Connect with us

Published

on

Russell Brand has accused the government of trying to “bypass” the judicial system after his YouTube channel was demonetised in the wake of sexual abuse allegations against him.

In a livestream video on Rumble the comedian also accused the “legacy media” of being in “lockstep” with each other to “support a state agenda” and “silence independent media voices”.

It comes after four women made allegations of rape, sexual assault and abuse against the star between 2006 and 2013 as part of an investigation by The Times, The Sunday Times and Channel 4’s Dispatches.

Another woman, speaking to Sky News, alleged Brand “ripped holes” in her tights and “refused to call her a taxi until she performed a sex act”.

The Metropolitan Police says it has received a number of sexual offence claims about Brand following the publication of the original accusations.

The 48-year-old denies all the allegations against him, says all his relationships were consensual, and has not been charged with any criminal offences.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Woman ‘felt trapped’ by Brand relationship

Speaking in his livestream, entitled “Are we being silenced? The battle for free speech”, he said: “You know I’ve been demonetised on YouTube. You are aware that the government wrote to social media platforms to demand that I be further censored.

More on Russell Brand

“In a sense, the bypassing of judicial process, right to punitive measures, financial ones, seems like an interesting stance for a government minister to be suggesting to a big tech platform.”

Taking aim at the government, “legacy media” and big tech platforms, he said: “What we appear to be looking at here are a set of collaborating institutions that have an agenda, and pursue that agenda, even when in pursuing it they have to bypass, obstruct, or absolutely ignore existing judicial or regulatory bodies by moving straight to punitive measures.”

Rumble refuses to demonetise Brand

Before the first allegations were published, Brand published a video insisting his relationships had always been consensual.

On Friday, he released a second clip on Rumble in which he claimed the British government had “asked big tech platforms to censor our online content”.

YouTube, owned by Google, demonetised Brand’s channel in the wake of the allegations against him.

However, Rumble, a video site popular with some conservatives and far-right groups, has not demonetised Brand.

Dame Caroline Dinenage, chair of the House of Commons media committee, wrote to Rumble to ask if it would be stopping Brand earning advertising revenue on the platform.

In her letter to Rumble’s founder and chief executive, Chris Pavlovski, Dame Dinenage wrote: “We would be grateful if you could confirm whether Mr Brand is able to monetise his content, including his videos relating to the serious accusations against him.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

C4 boss: Brand allegations ‘disgusting’

“If so, we would like to know whether Rumble intends to join YouTube in suspending Mr Brand’s ability to earn money on the platform.

“We would also like to know what Rumble is doing to ensure that creators are not able to use the platform to undermine the welfare of victims of inappropriate and potentially illegal behaviour.”

‘Deeply inappropriate’

In a statement, the site refused to demonetise Brand’s channel and described the letter as “deeply inappropriate and dangerous”.

“While Rumble obviously deplores sexual assault, rape, and all serious crimes, and believes that both alleged victims and the accused are entitled to a full and serious investigation, it is vital to note that recent allegations against Russell Brand have nothing to do with the content on Rumble’s platform,” the platform said in a statement.

Read more:
Channel 4 boss addresses ‘horrendous’ Brand allegations
BBC to review comedian’s time at the broadcaster

“We regard it as deeply inappropriate and dangerous that the UK Parliament would attempt to control who is allowed to speak on our platform or to earn a living from doing so.

“Singling out an individual and demanding his ban is even more disturbing, given the absence of any connection between the allegations and his content on Rumble.

Click to subscribe to the Sky News Daily wherever you get your podcasts

“Although it may be politically and socially easier for Rumble to join a cancel culture mob, doing so would be a violation of our company’s values and mission.

“We emphatically reject the UK Parliament’s demands.”

Police receive ‘number of claims’

On Monday, the Metropolitan police said a number of sexual offence claims relating to London and elsewhere in the UK had been made against Brand.

The London force said the allegations were all non-recent.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Russell Brand denies ‘serious allegations’

A statement said: “Following an investigation by Channel 4’s Dispatches and The Sunday Times, the Met has received a number of allegations of sexual offences in London.

“We have also received a number of allegations of sexual offences committed elsewhere in the country and will investigate these.”

There have been no arrests and enquiries continue.

Continue Reading

UK

PPE Medpro partners open to settlement over £122m COVID gowns contract breach

Published

on

By

PPE Medpro partners open to settlement over £122m COVID gowns contract breach

Partners of a company linked to Baroness Michelle Mone have said they are open to a possible settlement with the government after the company was found to have breached a £122m PPE contract.

The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) had accused PPE Medpro of providing 25 million “faulty”, non-sterile gowns during the COVID pandemic.

The High Court ruled earlier this month that it must pay back a £121.9m sum, the price of the gowns.

PPE Medpro, a consortium led by Lady Mone‘s husband Doug Barrowman, filed to enter administration earlier this month.

In a statement on Friday, Mr Barrowman said: “The consortium partners of PPE Medpro are prepared to enter into a dialogue with the administrators of the company to discuss a possible settlement with the government.”

PPE Medpro has spent £4.3m defending its position.

It said offers to settle on a no-fault basis had been made, including the remake of 25 million gowns, or a £23m cash equivalent, which were rejected.

More on Michelle Mone

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Sky’s Paul Kelso analyses scandal surrounding Baroness Mone

The consortium was awarded government contracts by the former Conservative administration to supply personal protective equipment (PPE) during the pandemic after Lady Mone recommended it to ministers.

It insists that it provided all 25 million gowns and disputes that the gowns were not sterile.

It is understood the partners want to resolve the issue, and administrators have been urged to approach the government to reach an agreement.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Reeves welcomes ruling on PPE contract breach

Read more:
Can PPE Medpro afford to pay back govt?

Baroness Mone: I have no wish to rejoin Lords
Baroness Mone ‘should resign’ from Lords

In the High Court ruling, Mrs Justice Cockerill said the gowns “were not, contractually speaking, sterile, or properly validated as being sterile”. This meant they could not be used in the NHS.

Barristers for PPE Medro claimed it had been “singled out for unfair treatment” and accused the government of “buyer’s remorse”.

Michelle Mone recommended the firm, led by husband Doug Barrowman, to minsters. Pic: PA
Image:
Michelle Mone recommended the firm, led by husband Doug Barrowman, to minsters. Pic: PA

It claimed the gowns had become defective because of the conditions they were kept in after being delivered. It also said the court made its ruling on a technicality.

Lady Mone branded the judgement a win for the “establishment”, while Mr Barrowman said it was a “travesty of justice”.

Baroness Mone, who created the lingerie brand Ultimo, was made a Conservative peer in 2015.

She now says she has “no wish to return” to the House of Lords.

Continue Reading

UK

Women risking breast cancer by ‘always putting ourselves last’, says Liz Hurley

Published

on

By

Women risking breast cancer by 'always putting ourselves last', says Liz Hurley

Liz Hurley has encouraged women to check themselves for breast cancer – and warned some are not because they “are scared that it’s self-indulgent to spend time on themselves”.

The British actress and model, who has been a global ambassador for the Estee Lauder Companies’ Breast Cancer Campaign for 30 years, told Sky News’ Jacquie Beltrao the demands of everyday life mean women “always put ourselves last”.

“We’re doing stuff for kids, for husbands, for mothers, for in-laws. There’s so much that we have to do that we tend to come last,” she said.

Hurley, whose grandmother died of breast cancer, said she finds it helps by thinking of breast checks as a way to “keep ourselves healthy in order to continue to take care of everybody else”.

That way, it “doesn’t seem self-indulgent or taking time away from something else, it seems really important”.

Checking one’s breasts “takes two minutes”, she added, or “about the same length of time as brushing your teeth”.

Hurley speaking to Sky's Jacquie Beltrao
Image:
Hurley speaking to Sky’s Jacquie Beltrao

More than a third of women in the UK do not take up the first mammogram appointment they are offered, and a recent study of 500,000 women from Sweden found a similar non-attendance rate there.

More on Cancer

More than 11,000 people die from breast cancer every year in the UK, or 31 each day, Cancer Research UK said.

That makes it the second most common form of cancer death, accounting for 7% of all cancer deaths, the charity said.

Asked whether some of the messaging had “fallen on deaf ears”, Hurley said attending screenings, which are free on the NHS, is “definitely advised”, and she suggested all women should familiarise themselves with their breasts.

In the past, the illness was seen as “a disease for older ladies. And we didn’t understand that younger women also get diagnosed. That’s been a lot in the news lately”, Hurley said.

“There appear to be more women, younger women being diagnosed. And that could well be one of the reasons is that people are more breast aware, more self-aware.”

Read more on Sky News:
Men must ‘demand cancer test’
Warning of millions of new cancer cases

She told Ms Beltrao, who is a breast cancer survivor, people “have seen you on television talking about breast cancer”.

As a result of more awareness, she said, women have “begun to understand that it can never be too early to start checking your own breasts and to familiarise yourself [with them].

“When you’re younger and you’re not yet having regular mammograms, you do really have to be aware of your own breasts to be able to see if there’s a change, feel if there is a change and go to your doctor.”

Continue Reading

UK

‘New era’ for British passports as King’s coat of arms appears on cover 

Published

on

By

'New era' for British passports as King's coat of arms appears on cover 

The King’s coat of arms will be on the front of all new British passports from December, the Home Office has announced. 

The inside pages have also been updated to include images of natural landscapes from all four UK nations, including Ben Nevis, the Lake District, Three Cliffs Bay, and the Giant’s Causeway.

The Home Office said the new passport is the first wholly new design in five years, and it will be the “most secure passport ever produced”.

It will include the latest anti-forgery technology, including new holographic and translucent features.

The updated features will improve verification and make passports significantly more resistant to forgery or tampering, the Home Office said.

The bio page of the new UK passport. Pic: PA
Image:
The bio page of the new UK passport. Pic: PA

Migration and citizenship minister Mike Tapp said: “The introduction of His Majesty’s arms, iconic landscapes, and enhanced security features marks a new era in the history of the British passport.

“It also demonstrates our commitment to outstanding public service – celebrating British heritage while ensuring our passports remain among the most secure and trusted in the world for years to come.”

More from UK

The Home Office has confirmed that passports bearing Queen Elizabeth II‘s coat of arms will remain valid until their printed expiry date.

Read more from Sky News:
Liam Gallagher among stars at Ricky Hatton funeral
Migrant with AK-47 tattoo found guilty of threatening to kill Farage

However, it advised travellers to check their passports’ validity and renew them well in advance of any upcoming trips.

The first modern British passport was introduced over a hundred years ago, in 1915.

Continue Reading

Trending