Connect with us

Published

on

Rishi Sunak will not face a sanction for breaching confidentiality rules around the investigation into his failure to declare his wife’s shares in a childcare company that benefitted from the budget.

Parliament’s standards committee, which scrutinises the behaviour of MPs, found Mr Sunak’s breach of confidentiality rules was “inadvertent”.

Standards commissioner Daniel Greenberg opened an investigation into the prime minister at the end of March following a complaint he failed to declare his wife’s shares in childcare company Koru Kids during a session before the liaison committee.

After a Downing Street spokesperson was reported as saying Mr Sunak would co-operate with the inquiry, it was expanded to examine a potential breach of the rules about confidentiality.

Mr Greenberg found Mr Sunak had broken the confidentiality rules, but noted he co-operated fully and subsequently said that “with hindsight, he would have made arrangements to restrict the disclosure of information by his office on his behalf”.

However, the matter was still referred to the standards committee as a breach was found.

The committee agreed with the findings, but also found that it was inadvertent, writing that no details that were not already public were disclosed, and not all communications from Downing Street would be directly authorised by the prime minister himself.

Continue Reading

Politics

Connecticut can’t take action against Kalshi for now, judge rules

Published

on

By

Connecticut can’t take action against Kalshi for now, judge rules

A US judge has granted prediction markets platform Kalshi a temporary reprieve from enforcement after the state of Connecticut sent it a cease and desist order last week for allegedly conducting unlicensed gambling.

The Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection (DCP) sent Kalshi, along with Robinhood and Crypto.com, cease and desist orders on Dec. 2, accusing them of “conducting unlicensed online gambling, more specifically sports wagering, in Connecticut through its online sports event contracts.”

Kalshi sued the DCP a day later, arguing its event contracts “are lawful under federal law” and its platform was subject to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s “exclusive jurisdiction,” and filed a motion on Friday to temporarily stop the DCP’s action.

An excerpt from Kalshi’s preliminary injunction motion arguing that the DCP’s action violates federal commodities laws. Source: CourtListener

Connecticut federal court judge Vernon Oliver said in an order on Monday that the DCP must “refrain from taking enforcement action against Kalshi” as the court considers the company’s bid to temporarily stop the regulator.

The order adds that the DCP should file a response to the company by Jan. 9 and Kalshi should file further support for its motion by Jan. 30, with oral arguments for the case to be held in mid-February.

Kalshi does battle with multiple US states

Kalshi is a federally regulated designated contract maker under the CFTC and, in January, began offering contracts nationally that allow bets on the outcome of events such as sports and politics.

Related: How prediction markets raise insider trading and credit risks

Its platform has become hugely popular this year and saw a record $4.54 billion monthly trading volume in November, attracting billions in investments, with Kalshi closing a $1 billion funding round earlier this month at a valuation of $11 billion.

However, multiple US state regulators have taken issue with Kalshi’s offerings, which have led to the company being embroiled in lawsuits over whether it is subject to state-level gambling laws.