Connect with us

Published

on

The Metropolitan Police says it no longer needs soldiers who were on standby as armed officers stepped back from duties.

Firearms specialists from other forces will still be drafted in to support the Met during the revolt, which stems from a decision to charge an armed officer with murder.

However, the force said enough firearms officers have now returned for it to be able to meet its counterterrorism responsibilities without military help.

Earlier, the Met said “a number of officers have taken the decision to step back from armed duties while they consider their position” and “that number has increased over the past 48 hours”.

“To ensure that we can continue to keep the public safe and respond to any eventualities, from Saturday evening Met firearms officers will be supported by a limited number of armed officers from other UK forces,” the force added.

The crisis has emerged after a police officer was charged with murder over the shooting of 24-year-old Chris Kaba, who was killed in September last year in Streatham Hill, south London.

Chris Kaba was killed in September 2022 in Streatham Hill, south London
Image:
A police officer has been charged with the murder of Chris Kaba (pictured)


The officer accused of his murder is named only as NX121 after a district judge granted an anonymity order.

The force’s commissioner Sir Mark Rowley welcomed a review into the situation by Home Secretary Suella Braverman to ensure armed officers “have the confidence to do their job”.

It was also backed by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, who said armed officers need “clarity” about their legal powers.

Speaking to broadcasters during a visit to a community centre in Hertfordshire, Mr Sunak said armed officers are “making life or death decisions in a split-second to keep us safe” and “they deserve our gratitude for their bravery”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Will police get better legal protection?

He added: “Now it is important when they are using these legal powers that they do so with clarity, and they have certainty about what they are doing, especially given the lethality they are using.

“That is why the home secretary has asked her department to review the guidance that the officers are operating under to make sure it is robust and that it commands the confidence, not just of the officers, but of the public as well.

“Obviously it wouldn’t be right for me to speculate on ongoing cases, but that is what we are doing.”

What legal protections do armed police officers have?

Most police officers in the UK do not routinely carry firearms. Where firearms support is needed, it is carried out by specially accredited firearms officers (AFOs) who are trained, including to assess intelligence and threats.

Duties include responding to high-risk incidents; taking part in operations where intelligence suggests firearms support may be required; providing public reassurance at events; providing enhanced and ballistic medical aid to help save lives and working closely with partners, including the military.

Despite making important and often time-critical decisions, they are still accountable under the law for their actions.

Under the law, armed police officers have the right to discharge a firearm to make a lawful arrest, defend themselves from unlawful violence and to protect others from harm – if they have reasonable grounds for believing there is an imminent danger to life.

The Home Office code of practice on police use of firearms in England and Wales stipulates “all force used must be reasonable in the circumstances”.

In Scottish law, a police officer is not entitled to discharge a firearm against a person unless the officer has reasonable grounds for believing that the person is committing – or about to commit – an action likely to endanger the life or cause serious injury to the officer or any other person, and there is no other way to prevent the danger.

As with all use of force by police officers, if the force used results in death, then the European Convention of Human Rights only allows “the use of force which is no more than absolutely necessary”.

The question of whether a use of force was absolutely necessary in the circumstances is one that depends to a large degree on the facts of the individual case.

The onus is on the individual officer to justify their actions in court.

‘London isn’t as safe as it was’

Earlier, former firearms officer with the Met Police, Tony Long, told Sky News that the action has made London less safe, saying: “The only reason [Sir Mark Rowley is paying attention now] is because… they’ve withdrawn their services because of their concerns, and he’s left with a situation where he’s having to call in the military.

“He’s having to get much-lesser-trained officers to step up to do jobs that they’re literally not trained to do, and at the same time, try and convince you all… it’s business as usual.

“It isn’t business as usual – the public in London are not as safe as they would be if armed response vehicles, officers and counter-terror specialist firearms officers were being allowed to do their job.”

Read more:
Met chief’s letter to home secretary in full
Will this force change in how police shootings are reported?

‘Public expects us to be held to highest standards’

In his letter, Sir Mark suggested legal changes over the way self-defence is interpreted in police misconduct cases, the introduction of a criminal standard of proof for unlawful killing in inquests and inquiries, and changes to the threshold at which the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) can launch an investigation.

“It is essential that we have a system which commands the confidence of officers and the communities they serve,” he wrote.

“Of course, where wrongdoing takes place, the public expect us to be held to the highest standards.

“I have been clear on this in all areas of policing, and the use of force must be no exception.

“The system that judges officers’ actions should be rooted in integrity and decisions should be reached swiftly, competently and without fear or favour.

“A review is needed to address accountability mechanisms, including the policies and practices of the Independent Office for Police Conduct and the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), ideally with a focus on the threshold for investigating police use of force and involvement in pursuits.”

Continue Reading

UK

Husband describes ‘horror’ as wife fatally hit by van at golf course after police chase

Published

on

By

Husband describes 'horror' as wife fatally hit by van at golf course after police chase

A husband has described how he watched in “helpless horror” as his wife was fatally hit by a van at a golf course after the vehicle was involved in a police chase.

Suzanne Cherry, 62, died in hospital four days after she was struck on the morning of 11 April, Staffordshire Police said.

Two patrol cars had been following the grey Nissan van in Kingstanding, Birmingham, after receiving reports of suspicious activity, according to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC).

They stopped chasing the van when it came off the road and went up an embankment at Aston Wood Golf Club, where it hit Ms Cherry, of Aldridge, Walsall.

In a statement released by police, Ms Cherry’s husband – who was not named – paid tribute to his “beautiful wife” and said her death leaves an “unfillable void” in the lives of her family.

“While enjoying what should have been the safest of one of Suzanne’s many activities, I watched in helpless horror as the life of my beautiful wife and our future together was snatched away in an instant,” he said.

Ms Cherry’s husband said she had “an amazing and infectious zest for life”, adding: “Suzanne leaves a legacy and an unfillable void in the lives of her mother Maureen, her three adult children, two step-children and countless others from her work, her sporting activities and social circle.

“Sue was loved, and will be painfully missed by her entire family and friends, we ask that our privacy at this difficult time be respected.”

Read more from Sky News:
London-born teenager set to become a saint – here’s how
The Who drummer rejoins band days after departure

Officers from three different forces have arrested six men in connection with the incident.

The IOPC is continuing to investigate the circumstances before the collision.

Police are continuing to appeal for witnesses to come forward.

Continue Reading

UK

Prince Andrew joins King and Queen at Easter Sunday church service

Published

on

By

Prince Andrew joins King and Queen at Easter Sunday church service

Prince Andrew was among members of the royal family who attended the traditional Easter Sunday service in Windsor.

It is the second year in a row that the Duke of York has joined the King and Queen at St George’s Chapel, appearing to enter the chapel quickly after his eldest brother’s arrival.

Other members of the royal family, including Princess Anne, the Duke and Duchess of Edinburgh, Princess Eugenie and Princess Beatrice and Andrew’s ex-wife Sarah Ferguson, also gathered outside the church.

The Duke of York leaves after attending the Easter Mattins service at St George's Chapel in Windsor Castle, Berkshire. Picture date: Sunday April 20, 2025.
Image:
The Duke of York leaving St George’s Chapel. Pic: PA

William and Kate did not attend the annual service, deciding instead to spend time with their children, George, Charlotte and Louis, in Norfolk before they go back to school.

Crowds wished the King and Queen a Happy Easter as they left the chapel, with two children presenting Camilla with a bunch of flowers, before they were driven away.

King Charles III and Queen Camilla attend the Easter Mattins service at St George's Chapel in Windsor Castle, Berkshire. Picture date: Sunday April 20, 2025.
Image:
King Charles and Queen Camilla arriving at St George’s chapel. Pic: PA

The Princess Royal speaks with the Dean of Windsor, the Right Rev Christopher Cocksworth, as she arrives for the Easter Mattins service at St George's Chapel in Windsor Castle, Berkshire. Picture date: Sunday April 20, 2025.
Image:
The Princess Royal. Pic: PA

Andrew was seen glancing at a member of the crowd, who wished him a “Happy Easter” before the duke walked off with his ex-wife.

The duke has not been pictured at a formal royal family event since last Easter. He missed the royal family’s traditional Christmas gathering at Sandringham amid the controversy surrounding his links to an alleged Chinese spy.

He disappeared from public life after stepping down from official duties in March 2020, following his explosive TV interview with BBC’s Newsnight.

The Duchess of Edinburgh followed by Princess Eugenie and her husband Jack Brooksbank and Princess Beatrice arrive for the Easter Mattins service at St George's Chapel in Windsor Castle, Berkshire. Picture date: Sunday April 20, 2025.
Image:
The Duchess of Edinburgh followed by Princess Eugenie and Princess Beatrice. Pic: PA

Sarah, Duchess of York, waves to the crowd as she attends the Easter Mattins service at St George's Chapel in Windsor Castle, Berkshire. Picture date: Sunday April 20, 2025.
Image:
Sarah Ferguson. Pic: PA

The Easter sermon is traditionally led by the Archbishop of Canterbury, but was today led by the Archbishop of York, Stephen Cottrell, from York Minster.

Mr Cottrell has temporarily taken over the role after Justin Welby announced he was stepping down in November last year, after an independent review found he “could and should” have reported decades-long abuse of men and young boys by his former friend, the barrister John Smyth QC.

Mr Cottrell has also apologised for his handling of the case.

King Charles III and Queen Camilla leave after attending the Easter Mattins service at St George's Chapel in Windsor Castle, Berkshire. Picture date: Sunday April 20, 2025.
Image:
Pic: PA

Queen Camilla waves to the crowd as she holds a posy after attending the Easter Mattins service at St George's Chapel in Windsor Castle, Berkshire. Picture date: Sunday April 20, 2025.
Image:
The Queen waves to crowds in Windsor. Pic: PA

King’s message of ‘faith, hope and love’

Last year’s Easter Sunday service was the King’s first major public appearance after he announced his cancer diagnosis.

The 76-year-old monarch is still receiving treatment for cancer, and last month, spent a short period of time in hospital after experiencing temporary side effects.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

King and Queen attend Maundy service

In his Easter message – a tradition he started when he was the Prince of Wales – Charles reflected on the examples of “great cruelty and great kindness” that “daily come before our eyes” – saying they should remind the world of the importance of the “virtues of faith, hope and love”.

Read more from Sky News:
Pope blesses Easter crowds
London-born teenager to become a saint

He shared the message last week ahead of attending the annual Maundy service at Durham Cathedral, where he presented the Maundy recipients – 76 men and 76 women – with two purses: one red and one white, containing Maundy Money.

The ancient tradition traces back to the 13th century and is given to recipients in recognition of outstanding Christian service and work in their local communities.

Continue Reading

UK

Police appeal over ‘senseless’ damage to seven statues during trans rights rally in London

Published

on

By

Police appeal over 'senseless' damage to seven statues during trans rights rally in London

Police are appealing for information after seven statues – including one of suffragette Millicent Fawcett – were daubed with graffiti during a trans rights rally in London.

The Metropolitan Police said the criminal damage took place during the protest in Parliament Square, Westminster, on Saturday.

Thousands of people had gathered for an “emergency demonstration” following the Supreme Court ruling earlier this week on the definition of a woman.

The words “Trans rights are human rights” were written on a statue of South African statesman Jan Christian Smuts.

Graffiti on the statue of South African statesman Jan Christian Smuts in Parliament Square. Pic: PA
Image:
Graffiti on the statue of South African statesman Jan Christian Smuts in Parliament Square. Pic: PA

The Met Police said officers were trawling CCTV footage and no arrests have been made as yet.

Chief Superintendent Stuart Bell said: “Criminal damage and vandalism like this has no place on the streets of London and spoils the area for locals and those visiting.

“While the police support the public’s right to protest, criminality like this is senseless and unacceptable. We are pursuing this and will take action against those responsible.”

Pic: PA
Image:
Graffiti on the statue of Millicent Fawcett. Pic: PA

Mr Bell said there were plans to remove the graffiti “but this requires specialist equipment and we are confident this will be done shortly”.

“We are keen to speak to those who saw anything on the day and urge anyone with information, pictures or footage to come forward,” he added.

The force has not shared details of which seven statues were defaced. Parliament Square is home to 12 statues of political figures including Winston Churchill, Abraham Lincoln and Mahatma Gandhi.

Protesters demonstrate in Westminster in support of the transgender community. Credit: Daniel Bregman
Image:
Thousands of protesters joined the rally on Saturday. Pic: Daniel Bregman

The Met said it was also dealing with a number of complaints from the public about signs and images shared on social media that were reportedly displayed at the protest.

The force said while officers were investigating the displayed signs and images, they had so far proved to be from historic events, did not take place in London, or did not constitute a criminal offence.

The protest followed a long-awaited judgment delivered on Wednesday, when the UK’s highest court ruled the terms “woman” and “sex” in the Equality Act 2010 “refer to a biological woman and biological sex”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Gender ruling – How it happened

It essentially means trans women who hold gender recognition certificates are not women in the eyes of the law.

This means transgender women with one of the certificates can be excluded from single-sex spaces if “proportionate”.

The UK government said the unanimous decision by five judges brought “clarity and confidence” for women and service providers.

Continue Reading

Trending