He also scrapped plans that would have made rental properties more energy efficient.
But with changes still years into the future – and the cost of living crisis rumbling on – will pushing deadlines back make a difference to people’s finances now? Here, Sky News takes a look.
When he was prime minister in 2020, Boris Johnson committed to banning the sale of any new petrol and diesel cars in the UK from 2030. This is now being pushed back until 2035.
Plans to fine manufacturers for each vehicle that doesn’t comply are also being watered down.
Figures show that although petrol and diesel are still the overwhelming majority – the numbers of plug-in and battery electric vehicles on UK roads have increased – by 45% and 58% respectively.
Advertisement
And in 2023 more electric vehicles were registered than diesel ones for the first time.
This shows a “general trend” away internal combustion engines (ICE) – and towards more sustainable modes of transport already, says Oliver Montague, chief-executive and co-founder of the e-bike engineer company Swytch.
So a change in the timing of the ban is unlikely to have much of an impact.
“Those who have to transition [to EVs] will still have to do so – they just have more time to do it,” he tells Sky News.
“The real shift will be for people who can choose how they want to get around – who aren’t already hooked to one particular mode of transport” – such as a diesel car that needs trading in.
And with the average car journey being only around eight miles – he believes many will opt for e-bikes or cycling, instead of an electric vehicle, meaning the ICE ban will have even less of an impact.
The RAC also notes the ban only covers new petrol and diesel cars, which means “a lot of people won’t be affected as the majority tend to buy used vehicles”.
Mike Childs, head of science, research and policy at Friends of the Earth, adds that people will still be able to buy non-UK manufactured EVs.
“From a consumer perspective it won’t have a great impact because they can just buy Chinese or German EVs,” he tells Sky News.
“But for British manufacturing it’s a huge backwards step and a massive shot in the foot for jobs.”
No gas boilers in new homes
Plans to stop new build properties being fitted with gas boilers beyond 2025 are being pushed back 10 years.
This doesn’t affect people who already have gas boilers, who won’t need to replace them with alternatives such as heat pumps. As a result, this change is more likely to affect developers than consumers.
Image: Domestic heat pump
Jess Ralston, energy analyst at Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit, says that with a greater upfront cost for heat pumps, we won’t know until the changes come in how much of that will be passed on to buyers.
But she adds: “As time goes on heat pumps are going to be cheaper to buy and run anyway.”
Plans for all new heating systems to be low carbon by 2035, including £450m in household grants, has also been scrapped.
This means more people will have gas boilers for longer, which with prices “two to three times’ pre-crisis levels” will mean people paying more in energy bills, Ms Ralston adds.
But on Wednesday Mr Sunak did announce a 50% increase in the boiler upgrade scheme, which offers people £7,500 to help with the costs of switching from a boiler to a heat pump.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
4:30
Green Party hits out at Braverman
More energy efficient landlords
In 2020, Boris Johnson also pledged that from 2028 all rental properties would have to have an energy efficient rating of C or higher (A being the best and G the worst). But Mr Sunak is scrapping this due to “cost of living challenges”.
Ms Ralston says she “cannot get a single shred of logic” from the decision.
“This would reduce people’s energy bills in the cost of living crisis and increase energy security – things that the government say they want to be doing. It makes no sense whatsoever.”
Mr Childs says it will disproportionately affect people on lower incomes who are more likely to rent their homes.
“This is a massive kick in the teeth to people who live in cold, damp rented homes that are expensive to heat.
“It’s also a massive handout to landlords who can’t be bothered to insulate their properties properly,” he says.
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
He adds that despite some drop in prices this year, the cost of oil and gas is increasing again – and will remain volatile for as long as Russia is at war with Ukraine.
“There are more renters than there are landlords, so it makes no sense on votes. It just begs the question of whether the government are being lobbied by wealthy landlords,” Ms Ralston says.
Hydrogen levy
The government was proposing to introduce a levy of around £100 on household energy bills in 2025 – to help pay for low-carbon hydrogen production.
But after many claimed the hydrogen was being used primarily in industry – not people’s homes – ministers have scrapped it.
This is being welcomed by environmental and consumer groups.
Ms Ralston says that heat pumps are far more efficient than hydrogen for heating homes – so the government was right to recognise this wasn’t something the public should pay for.
Mr Childs adds that hydrogen still relies on natural gas – which both homes and transport have been moving away from, so Friends of the Earth has been “against it from the outset”.
Kemi Badenoch strode onto the conference stage to deliver a speech focused on how her party would cut national spending and painstakingly rebuild the economy after the “doom loop” of a Labour government.
The headline moment was a pricey home-owning rabbit pulled out of the hat, a pledge to scrap stamp duty in a paean to the Conservative dream of property ownership: a promise delivered to delighted applause.
The party claims the cost of abolishing tax duty on people’s primary residences would be around £9 billion – a considerable chunk of the £23 billion in cuts the party are pledging to find from the welfare budget.
It’s a clear statement of Conservative intent, delivered with a new-found confidence from a woman who has faced months of speculation about her leadership.
Image: Shadow business secretary Andrew Griffith, shadow environment secretary Victoria Atkins, and shadow housing secretary Sir James Cleverly enjoying the moment. Pic: PA
Unlike many of her previous speeches, this one didn’t dwell on the previous government’s mistakes.
Indeed, she said she wanted to celebrate the “great things” her party had done in 14 years in power – delivering Brexit, supporting Ukraine, and halving the deficit from 2010 to 2020.
The economic record of the past four years of Conservative government was unsurprisingly left unsaid. But the subtext has been clear throughout conference – a drive to rebuild the party’s reputation for economic competence following the economic disaster of Liz Truss’s mini-budget three years ago.
Now we’re told “only the Conservatives” can be trusted with the economy and border security, with Badenoch highlighting her “golden rule” of government spending aimed at reducing the deficit, reiterating the shadow chancellor’s promises to slash government spending by £47bn.
Image: Kemi Badenoch with her husband, Hamish, after the speech. Pic: PA
She doesn’t want to risk alienating them even further- particularly after a conference where we’ve seen a steady stream of local councillors announcing their defection from the Tories to Reform.
There were a few gentle jokes at their expense, highlighting Reform’s pledges to both slash taxes and expand public spending.
She claimed Farage is planning a free beer giveaway – and “shaking the same magic money tree” as Labour and the Lib Dems. But she didn’t repeat the “socialist” attack line we’ve heard from other Tories on Reform this conference.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
53:00
In full: Badenoch keynote speech
The driving force of this speech was an attack on the government, and a pledge to “clear up the mess left by Labour” – on the economy, on border security, and on sleaze.
Her Churchillian claim that “never in the field of human history have so many been let down by so few” earned her loud guffaws from the hall – followed by a roll-call of scandal-hit Labour figures – from former British Ambassador to the US Peter Mandelson to recently resigned deputy prime minister Angela Rayner.
The hall was full – and the party faithful keen to applaud.
They enjoyed Badenoch highlighting the challenge faced by the Tories in drawing a rather melodramatic equivalence with the fight against fascism in the Second World War, and the battle to “banish socialism and deliver prosperity” in the 1980s – evoking both Sir Winston Churchill and her political hero Margaret Thatcher.
They loved her declaration of undying love for the Conservative party, who she described as her family – “in many ways quite literally”, given that she married the deputy chairman of her local Conservative association.
Badenoch doesn’t enjoy the level of devotion we’ve seen for her defeated leadership rival Robert Jenrick, who earned rapturous applause for his speech attacking activist judges on Tuesday – and polling shows he’s much more popular with the party membership.
But CCHQ will undoubtedly be relieved to have avoided the kind of outright rebellion we saw from Andy Burnham at Labour’s conference last week.
And given the delighted response from her headline announcement in the hall today – it looks like Badenoch has done enough to hold off her critics – at least for the time being.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:30
Lioness Jess Carter: ‘It’s been tough’
But the scale of racism facing footballers is highlighted by the abuse received by Kira Rai – a British Sikh Punjabi – after signing for Peterborough United last month.
They play in the fourth tier, far from the spotlight of the Women’s Super League, but that does not limit the venom targeted at Rai on social media.
She told Sky News: “There were some racial slurs about my heritage, where I come from, that I don’t belong in this country, that I should go back to X country and just sorts of things along those lines.
“I think that’s probably quite difficult to read about yourself at the end of the day.
“It should be a moment for me to celebrate, I’ve just joined a new club.”
What an impact she has made at her new club, scoring an incredible five-minute hat-trick in the FA Cup on Sunday on her home debut.
But the joy is tinged with sadness when we meet the next day.
X
This content is provided by X, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable X cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to X cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow X cookies for this session only.
“I’ve been in football since I was six, so for people to question whether I belong in football purely based on the colour of my skin, I think is something that’s really difficult to get your head round,” she said.
“It’s probably a reflection of what’s going on in society right now and how prevalent racism has become, and I think football is quite clearly a reflection on society.
“In society, over the last weeks, months, I think there’s almost an underlying tension that’s perhaps not been there in recent years.”
Image: Kira Rai, who plays for Peterborough United, suffered racial slurs about her heritage
‘Depressing’ rise in racism
The is felt by the police unit that has overseen football issues for the last two decades, with racism in stadiums and online rising.
Social media is a growing concern, with 170 referrals already this season of online racism compared to 54 in the first three months of the 2022-23 season and 41 in 2023-24.
“We’re seeing more reports, which is depressing,” Chief Constable Mark Roberts said in an exclusive interview.
“I think we’re also seeing that the number of those reports that actually meet the criminal threshold has increased.”
It’s up to 154 already this season.
Image: Chief Constable Mark Roberts says reports of abuse which meet the criminal threshold has increased
Incidents ‘creeping back’ into stadiums
“There’s an awful lot in the political sphere that people are saying that probably a few years ago just wouldn’t have been thought of, so I think it taps into that broader societal piece which makes it challenging,” the National Police Chiefs Council’s football lead added.
“Sadly that seems to have gone backwards a bit. The lower league grounds now, we are seeing incidents creep back into the games which obviously we’ve got to be really keen to clamp down on and make sure that people face consequences.
“Now whether that’s been driven by people being able to say things or feel that they can say things online and that’s now leaking into the actual stadiums, there is a definite trend to see more of it.”
One of the unit’s most high-profile investigations has been into the racism that led Carter to speaking out during England’s run to Euro 2025 and stepping away for a time from social media.
While two arrests have been announced, Sky News can reveal a third person has been arrested. A fourth suspect has also been identified, and six people overseas are under suspicion.
Carter previously told Sky News: “I wasn’t sure I was going to be able to come back on the pitch and be me.”
No one has been charged.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:38
FA considering social media boycott over racism
‘Slippage’ with Musk’s X
Three cases are pending with Elon Musk’s X.
And whether it’s X or Meta-owned Instagram, there is no agreement on the “grossly offensive legal threshold” with policies more tolerable than British law.
Mr Roberts said: “There has been some slippage recently with X that we’re working with them to try to get back to those standards. And I think one of the factual issues we sometimes struggle with is our perception of what is clearly a criminal offence.
“They can sometimes suggest that it doesn’t meet the threshold for their community guidelines, which I find difficult to reconcile really because surely if it meets the criminal prosecution threshold, surely it should breach [their guidelines], and we sometimes have a wrangle about securing information from them.”
Image: England’s Jadon Sancho (L), Marcus Rashford (R) and Bukayo Saka were racially abused after missing penalties during the 2021 Euros final. Pic: AP
A challenge is dealing with international police forces with two-thirds of referrals of racism generated overseas – beyond the jurisdiction of the football policing unit.
While not naming particular countries, Mr Roberts said abuse posted from Eastern Europe and Asia is the main problem.
“The level of interest from some countries varies,” he said. “Some just aren’t interested. We won’t get a response. Others will try and take positive action.”
The approach of English football can seem somewhat disjointed if different campaigns and anti-racism investigations run by different parts of the game.
“I would like a joint function to tackle online hate with ourselves, the football bodies, Kick It Out and others, ideally supported by government, so that we can do it in a really coherent, joined-up way,” he said in our interview at Cheshire Police HQ.
“I think that would make a massive difference, whether it’s education, whether in-stadium hate, whether it’s online hate.
“The way we’re going to tackle this most effectively is by doing it in a joined-up way where we’re mutually supportive. So I think that’s something we’d be keen to pursue.”
So would those who have been the target of abuse just for doing what they love – playing football.
‘No one wants to talk about this’
Kira Rai, a role model for British South Asians in football, said: “Perhaps there needs to be an overhaul, everyone needs to come together and actually deal with these uncomfortable conversations because they’re not necessarily fun conversations that we have.
“No one really wants to talk about this, and I can understand why. For real change, for genuine change to actually occur, you have to have these difficult conversations.
“You have to listen to player stories, to fan stories, to anyone’s stories in football, in society, to actually get to the bottom of it.”
And as some players showed last weekend in the Women’s Super League, change doesn’t come by taking a knee, but taking a stand.
Up to 14.2 million people could each receive an average of £700 in compensation due to car loan mis-selling, the financial services regulator has said.
Nearly half (44%) of all car loan agreements made between April 2007 and November 2024 could be eligible for payouts, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) said.
Those eligible for the compensation will have had a loan where the broker received commission from a lender.
Lenders broke the law by not sharing this fact with consumers, the FCA said, and customers lost out on better deals and sometimes paid more.
A scheme is seen by the FCA as the best outcome for consumers and lenders, as it avoids the courts and the Financial Ombudsman Service, therefore minimising delay, uncertainty and administration costs.
The scheme will be funded by the dozens of lenders involved in the loans, and cost about £8.2bn, on the lower end of expectations, which had been expected to reach as much as £18bn.
The figure was reached by estimating that 85% of eligible applicants will take part in the scheme.
More from Money
What if you think you’re eligible?
Anyone who believes they have been impacted should contact their lender and has a year to do so. Compensation will begin to be paid in 2026, with an exact timeline yet to be worked out.
The FCA said it would move “as quickly as we can”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
4:21
Payouts due after motor finance scandal
People who have already complained do not need to take action. Complaints about approximately four million loan agreements have already been received.
There’s no need to contact a solicitor or claims management firm, the FCA said, as it aimed for the scheme to be as easy as possible.
A lender won’t have to pay, however, if it can prove the customer could not have got cover anywhere else.
The number of people who will get a payout is not known. While there are 14.2 million agreements identified by the FCA, the same person may have taken out more than one loan over the 17-year period.
More expensive car loans?
Despite the fact many lenders have to contribute to redress, the FCA said the market will continue to function and pointed out the sector has grown in recent years and months.
In delivering compensation quickly, the FCA said it “can ensure that some of the trust and confidence in the market can be repaired”.
It could not, however, rule out that the scheme could mean fewer offers and more expensive car loans, but failure to introduce a scheme would have been worse.
The FCA said: “We cannot rule out some modest impacts on product availability and prices, we estimate the cost of dealing with complaints would be several billion pounds higher in the absence of a redress scheme.
“In that scenario, impacts on access to motor finance and prices for consumers could be significantly higher with uncertainty continuing for many more years.”