Elon Musk pushed to use Tesla’s internal driver monitoring camera to record video of drivers’ behavior, primarily for Tesla to use this video as evidence to defend itself from investigations in the event of a crash, according to Walter Isaacson’s new biography of the Tesla CEO.
Walter Isaacson’s biography of Elon Musk is out, resulting in severalrevelations about Tesla’s past, present, and future. One of these revelations is a potential use for the Tesla internal driver monitoring camera that is included on current Teslas.
Many cars have a camera like this to monitor driver attentiveness and warn a driver if they seem to be paying too little attention to the road, though other automakers typically use infrared cameras and the data never leaves the car.
Teslas have had these cameras for many years, first showing up on the Model 3 in 2017 and later on the S/X, but they weren’t activated until 2021. Before that, Tesla determined attention by detecting steering wheel torque (a safety that was pretty easy to defeat).
But that wasn’t the only thing Tesla wanted to use the cameras for. According to the biography, Musk pushed internally to use the camera to record clips of Tesla drivers, initially without their knowledge, with the goal of using this footage to defend the company in the event of investigations into the behavior of its Autopilot system.
Musk was convinced that bad drivers rather than bad software were the main reason for most of the accidents. At one meeting, he suggested using data collected from the car’s cameras—one of which is inside the car and focused on the driver—to prove when there was driver error. One of the women at the table pushed back. “We went back and forth with the privacy team about that,” she said. “We cannot associate the selfie streams to a specific vehicle, even when there’s a crash, or at least that’s the guidance from our lawyers.”
– Walter Isaacson, Elon Musk
The first point here is interesting because there are indeed a lot of bad drivers who misuse Autopilot and are certainly to blame for what happens while it’s activated.
As mentioned above, Autopilot and FSD are “Level 2” systems. There are six levels of self-driving – 0 through 5 – and levels 0-2 require active driving at all times, whereas with levels 3+, the driver can turn their attention away from the road in certain circumstances. But despite Tesla’s insistence that drivers still pay attention, a study has shown that driver attention does decrease with the system activated.
We have seen many examples of Tesla drivers behaving badly with Autopilot activated, though those egregious examples aren’t entirely the issue here. There have been many well-publicized Tesla crashes, and in the immediate aftermath of an incident, rumors often swirl about whether Autopilot was activated. Regardless of whether there is any reason to believe that it was activated, media reports or social media will often focus on Autopilot, leading to an often unfair public perception that there is a connection between Autopilot and crashing.
But in many of these cases, Autopilot eventually gets exonerated when the incident is investigated by authorities. Oftentimes, it’s a simple matter of the driver not using the system properly or relying on it where they should not. These exonerations often include investigations where vehicle logs are pulled to show whether Autopilot was activated, how often it had to remind the driver to pay attention, what speed the car was driving, and so on. Cameras could add another data point to those investigations.
Even if crashes happen due to human error, this could still be an issue for Tesla because human error is often a design issue. The system could be designed or marketed to better remind drivers of their responsibility (in particular, don’t call it “full self-driving” if it doesn’t drive itself, perhaps?), or more safeguards could be added to ensure driver attention.
The NHTSA is currently probing Tesla’s Autopilot system, and it looks like safeguards are what they’ll focus on – they’ll likely force changes to the way Tesla monitors drivers for safety purposes.
But then Musk goes on to suggest that not only are these accidents generally the fault of the drivers, but that he wants cabin cameras to be used to spy on drivers, with the specific purpose of wanting to win lawsuits or investigations brought against Tesla (such as the NHTSA probe). Not to enhance safety, not to collect data to improve the system, but to protect Tesla and his ego – to win.
In addition to this adversarial stance against his customers, the passage suggests that his initial idea was to collect this info without informing the driver, with the idea of adding a data privacy pop-up only coming later in the discussion.
Musk was not happy. The concept of “privacy teams” did not warm his heart. “I am the decision-maker at this company, not the privacy team,” he said. “I don’t even know who they are. They are so private you never know who they are.” There were some nervous laughs. “Perhaps we can have a pop-up where we tell people that if they use FSD [Full Self-Driving], we will collect data in the event of a crash,” he suggested. “Would that be okay?”
The woman thought about it for a moment, then nodded. “As long as we are communicating it to customers, I think we’re okay with that.”
-WALTER ISAACSON, ELON MUSK
Here, it’s notable that Musk says he is the decision-maker and that he doesn’t even know who the privacy team is.
In recent years and months, Musk has seemed increasingly distracted in his management of Tesla, recently focusing much more on Twitter than on the company that has catapulted him to the top of the list of the world’s richest people.
It might be good for him to have some idea of who the people working under him are, especially the privacy team, for a company that has active cameras running on the road, and in people’s cars and garages, all around the world, all the time – particularly when Tesla is currently facing a class action lawsuit over video privacy.
In April, it was revealed that Tesla employees shared videos recorded inside owners’ garages, including videos of people who were unclothed and ones where some personally identifiable information was attached. And in Illinois, a separate class action lawsuit focuses on the cabin camera specifically.
So, this blithe dismissal of the privacy team’s concerns does not seem productive and does seem to have had the expected result in terms of Tesla’s privacy performance.
Musk is known for making sudden pronouncements, demanding that a particular feature be added or subtracted, and going against the advice of engineers to be the “decision-maker” – regardless of whether the decision is the right one. Similar behavior has been seen in his leadership of Twitter, where he has dismantled trust & safety teams, and in the chaos of the takeover, he “may have jeopardized data privacy and security,” according to the DOJ.
While we don’t have a date for this particular discussion, it does seem to have happened at least post-2021, after the sudden deletion of radar from Tesla vehicles. The deletion of radar itself is an example of one of these sudden demands by Musk, which Tesla is now having to walk back.
For its part, Tesla does currently have a warning in the car that describes what the company will do with the data from your internal camera. This is what it looks like currently in a Model 3:
Notably, this language focuses on safety rather than driver monitoring. Tesla explicitly says that the camera data doesn’t leave the vehicle unless the owner opts in and that the data will help with future safety and functionality improvements. But also says that the data is not attached to a VIN, nor is it used for identity verification.
Beyond that, we also have not seen Tesla defend itself in any autopilot lawsuits or investigations by using the cabin camera explicitly – at least not yet. With driver monitoring in focus in the current NHTSA investigation, it’s entirely possible that we might see more usage of this camera in the future or that camera clips are being used as part of the investigation.
But at the very least, this language in current Teslas does suggest that Musk did not get his wish – perhaps to the relief of some of the more privacy-interested Tesla drivers.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Hester Peirce, commissioner of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), speaks during the DC Blockchain Summit in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday, May 24, 2022.
Valerie Plesch | Bloomberg | Getty Images
LAS VEGAS — Now that the SEC is out of the business of regulating meme coins, investors shouldn’t expect any guidance on $TRUMP, according to Hester Peirce, one of the agency’s veteran commissioners.
The SEC said in February that it does not deem most meme coins securities under U.S. federal law. That took the crypto tokens out of its purview just weeks after President Donald Trump launched his own meme coin and saw it immediately soar in value, lifting his paper net worth by billions of dollars.
Peirce told CNBC that it’s a similar situation to when nonfungible tokens (NFTs) gained popularity in 2021. They weren’t securities but they did rise and fall in value based on investor activity in the market. Peirce said the SEC missed an opportunity to announce publicly that the agency wasn’t getting involved.
“Here was something where I saw a lot of interest in this out in the world — in meme coins — and it made sense for us to say, ‘People, if you are expecting that there’s SEC protection around these, you should not expect that,'” Peirce said in an interview at Bitcoin 2025 in Las Vegas. “You can package almost anything into a securities transaction. But generally, it’s good for people to know, I should not be looking to the SEC for protection in this area.”
In other words, buy at your own risk.
Since President Trump took office in January, the SEC has been rolling back its enforcement in crypto, taking a more industry-friendly approach to the asset class. It’s a controversial strategy, as the president and his family deepen their involvement in crypto, profiting in a way that’s led many Democratic lawmakers to declare a clear conflict of interest.
Like most meme coins, the token has no underlying value. But after debuting in January, just ahead of the inauguration, $TRUMP soared to a $15 billion market cap, fueled by President Trump’s social media posts declaring, “It’s time to celebrate everything we stand for: WINNING!”
Within days, the token lost most of its value. Still, the project creators get a fee for every trade.
The White House previously told CNBC that Trump’s assets are held in a trust managed by his children, and there are “no conflicts of interest.”
But Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., the ranking member of the Senate Subcommittee on Investigations, is among a growing list of Democratic lawmakers warning that the Trump family’s crypto holdings may serve as a backdoor for foreign and corporate interests seeking access to the president.
Meanwhile, crypto billionaires once targeted by regulators like the SEC are regaining political and financial influence.
On Thursday, the SEC dropped its long-running lawsuit against Binance and founder Changpeng Zhao, bringing to an end one of the most aggressive crypto enforcement actions brought by former SEC Chair Gary Gensler.
The agency had accused Binance of misleading investors, commingling customer funds, and allowing wealthy U.S. users to evade restrictions. After pleading guilty to federal money-laundering violations in November 2023, Zhao served just four months in prison and emerged with most of his crypto empire intact. Forbes now estimates his net worth at over $67 billion.
Leading up to the dismissal, Zhao had deepened ties to Trump-affiliated networks. As Binance prepared to list USD1, a new stablecoin that funnels profits to Trump-aligned entities, Zhao disclosed that he had applied for a presidential pardon from Trump’s Justice Department. Weeks later, Binance received a $2 billion capital injection into USD1 from an Emirati state fund.
Peirce rejected the idea the SEC’s actions are politically motivated.
“We didn’t have a clear set of rules,” Peirce said, regarding the Binance case. “There were a lot of questions about how this particular activity in the crypto space intersected with our existing securities laws. So we’re trying to take a step back, use our regulatory tools to write those rules, and then enforce those rules.”
That same philosophy guided the SEC’s January decision to rescind Staff Accounting Bulletin 121, a controversial directive that had effectively blocked traditional financial institutions from offering crypto custody.
“It wasn’t even a rule,” Peirce said. “It didn’t go through the normal process. it was just a pronouncement.”
She said the policy had the effect of excluding banks and other experienced custodians from participating in the crypto space.
“It said that lots of traditional entities that would have done custody for crypto, practically speaking, could not participate,” she said.
Bitcoin 2025 brought together thousands of investors, builders, and believers for a showcase of crypto’s next chapter.
MacKenzie Sigalos
LAS VEGAS — At the world’s largest bitcoin conference this week on the Vegas Strip, the most consequential story wasn’t about bitcoin.
Stablecoins, the dollar-pegged digital tokens now driving a full-scale financial and political shift in Washington, stole the show.
The momentum behind stablecoin legislation and crypto market reform is accelerating — and it’s attracting a new kind of donor, investor, and voter. That shift took center stage at Bitcoin 2025 in Las Vegas.
Vice President JD Vance became the first sitting U.S. vice president to address the bitcoin community on Wednesday, delivering a full-throated endorsement of crypto.
“I think it’s wrong, actually, to call this just a conference,” Vance told a crowd of 35,000. “This is a movement. And I’m proud to stand with you.”
“In this administration, we do not think that stablecoins threaten the integrity of the U.S. dollar. Quite the opposite,” said Vance. “We view them as a force multiplier of our economic might.”
Stablecoins are designed to have a stable value against a non-crypto asset, usually the U.S. dollar.
“We’re streamlining payment rails for ensuring U.S. dollar global dominance for decades to come,” Bo Hines, a White House official heading up the president’s Digital Assets Council, told CNBC on the sidelines of Bitcoin 2025.
He added that stablecoin integration into the U.S. financial system could unlock trillions of dollars in global demand for American debt.
Those ambitions hinge on the passage of the GENIUS Act, a Senate bill that would establish the first comprehensive regulatory framework for stablecoin issuers.
Sen. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., told the Bitcoin 2025 crowd that the bill would move to a cloture vote on Monday after weeks of negotiations with Democrats.
“We think we have a final deal,” Lummis said. “If we can get this passed, this will be the first piece of digital asset legislation to pass the U.S. Senate.”
On the House side, Republicans are racing to match that pace.
House Majority Whip Tom Emmer, R-Minn., praised Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., for pushing a “calcified” Senate to act at record speed and said the House is determined to get both the stablecoin and broader market structure bills on President Donald Trump‘s desk before the August recess.
“The president promised this,” Emmer said. “We want it done now.”
Rep. Bryan Steil, R-Wisc., who chairs the House Subcommittee on Digital Assets, is leading efforts to advance companion legislation and expects the bill to reach the Financial Services Committee by July.
“Stablecoin issuers will be purchasing U.S. Treasuries at a period of time where that is incredibly essential,” Steil told CNBC in Vegas.“It enshrines the U.S. dollar in our dominant role as the world’s reserve currency.”
Tether — the largest stablecoin issuer in the world — now ranks among the top buyers of U.S. Treasuries globally.
Steil dismissed Democratic efforts to propose an amendment banning government officials from profiting off stablecoin ventures. The Trump family has ties to World Liberty Financial and its newly-launched stablecoin USD1.
Kraken CEO Dave Ripley, who has been advising lawmakers behind the scenes, called the legislation essential to bringing financial institutions — including consumer brokers and major banks — into the digital asset ecosystem.
But he cautioned that key provisions, including whether yield on stablecoins can be shared with users and how government officials may participate in the market, are still being debated.
“Crypto is all about individuals,” he said. “Let’s bring the value to them.”
Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino said commodity trading firms will be “the biggest driver” of stablecoin adoption in the next five years. He is already preparing for the next wave of competition as mainstream financial players begin launching their own digital dollars on the blockchain.
Ardoino, whose company controls more than 60% of the stablecoin market, emphasized that traditional financial firms entering the stablecoin space will be constrained by their reliance on high-fee customers.
“All the traditional financial firms will create stablecoins that will be offered to their existing customers,” he told CNBC.
According to The Wall Street Journal, major banks including JPMorgan, Bank of America and Citi are in early talks to issue a unified digital dollar to compete with Tether.
Tether, by contrast, is targeting the global majority excluded from banking.
“Many of our competitors say, ‘Oh, Tether is serving this niche of the unbanked,'” he said. “Half of the population of the world should not be called a niche.”
That global reach is one reason policymakers in Washington are moving fast.
Under Trump’s newly appointed regulatory team, momentum has shifted decisively.
The Securities and Exchange Commission, which has been long viewed as the industry’s top adversary, has begun dismantling its enforcement-first framework, clearing the way for greater institutional participation in crypto.
SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce said the change was long overdue.
“For many years now, I’ve been complaining about the fact that the commission has not taken proactive steps to provide clarity, and now finally, we’re at a place where we can do that,” she said.
Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev, who has been meeting privately with the SEC, says tokenization — not just of dollars, but of public and private markets — is now within reach, even without new legislation.
“We’ve actually been engaging with the SEC crypto task force as well as the administration,” he told CNBC. “And it’s our belief, actually, that we don’t even need congressional action to make tokenization real. The SEC can just do it.”
With its new electric SUV arriving at dealerships later this year, Toyota is offering clearance pricing on older models. Until June 2, you can score $19,000 off the Toyota bZ4X, but is it worth it?
Toyota bZ4X is available with $19,000 off in lease cash
Earlier this month, Toyota introduced the 2026 bZ, an upgraded version of the outgoing bZ4X. Toyota appears to be in a hurry to unload the outgoing electric SUV.
Toyota is currently offering $19,000 in lease cash for the 2024 bZ4X. The offer is available on all four trims. However, the promo is only good until June 2, 2025. Alternatively, you can opt for 0% APR plus an additional $2,500 cash incentive.
The 2025 Toyota bZ4X is available with $10,000 in lease cash. Like the 2024 model, it’s also available with 0% APR and a $2,500 cash incentive.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Although the 2025 bZ4X is listed for lease as low as $269 per month (for 36 months), is it worth buying? Toyota did cut prices on the 2025MY by up to $6,000, so it could equal out for what you get, but there are a few things to consider.
2025 Toyota bZ4X Limited AWD Supersonic Red (Source: Toyota)
Toyota’s new “bZ” electric SUV, arriving at dealerships later this year, boasts 25% more range, with up to 314 miles. The outgoing bZ4X is rated with up to 252 miles of range.
It also features more power, faster charging, an improved interior and exterior design, and a built-in NACS port, allowing you to access Tesla Superchargers. According to Toyota, the new name is simpler for buyers to recognize.
2025 Toyota bZ4X trim
Starting Price (excluding $1,395 DPH fee)
Price reduction (vs 2024MY)
Range (mi)
XLE FWD
$37,070
-$6,000
252
XLE AWD
$39,150
-$6,000
228
Limited FWD
$41,800
-$5,380
236
Limited AWD
$43,880
-$5,380
222
Nightshade
$40,420
N/A
222
2025 Toyota bZ4X prices and range by trim
For those looking for a comparable electric SUV, the 2025 Hyundai IONIQ 5, Honda Prologue, and Chevy Equinox EV are currently on sale.
2026 Toyota bZ electric SUV (Source: Toyota)
Hyundai is offering 2025 IONIQ 5 (which also comes with a built-in Tesla NACS port) leases as low as $209 per month. The 2025 Honda Prologue is available to lease starting at $259 per month, while the 2025 Chevy Equinox EV can be leased for as little as $289 per month.
Looking for your next electric SUV? We’ll help you find the best offers in your area. You can use our links below to see what’s available.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.