Connect with us

Published

on

The first minister of Wales insists “fewer lives will be lost” on Welsh roads – as the new national speed limit of 20mph is introduced across the country.

Nearly all roads in built-up or residential areas in Wales have now become, by default, 20mph instead of 30mph.

The plan is hugely controversial – with the leader of the House of Commons Penny Mordaunt describing it this week as “absolutely insane, even by the standards of the Labour Welsh government.”

Read more: Why is the default speed limit changing to 20mph in Wales and could it be introduced elsewhere?

But Mark Drakeford told Sky News the new law is about safety, not politics.

“It’s not a political item in any sense, it is grounded in the evidence,” he said.

“The key positive is reduced speed means fewer accidents, and fewer lives being lost. The evidence I think is incontrovertible, that lower speed limits reduce accidents, reduce damage done to people.

“I have no doubt that the Tories will try to weaponise this sort of thing, it’s just in their nature. I am very confident people in Wales will see through that.”

First Minister Mark Drakeford
Image:
First Minister Mark Drakeford says the new law is about safety

The Welsh government hopes the new law, which has cost £32m to introduce, will see 40% fewer collisions, save six to 10 lives a year and up to 2,000 avoiding injury.

Mr Drakeford said the results from Spain demonstrate the benefits.

“In 2019, Spain introduced a law very similar to what we have in Wales,” he said.

“They’ve had a 20% reduction in urban deaths that have followed, 34% reduction in cyclist fatalities.”

Read more:
Welsh motorists urged to stop relying on sat navs – here’s why
Drivers left confused by contradictory speed limit signs

The rollout comes after two years of trials in eight areas of Wales, including in the Heath, north Cardiff.

Parents attending a baby group at the local community centre have mixed feelings over whether it has worked.

“I think there’s no doubt that people are safer if cars are driving slower and injuries are less severe is an accident, so I think it’s a positive thing,” one mother told Sky News.

Road rage risk

Richie, one of the fathers at the group, doesn’t feel the new limit has worked.

“I think there’s been a huge amount of road rage with it,” he said. “I was overtaken yesterday doing 20mph, a guy was doing 40mph, I don’t agree with it at all – it’s a horrendous idea.”

Richie and his daughter
Image:
Richie and his daughter

Melanie, another mother, doesn’t think a blanket roll-out is the right approach.

She said: “I don’t know if people really abide to it. I often see people flouting 20mph, particularly around the park. I think it makes sense, particularly around schools and parks…the whole of Cardiff? I don’t think so.”

Melanie
Image:
Melanie said she often saw drivers flouting the 20mph limit

There are numerous campaign groups against it, mainly focusing on the impact in their local area.

Stephen Clark is a member of the group “20mph Limit – Democracy for Wales” in Heath. He admits 20mph is safer, but only in the places that it is required.

“It is not necessary in the main arteries that run through the city where people travel daily, to and from work. I just feel it’s very unfair on the general public,” he says.

“I believe it leads to more erratic driving. It’s very difficult to adjust to this new 20mph speed limit because you’re constantly having to monitor your speed.”

An online petition against the scheme has secured more than 70,000 signatures. There are economic concerns too.

The Welsh government’s own report has found that over a 30-year period the economic impact of the slower speed limit could be in the region of £4.5bn. It is keen to focus on the £92m annual saving to the NHS.

Welsh Conservative shadow transport minister Natasha Asghar MS urged the Labour government to scrap the “vanity project”, saying the 20mph policy will “slow emergency services down, cost the economy up to £9bn, and impact people’s livelihoods”.

The new speed limit will be enforced by police as normal, but the first minister told Sky News there will be an educational approach to the public in the first instance.

“We are very committed, alongside the police colleagues, to an approach that is about education, informing, giving people time to ensure they understand the law has changed, nobody is going to be rushing in with a heavy hand,” Mr Drakeford said.

“There will come a point where people who are persistently refusing to do the things that everybody else is doing, then they won’t be able to do that with impunity.”

Continue Reading

UK

How is your local NHS coping under winter pressures?

Published

on

By

How is your local NHS coping under winter pressures?

Pressure on hospitals is particularly high this winter, with more than a dozen declaring critical incidents in recent days.

Hospitals struggle every winter with additional pressures due to the impact of cold weather, but the early arrival of flu this season and high volume of cases meant Christmas and New Year’s weeks were even busier than usual.

There are currently at least 20 hospitals that have declared critical incidents in England, although this is a fast-moving picture, and some trusts will go into critical incident for as little as half an hour.

The latest NHS winter situation reports give a more detailed look at the level of pressure experienced by individual trusts, including those with the worst ambulance handover delays and highest levels of flu patients.

Ambulance handover delays

When a patient arrives at a hospital in an ambulance, clinical guidelines suggest that it should take no longer than 15 minutes to transfer them into emergency care.

It is now common for handovers to regularly exceed this timeframe, however, when emergency departments are overcrowded and lack the capacity to keep up with new patient arrivals.

This is risky for patients because it delays their assessment and treatment by clinicians, and also reduces the availability of ambulances to respond to new incidents.

The trust with the longest delays was University Hospitals Plymouth, with an average handover time of three hours and 33 minutes over the week – two hours and 40 minutes longer than the average for England. It also recorded the longest average handover times for a single day, at five hours and 14 minutes on New Year’s Day.

Use the table below to search for local ambulance handover times:

On 7 January, University Hospitals Plymouth declared a critical incident at Derriford Hospital due to “significant and rising demand for hospital care”, though this has since been stood down.

The Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital Trust had an average ambulance handover time of three hours and 15 minutes, increasing by more than an hour from one hour and 51 minutes the week before.

In Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, 83% of handovers took more than 30 minutes, the highest share among areas dealing with more than five ambulance arrivals per day.

This area also recently declared and then stood down a critical incident.

In total across England, 43 trusts out of 127 had average handover times of more than an hour, while nine areas had average handover times of more than two hours.

Flu

This winter’s flu wave arrived earlier than usual and has hit health services hard.

Over New Year’s week, there were 5,407 flu patients in hospitals in England on average each day, more than three times higher than during the same week last year and increasing by 20% from the week before.

The worst impacted trusts were Northumbria Healthcare and University Hospitals Birmingham, with 15% and 13% of all available beds occupied by flu patients respectively in the latest week.

Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust had among the biggest increase in flu patients from the previous week, more than doubling from 18 to 42 patients per day on average.

Use the table below to search for local flu hospitalisations:

There are some indications that flu activity may have now peaked, with national flu surveillance showing a decrease in positive flu tests in the latest week, though activity remains at high levels.

Bed occupancy

Current NHS guidance is that a maximum of 92% of hospital beds should be occupied to reduce negative risks associated with overfilled beds.

These risks include the impact on patient flow resulting from it being more difficult to find beds for patients, and negative impacts on performance and waiting times, as well as being linked to increased infection rates.

In the week to 5 January, 92.8% of 102,546 open hospital beds were available each day on average, not far off the recommended level.

However, bed occupancy was very high in some trusts, with more than 95% of beds occupied in 43 trusts on average over the week.

The trust with the highest rate of bed occupancy was Wye Valley NHS Trust, with 99.9% of 332 beds occupied on average throughout the week.

There was only one day when beds weren’t fully occupied, on 3 January, when two beds of 322 were available.

Use the table below to search for local bed occupancy:

Kettering General Hospital NHS Trust recorded bed occupancy of 98.5% over the week. This trust declared a critical incident on 8 January.

Part of the problem for bed availability is prolonged hospital stays – also known as bed-blocking.

This is often linked to pressures in other parts of the health and social care system, for example when patients can’t be discharged to appropriate social care providers even though they are ready to leave hospital.

Just under half of beds occupied by patients in English hospitals last week were occupied by long-stay patients who had been there for seven or more days.

In seven trusts, at least three in five beds were occupied by long-stay patients, while in Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust the figure was more than four in five beds.


The Data and Forensics team is a multi-skilled unit dedicated to providing transparent journalism from Sky News. We gather, analyse and visualise data to tell data-driven stories. We combine traditional reporting skills with advanced analysis of satellite images, social media and other open source information. Through multimedia storytelling we aim to better explain the world while also showing how our journalism is done.

Continue Reading

UK

Government contract ends for controversial asylum barge Bibby Stockholm

Published

on

By

Government contract ends for controversial asylum barge Bibby Stockholm

The government contract for the controversial asylum barge in Dorset has ended.

The last asylum seekers are believed to have left Bibby Stockholm at the end of November after Labour said it would have cost more than £20m to run in 2025.

Its closure this month was expected, and on Friday the management firm and the Home Office confirmed to Sky News the contract had now expired.

It’s currently unclear when Bibby Stockholm will leave Portland and what it will be used for next.

The Conservative government started using the vessel in August 2023.

It said putting nearly 500 men on board while they waited for an asylum decision was cheaper than paying for hotel rooms.

However, it was controversial from the start and sparked legal challenges and protests.

More on Asylum

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

August: 2023: Barge reminds migrant of Islamic State

Days after the first group boarded there was an outbreak of Legionella bacteria in the water system and it had to be evacuated for two months.

In December 2023, an Albanian asylum seeker, Leonard Farruku, died on board.

Read more from Sky News:
Farage ‘can’t be pushed or bullied’ after Musk rebuke
Zebra dies after ‘incident’ with rhino in Colchester

A Home Office spokesperson said the government was determined to reform the asylum system to make it operate “swiftly, firmly and fairly”.

“This includes our accommodation sites, as we continue to identify a range of options to reduce the use of hotels,” the new statement added.

“We are already closing some hotels and will continue to engage with local authorities and key stakeholders as part of this process.”

Continue Reading

UK

Rachel Reeves intent on ‘making Britain better off’ on China trip – as she backs ‘non-negotiable’ budget

Published

on

By

Rachel Reeves intent on 'making Britain better off' on China trip - as she backs 'non-negotiable' budget

Making Britain better off will be “at the forefront of the chancellor’s mind” during her visit to China, the Treasury has said amid controversy over the trip.

Rachel Reeves flew out on Friday after ignoring calls from opposition parties to cancel the long-planned venture because of market turmoil at home.

The past week has seen a drop in the pound and an increase in government borrowing costs, which has fuelled speculation of more spending cuts or tax rises.

The Tories have accused the chancellor of having “fled to China” rather than explain how she will fix the UK’s flatlining economy, while the Liberal Democrats say she should stay in Britain and announce a “plan B” to address market volatility.

However, during a visit to Beijing’s flagship store of UK bike maker Brompton, Ms Reeves said she would not alter her economic plans, with the October Budget designed to return the UK to economic stability.

“Growth is the number one mission of this government,” she said.

“The fiscal rules laid out in the budget are non-negotiable. Economic stability is the bedrock for economic growth and prosperity.”

👉 Click here to follow Electoral Dysfunction wherever you get your podcasts 👈

The chancellor is being accompanied by Bank of England governor Andrew Bailey and other senior executives.

She will meet with her counterpart, Vice Premier He Lifeng, in Beijing later on Saturday to discuss financial services, trade and investment.

She will also “raise difficult issues”, including Chinese firms supporting Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and concerns over constraints on rights and freedoms in Hong Kong, the Treasury said.

But it did not mention whether Ms Reeves would raise the treatment of the Uyghur community, which Downing Street said Foreign Secretary David Lammy would do during his visit last year.

Britain's Foreign Secretary David Lammy and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi shake hands before their meeting at the Diaoyutai State Guesthouse in Beijing. Pic: AP
Image:
Britain’s Foreign Secretary David Lammy and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Beijing. Pic: AP

On Friday, Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy defended the trip, telling Sky News that the climbing cost of government borrowing was a “global trend” that had affected many countries, “most notably the United States”.

“We are still on track to be the fastest growing economy, according to the OECD [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development] in Europe,” she told Anna Jones on Sky News Breakfast.

“China is the second-largest economy, and what China does has the biggest impact on people from Stockton to Sunderland, right across the UK, and it’s absolutely essential that we have a relationship with them.”

Read more – Ed Conway analysis: The chancellor’s gamble with China

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Nandy defends Reeves’ trip to China

However, former prime minister Boris Johnson said Ms Reeves had “been rumbled” and said she should “make her way to HR and collect her P45 – or stay in China”.

While in the country’s capital, Ms Reeves will also visit British bike brand Brompton’s flagship store, which relies heavily on exports to China, before heading to Shanghai for talks with representatives across British and Chinese businesses.

It is the first UK-China Economic and Financial Dialogue (EFD) since 2019, building on the Labour government’s plan for a “pragmatic” policy with the world’s second-largest economy.

Sir Keir Starmer was the first British prime minister to meet with China’s President Xi Jinping in six years at the G20 summit in Brazil last autumn.

Relations between the UK and China have become strained over the last decade as the Conservative government spoke out against human rights abuses and concerns grew over national security risks.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

How much do we trade with China?

Navigating this has proved tricky given China is the UK’s fourth largest single trading partner, with a trade relationship worth almost £113bn and exports to China supporting over 455,000 jobs in the UK in 2020, according to the government.

During the Tories’ 14 years in office, the approach varied dramatically from the “golden era” under David Cameron to hawkish aggression under Liz Truss, while Rishi Sunak vowed to be “robust” but resisted pressure from his own party to brand China a threat.

The Treasury said a stable relationship with China would support economic growth and that “making working people across Britain secure and better off is at the forefront of the chancellor’s mind”.

Ahead of her visit, Ms Reeves said: “By finding common ground on trade and investment, while being candid about our differences and upholding national security as the first duty of this government, we can build a long-term economic relationship with China that works in the national interest.”

Continue Reading

Trending