The Candela C-8 Polestar Edition electric boat has just crushed the previous record for distance sailed in 24 hours by an electric boat.
Swedish electric boat maker Candela’s C-8 electric hydrofoil boats are known for their extreme efficiency, soaring through the air with less than 1% of the boat actually touching the water. Flying on submerged hydrofoils, the Candela C-8 uses just 20% of the energy needed by other boats.
That means the boat can use significantly less on-board battery to go much farther than higher-power electric boats with much larger batteries than Candela’s. And since Candela partnered with Polestar to provide the batteries and charging system for the C-8, it can take advantage of DC fast charging for short recharge stops during a journey.
In this case, the team at Stockholm-based Candela wasn’t just trying to demonstrate how efficient a single charge could be, but also how important DC fast charging is for marine applications.
As the company explained:
The aim here was not to drive as far as possible on one charge, but really to see how far we could drive in a day, using DC charging to quickly top up the battery – something owners will do, as DC charging networks grow in the US, Norway and along the French/Italian riviera.
The Candela team traded off drivers throughout the day and night, and used a DC charger with a Voltpack mobile battery system from Northvolt. Together they managed to cover 420 nautical miles (483 miles or 778 km) in 24 hours. The previous record was held by the team at Voltari who traveled 79 nautical miles (91 miles or 146 km) from Florida to the Bahamas, performed all on a single charge.
To put Candela’s 420-nautical-mile trip into perspective, that’s like traveling from London to Amsterdam and back again. Or for our American audience, traveling from Tampa, Florida, to New Orleans, or from San Francisco to San Diego. Wow, I always forget how big California is.
“This feat shows that fast, electric waterborne transport over long distances is viable today, not a distant future,” said Gustav Hasselskog, Candela’s CEO and founder, who piloted the C-8 during the record attempt.
The total cost for electricity worked out to approximately €110 (US $117), with Candela saying that a conventional boat would have used at least €1,400 (US $1,490) of fuel for the same long-distance journey.
Perhaps more impressive than just the distance covered was the team’s speed, which averaged 17 knots (19.5 mph or 31.5 km/h) throughout the 24 hours, including time stopped to charge. By comparison, Voltari’s boat crawled along at just over trolling speeds of around 3.95 knots (4.5 mph or 7.3 km/h) to accomplish their feat, taking 18 hours to complete the Florida to Bahamas journey that most boats cover in two to three hours.
While underway, the Candela C-8 traveled at close to its maximum speed at around 27 knots (31 mph or 50 km/h). The route consisted of a loop between Stockholm and the island of Tynningö, stopping to DC fast charge after each loop.
Candela’s impressive feat was performed in collaboration with battery maker Northvolt and charging station supplier Plug, to showcase how future DC charging networks for boats could look. Instead of making heavy investments in upgrading the local grid, islands could deploy battery systems like Northvolt’s Voltpack to ensure that there’s enough power available for fast charging, which could be a more cost-effective and quicker solution.
In this case, Northvolt’s Voltpack stood on the dock outside Candela’s Frihamnen office. Connected to a DC charger from Plug, it recharged the Candela C-8 a total of 17 times over the 24-hour span.
“With a relatively modest investment, charging stations could be built to fully electrify marine transport in the Stockholm archipelago. For a few hundred million euros, a charging network covering Europe’s coastal passenger transports would become a reality,” stated Hasselskog.
Electrek’s Take
While the 420 nautical miles in 24 hours is the sexy part of this story, the true unsung hero is the DC fast charging that made all of this possible (and of course the whole “flying electric boat” thing, which is just more proof that we’re all living in the future).
The setup from Northvolt and Plug showed an interesting solution to provide DC fast charging facilities, even when the local grid isn’t set up to handle such power. Seeing these systems dropped on islands around popular boating destinations could immediately turn those areas into capable electric boat highways for long-distance travel.
Obviously, it helps if your boat can fly to go even farther on that charge, but even old-fashioned boats that have to touch the water can of course benefit from readily available marine DC fast charging.
Nice job, Candela!
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
With a new lineup of electrified vehicles, including plug-in hybrid (PHEV), hybrid, and EV models, Toyota is swinging for the fences. By offering every powertrain option, Toyota believes it has a better chance of hitting a home run. Will it hit it out of the park, or is Toyota setting itself up for a swing and a miss?
Toyota bets on new PHEV, hybrid, and EVs for growth
Toyota is the king of hybrids. When you see a Prius, you immediately recognize the brand. That’s because the compact hybrid has been around for over 25 years now.
As the industry shifts toward cleaner, more efficient options, Toyota is banking on PHEVs to drive growth. Plug-in hybrids are not a new thing for Toyota. The first Prius PHEV was introduced in the US in 2016.
Between Toyota and Lexus brand vehicles, the Japanese automaker offers 32 “electrified” cars in the US, which it claims to be the most of any automaker. In the first quarter, Toyota sold 112,608 electrified vehicles, accounting for nearly 50% of sales.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Over the next few years, the company anticipates a substantial increase in demand for plug-in hybrid vehicles in the US.
2026 Toyota bZ electric SUV (Source: Toyota)
In a recent interview with CNBC, David Christ, Vice President of Toyota Motor North America, said the company will “grow our PHEV volume through the lineup over the next few years.”
Sources claim that Toyota plans for PHEV sales to account for around 20% of US sales by 2030, up from the current 2.4%.
2026 Toyota RAV4 PHEV (Source: Toyota)
To boost the appeal, Toyota is “working to increase, perpetually increase, the amount of miles you can drive on EV-only range,” Christ explained.
The updated PHEV version of its best-selling RAV4, introduced last week, has 50 miles EV range. Although that’s up from 42 miles in the outgoing model, will it be enough?
2026 Toyota C-HR electric SUV (Source: Toyota)
Christ compared Toyota’s upcoming “electrified” lineup to having bases loaded in a baseball game. “We’ve got ICE. We’ve got hybrid. We got plug-in hybrid. We got EV,” he told CNBC, adding “So, our chances of being successful in scoring runs is just a lot better than if you’re really overly committed to any one of those power trains.”
Like a handful of other automakers, Toyota believes PHEVs will act as a “bridge” to 100% electric vehicles, but they also have some major drawbacks.
2026 Toyota Woodland electric SUV (Source: Toyota)
Since PHEVs are essentially a combination of an EV and a gas-powered vehicle, they require both technologies, which is significantly more costly. Toyota’s plug-in models cost thousands more than its hybrid or gas-powered vehicles.
The 2025 Toyota RAV4 PHEV ($44,265 MSRP) costs nearly $15,000 more than the base gas model and $12,000 more than the hybrid.
2026 Toyota C-HR electric SUV (Source: Toyota)
While it ramps up PHEV volume, Toyota has a handful of new EVs set to launch in the US. The updated bZ electric SUV (formerly known as the bZ4X) will arrive at US dealerships later this year, featuring increased range, new styling, and an NACS port to access Tesla Superchargers. In 2026, Toyota will launch the smaller C-HR and rugged bZ Woodland electric SUVs.
Electrek’s Take
Will Toyota’s big bet on hybrids and PHEVs pay off? With so many EVs hitting the market, which are much more advanced and efficient, it could be a big swing and a miss for Toyota.
Several Japanese automakers, including Nissan and Honda, are also banking on hybrids and PHEVs over the next few years.
Nissan believes its third-gen e-Power hybrid system will be its saviour, but it will likely be too little, too late, with BYD and other Chinese EV leaders rapidly launching more affordable, efficient tech and vehicles.
Since Toyota is already ahead of the game with several PHEV models on the market, it won’t be as costly, but it’s still delaying the inevitable.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Eight days after publicly unveiling a new Max variant of its already popular MONA M03 sedan, XPeng Motors has officially launched it in China at an insanely low price of RMB 139,800 ($19,400). For those prices, MONA M03 Max drivers will gain access to some of XPeng’s most advanced AI-centric technologies.
Less than a year ago, XPeng Motors gave the public its first hint at a new model that would become the MONA M03. After teasing us with brief images all summer, XPeng officially unveiled the MONA M03 in July 2024 before launching it in China at ultra-affordable prices.
For example, the M03 initially launched in three separate trims, priced at RMB 119,800 ($16,815), RMB 129,800 ($18,220), and RMB 155,800 ($21,870), respectively. The three variants – 515, 620, and 580 Max – refer to each MONA M03’s CLTC range (km), and the “Max” signifies the addition of XPeng’s smart driving ADAS capability.
The two lower-end trims of the MONA M03 began deliveries in August 2024 and have since propelled the model to the top-selling A-segment BEV sedan in China for eight consecutive months. By the end of March 2025, XPeng announced it had built 100,000 MONA EVs in seven months, hailing the milestone as a new record for passenger BEVs.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
During a public event in China on May 20, XPeng unveiled the new MONA M03 Max ahead of its formal launch, which began today.
Source: XPeng Motors
XPeng’s new MONA M03 variant is bang for small bucks
As we learned last year, MONA stands for “Made of new AI” and represents XPeng’s goal of delivering advanced AI technology to everyday customers. The new MONA M03 Max is a perfect example of this target, as it comes loaded with class-leading technology but at a price that most everyone can afford.
Not to mention some cool cosmetic features and functions to cater to the M03’s younger audience, 90% of which are below the age of 35, per XPeng Motors. Per XPeng Motors:
With AI innovation as its driving force, the MONA M03 Max brings industry-leading intelligent driving capabilities to the mainstream market. Combining class-leading advanced ADAS, a premium smart cockpit, and high-end smart features typically found in vehicles priced over RMB 200,000 ($27,760), the MONA M03 Max challenges conventional expectations of A-class vehicles — and ushers in a new era of truly accessible, high-level intelligent driving.
As reported earlier this month, the new MONA M03 Max features XPeng’s proprietary AI Turing Smart Driving System as a standard feature. The ADAS integrates perception, decision-making, and control into one holistic design powered by dual NVIDIA Orin X chipsets and monitored by 27 high-precision sensors and an ultra-HD surround reality display. Per XPeng, the system can accurately detect over 50 road elements and obstacles (see image above).
Unlike its MONA M03 siblings launched last year, the new Max variant also features XPeng’s AI Tianji 5.7.0 Smart Cockpit. Per the automaker:
The XPeng MONA M03 Max takes its intelligent cockpit to new heights with the debut of the upgraded AI Tianji System 5.7.0. Compared to the MONA M03 launched earlier in 2024, the new system adds over 300 new features. Empowered by XPeng’s self-developed XGPT large language model, voice interaction becomes more seamless than ever — expanding scenario coverage by 30% and enabling voice control for over 90% of the vehicle’s functions. This delivers an experience that outperforms even premium models priced above RMB 200,000.
Per XPeng, the MONA M03 will now come in four varying range options with the following pricing:
MONA M03 Trim
Range
Price
515 Plus
515 km (320 miles)
RMB 119,800 ($16,629)
620 Plus
620 km (385 miles)
RMB 129,800 ($18,017)
502 Max
502 km (312 miles)
RMB 129,800 ($18,017)
600 Max
600 km (373 miles)
RMB 139,800 ($19,405)
These M03 variants are all officially on the market in China. Per XPeng, there are no plans to sell this model outside of China at this time.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Tesla’s insurance products are currently unsustainable, according to a new report that shows the company is losing money insuring its own cars.
Tesla vehicles have long had a reputation for being expensive to insure.
The automaker tried to address the situation on multiple fronts. It launched its own “collision centers” to try to control repair costs, and it also introduced its own insurance products.
Tesla claims that no other insurer knows more about its technology and its owners than Tesla does, so the automaker should be able to offer more precise products.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
For the last few years, Tesla has been offering its own car insurance in some US states. The automaker utilizes its capacity to collect real-time driving data from its vehicles to create what it calls a “Safety Score. ” This score is based on how and when drivers drive, and the company increases or decreases their monthly premium accordingly.
The use of Tesla’s ADAS systems, Autopilot and Supervised Full Self-Driving, can also affect premiums.
Tesla owners have been reporting mixed results when trying to obtain lower quotes from Tesla compared to other insurers.
Now, data from S&P Global points to Tesla Insurance having significant problems:
An insurance company’s loss ratio is a key metric, as it represents the percentage of premiums paid out to customers. The higher it is, the more likely an insurer is likely to lose money.
Based on S&P Global’s latest data, Tesla’s was at 92.5% in 2023. This means that Tesla Insurance paid out 92.5 cents in claims for every dollar it collected in premiums.
After accounting for overhead costs, it means that Tesla was likely losing money on its insurance products.
This is quite interesting, as it directly contradicts Tesla’s claim that its vehicles are involved in crashes at a significantly lower rate than other vehicles and are relatively inexpensive to repair.
Neither of those claims can be true if insurance premiums are expensive.
If it were the case, insurance costs on Tesla vehicles would be going down, and Tesla would be making money with its insurance products.
Now, S&P claims that even the latter is not valid.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.