Connect with us

Published

on

Home Secretary Suella Braverman has called for a reform of the international asylum system, saying it is no longer fit for purpose.

Speaking in Washington DC, Ms Braverman outlined how she believed the current system was “outdated”.

She branded the number of displaced people in the world as an “epoch-defining challenge” – the same language the government uses to describe China.

Read more: Sir Ed Davey announces big cancer plan – politics latest

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Being gay isn’t enough to claim asylum’

Uncontrolled and illegal migration is an “existential challenge for the political and cultural institutions of the West”, she said, adding that “uncontrolled immigration, inadequate integration, and a misguided dogma of multiculturalism have proven a toxic combination for Europe over the last few decades”.

The speech was panned by NGOs, campaigners and politicians, with Amnesty International saying it was “a display of cynicism and xenophobia”.

Part of her speech criticised how current levels of migration have led to “undermining the stability and threatening the security of society” in “extreme cases”.

More on Conservatives

She said: “We are living with the consequence of that failure today. You can see it play out on the streets of cities all over Europe. From Malmo, to Paris, Brussels, to Leicester.”

“If people are not able to settle in our countries, and start to think of themselves as British, American, French, or German, then something is going badly wrong,” she added.

Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge

Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge

Sky News Monday to Thursday at 7pm.
Watch live on Sky channel 501, Freeview 233, Virgin 602, the Sky News website and app or YouTube.

Tap here for more

Ms Braverman said “we now live in a completely different time” to 1951 when the UN Human Rights Convention was signed.

She went on: “Is the Refugee Convention in need of reform?

“What would a revised global asylum framework look like?

“How can we better balance national rights and human rights, so that the latter do not undermine national sovereignty?”

Read more:
Braverman orders review into ‘political activism’ in policing
Govt not ruling out electronic tagging to control migrants

Ms Braverman also questioned whether courts have redefined asylum to be granted for people suffering “discrimination” instead of “persecution” – especially in the context of someone who is gay or a woman.

“Where individuals are being persecuted, it is right that we offer sanctuary?

“But we will not be able to sustain an asylum system if in effect, simply being gay, or a woman, and fearful of discrimination in your country of origin, is sufficient to qualify for protection.”

‘The need is not for reform’

The UN’s refugee agency, the UNHCR, responded to Ms Braverman’s speech by saying the convention “remains as relevant today as when it was adopted in providing an indispensable framework for addressing those challenges, based on international co-operation”.

“The need is not for reform, or more restrictive interpretation, but for stronger and more consistent application of the convention and its underlying principle of responsibility-sharing,” it added.

Punchy home secretary landing blows ahead of party conference

It is no surprise to hear Suella Braverman talking tough on immigration.

Even so, today’s language is particularly punchy.

She talks about the “obvious threat to public safety and national security” illegal immigration poses and says “nobody entering the UK by boat from France is fleeing imminent peril”.

There has been backlash already, unsurprisingly, from charities and NGOs. One man who crossed the Channel in 2019 (fleeing Iran) told me the home secretary has “turned her back” on those in need.

It is criticism the home secretary is used to. Beyond the ethics, though, there is the question of whether anything she says will actually shift the dial.

The most eye-catching part of the Home Secretary’s speech was her call to reform the UN Refugee Convention. She says the convention, set up after the Second World War, needs to adapt for a “different time” and its application has shifted too far from helping people fleeing “persecution” to those fleeing “discrimination”.

It’s not clear there is any appetite to reform the convention from the 140+ other countries signed up to it. It won’t fix the small boats problem any time soon.

She also spoke about the importance of deterrents: Rwanda and the Illegal Migration Bill. The Rwanda plan has been bogged down in court, and there is no proof yet that government legislation will work. Small boat crossings are down from last year, but they are still much higher than 2021. Last month, more than 800 people crossed the channel in a single day.

Suella Braverman pointed to polling showing most red wall voters want to stop small boat crossings “using any means necessary”. She did not point to the recent YouGov poll suggesting 86% believe the government is handling immigration badly.

Her speech may not distract from the perils of the government’s illegal migration policy, but it certainly sends a message ahead of the Conservative Party conference.

“An appropriate response to the increase in arrivals and to the UK’s current asylum backlog would include strengthening and expediting decision-making procedures.

“This would accelerate the integration of those found to be refugees and facilitate the swift return of those who have no legal basis to stay.

“UNHCR has presented the UK Government with concrete and actionable proposals in this regard and continues to support constructive, ongoing efforts to clear the current asylum backlog.”

The speech and its contents were met with criticism from a range of charities, MPs and campaigners.

Ben Bradshaw, a gay Labour MP and former cabinet minister, asked if any “LGBT or any other Tories” were prepared to condemn the home secretary, adding that “being gay is enough to result in persecution or death in many countries”.

Michael Fabricant, a Tory MP and a patron of the Conservative LGBT+ group, said that “if someone simply claims to be gay in order to seek asylum, that should not lift the bar to entry to the UK”.

Read more:
Debate over Refugee Convention is vital to protect the most vulnerable

Braverman has leadership ambitions – but her rhetoric risks backfiring

He added: “However, if someone has experienced persecution from the country from which they are escaping, it presents a different and far more persuasive case. Each application should be considered carefully on its merits.”

Fellow Conservative MP David Davis said “it is perfectly reasonable to ask why there are so many migrants”, but looking at the origin of where people come from – and influencing factors like Western foreign policy and wars in such regions, should also be taken into account.

Braverman ‘spot on’

Ms Braverman’s junior in the Home Office, Robert Jenrick, supported her speech – saying the authors of the international laws criticised by the secretary of state would be “appalled” with how the system is now mired in organised criminality and exploited by economic migrants.

Tory MP Scott Benton said Ms Braverman was “absolutely spot on”, adding that “she’s right to highlight the need for reform and the British public are with her on this issue and so many others”.

Lord Dubs, the Labour peer, who arrived in the UK as a child refugee from the Nazis in Czechoslovakia, said that Ms Braverman’s comments were “shocking”.

“In many countries being gay is an imprisonable offence. For some, it means the death penalty,” he said.

“She’s repeating the shameful policy that people should not be treated as refugees if they arrive here by boat.

“But she’s closed virtually all other means of arrival.”

‘Cynicism and xenophobia’

Sacha Deshmukh, Amnesty International UK’s chief executive, said: “The Refugee Convention is a cornerstone of the international legal system and we need to call out this assault on the convention for what it is – a display of cynicism and xenophobia.

“The Refugee Convention is just as relevant today as it was when it was created, and verbal assaults from the home secretary don’t alter the harsh realities that cause people from countries such as Sudan, Afghanistan and Iran to flee from conflict and persecution.”

He added: “Instead of making inflammatory speeches decrying the rights of people fleeing persecution and tyranny, Suella Braverman should focus on creating a functioning UK asylum system that tackles the massive backlog her policies have created, so as to be able to meet the limited refugee responsibilities that fall to the UK.”

Josie Naughton, chief executive of Choose Love, said: “It is the Home Secretary, not the global refugee convention, that is out of touch with the modern age.

Click to subscribe to the Sky News Daily wherever you get your podcasts

“In a world marred by conflicts and displacement, more and more people are fleeing war zones and persecution in search of safety.

“On top of natural disasters, and rising climate concern, we all know that the number of people being displaced will only increase globally.

“The UN’s 1951 Refugee Convention was put in place to protect every human being searching for safety, fleeing war zones, danger and threats to their life and freedoms. More than ever, the world must come together and unite behind it. We cannot solve this problem by seeking to undermine fundamental human rights. Working together is the only solution.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Kemi Badenoch reveals her ‘golden rule’ to ‘get economy back on track’

Published

on

By

Kemi Badenoch reveals her 'golden rule' to 'get economy back on track'

Kemi Badenoch will promise to introduce a “golden rule” to get the deficit down and “get our economy back on track” if the Tories win the next election.

During her keynote speech at the end of the Conservative Party’s conference on Wednesday, the Tory leader will say her party is the only party “who can be trusted to meet the test of our generation”.

Follow live updates from Tory conference

“We are the only party with a plan to get our economy back on trust,” she is expected to say.

Ms Badenoch will tell Tory members she would introduce a “golden economic rule” to ensure for every pound saved, half or more will go to reduce the deficit and half will go towards tax cuts or spending to boost the economy.

She will accuse Chancellor Rachel Reeves of doubling the deficit “with her borrowing and tax doom loop” over the next decade.

“It’s not sustainable, and it’s not fair,” she will say.

“It is stealing from our children and grandchildren, and Conservatives will put a stop to it.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Why Kemi Badenoch ‘lacked confidence’

Where will the cuts fall?

Ms Badenoch will say the Tories have already identified £47bn in savings, including £23bn from welfare, £8bn from the civil service and £7bn from the overseas aid budget.

She will also announce plans to reform the higher education sector, double apprenticeship funding, and back high-value courses for young people.

She will pledge to end “debt trap” degrees, which she will say offer poor value to students and taxpayers, and instead fund “worthwhile courses”.

This will lead to savings, she will say, to pay for the doubling of apprenticeship funding, in addition to the employers’ apprenticeship levy funds currently paid by UK employers with a payroll of more than £3m.

“This can’t be right – young people in Britain deserve a better deal, which is why the Conservatives are throwing out the status quo,” she is expected to say.

Read more:
Twenty Tory councillors defect to Reform
Beth Rigby on tough questions facing Badenoch

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Empty seats at Tory party conference

The plan would see more apprenticeships for people aged 18-21, while any remaining funding would be used to support “high-quality” courses at research-intensive British universities.

The Conservative Party’s conference has been marred by a lacklustre attendance, the defection of 20 Tory councillors to Reform, and a Sky News/YouGov poll which found half of the party’s members think Ms Badenoch should not lead the party into the next election.

Continue Reading

Politics

BitGo secures VARA license amid regulatory crackdown

Published

on

By

BitGo secures VARA license amid regulatory crackdown

BitGo secures VARA license amid regulatory crackdown

Dubai’s regulator announced it had issued financial penalties against 19 companies related to digital asset activities amid approval for BitGo’s MENA entity.

Continue Reading

Politics

Tetchy Badenoch criticised me for asking hard questions – but leadership challenge talk won’t go away

Published

on

By

Tetchy Badenoch criticised me for asking hard questions - but leadership challenge talk won't go away

In the 11 months since Kemi Badenoch has become party leader, the Conservative Party has dropped from 26% to 17% in the polls.

It has lost nearly 700 council seats, 16 councils, while 18 senior Tories have defected, including one of the party’s great thinkers, Danny Kruger.

Politics Live: Tory councillors defect to Reform

Her personal poll rating, minus 47, is worse than the lowest ebb of Iain Duncan Smith’s fated leadership and worse than when Boris Johnson resigned.

To rub salt into the wounds, a Sky News/YouGov poll this week found that the majority of Tory members think Robert Jenrick should be the leader, while half don’t think she should lead them into the next general election.

Being leader of the Opposition is often described as the hardest job in politics, but for Badenoch, with Reform stealing the march as the party of the right, it looks pretty much impossible.

For someone who needs to try to win people over, Badenoch has a curious style. She likes to be known as a leader who isn’t afraid of a fight and, at times, she approached our interview at the Conservative Party conference as if she was positively looking for one.

More on Kemi Badenoch

A few times in our interview when I asked her a question she didn’t like, or didn’t want to answer (it is my job to ask all politicians hard questions), she seemed tetchy.

And when I deigned to ask her whether she admired Nigel Farage, she criticised me for asking the question. She asked why I was not asking her if I admire Sir Keir Starmer or Sir Ed Davey.

Her approach surprised me, as I had asked the prime minister exactly the same question a week before. He’d answered it directly, without arguing over why I had asked it: “I think he is a formidable politician,” said Sir Keir.

Badenoch told me she didn’t understand the question, and then told me she wasn’t interested in talking about him. It made for an awkward, ill-tempered exchange.

The facts remain that Farage is topping the polls, helped by Labour’s collapsing support and the Conservatives’ deep unpopularity.

And in the run-up to our interview, Reform drip-fed the news that 20 Tory councillors were defecting to Farage’s party.

There is open talk in Badenoch’s party about whether the Tories will need to try to come to some sort of agreement with Reform at the next election to try to see off Labour and ‘progressive parties’.

Farage says absolutely not, as does Badenoch – but many in her party do not think she has that luxury.

Andrew Rosindell, MP for Romford, told GB News he’ll lose his seat unless the two sides “work together” and said the right must unite to defeat the left. Arch-rival Robert Jenrick pointedly refuses to rule it out, saying only it’s “not the priority”. Meanwhile, party members support an electoral pact by two to one, according to our Sky News poll.

On the matter of whether these MPs, and party members, have a point, Badenoch bristled: “It is important that people know what we stand for. Robert Jenrick is not the leader of the Conservative Party, neither is Andrew Rossindell. I am the leader of the party and we are not having a coalition or a pact with Reform.”

Read More:
Jaunty Jenrick: a leader’s speech in all but name
Kemi Badenoch praises Thatcher but faces fight with grandees

When I ask colleagues if they think Badenoch is too aloof, too argumentative, too abrasive to lead this rebuild, the popular refrain for her supporters is that she is “a work in progress” and that it would be madness to change the leader again.

The question is, will she be given the time to develop? The plot to oust her is active and much of the chatter around this conference is whether she might be challenged before or after the May local elections.

There are some colleagues who believe it is better to give her more time to turn things around and, if May is truly dreadful and the party goes further backwards, remove her then.

Ahead of conference, when asked by Tim Shipman of the Spectator whether she would resign if the Conservatives go backwards in May, she said rather cryptically “ask me after the locals”.

When I asked Badenoch why she said that she replied, “let’s see what the election result is about”.

When I explained that it sounded rather like she might throw in the towel after next May and so was seeking clarification, she told me that I was asking irrelevant questions.

“Your viewers want to know how their lives are going to be better. Not be inside the Westminster bubble politics of who’s up, who’s down… It’s part of the reason why the country is in this mess. Perhaps if people had scrutinised Labour’s policies instead of looking at just poll ratings, they would be running the country better.”

But Tories are looking at poll ratings and there is a view from some in the party that if the Tories wait until another drubbing in the May local, Scottish and Welsh elections, there might not be much of a party apparatus left to rebuild from.

More than half of Tory members want pact with Reform
Image:
More than half of Tory members want pact with Reform

In short, there is not a settled view on when a challenge might come, but with the party in the position it is in, talk of a challenge will not go away.

Badenoch wants to make the case that her “authentic conservatism” is worth sticking with and that the policies the Conservatives are announcing will give them a pathway back.

On borders, the Tories are trying to neutralise Reform with a very similar offer. On the economy and welfare cuts, they hope they can beat Labour and Reform.

But really, the question about this party and this leader is about relevance. The prime minister didn’t even bother to name check Badenoch in his conference speech, while Davey trained his guns on Farage rather than his traditional Tory rival.

Badenoch may not like being asked about Reform, might – in her words – not be interested in Reform, but her former voters, and the country, are. The enormous challenge for her in the coming months is to see if she can get them to look at her.

Continue Reading

Trending