The Sunday Times and Channel 4’s Dispatches published their joint investigation on Saturday accusing Russell Brand of rape, sexual assault and abuse.
Four women alleged Brand assaulted them between 2006 and 2013.
This period marks the height of Brand’s fame – he was a presenter for the BBC and Channel 4 before becoming a high-profile Hollywood star.
The comedian vehemently denied “very serious criminal allegations” in a YouTube video on Friday night, claiming his relationships were “always consensual”.
Here are the allegations against him in full.
Warning: This article contains details of a graphic nature that readers may find distressing
‘Grooming and sexually assaulting a 16-year-old’
Alice – not her real name – alleged she had a sexual relationship with Brand aged just 16 and that he sexually assaulted her.
Brand, who was 30 at the time, sent cars to Alice’s school to collect her from lessons so they could have sex at his home, she said.
He became increasingly controlling during the relationship, Alice said, and encouraged her to lie to family and friends about the relationship, even instructing her to save his number under the name “Carly” to avoid suspicion. She says Brand’s management also told him to keep their relationship private.
She also alleged that he removed a condom during sex without her knowledge.
“Russell engaged in the behaviours of a groomer, looking back, but I didn’t even know what that was then, or what that looked like,” she said.
While in bed with Brand, Alice says the comedian forced his penis into her mouth to the point she was unable to breathe.
“I was pushing him away and he wasn’t backing off at all,” she said.
“I ended up having to punch him really hard in the stomach to get him off. I was crying and he said, ‘Oh, I only wanted to see your mascara run anyway’.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:00
How the Brand allegations came out
After this, he held her mouth open, drooled into it, and then held her mouth shut, forcing her to swallow his spit and leaving her “gagging and crying”.
Alice also told the investigation that Brand found it arousing that she was a virgin, called her “the child” and “my little dolly” and asked her to read the 1955 novel Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov about a professor sexually obsessed with pre-pubescent girls.
‘Raping a businesswoman in LA’
Nadia, who did not use her real name to protect her identity, said Brand raped her at his home in LA in 2012.
They previously had consensual sex but Nadia said he had a “glazed over” look during the encounter.
In the early hours of 1 July 2012, Brand pleaded with her to visit his house.
When she got there, he asked her to join him and a “friend” for a threesome in his bedroom, she alleged.
When she refused, Nadia said Brand pushed her against a wall and raped her without using a condom.
Image: Russell Brand in 2012. Pic: AP
After escaping his house, she said Brand sent her a text at 3.29am, which said: “I’m sorry. That was crazy and selfish. I hope you can forgive me, I know that you’re a lovely person. X.”
She said she ignored a call from him but texted him the following morning to say he had “scared the s***” out of her, adding: “When a girl say(s) NO it means no.”
Brand replied he was “very sorry” and “embarrassed” by his behaviour, The Times reported.
Nadia provided the team of journalists with her medical records from a rape treatment centre she went to after the rape, as well as therapy records.
Several months later, she said she wrote to Brand, saying: “You completely broke me down.”
Brand ‘fired woman who worked for him after sex assault’
Phoebe – not her real name – had a brief consensual relationship with Brand after they met at an Alcoholics Anonymous meeting in 2013, she said.
He later hired her for a project they worked on together.
During this time, Phoebe said she became “trapped” in a bedroom in Brand’s home and he started chasing her around the room.
Image: Russell Brand denied the allegations in his latest YouTube video. Pic: YouTube/Russell Brand
Brand, who was naked, “grabbed me and got me on the bed” and tried to forcibly remove her clothes.
She said: “I was screaming, and I was like, ‘What are you doing, stop, please, you’re my friend, I love you, please don’t do this, I don’t want to do this’. I think he had his hands down my trousers but I was fighting so hard and I was screaming so hard, hoping that I could get through somehow.”
When the assault ended, Phoebe said Brand became “super angry” and shouted “f*** you” and told her she was fired.
She ran out of his house barefoot, running into a group of people outside who had arrived for a business meeting, Phoebe said.
One of the people in the group apologised to Phoebe years later, she claimed.
She said: “He pulled me aside and he said to me, ‘I have never forgiven myself for not running in that house to save you. I heard you screaming. And I didn’t know what to do. And we were all so scared of him and I didn’t do anything. And I am sorry’.”
Phoebe continued working with Brand but she said he “cornered her” and threatened legal action when he discovered she had told friends about the alleged assault.
‘Sexually assaulted ex-girlfriend’
Brand’s former girlfriend Jordan Martin did not provide an account to the journalists working on the investigation due to “personal family circumstances” but confirmed to the team that she stood by allegations she made in a self-published book.
The former model had a six-month relationship with Brand in 2007.
In her book, she detailed an alleged sexual assault at The Lowry Hotel in Manchester between Dina and Randall Grand – pseudonyms she used for herself and Brand.
Ms Martin said the comedian became angry when he found out she had spoken to an ex-boyfriend.
He then grabbed her phone and assaulted her in the bathroom, sliding his hand into her underwear, she claimed.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:28
Brand arrives at gig after sex assault claims
She said she was “not ready for this intrusion” and did not find it “sensual or pleasant”.
Brand also forced her to brush her teeth so hard that it made her gums bleed so she would taste “anonymous” to him, Ms Martin said.
She wrote that Brand “pushes boundaries, controlling other people to fulfil personal perversions for the sake of dominance”.
“There were times when I felt bullied and abused, not in a physical or sexual way, but mentally. I was vulnerable… His manipulative side was so powerful it was easier to just submit.”
Brand has never disputed Ms Martin’s account in her book.
‘Offered naked assistant to Jimmy Savile’
Dispatches and The Times also detailed other disturbing behaviour in the documentary – including inappropriate comments made to paedophile Jimmy Savile.
On his radio show in 2007, Brand spoke with Savile, who said they could meet if Brand brought his sister.
The comedian said he didn’t have a sister but offered to bring his assistant naked to the meeting.
“I’ve got a personal assistant, and part of her job description is that anyone I demand she greet, meet, massages, she has to do it. She’s very attractive, Jimmy,” Brand is claimed to have said.
Savile died in 2011 aged 84.
More than 450 allegations of sexual abuse against children were reported to police after his death.
Brand’s personal assistant between 2006 and 2007 also alleged he showed friends intimate pictures of women.
Brand also instructed the assistant, Helen Berger, to procure women for him to have sex with from audiences on shows he presented, she claimed.
She also said Brand often wore only underwear around her and had a “very active sex addiction”.
Meanwhile, a production runner on Big Brother’s Efourum said Brand flashed her on set and insinuated she “might like to suck his d***”.
She added: “I was incredibly shocked. I wasn’t going to tell anyone what he’d done because I didn’t want to lose my job.”
She later had consensual sex with him but he insisted she had to keep it a secret.
“As an older woman I can say with clarity I felt like I was groomed for sex,” the runner said.
“Production companies enabled him to exist in environments where he was able to take advantage of who he was.”
Another crew member said she raised a separate complaint with a colleague about Brand’s sexual pursuit of audience members on his shows.
The crew member said women often phoned her in tears “because they felt used”.
“I don’t know what went on once they left the studio,” they added.
She said it felt she was a “pimp to Russell Brand’s need” and that they “were taking lambs into slaughter”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:42
Brand denies ‘serious allegations’
Brand denies allegations ‘absolutely’
Denying the allegations in a video posted online ahead of the publication of the claims, Brand said he was facing a “litany of extremely egregious and aggressive attacks”.
The 48-year-old said: “These allegations pertain to the time when I was working in the mainstream, when I was in the newspapers all the time, when I was in the movies and as I have written about extensively in my books, I was very, very promiscuous.
“Now during that time of promiscuity, the relationships I had were absolutely, always consensual. I was always transparent about that then, almost too transparent, and I am being transparent about it now as well.
“To see that transparency metastasised into something criminal, that I absolutely deny, makes me question – is there another agenda at play?”
The family of a grooming victim say they are “angry” and “heartbroken” that prosecutors didn’t see a video of her police interview during their investigations.
Jodie Sheeran, then 15, was allegedly taken to a hotel and raped in November 2004.
She’s believed to have been groomed by young men of Pakistani heritage for a year beforehand. Jodie’s son, Jayden, was born nine months later.
A man was charged, but the case was dropped a day before the trial was meant to start in 2005.
Her father, David, said they were told it was because Jodie had a “reckless lifestyle” and was “an unreliable witness”, but that they never received a formal reason.
Jodie died in November 2022 from an alcohol-related death.
It’s now emerged the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) didn’t view the video of Jodie’s police interview as it “was not shared with us” and they didn’t know at the time that it still existed.
Instead, they only had a transcript of what she told officers.
It’s unclear exactly why this happened, but Staffordshire Police said the footage was available in 2019, when the CPS and police reviewed the case, and in 2023, when the investigation was opened again.
Image: Jodie Sheeran with her mother Angela
“I don’t know if I’ve been misled [or] it was an accident,” Jodie’s mother, Angela, told Sky News’ Sarah-Jane Mee.
“To suddenly say evidence has been there all along – and I’ve got every single letter, every email to tell me they haven’t got the evidence any more… and then it’s emerged Staffordshire Police did have the evidence after all – it was shocking really.”
The CPS watched the video last month and said the transcript is an accurate representation of what Jodie says on the tape.
However, it hasn’t changed their view that there’s no realistic prospect of conviction – and won’t be taking any further action.
Image: Jodie’s father David (right, with Jayden) says it seems police and CPS ‘didn’t know what one another were doing’
Jodie’s father told Sky News he believes it shows the police and CPS “didn’t know what one another were doing – and it makes you so angry”.
“I feel like they’ve gotten away with it,” added Jodie’s son Jayden. “It’s years on now – I’m grateful they’ve found the evidence but what are they doing about it?”
‘I’ll keep fighting until I get justice’
Angela said it shows that other families in a similar situation shouldn’t “take no for an answer” from police or the CPS.
“Since losing a child, nothing else matters, so I’m not going anywhere,” she said.
“So I will keep fighting and fighting and fighting until I get justice for Jodie – and hopefully justice for probably thousands of other victims out there as well.”
Image: Angela says she will ‘keep fighting until I get justice for Jodie’
A Staffordshire Police spokesperson said their thoughts remain with Jodie’s family and that a “significant amount of work has been undertaken reviewing this case several times”.
They said the interview video was “available to the Senior Investigating Officers in 2019 and 2023” and a “comprehensive contemporaneous written record” of it was given to the CPS on both occasions.
The statement added: “In August 2025, a copy of the recording was provided to the CPS who conducted due diligence to ensure the contemporaneous written record of Jodie’s ABE interview, that they reviewed in 2019 and 2023, was an accurate account of the video recording. They have confirmed this is the case.”
Police said the case had beensubmittedfor a further evidential review.
“Should any new evidence come to light, it will be referred to the CPS for their consideration,” the spokesperson added.
The CPS said: “We carried out reviews of our decision-making in this case in 2019 and 2023 using records provided by Staffordshire Police – both these reviews found that there was not enough evidence to charge the suspect with rape.
“While we requested all available records, Jodie’s video interview from 2005 was not shared with us, we were not informed that it had been retained, and it was only made available to our prosecutors recently after further requests.
“Having cross-referenced the video with detailed accounts of it previously available to us, we have determined that the conclusions we reached in our previous reviews still stand.”
:: Watch the full interview on The UK Tonight with Sarah-Jane Mee from 8pm on Tuesday
Children sexually abusing other children has become a “crisis” in the UK, experts have told Sky News.
This report contains details you may find distressing.
The National Association for People Abused in Childhood (NAPAC) says there has been a pronounced rise in child-on-child abuse – and data for group-based offending shows it is now more prevalent than incidents involving grooming gangs.
The “shocking” statistics show there has been a “fundamental shift” in offending, NAPAC chief executive Gabrielle Shaw told Sky News.
Latest child sexual abuse and exploitation crime figures from the National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) for England and Wales show that, where age was recorded, 52% of all perpetrators were between the ages of 10-17.
Image: NAPAC chief executive Gabrielle Shaw says the figures show the UK is facing a ‘crisis’
Some 41% of these relate to indecent images of children.
Most of these nude images are taken by teenagers of themselves before they are shared with a partner as part of “experimental” behaviour.
But at the other end of the offending scale, 17% of sexual crimes that are committed against children by other children are rape offences.
Richard Fewkes, director of NPCC’s child sexual exploitation taskforce, warns that consensual exchanging of intimate images can end up in coercion and blackmail, with easy access to violent pornography partly behind this disturbing trend in children abusing children.
“For a generation of boys, in particular, then very often they see that as normal behaviour,” he told Sky News. “They act it out, with girls.”
Teenagers sharing indecent images of each other may be recorded as crimes due to the legal age of consent, according to Richard Fewkes.
Inside the call centre on the frontline
Warning: This section contains references to child sexual abuse
There’s a shrill ring as the first call of the day comes in. “You’re through to someone you can talk to.”
We’ve been given exclusive access to NAPAC’s helpline in Stockport, where call handlers speak to victims who have suffered all types of abuse.
The man who has called the helpline was so badly beaten as a child by his father that he was left with broken bones.
The victim is now having to care for his elderly father, triggering painful memories.
“He just wanted that safe space,” says call handler Claire Tong.
“He said, ‘Thank god there’s people like you that I can talk to’.”
NAPAC’s support service hears from around 10,000 victims every year – and the organisation also works with police in responding to group-based sexual offending.
Through our day at the helpline, we get a grim snapshot into the lives of ordinary people across the UK who have suffered unimaginable pain.
Children ritually abused to ‘raise demon’
Sam Booth has worked at NAPAC for a decade, first as a volunteer and now as a supervisor.
She shows me the themes of last week’s calls written on a whiteboard and one stands out – ritual abuse.
“Satanic ritual abuse is abuse by a group of people,” Sam says.
“They have robes on with hoods. They could be a child or a teenager, they could be ritually, sexually abused ….to raise some kind of demon.”
Sam says multiple people have called, triggered by the smell of soil. As children, they had been buried to the point of death before being revived.
Victims can be signposted to other services, for example if they want to pursue legal action or therapy.
Support can mean difference between life and death
Among those to have been helped by NAPAC is Sadie, who was sexually abused by her biological father when she was a young child.
Sadie, not her real name, says her childhood memories are “the constant feeling of being dissociated from your body, always having stomach aches, feeling unclean”.
Sadie’s email to NAPAC, fully disclosing the abuse for the first time, was the crucial step towards getting direct support.
For some victims, their call could be the difference between life and death.
The rise in young people seeking help
Exclusive data shared with Sky News shows that in 2014, NAPAC received 358 calls in which callers volunteered their age.
16 of these callers were between the ages of 19 and 24 (4.4%).
Over the next decade the percentage doubled.
In 2024 there were 1,487 calls in which callers volunteered their age.
130 of these callers were aged 19-24 (8.8%).
More than half of callers of all ages say they feel anxious or experience anxiety.
Meanwhile, more than a third of callers say they feel isolated.
Holly Aisbett, who has worked for NAPAC for three years, says a conversation that stands out to her was with a suicidal woman calling from a bridge.
“We were probably on the phone for about an hour; she did eventually tell us her location,” says Holly.
“We reported it to the police, we don’t often do that, but obviously when things escalate, we do have a duty of care.”
All the NAPAC staff we spoke to admit to being impacted by challenging calls every day. But they continue to handle them with empathy.
“You get a really good feeling when you get a caller talking to you about something they’ve never told anyone,” says Sam.
“You feel privileged that they’re able to talk to you.”
Mr Fewkes said there is no easy solution to the crisis of children abusing children, but he believes better education for parents and young people is a crucial step in the right direction.
A Home Office spokesperson said: “We are taking forward a wide range of actions to help prevent child sexual abuse, bring more offenders to justice, and improve the support available to victims and survivors.
“A review is currently underway to look at how best to support school staff in handling cases of child sexual abuse. This sits alongside increased funding for the Lucy Faithfull Foundation, which works to prevent harmful sexual behaviour among children and young people.”
For NAPAC support, call 0808 801 0331 or email support@napac.org.uk
Sir Ed Davey will call on US experts fleeing an “anti-science agenda” to come to the UK, and pledge to make curing cancer a “top priority”.
The Liberal Democrat leader will use his keynote speech at the party’s annual conference in Bournemouth today to call for a dedicated fellowship scheme to attract American scientists.
Sir Ed is expected to warn that “what’s happening on the other side of the Atlantic” is the “biggest threat to the fight against cancer”.
“The US is by far the world’s biggest funder of cancer research – mostly through its National Cancer Institute,” the leader will say.
“But since Donald Trump returned to the White House, he has cancelled hundreds of grants for cancer research projects.
“He’s slashing billions of dollars from the National Cancer Institute’s budget.”
Sir Ed will appeal to scientists who have had projects cancelled or funding cut to “come here and finish it in the UK”.
He believes a dedicated scheme should be established to allow them to move to work at British research institutions, without having to pay large visa fees.
Sir Ed has is the only English party leader to explicitly criticise Mr Trump, and refused an invite to the state banquet with the King at Windsor Castle as part of the US president’s state visit last week.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
10:51
Davey refuses to rule out deal with Starmer
‘Cast-iron guarantee’ for cancer patients
Sir Ed will also use his speech to pledge to boost healthcare and cancer research more widely.
He is expected to tell party members: “The UK should step up and say: if Trump won’t back this research, we will.
“We’ll boost funding for cancer research in the UK. We’ll rebuild a National Cancer Research Institute, after it was closed under the Conservatives, to coordinate research and drive it forward.
“We’ll pass a Cancer Survival Research Act to ensure funding for research into the deadliest cancers.”
He will announce a “cast-iron guarantee” that each patient in the UK diagnosed with cancer will start treatment within two months.
Sir Ed will also accuse Reform members of supporting the Trump administration’s move to cut millions of pounds of research into mRNA vaccines, based on “totally false conspiracy theories”.
He will say they members “enthusiastically applauded” the decision at the party’s conference earlier this month.
It follows the Liberal Democrat leader refusing to rule out making a deal with Labour after the next general election to help keep Reform out of government.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:04
Can Davey stop Farage getting into No 10?
Across the conference, Sir Ed has also:
Accused Elon Musk of being a “criminal [for] allowing online harm to children” on his social media platform X, insisting he’s not concerned about being sued by the billionaire for saying so despite him not being charged;
Suggested the Lib Dems could win “way more” than 100 seats at the next general election;
And accused the BBC of scrutinising Reform less than other political parties.
The Liberal Democrats have already used the conference to announce plans for a windfall tax on big banks to help homeowners install solar panels and insulation, and propose cigarette-style health warnings on social media apps to protect children.
They also want to introduce a law to ban ministers from lobbying on behalf of foreign leaders.