from a device. A translated version of the ANFR report has the agency calling on Apple to withdraw the iPhone 12, “quickly remedy this malfunction,” and if not, “recall copies already sold.”

There are two measures of SAR for a device operating in the same frequency range as an iPhone, per EU standards. The “head and trunk” value, taken to protect against “acute exposure effects on central nervous tissues” when a phone is against the head or in a pants pocket, must not exceed 2 Watts of power per kilogram of body tissue, averaged over six minutes. When the phone is held in the hand or in clothing or accessories, for a “limbs” value, it’s 4 W/kg. EU regulations for electromagnetic radiation absorption from devices.Official Journal of the European Communities

France’s ANFR measured the iPhone 12 exceeding the “limbs” limit at 5.74 W/kg. The ANFR stated that it would ensure the iPhone 12 was no longer available for sale in France and would oversee “corrective updates” it expects from Apple. Jean-Noel Barot, a digital and telecommunications minister in France, told newspaper Le Parisien that software updates could fix the issue, according to Reuters. Advertisement

Apple responded swiftly to ANFR’s claims, telling multiple press outlets earlier this week that the iPhone 12 was certified by multiple international bodies and that it had provided the ANFR with documentation showing the device within regulatory limits, both from within Apple and independent lab results. Ars Technica reached out to Apple for comment and will update this post with new information.

The EU’s standards note that within a phone’s typical frequency range, the main danger of excess radiation is not changes to cells or chemicals in the body, leading to cancer, but “whole-body heat stress and excessive localized heating of tissues.” The vast majority of mobile phone research indicates no adverse effects from regular exposure to the non-ionizing frequencies phones use to communicate. But a series of studies, however inconclusive or problematic, have raised unnecessary concern and garnered media attention. The World Health Organization states that “no adverse health effects have been established as being caused by mobile phone use.”

France’s notice has spurred action by other countries. Germany’s Federal Office for Radiation Protection said Wednesday that “the question of the need for change is currently the subject of discussions,” Reuters reported. Belgium’s state secretary for digitalization, Mathieu Michel, told Reuters that he reached out to regulators to review not just the iPhone 12 but all Apple smartphones and other devices. Denmark and Italy have said they are investigating but have taken no formal actions.

In the US, SAR limits set by the Federal Communications Commission are 1.6 W/kg. The iPhone 12’s submitted SAR levels were measured at 1.554 W/kg at their peak, generally when using a hotspot or engaging in “Simultaneous Transmission.” The iPhone 12 did, of course, clear the FCC for release in 2020.

French regulators have recently shown enthusiasm for demanding more from US-based tech companies. They’ve asked Google and Facebook to offer one-click cookie rejection and put repairability scores on smartphones and appliances and told the US and other nations that they want to see global AI regulations by year’s end. reader comments 23 with Kevin Purdy Kevin is a senior technology reporter at Ars Technica, covering a variety of technology topics and reviewing products. He started his writing career as a newspaper reporter, covering business, crime, and other topics. He has written about technology and computing for more than 15 years. Advertisement Channel Ars Technica ← Previous story Related Stories Today on Ars

Continue Reading

Politics

Cabinet minister admits UK-France migrant returns could be ‘frustrated’ by legal challenges

Published

on

By

Cabinet minister admits UK-France migrant returns could be 'frustrated' by legal challenges

A cabinet minister has said attempts to deport asylum seekers could be delayed in the courts, amid confusion over whether there is a human rights “loophole” in the UK’s migration deal with France.

The “one in, one out” agreement will see migrants ineligible to stay in the UK sent back across the Channel. In exchange, the UK will take from France those who have links to Britain.

Politics Live: Chancellor warned ‘substantial tax rises’ needed

The treaty contains a clause that says in order for people to be returned, the UK must confirm they do not have an “outstanding human rights claim”.

Critics have argued this could risk bogus applications being made to frustrate the deportation process and cause delays.

Chris Philp, the Conservative shadow home secretary, said it was an obvious “loophole” in the deal.

However, Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy told Sky News this was “not the case at all”.

“The deal that we’ve struck will allow people with us to send people back to France who have human rights claims. Those claims will be heard in France,” she said.

 Channel crossings have reached a record high. Pic: PA
Image:
Channel crossings have reached a record high. Pic: PA

But despite denying there was a loophole, Ms Nandy admitted deportations could get held up in UK the courts.

She said: “Obviously there are people who will try to frustrate the process through the courts, but we’re speeding up the court process to make sure that those delays will be minimal and we will be able to return people to France so that, if they have an asylum claim, for example, that claim can be heard in France if they’ve travelled through France on the way here on small boats.”

When asked for clarity, the Home Office insisted people can be removed from the UK if they have made a human rights claim which is “clearly unfounded” in UK law.

It is understood that preparations have been made for judicial challenges against these decisions to be heard by UK courts from France, though sources suggested that once France has agreed to accept a return, there is no way back.

The charity Care4Calais said it would consider its options, with a spokesperson telling Sky News: “Care4Calais initiated legal challenges against the last government’s Rwanda policy and their attempts to introduce ‘pushbacks’ in the Channel – and we won.

“We will consider all options open to us to oppose any plans that will put more lives at risk, and involve governments trading humans.”

The government is under pressure for the scheme to work as Channel crossings have risen to a record high under their watch, despite a promise in the Labour manifesto to “smash the gangs”.

Row as crossings continue

A row broke out on Wednesday afternoon after Mr Philp shared footage from Calais showing migrants making the journey from France to England.

The senior Tory claimed this showed the government’s deal “is not deterring anyone”.

Dame Angela Eagle, the border security minister, accused him of being a “hypocrite”, saying thousands of people crossed the Channel while the Tories tried and failed to get their Rwanda scheme going.

She said the deal with France “will take time and it will be hard” but insisted it will ” make an important contribution to the all-out assault we are waging against the business model of the smuggling gangs, which was allowed to flourish and grow for six years while your government was in charge”.

“That is the difference between having a serious and comprehensive plan to fix this crisis, and just standing in a boat pointing at it. I hope you’re getting a nice tan, though,” she said.

The deal with France is one of a number of measures the government has implemented to crack down on small boat crossings.

Read more from Sky News:
Explained: What is the UK-France migrant returns deal?
Row over checks for Gazans who’ve earned places at UK unis

Ministers have refused to say how many people could be sent back across the Channel, claiming that would benefit smuggling gangs.

However, reports have suggested that about 50 a week could be sent to France – a small number compared to the 800 people every week on average who have arrived in the UK via small boats this year.

Bruno Retailleau, France’s interior minister, said the agreement “establishes an experimental mechanism whose goal is clear: to smash the gangs”.

The initial agreement will be in place until June 2026.

Continue Reading

Politics

What is the UK-France migrant returns deal, who will be returned and how many?

Published

on

By

What is the UK-France migrant returns deal, who will be returned and how many?

A new UK-France migrant returns deal has come into force in a bid to reduce the number of migrants crossing the Channel in small boats.

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron announced the “one in, one out” agreement on 10 July after months of talks, and it has since been approved by the European Commission.

Here is what we know about the deal so far.

What is the basic agreement?

The UK will be able to send migrants who enter the UK on small boats back to France.

For each one returned, the UK will allow an asylum seeker to enter through a safe and legal route – as long as they have not previously tried to enter illegally.

This is a pilot scheme for now, which will be in place until June 2026. A joint committee has been set up to review it on a monthly basis pending a decision on its long-term future.

When will it begin?

The agreement came into force on 5 August, having been signed by both countries and approved by the European Commission.

Home Secretary Yvette Cooper told Sky News anyone arriving in the UK by small boat after this date can be detained “immediately upon arrival”.

The process of then transferring them to France will take up to three months, according to the treaty.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Cooper insists no panic over migration

Who will be returned?

The scheme applies to adults or accompanied minors who have arrived by small boat via France.

There have been no details released on how the government will select who is returned out of this cohort – as it will only apply to a small fraction of arrivals – but the treaty notes some cases in which migrants will be ineligible for deportation.

This includes if someone has an outstanding human rights claim, outstanding suspensive judicial remedies or an injunction or court order that prevents their transfer.

Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy has rejected accusations from the Tories that these are “easy loopholes” for lawyers to exploit, telling Sky News: “That’s not the case at all. The deal that we’ve struck will allow us to send people back to France who have human rights claims. Those claims will be heard in France.”

Read more:
What difference will ‘one in, one out’ small boats deal make?

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Yvette Cooper: ‘No fixed numbers yet’

How many will be returned?

No numbers have been mentioned as part of the scheme, but there are reports around 50 people a week will ultimately be returned to France.

Since the start of March, an average of more than 1,000 people have arrived in small boats every week. Sending 50 of them back would represent less than 5% of that total.

Home Secretary Ms Cooper has admitted the scheme will start small as it is just a pilot at this stage, but says the hope is that it can be expanded.

She has declined to give a figure, saying people smuggling gangs would then operate their networks around that information.

Is the deal set in stone?

The treaty will remain in force until June 2026. Both countries will continually review the scheme over the next year, pending a decision on the long-term future of the arrangements.

Bruno Retailleau, France’s interior minister, said the agreement “establishes an experimental mechanism whose goal is clear: to smash the gangs”, adding that it marked the “first stage” of efforts by the whole of the European Union sparked by the UK-EU summit in London in May.

Who will be accepted into the UK?

As part of the deal, the UK has agreed to provide a voluntary application route for entry from France. Those wanting to come will have to submit an Expression of Interest application to the Home Office.

They will need to establish their identity and nationality and will be subject to strict security and eligibility checks before a decision is made.

How much is it costing?

The UK will pay the full cost of transporting migrants in both directions under the terms of the treaty. The government has not put a figure on how much this could cost.

This is on top of the hundreds of millions the UK has given to France to police the Calais coast.

What have the French said?

Bruno Retailleau, France’s interior minister, said the agreement “establishes an experimental mechanism whose goal is clear: to smash the gangs”.

He added that it marked the “first stage” of efforts by the whole of the European Union sparked by the UK-EU summit in London in May.

What else is being done?

Mr Macron has repeatedly said the UK needs to address “pull factors”, such as illegal working.

The Home Office has said authorities will soon undertake “a major nationwide blitz targeting illegal working hotspots, focusing on the gig economy and migrants working as delivery riders”.

Uber Eats, Deliveroo and Just Eat have already committed to ramp up facial verification and fraud checks in the coming months after ministers called in bosses for talks.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Officers in crackdown on suspected illegal delivery drivers

The government has also introduced eVisas for people in the UK on a visa to make it easy to identify those who are in the UK legally.

For the first time, France has also agreed to allow police officers to enter the water from the beaches in northern France to try to stop the boats from leaving.

Over the past two weeks, they have been filmed slashing the rigid inflatable boats (RIBs) the people smugglers load up with migrants.

The British government, which is helping to fund the French police’s efforts, is pushing France to go further and let officers intervene against boats in deeper waters.

Continue Reading

Technology

Super Micro stock sinks 20% after earnings, outlook disappoint

Published

on

By

Super Micro stock sinks 20% after earnings, outlook disappoint

Super Micro missed Q4 estimates

Super Micro Computer shares plunged 20% on Wednesday after the company posted weaker-than-expected fiscal fourth quarter results, dented in part by President Donald Trump’s tariffs.

CEO Charles Liang told investors on a conference call that the company has “taken measures to reduce the impact” of the tariffs.

The company has in recent years benefited from surging demand for AI servers packed with Nvidia chips, but has growth has since slowed.

The server maker also offered guidance late Tuesday that fell short of consensus estimates. Super Micro said it expects 40 cents to 52 cents in adjusted earnings per share on $6 billion to $7 billion in revenue for the fiscal first quarter.

Wall Street had projected 59 cents per share and $6.6 billion in revenue for the first quarter.

Read more CNBC tech news

For the full year, Super Micro said it expects revenue to be at least $33 billion. That’s a step down from its forecast in February, where it projected as much as $40 billion in sales, but greater than the LSEG consensus of $29.94 billion.

Super Micro reported fourth-quarter adjusted earnings per share of 41 cents, compared with expectations for 44 cents. Revenue came in at $5.76 billion, which was below analysts’ forecasts of $5.89 billion.

Stock Chart IconStock chart icon

hide content

YTD stock chart for Super Micro Computer.

CNBC’s Jordan Novet contributed reporting to this story.

Continue Reading

Trending