Connect with us

Published

on

Armed officers from other forces will be drafted in to support the Metropolitan Police as it faces a revolt.

Soldiers are also on standby after scores of Met Police officers stood down from firearms duties following a murder charge against one of their colleagues.

The force said “a number of officers have taken the decision to step back from armed duties while they consider their position” and “that number has increased over the past 48 hours”.

“To ensure that we can continue to keep the public safe and respond to any eventualities, from Saturday evening Met firearms officers will be supported by a limited number of armed officers from other UK forces,” the Met Police added.

The crisis has emerged after a police officer was charged with murder over the shooting of 24-year-old Chris Kaba, who was killed in September last year in Streatham Hill, south London.

CHRIS KABA
Image:
A police officer has been charged with the murder of Chris Kaba (pictured)


The officer accused of his murder is named only as NX121 after a district judge granted an anonymity order.

The force’s commissioner Sir Mark Rowley welcomed a review into the situation by Home Secretary Suella Braverman to ensure armed officers “have the confidence to do their job”.

It was also backed by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, who said armed officers need “clarity” about their legal powers.

Speaking to broadcasters during a visit to a community centre in Hertfordshire, Mr Sunak said armed officers are “making life or death decisions in a split-second to keep us safe” and “they deserve our gratitude for their bravery”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Will police get better legal protection?

He added: “Now it is important when they are using these legal powers that they do so with clarity, and they have certainty about what they are doing, especially given the lethality they are using.

“That is why the home secretary has asked her department to review the guidance that the officers are operating under to make sure it is robust and that it commands the confidence, not just of the officers, but of the public as well.

“Obviously it wouldn’t be right for me to speculate on ongoing cases, but that is what we are doing.”

What legal protections do armed police officers have?

Most police officers in the UK do not routinely carry firearms. Where firearms support is needed, it is carried out by specially accredited firearms officers (AFOs) who are trained, including to assess intelligence and threats.

Duties include responding to high-risk incidents; taking part in operations where intelligence suggests firearms support may be required; providing public reassurance at events; providing enhanced and ballistic medical aid to help save lives and working closely with partners, including the military.

Despite making important and often time-critical decisions, they are still accountable under the law for their actions.

Under the law, armed police officers have the right to discharge a firearm to make a lawful arrest, defend themselves from unlawful violence and to protect others from harm – if they have reasonable grounds for believing there is an imminent danger to life.

The Home Office code of practice on police use of firearms in England and Wales stipulates “all force used must be reasonable in the circumstances”.

In Scottish law, a police officer is not entitled to discharge a firearm against a person unless the officer has reasonable grounds for believing that the person is committing – or about to commit – an action likely to endanger the life or cause serious injury to the officer or any other person, and there is no other way to prevent the danger.

As with all use of force by police officers, if the force used results in death, then the European Convention of Human Rights only allows “the use of force which is no more than absolutely necessary”.

The question of whether a use of force was absolutely necessary in the circumstances is one that depends to a large degree on the facts of the individual case.

The onus is on the individual officer to justify their actions in court.

‘London isn’t as safe as it was’

Tony Long, a former firearms officer with the Met Police, told Sky News London is now a less safe city, saying: “The only reason [Sir Mark Rowley is paying attention now] is because… they’ve withdrawn their services because of their concerns, and he’s left with a situation where he’s having to call in the military.

“He’s having to get much-lesser-trained officers to step up to do jobs that they’re literally not trained to do, and at the same time, try and convince you all… it’s business as usual.

“It isn’t business as usual – the public in London are not as safe as they would be if armed response vehicles, officers and counter-terror specialist firearms officers were being allowed to do their job.”

Read more:
Met chief’s letter to home secretary in full
Will this force change in how police shootings are reported?

‘Public expects us to be held to highest standards’

In his letter, Sir Mark suggested legal changes over the way self-defence is interpreted in police misconduct cases, the introduction of a criminal standard of proof for unlawful killing in inquests and inquiries, and changes to the threshold at which the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) can launch an investigation.

“It is essential that we have a system which commands the confidence of officers and the communities they serve,” he wrote.

“Of course, where wrongdoing takes place, the public expect us to be held to the highest standards.

“I have been clear on this in all areas of policing, and the use of force must be no exception.

“The system that judges officers’ actions should be rooted in integrity and decisions should be reached swiftly, competently and without fear or favour.

“A review is needed to address accountability mechanisms, including the policies and practices of the Independent Office for Police Conduct and the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), ideally with a focus on the threshold for investigating police use of force and involvement in pursuits.”

Continue Reading

UK

Badenoch has done enough to hold off her critics – for now

Published

on

By

Badenoch has done enough to hold off her critics - for now

Kemi Badenoch strode onto the conference stage to deliver a speech focused on how her party would cut national spending and painstakingly rebuild the economy after the “doom loop” of a Labour government.

The headline moment was a pricey home-owning rabbit pulled out of the hat, a pledge to scrap stamp duty in a paean to the Conservative dream of property ownership: a promise delivered to delighted applause.

Politics latest: Tories react to stamp duty announcement

The party claims the cost of abolishing tax duty on people’s primary residences would be around £9 billion – a considerable chunk of the £23 billion in cuts the party are pledging to find from the welfare budget.

It’s a clear statement of Conservative intent, delivered with a new-found confidence from a woman who has faced months of speculation about her leadership.

Shadow business secretary Andrew Griffith, shadow environment secretary Victoria Atkins, and shadow housing secretary Sir James Cleverly enjoying the moment. Pic: PA
Image:
Shadow business secretary Andrew Griffith, shadow environment secretary Victoria Atkins, and shadow housing secretary Sir James Cleverly enjoying the moment. Pic: PA

Unlike many of her previous speeches, this one didn’t dwell on the previous government’s mistakes.

Indeed, she said she wanted to celebrate the “great things” her party had done in 14 years in power – delivering Brexit, supporting Ukraine, and halving the deficit from 2010 to 2020.

The economic record of the past four years of Conservative government was unsurprisingly left unsaid. But the subtext has been clear throughout conference – a drive to rebuild the party’s reputation for economic competence following the economic disaster of Liz Truss’s mini-budget three years ago.

Now we’re told “only the Conservatives” can be trusted with the economy and border security, with Badenoch highlighting her “golden rule” of government spending aimed at reducing the deficit, reiterating the shadow chancellor’s promises to slash government spending by £47bn.

Kemi Badenoch with her husband, Hamish, after the speech. Pic: PA
Image:
Kemi Badenoch with her husband, Hamish, after the speech. Pic: PA

Unlike Sir Keir Starmer and Sir Ed Davey, Badenoch chose not to focus her attacks on Reform UK – conscious that many of her supporters are drawn to Nigel Farage’s ideas.

She doesn’t want to risk alienating them even further- particularly after a conference where we’ve seen a steady stream of local councillors announcing their defection from the Tories to Reform.

There were a few gentle jokes at their expense, highlighting Reform’s pledges to both slash taxes and expand public spending.

She claimed Farage is planning a free beer giveaway – and “shaking the same magic money tree” as Labour and the Lib Dems. But she didn’t repeat the “socialist” attack line we’ve heard from other Tories on Reform this conference.

Read more:
What I learned from my tetchy exchange with Kemi Badenoch
Jenrick ‘merely pointing out fact’ about not seeing white faces

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

In full: Badenoch keynote speech

The driving force of this speech was an attack on the government, and a pledge to “clear up the mess left by Labour” – on the economy, on border security, and on sleaze.

Her Churchillian claim that “never in the field of human history have so many been let down by so few” earned her loud guffaws from the hall – followed by a roll-call of scandal-hit Labour figures – from former British Ambassador to the US Peter Mandelson to recently resigned deputy prime minister Angela Rayner.

The hall was full – and the party faithful keen to applaud.

They enjoyed Badenoch highlighting the challenge faced by the Tories in drawing a rather melodramatic equivalence with the fight against fascism in the Second World War, and the battle to “banish socialism and deliver prosperity” in the 1980s – evoking both Sir Winston Churchill and her political hero Margaret Thatcher.

They loved her declaration of undying love for the Conservative party, who she described as her family – “in many ways quite literally”, given that she married the deputy chairman of her local Conservative association.

Badenoch doesn’t enjoy the level of devotion we’ve seen for her defeated leadership rival Robert Jenrick, who earned rapturous applause for his speech attacking activist judges on Tuesday – and polling shows he’s much more popular with the party membership.

But CCHQ will undoubtedly be relieved to have avoided the kind of outright rebellion we saw from Andy Burnham at Labour’s conference last week.

And given the delighted response from her headline announcement in the hall today – it looks like Badenoch has done enough to hold off her critics – at least for the time being.

Continue Reading

UK

Huge surge in online hate crimes targeting footballers revealed

Published

on

By

Huge surge in online hate crimes targeting footballers revealed

Suspected online hate crimes referred to police have quadrupled already this season in English football, Sky News can reveal.

And we have learned that the football policing unit has urged the government to form a new unit to address racism in the sport.

We have also uncovered new details about the police investigation into the hate received by England star Jess Carter, who revealed to me after the Euros final win that the abuse nearly forced her to stop playing at the tournament.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Lioness Jess Carter: ‘It’s been tough’

But the scale of racism facing footballers is highlighted by the abuse received by Kira Rai – a British Sikh Punjabi – after signing for Peterborough United last month.

They play in the fourth tier, far from the spotlight of the Women’s Super League, but that does not limit the venom targeted at Rai on social media.

She told Sky News: “There were some racial slurs about my heritage, where I come from, that I don’t belong in this country, that I should go back to X country and just sorts of things along those lines.

“I think that’s probably quite difficult to read about yourself at the end of the day.

“It should be a moment for me to celebrate, I’ve just joined a new club.”

What an impact she has made at her new club, scoring an incredible five-minute hat-trick in the FA Cup on Sunday on her home debut.

But the joy is tinged with sadness when we meet the next day.

‘A reflection of society’

“I’ve been in football since I was six, so for people to question whether I belong in football purely based on the colour of my skin, I think is something that’s really difficult to get your head round,” she said.

“It’s probably a reflection of what’s going on in society right now and how prevalent racism has become, and I think football is quite clearly a reflection on society.

“In society, over the last weeks, months, I think there’s almost an underlying tension that’s perhaps not been there in recent years.”

Kira Rai, who plays for Peterborough United, suffered racial slurs about her heritage
Image:
Kira Rai, who plays for Peterborough United, suffered racial slurs about her heritage

‘Depressing’ rise in racism

The is felt by the police unit that has overseen football issues for the last two decades, with racism in stadiums and online rising.

Social media is a growing concern, with 170 referrals already this season of online racism compared to 54 in the first three months of the 2022-23 season and 41 in 2023-24.

“We’re seeing more reports, which is depressing,” Chief Constable Mark Roberts said in an exclusive interview.

“I think we’re also seeing that the number of those reports that actually meet the criminal threshold has increased.”

It’s up to 154 already this season.

Chief Constable Mark Roberts says reports of abuse which meet the criminal threshold has increased
Image:
Chief Constable Mark Roberts says reports of abuse which meet the criminal threshold has increased

Incidents ‘creeping back’ into stadiums

“There’s an awful lot in the political sphere that people are saying that probably a few years ago just wouldn’t have been thought of, so I think it taps into that broader societal piece which makes it challenging,” the National Police Chiefs Council’s football lead added.

“Sadly that seems to have gone backwards a bit. The lower league grounds now, we are seeing incidents creep back into the games which obviously we’ve got to be really keen to clamp down on and make sure that people face consequences.

“Now whether that’s been driven by people being able to say things or feel that they can say things online and that’s now leaking into the actual stadiums, there is a definite trend to see more of it.”

One of the unit’s most high-profile investigations has been into the racism that led Carter to speaking out during England’s run to Euro 2025 and stepping away for a time from social media.

While two arrests have been announced, Sky News can reveal a third person has been arrested. A fourth suspect has also been identified, and six people overseas are under suspicion.

Carter previously told Sky News: “I wasn’t sure I was going to be able to come back on the pitch and be me.”

No one has been charged.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

FA considering social media boycott over racism

‘Slippage’ with Musk’s X

Three cases are pending with Elon Musk’s X.

And whether it’s X or Meta-owned Instagram, there is no agreement on the “grossly offensive legal threshold” with policies more tolerable than British law.

Mr Roberts said: “There has been some slippage recently with X that we’re working with them to try to get back to those standards. And I think one of the factual issues we sometimes struggle with is our perception of what is clearly a criminal offence.

“They can sometimes suggest that it doesn’t meet the threshold for their community guidelines, which I find difficult to reconcile really because surely if it meets the criminal prosecution threshold, surely it should breach [their guidelines], and we sometimes have a wrangle about securing information from them.”

England's Jadon Sancho (L), Marcus Rashford (R) and Bukayo Saka were racially abused after missing penalties during the 2021 Euros final. Pic: AP
Image:
England’s Jadon Sancho (L), Marcus Rashford (R) and Bukayo Saka were racially abused after missing penalties during the 2021 Euros final. Pic: AP

A challenge is dealing with international police forces with two-thirds of referrals of racism generated overseas – beyond the jurisdiction of the football policing unit.

While not naming particular countries, Mr Roberts said abuse posted from Eastern Europe and Asia is the main problem.

“The level of interest from some countries varies,” he said. “Some just aren’t interested. We won’t get a response. Others will try and take positive action.”

The approach of English football can seem somewhat disjointed if different campaigns and anti-racism investigations run by different parts of the game.

Read more from Sky News:
Antoine Semenyo backs jailing abusers
FA could boycott social media over racism
Tennis star denies being racist

For Mr Roberts, that could ideally be enhanced.

“I would like a joint function to tackle online hate with ourselves, the football bodies, Kick It Out and others, ideally supported by government, so that we can do it in a really coherent, joined-up way,” he said in our interview at Cheshire Police HQ.

“I think that would make a massive difference, whether it’s education, whether in-stadium hate, whether it’s online hate.

“The way we’re going to tackle this most effectively is by doing it in a joined-up way where we’re mutually supportive. So I think that’s something we’d be keen to pursue.”

So would those who have been the target of abuse just for doing what they love – playing football.

‘No one wants to talk about this’

Kira Rai, a role model for British South Asians in football, said: “Perhaps there needs to be an overhaul, everyone needs to come together and actually deal with these uncomfortable conversations because they’re not necessarily fun conversations that we have.

“No one really wants to talk about this, and I can understand why. For real change, for genuine change to actually occur, you have to have these difficult conversations.

“You have to listen to player stories, to fan stories, to anyone’s stories in football, in society, to actually get to the bottom of it.”

And as some players showed last weekend in the Women’s Super League, change doesn’t come by taking a knee, but taking a stand.

Continue Reading

UK

Millions of people could each get hundreds of pounds in compensation over car loan mis-selling

Published

on

By

Millions of people could each get hundreds of pounds in compensation over car loan mis-selling

Up to 14.2 million people could each receive an average of £700 in compensation due to car loan mis-selling, the financial services regulator has said.

Nearly half (44%) of all car loan agreements made between April 2007 and November 2024 could be eligible for payouts, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) said.

Those eligible for the compensation will have had a loan where the broker received commission from a lender.

Lenders broke the law by not sharing this fact with consumers, the FCA said, and customers lost out on better deals and sometimes paid more.

A scheme is seen by the FCA as the best outcome for consumers and lenders, as it avoids the courts and the Financial Ombudsman Service, therefore minimising delay, uncertainty and administration costs.

The scheme will be funded by the dozens of lenders involved in the loans, and cost about £8.2bn, on the lower end of expectations, which had been expected to reach as much as £18bn.

The figure was reached by estimating that 85% of eligible applicants will take part in the scheme.

More from Money

What if you think you’re eligible?

Anyone who believes they have been impacted should contact their lender and has a year to do so. Compensation will begin to be paid in 2026, with an exact timeline yet to be worked out.

The FCA said it would move “as quickly as we can”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Payouts due after motor finance scandal

People who have already complained do not need to take action. Complaints about approximately four million loan agreements have already been received.

There’s no need to contact a solicitor or claims management firm, the FCA said, as it aimed for the scheme to be as easy as possible.

A lender won’t have to pay, however, if it can prove the customer could not have got cover anywhere else.

The number of people who will get a payout is not known. While there are 14.2 million agreements identified by the FCA, the same person may have taken out more than one loan over the 17-year period.

More expensive car loans?

Despite the fact many lenders have to contribute to redress, the FCA said the market will continue to function and pointed out the sector has grown in recent years and months.

In delivering compensation quickly, the FCA said it “can ensure that some of the trust and confidence in the market can be repaired”.

It could not, however, rule out that the scheme could mean fewer offers and more expensive car loans, but failure to introduce a scheme would have been worse.

Read more:
UK steel set for further hit as EU to double tariffs
Is another spectacular Bitcoin comedown inevitable?

The FCA said: “We cannot rule out some modest impacts on product availability and prices, we estimate the cost of dealing with complaints would be several billion pounds higher in the absence of a redress scheme.

“In that scenario, impacts on access to motor finance and prices for consumers could be significantly higher with uncertainty continuing for many more years.”

Continue Reading

Trending