Russell Brand faces new allegations he ‘laughed’ on radio show after ‘exposing himself to woman’
The BBC has said it is looking into allegations by a woman who claimed Russell Brand exposed himself to her and then laughed about it afterwards on his BBC radio show.
Brand, 48, has previously been accused of rape, sexual assault and abuse by four other women with the alleged offences taking place between 2006 and 2013.
The comedian and presenter has denied the claims, which were first reported by the Sunday Times and Channel 4’s Dispatches, saying his relationships were “always consensual”.
The Metropolitan Police subsequently said it had received a sexual assault allegation against Brand dating back to 2003.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
Brand: ‘Could we have done more?’
Brand’s latest accuser is a woman – who the BBC is calling ‘Olivia’ to protect her identity – who accuses Brand of sexual misconduct in 2008.
The alleged incident is the first time he has been accused of sexual misconduct and then heard talking about it, according to BBC News.
And it raises serious questions for the corporation about how that part of the show, which was pre-recorded, was able to be broadcast just days later, BBC News reported.
‘I said no, no, no’
Olivia claimed Brand exposed himself to her 15 years ago in Los Angeles while she was working in the same building as the BBC.
She said she answered the door to Brand and his team, who were there to pre-record an episode of The Russell Brand Show for Radio 2, on 16 June 2008.
Olivia said she went into the bathroom and then noticed Brand behind her.
In her account to the BBC, Brand said he was going to have sex with her and she said “no, you’re not”.
She claimed he then showed her his genitals “and I said no, no, no”.
Olivia said Brand then put his genitals back in his trousers and the bathroom door was shut when there was a “banging” noise, with someone saying “Russell, you are wanted in the radio studio”.
Read more:
The allegations in full
Stars’ past warnings resurface
From drug addict to controversial comedy star
Accuser says she felt ‘disgusted’ after incident
Olivia said she returned to her desk in disbelief at what had happened, and texted a BBC employee in the office about it.
She said the employee told her that he knew what had happened because Brand was talking about it in the studio, BBC News reported.
It also reported Olivia had later tracked down the recording after recent allegations against Brand emerged.
The radio episode, which aired on 21 June 2008, featured an exchange between Brand and his colleague Matt Morgan who said, “[It’s been] 25 minutes since he showed his w**** to a lady” and referred to “the receptionist”.
Brand is apparently heard laughing in the recording.
Olivia, who has never worked as a receptionist, said she felt disgusted when she heard the audio had not been cut out.
Olivia never made a complaint, according to the BBC News report, which added BBC management was informed about the incident in 2019, but no formal action was taken.
Click to subscribe to the Sky News Daily wherever you get your podcasts
BBC to investigate
A BBC spokesperson said: “We’re very sorry to hear of these allegations and we will look into them.
“We are conducting a review to look at allegations of this nature and if the woman who has shared her story is willing to speak to us, we would be very keen to hear from her and anyone else who may have information.
“A key part of the review is to understand what complaints were made at the time, if there was knowledge of Russell Brand’s conduct while he worked on BBC radio, and what was done as a result. We will of course speak to the bureau team and anyone who was working there in 2008 as part of this.
“Further, the Director General [Tim Davie] has been very clear that some broadcasts from that period were, and are, inexcusable and totally unacceptable, and would never be aired today.”
Matt Morgan said in a statement reported on BBC News: “I was not aware until now of the nature of this encounter. I’ve expressed my regrets now looking back at the impact of the show and this is a further example.
“The recent coverage has been very distressing to read and I reiterate my absolute condemnation of any form of the mistreatment of women”
Sky News has reached out to Brand’s representatives for comment.
Britain loves chocolate.
We’re estimated to consume 8.2kg each every year, a good chunk of it at Christmas, but the cost of that everyday luxury habit has been rising fast.
Whitakers have been making chocolate in Skipton in North Yorkshire for 135 years, but they have never experienced price pressures as extreme as those in the last five.
“We buy liquid chocolate and since 2023, the price of our chocolate has doubled,” explains William Whitaker, the real-life Willy Wonka and the fourth generation of the family to run the business.
William Whitaker, managing director of the company
“It could have been worse. If we hadn’t been contracted [with a supplier], it would have trebled.
“That represents a £5,000 per-tonne increase, and we use a thousand tonnes a year. And we only sell £12-£13m of product, so it’s a massive effect.”
Whitakers makes 10 million pieces of chocolate a week in a factory on the much-expanded site of the original bakery where the business began.
Automated production lines snake through the site moulding, cutting, cooling, coating and wrapping a relentless procession of fondants, cremes, crisps and pure chocolate products for customers, including own-brand retail, supermarkets, and the catering trade.
Steepest inflation in the business
All of them have faced price increases as Whitakers has grappled with some of the steepest inflation in the food business.
Cocoa prices have soared in the last two years, largely because of a succession of poor cocoa harvests in West Africa, where Ghana and the Ivory Coast produce around two-thirds of global supply.
A combination of drought and crop disease cut global output by around 14% last year, pushing consumer prices in the other direction, with chocolate inflation passing 17% in the UK in October.
Skimpflation and shrinkflation
Some major brands have responded by cutting the chocolate content of products – “skimpflation” – or charging more for less – “shrinkflation”.
Household-name brands including Penguin and Club have cut the cocoa and milk solid content so far they can no longer be classified as chocolate, and are marketed instead as “chocolate-flavour”.
Whitakers have stuck to their recipes and product sizes, choosing to pass price increases on to customers while adapting products to the new market conditions.
“Not only are major brands putting up prices over 20%, sometimes 40%, they’ve also reduced the size of their pieces and sometimes the ingredients,” says William Whitaker.
“We haven’t done any of that. We knew that long-term, the market will fall again, and that happier days will return.
“We’ve introduced new products where we’ve used chocolate as a coating rather than a solid chocolate because the centre, which is sugar-based, is cheaper than the chocolate.
“We’ve got a big product range of fondant creams, and others like gingers and Brazil nuts, where we’re using that chocolate as a coating.”
The costs are adding up
A deluge of price rises
Brazil nuts have enjoyed their own spike in price, more than doubling to £15,000 a tonne at one stage.
On top of commodity prices determined by markets beyond their control, Whitakers face the same inflationary pressures as other UK businesses.
“We’ve had the minimum wage increasing every year, we had the national insurance rise last year, and sort of hidden a little bit in this budget is a business rate increase.
“This is a small business, we turn over £12m, but our rates will go up nearly £100,000 next year before any other costs.
“If you add up all the cocoa and all the other cost increases in 2024 and 2025, it’s nearly £3m of cost increases we’ve had to bear. Some of that is returning to a little normality. It does test the relevance of what you do.”
The UK is to rejoin the European Union’s Erasmus student exchange scheme, according to reports.
The popular programme allowed Britons to spend a year studying at European universities as part of their degree, without paying extra fees, and vice versa for their European counterparts.
It ended for British students after Brexit on 1 January 2021 and was replaced by the Turing scheme.
But ministers could announce the UK will rejoin Erasmus from January 2027 as soon today, The Times and The Guardian have reported.
How did we get here?
Sir Keir Starmer promised a post-Brexit reset deal with Brussels and announced the government was working on rejoining the programme in May.
Negotiations have included work on “mutually agreed financial terms” for the UK and the EU.
The UK had pushed for a discount on membership fees, which are calculated on the basis of a country’s gross domestic product (GDP), The Times reported.
It said the EU is understood to have offered the government a 30% reduction of fees in the first year of membership.
Labour MP Darren Frith told Sky News’ Politics Hub he would “welcome” such a move.
The Guardian reported that, as well as university-based study exchanges, British students will be able to participate in vocational training placements under the scheme.
Cabinet Office minister Nick Thomas-Symonds held talks with Maros Sefcovic, the European Commission’s trade lead, in Brussels last week.
A Cabinet Office spokesman said: “We are not commenting on ongoing talks.”
‘Fantastic opportunities for students’
But the UK’s universities welcomed the apparent breakthrough.
Tim Bradshaw, chief executive of the Russell Group of leading universities, said: “We’re delighted at the UK’s association to Erasmus+.
“With an even greater scope than previous programmes, Erasmus+ opens up fantastic opportunities for students, adult learners and young people to all benefit from new experiences and learning.
“It will also renew the huge contributions that EU students and staff make to life on our university campuses.”
The Lib Dems, who have been campaigning to rejoin Erasmus, welcomed the news.
Leader Sir Ed Davey said: “This is a moment of real opportunity and a clear step towards repairing the disastrous Conservative Brexit deal.”
Resident doctors across England begin a five-day strike this morning over pay and jobs, marking the 14th walkout by them since March 2023.
It coincides with the record number of flu cases in England and NHS leaders warning of a “huge strain on hospitals” and strikes causing “further disruption and delays”.
Resident doctors are striking in England from 7am today until 7am on Monday 22 December.
Sir Keir Starmer called the action “irresponsible” while Health Secretary Wes Streeting has rejected the British Medical Association’s (BMA) pay demands, accusing the union of a “shocking disregard for patient safety”.
But the BMA insists its strike is “entirely avoidable” and has demanded a “credible offer” to avert “real-terms pay cuts”.
Why are resident doctors on strike?
The government says resident doctors have already received an average pay rise of 28.9% over the past three years (2023-24 to 2025-6).
But the BMA has been demanding an additional 26% pay uplift to restore what they say amounts to erosion in their earnings, once inflation is taken into account. Although there is some dispute about the extent of the real terms fall, because of the BMA’s use of the Retail Price Index (RPI) in its calculation.
Hopes that the strike could be averted were dashed on Monday when the BMA said 83% of resident doctors rejected a fresh proposal from the government.
While it did not include any extra pay, the offer included the fast expansion of specialist training posts; covering out-of-pocket expenses such as exam fees; and offering to extend the union’s strike mandate to enable any walkout to be rescheduled to January.
What if I need urgent medical care?
The Department of Health and Social Care says it is important people do not avoid seeking urgent care, and should use 999 if it is a serious or life-threatening emergency. For everything else, there is NHS 111 or the NHS App.
It adds that patients should turn up for planned appointments unless they have been told otherwise. Any appointments that need to be rescheduled will be given priority.
During strikes, there are exemptions or special arrangements, called derogations, which allow certain essential services to continue operating. It means critical services will be maintained to ensure patient safety and prevent serious harm.
How much do resident doctors earn?
There are many different types of resident doctor in England with different levels of pay. Full Fact, which has crunched the numbers, said they currently earn between £38,831 and £73,992 a year, but that does not take into account extra pay for unsociable hours.
Full Fact states that resident doctors typically get between a quarter and a third more than their basic salary from other sources.
This takes estimated average earnings (in the year ending August 2025) to between £45,846 and £81,061 (although the government claims the figures are more like £49,000 to £97,000).
Comparisons with other countries are difficult because of how doctors are categorised. Broadly, resident doctors in England earn about the same as those in Ireland and anything between 1% less and 26% more than in New Zealand.
But doctors in Australia earn somewhere between 23% and 48% more than their counterparts in England.
What has the reaction been?
The prime minister has said the strike comes “on the back of a very substantial pay increase in the last year or so”.
“I think it’s irresponsible action by the BMA,” he told MPs.
The health secretary called for doctors to ignore the strike and criticised what he called the “fantasy demand for another 26% pay rise,” adding that “it reveals the BMA’s shocking disregard for patient safety”.
Dr Jack Fletcher, chairman of the BMA’s resident doctors’ committee, said the strikes were “entirely avoidable”. He added that “we should start negotiating, and the government should stop game-playing”.
But organisations representing NHS trusts have been scathing about the walkouts. Daniel Elkeles, chief executive of NHS Providers, said: “Trust leaders and staff will be working now to minimise the impact of the strike, but sadly it will mean further disruption and delays.”
Meanwhile, Rory Deighton, acute and community care director at the NHS Confederation, said: “These strikes come at the worst possible time, with rapidly rising flu levels putting huge strain on hospitals.”
What about public support for strikes?
Public support for the strikes is low, according to a YouGov poll released last week.
The results showed 58% of those asked either somewhat or strongly opposed the industrial action, while 33% somewhat or strongly supported it.
-
Sports2 years agoStory injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports3 years ago‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports2 years agoGame 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports3 years agoButton battles heat exhaustion in NASCAR debut
-
Sports3 years agoMLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment3 years agoJapan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment1 year agoHere are the best electric bikes you can buy at every price level in October 2024