Connect with us

Published

on

Rumble has refused to follow in YouTube’s steps and demonetise Russell Brand after claims of sexual abuse were made against him.

The free-speech video streaming platform said it was “deeply inappropriate and dangerous” for Dame Caroline Dinenage, chair of the House of Commons media committee, to ask if they would stop Brand earning advertising revenue on Rumble.

The 48-year-old comedian, who found fame in stand-up comedy and on traditional TV, is thought to have made most of his money in recent years through uploading videos on YouTube and Rumble.

Brand has been barred from making money on YouTube after four women made allegations of rape and sexual assault against Brand in a joint investigation by The Sunday Times and Channel 4’s Dispatches – allegations he denies.

Russell Brand leaves the Troubabour Wembley Park theatre after performing a comedy set
Image:
Russell Brand leaves the Troubabour Wembley Park theatre after performing a comedy set

But his Rumble account, which has 1.42 million followers – the fifth most of anyone on the platform – will remain monetised.

In a statement, Rumble said the letter was “extremely disturbing”, adding: “While Rumble obviously deplores sexual assault, rape, and all serious crimes, and believes that both alleged victims and the accused are entitled to a full and serious investigation, it is vital to note that recent allegations against Russell Brand have nothing to do with the content on Rumble’s platform.

“We regard it as deeply inappropriate and dangerous that the UK Parliament would attempt to control who is allowed to speak on our platform or to earn a living from doing so.

More from UK

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

BBC director-general Tim Davie has revealed everyone in the industry is asking themselves, ‘could they have done more’ at the time.

“Singling out an individual and demanding his ban is even more disturbing given the absence of any connection between the allegations and his content on Rumble.

“Although it may be politically and socially easier for Rumble to join a cancel culture mob, doing so would be a violation of our company’s values and mission.

“We emphatically reject the UK Parliament’s demands.”

Click to subscribe to the Sky News Daily wherever you get your podcasts

What the ‘extremely disturbing’ letter said

In her letter to Rumble’s founder and chief executive, Chris Pavlovski, Dame Dinenage wrote: “While we recognise that Rumble is not the creator of the content published by Mr Brand, we are concerned that he may be able to profit from his content on the platform.

Read more:
Channel 4 boss addresses ‘horrendous’ Brand allegations
BBC to review comedian’s time at the broadcaster

“We would be grateful if you could confirm whether Mr Brand is able to monetise his content, including his videos relating to the serious accusations against him.

“If so, we would like to know whether Rumble intends to join YouTube in suspending Mr Brand’s ability to earn money on the platform.

“We would also like to know what Rumble is doing to ensure that creators are not able to use the platform to undermine the welfare of victims of inappropriate and potentially illegal behaviour.”

Rumble’s free-speech policy has made it popular among controversial commenters such as Andrew Tate, who claims he has a $9m (£7.3m) deal with the platform.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Alex Mahon said the allegations against Russell Brand were ‘horrendous’, ‘disgusting’ and ‘saddening’.

The allegations

Four women allege Brand assaulted them between 2006 and 2013.

This period marks the height of Brand’s fame – he was a presenter for the BBC and Channel 4 before becoming a high-profile Hollywood star.

The comedian vehemently denied “very serious criminal allegations” in a YouTube video on 15 September, claiming his relationships were “always consensual”.

You can see all the allegations made against Brand here.

Continue Reading

UK

Should some women offenders be spared jail? Female inmates reveal impact of prison

Published

on

By

Should some women offenders be spared jail? Female inmates reveal impact of prison

“Good luck, because it’s a shithole here,” a prisoner shouts as we walk around the grounds at HMP Foston Hall.

Other inmates described this women’s prison in Derbyshire as a “holiday camp”, even “rehab”.

There was no one homogenous view, but there is also not one type of prisoner here – it is home to both murderers and shoplifters.

We’ve come to talk to people ahead of the publication of the sentencing review in the coming days. It’s likely to recommend the scrapping of short sentences for some lower-level crimes, and suggest prison isn’t the best place to punish certain “vulnerable” groups of offenders, including women.

“My kind of theft, I nick chocolate from shops,” inmate Connie Parsons told us as we gathered in her cell.

She’s been convicted of shoplifting nine times and says she’s been in and out of prison since she was 15 years old.

“I normally only get four weeks, three weeks, two weeks. It’s a constant cycle of going out, committing crime,” she said.

Ask Mollie a question about this story

Connie Parsons
Image:
Connie has a teenage son but hasn’t seen him for years

At points, Parsons has been homeless and addicted to drugs.

“I used to just come to prison before to have a little lie down and get myself well… to keep myself safe,” she said. “But this prison, you’re not safe… I never self-harmed before I came to this prison. And now I self-harm quite a lot.”

She has a young teenage son on the outside. “I know this might sound harsh, but I think it’s got to the point now I don’t know what to miss about him. But I think about him every single day,” she said.

‘For lots of women, prison is the right place to be’

We put Parsons’ case to the prisons minister, Lord Timpson, who said it was “really sad to hear”, adding he sees “lots of people like Connie” in the prison system.

Pressed on how some will view Parsons as a repeat offender, perhaps deserving of prison, Lord Timpson said: “For lots of women, prison is the right place to be, but where there are certain circumstances, for example non-violent offences for women… you need to work out what is the right path to make sure they don’t commit further crime.”

Lord Timpson said for someone like Parsons, he’d like to see the use of an intensive supervision court or as he called it “problem-solving court”. These work by judges monitoring the progress of offenders on community sentences, offering “wraparound” support, including housing, help for addiction issues and mental health.

Tilat Ajmal
Image:
Tilat Ajmal served less than three months


Prisoner leaves with jail on her CV

“I had a job, I ain’t got a job now,” said Tilat Ajmal.

Before she went to prison, Ajmal worked for the NHS as a cleaner for 18 years.

As we filmed, she was leaving jail after serving less than three months for smuggling an item into prison while visiting someone. It was her first offence.

Her bags were packed, and in them was a CV she’d prepared. But she didn’t seem hopeful.

“I think it’s a bit bad having a conviction, I’ve been working all my life,” she said.

“As soon as coming out of them gates, I think you just have hundreds and thousands of things going through your head.”

‘Just enough time to rip their lives apart’

After we filmed at the prison, Sky News joined a support session at a women’s centre in Nottingham. It offers mandatory services to people serving sentences in the community, and also those on probation or licence periods.

I asked a case worker to explain why certain women offenders should be considered unique in the criminal justice system.

“I think what happens when a man goes to prison is that there is usually a woman holding everything together,” said Rachel Strong.

“He will be released from prison, his home will still be there, his family. He may have lost his job but there will be someone there. He will come out to his support network in place.

“That woman is that support network – so when she goes to prison, there’s nobody holding that together. People will lose their homes, sometimes their children are taken into care.

“Usually when women are sent to prison it’s for short sentences. Not enough time for anything productive, just enough time to rip their lives apart.”

Donna Pritchards
Image:
Donna Pritchards

‘It’s like rehab’

“I don’t mind prison, it’s like rehab,” said Donna Pritchards, who has been to HMP Foston Hall three times.

“I know you get clean when you’re here, and I needed it.”

Drugs are ‘main issue’ in prison

Others told us it was “easy” to get hold of drugs inside jail, with one prisoner describing some leading a “life of luxury”, with jail being like a “holiday camp”.

Amanda Brewer, drug strategy lead, told us: “Illicit drugs are our main issue day to day in everything that we do.

“They’re the main drivers for violence, they can cause self-harm issues, they cause vulnerability.”

Prisoners are also “trading” prescription drugs between one another.

‘Prison is not a nice place to be’

As the government explores greater use of alternatives to custody and scrapping certain short prison sentences, I asked the prisons minister whether criminals might see their approach as a “soft touch”.

“Prison is not a nice place to be,” said Lord Timpson, “but they need to turn their lives around there.”

The government commissioned the sentencing review alongside the creation of the Women’s Justice Board because they have an overcrowding crisis across the prison estate. But they also fundamentally believe prison isn’t the best form of punishment for certain types of offenders.

Women offenders in England and Wales are likely to be disproportionately impacted by the recommendations made in the review.

That’s because we expect it to suggest the scrapping of certain short sentences. In 2022, the Prison Reform Trust found over half (58%) of terms given to women were for less than six months.

Women are also considered by ministers to be a “vulnerable” group, with prison having a knock-on impact on their lives and potential for reoffending. Many report being a victim of crimes like domestic abuse, and 55% of female prisoners are mothers.

After two days of rare and unique access to different parts of the criminal justice system, it’s clear many feel prison isn’t working for female offenders. But what exactly a greater use of alternatives to custody looks like will take some time to figure out.

Continue Reading

UK

The King and Queen unveil new portraits commemorating their coronation

Published

on

By

The King and Queen unveil new portraits commemorating their coronation

New portraits of the King and Queen, commissioned to commemorate their coronation in 2023, have been unveiled.

The two separate full-length paintings of Charles and Camilla were made by artists Peter Kuhfeld and Paul Benny, respectively.

King Charles and Queen Camilla unveil their official Coronation State Portraits during a visit to the National Gallery.
Pic Reuters
Image:
Pic: Reuters

The artists were personally chosen by the King and Queen, who were joined at the unveiling by Camilla’s daughter Laura Lopes.

Mr Kuhfeld, who has known the monarch for more than 40 years, added he hopes his depiction of Charles captured both “the man and the King”.

Mr Benny also said about the Queen: “She said nothing but wonderful things about it, more importantly Laura liked it – you know when the kids like it, you’re probably on the right track.”

Pic: PA PORTRAIT
Pic: PA PORTRAIT
Image:
Pics: PA

Their portraits will be hung in the National Gallery until 5 June, before moving to their permanent home in Buckingham Palace’s Throne Room.

On 6 May two years ago, the monarch and his wife were crowned at Westminster Abbey, in a ceremony watched by millions.

More on King’s Coronation

Charles, 76, was the country’s longest-serving heir to the throne, ascending after Queen Elizabeth II died in September 2022.

Read more from Sky News:
Vardy agrees to pay almost £1.2m of Rooney’s legal costs
The Royal Family, huge crowds, a military parade and a flypast
Donald Trump denies posting image of himself as pope

He vowed at the time: “That promise of lifelong service I renew to you all today.”

Continue Reading

UK

Boy, 13, dies after jumping into canal

Published

on

By

Boy, 13, dies after jumping into canal

A 13-year-old boy has died after being pulled from a canal.

The teenager failed to surface after jumping into the canal at Clapperbrook Lane East, Exeter, on Monday, 5 May, Devon and Cornwall police said.

Emergency services were called to the scene at around 4.35pm, with police, fire, and ambulance services in attendance.

The boy was pulled from the water and received first aid before being taken to hospital in serious condition, where he later died.

His next of kin have been informed, officers said in a statement.

Read more from Sky News:
Boy, 14, mistakenly arrested during terror plot investigation
Legal Aid Agency hit by cyber security incident

Acting Superintendent Chris Conway said: “This is an awful and tragic incident, and we offer our condolences to the family who are being supported by specialist officers.

More on Exeter

“We would ask that the privacy of the family is respected as they come to terms with their devastating loss.”

Police said the teenager’s death is not being treated as suspicious.

Continue Reading

Trending