Connect with us

Published

on

Hong Kong regulators are looking to tighten the noose around the crypto market after arresting six individuals following allegations of fraud around an unlicensed crypto exchange, JPEX. The government intends to increase its efforts to inform investors and remind them only to utilize platforms granted Securities and Futures Commission licenses. 

Meanwhile, Thailand’s Revenue Department plans to impose personal income tax on foreign revenues, including those from crypto trading, of any person residing in Thailand for more than 180 days. Under the previous regulation, only foreign income remitted to Thailand in the year of earning was taxed. The new rule closes this loophole and obligates an individual to declare any income earned overseas, even if it wasn’t used in the local economy.

In Brazil, lawmakers are also pushing to acknowledge crypto as a part of personal financial assets — but for another reason. Lawmakers in the National Congress of Brazil aim to include digital assets in an amendment to a bill that aims to protect the private savings of individuals up to an amount equal to 40 minimum wages from potential seizure on behalf of creditors. In a note to the congressional Committee on the Constitution, Justice and Citizenship, Deputy Felipe Francischini said, “Nowadays, people’s investment behavior changed, with the traditional savings account losing ground to other forms of financial investment.”

The House of Lords approves the bill to seize stolen crypto in the U.K.

A bill aiming to expand the ability of authorities in the United Kindom to target illicit cryptocurrency usage has been pushed to the final stages for approval by the House of Lords. The Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill, introduced in September 2022, will return to the lower chamber of the British parliament, the House of Commons, which will either decide to accept the proposed amendments or recommend further changes to the bill.

Continue reading

Sam Bankman-Fried’s parents officially enter the FTX court saga

Debtors of the bankrupt cryptocurrency exchange FTX have launched legal action against the parents of exchange founder Sam Bankman-Fried, alleging that they misappropriated millions of dollars through their involvement in the exchange’s business. The counsel for FTX debtors and debtors-in-possession, represented by the law firm Sullivan & Cromwell, filed a lawsuit against SBF’s parents, Joseph Bankman and Barbara Fried. 

The plaintiffs argued that Bankman and Fried exploited their access and influence within the FTX empire to enrich themselves at the expense of the debtors in the FTX bankruptcy estate. The debtors alleged that SBF’s parents were “very much involved” in the FTX business from inception to collapse, contrary to what SBF has claimed.

Continue reading

The House Committee approves the U.S. Anti-CBDC bill 

The CBDC Anti-Surveillance State Act, aimed at preventing “unelected bureaucrats in Washington” from issuing a central bank digital currency (CBDC), has taken one step further on its procedural journey after it passed the House Financial Services Committee. That means the bill will next face a congressional vote.

The bill contains provisions preventing the United States Federal Reserve from issuing a CBDC to individuals and barring the Fed from utilizing any CBDC to implement monetary policy. In his recent interview with Cointelegraph, Representative Tom Emmer called digital assets a “sleeper issue” in U.S. politics, both at the state and federal levels.

Continue reading

Continue Reading

Politics

Labour’s dilemma: The two-child benefit cap

Published

on

By

Labour's dilemma: The two-child benefit cap

The two-child benefit cap: To scrap or not to scrap?

There is an ongoing row in the Labour Party about welfare spending and how to cut it while maintaining protections for the most vulnerable.

Those on the left are suspicious of anything that may look or smell like balancing the books on the backs of the poorest in society.

Those on the other side point to an unsustainable welfare bill that has been allowed to balloon under the Conservatives and looks set to continue under Labour.

Rachel Reeves will have to weigh up finding between £3bn and £4bn to scrap the cap, or face the wrath of Labour MPs on small majorities who believe they were elected to deliver on ‘Labour values’ like lifting this very cap.

But perhaps there is a compromise the chancellor could opt for, which may placate the left of her party while needing less cash.

For example, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies, lifting the cap from two to three children would cost £2.6bn; or a tapered system, where parents got the full amount for the first two kids and then half the amount for any subsequent children, would cost around £1.8bn.

But Labour big beast David Blunkett – the only senior Labour figure against lifting the cap – wants to see a more nuanced approach.

Blunkett believes the cap ought to remain, but he wants there to be exemptions for disabled children and parents who have been widowed, and he would prefer the government to focus on anti-child poverty measures and improving pathways to work for parents, all paid for by a tax on gambling – something former prime minister Gordon Brown has been agitating for.

Read more:
What is the two-child benefit cap?
What tax rises could Rachel Reeves announce?

At a time when the government perpetually reminds us of how little money it has and how much strain public finances are under due to austerity, finding several billion to scrap a policy that is broadly popular with the public may seem like an unwise move.

According to the latest polling from YouGov, 59% of the public are in favour of keeping the cap in place, and only 26% thought it should be abolished.

But politically, the chancellor is aware of the strength of feeling within her party about reducing child poverty as soon as possible, and her colleague, the Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson, has stressed the party has a “moral mission” to tackle child poverty.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Why did Labour delay their child poverty strategy?

Irrespective of what Reeves chooses, her political woes do not end there.

Taxes are set to go up in the budget later this month, and Reeves has refused to rule out breaking her manifesto promise of not raising taxes on working people.

This combined with persistently disappointing voter intention polling for Labour, could spell deep dissatisfaction among the public.

A decision to lift the two-child benefit cap may boost morale among Labour MPs, but if it’s not enough to prevent the loss of hundreds of political foot soldiers in May’s local elections, Reeves and Sir Keir Starmer will need to find more red meat to throw to their party before too long.

Continue Reading

Politics

Jurors ask pointed questions in MEV bot trial as deliberations proceed

Published

on

By

Jurors ask pointed questions in MEV bot trial as deliberations proceed

Jurors ask pointed questions in MEV bot trial as deliberations proceed

As deliberations entered their second day in a criminal trial over a $25 million exploit, jurors asked for clarification on previous testimony and the definition of “good faith.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Stablecoin yield debate: US Treasury gets conflicting advice on GENIUS Act

Published

on

By

Stablecoin yield debate: US Treasury gets conflicting advice on GENIUS Act

Stablecoin yield debate: US Treasury gets conflicting advice on GENIUS Act

While Coinbase insists that the US Treasury cannot override Congress’s intent on the GENIUS Act, banks continue to press for a blanket ban on stablecoin interest.

Continue Reading

Trending