According to the i paper, which first reported on the story, this means private school fees could be hit with a 20% increase as soon as the first academic year after the election – which is due to take place before the end of next year.
Labour estimates this could raise £1.7bn to invest in state schools.
Party chair Anneliese Dodds told Sky News: “At the moment, 90% of kids go to schools that are not private. We need to be gathering the money from somewhere in order to (raise standards). We’ve been really upfront about this.”
More from Politics
She added: “We need to see that change and what Labour will never do is have an unfunded policy. We had that with Liz Truss. We saw the impact on our economy.”
Asked if it was fair to parents who “scrimp and save” to send their children to private school, Ms Dodds insisted it would not lead to a drop in attendance.
Advertisement
She said: “We’ve actually seen over the last 20 years, the fees that private schools charge going up pretty much year on year, often above inflation.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:14
Anneliese Dodds is asked about the party’s VAT plans for private schools
“There’s not been any drop-off in the number of students and pupils attending those schools. In fact, the number of pupils at those schools has gone up over time.”
Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer has previously pledged that a government led by him would strip private schools of their charitable status, which makes them eligible for tax relief and business rate discounts.
Last year he used the policy to launch a personal attack on Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, who attended the £49,000-a -year Winchester College.
Many Conservatives are opposed to the plan, arguing it will force more parents to send their children to state schools, piling extra pressure on the system.
Teachers within the independent sector have also warned it is likely to have a disproportionate impact on the smaller and medium sized private schools compared to the most prestigious ones like Winchester and Eton.
Julie Robinson, the chief executive of the Independent Schools Council, told the i: “We would urge Labour to take note of the real concerns that many across education have raised, particularly the effect their policy would have on children in smaller schools, in faith schools, children on bursaries, and pupils with special educational needs.”
Warnings of a mass exodus were dismissed in a report by the independent Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) in July, which said the policy would have “a relatively limited effect” on pupil numbers.
The report also said the gap between private school fees and state school spending per pupil has more than doubled since 2010, when it was about 40% or £3,500.
It said in 2022/2023, the average private school fees across the UK were £15,200. The report said this is £7,200 or nearly 90% higher than state school spending per pupil.
A Labour Party spokesperson said it makes “no apology for relentless focus on how to drive high and rising standards in our state schools”.
“Because we are the party of fair taxes, we will end the unjustifiable tax break afforded to private schools and fund recruitment of over 6,500 more teachers and put access to mental health counselling in every school.”
The license came eight months after the regulator granted the company in-principle approval, and a few weeks after Bybit secured a non-operational license for Dubai.
Sir Keir Starmer has denied any ministers were involved in the collapse of the trial of alleged Chinese spies.
Christopher Cash, 30, a former parliamentary researcher, and teacher Christopher Berry, 33, were accused of spying for China, but weeks before their trial was due to begin, it was dropped.
Berry, of Witney, Oxfordshire, and Cash, of Whitechapel, east London denied the allegations.
Sir Keir, his ministers and national security adviser Jonathan Powell have faced accusations they were involved in the trial being dropped.
The prime minister has maintained that because the last Conservative government had not designated China as a threat to national security, his government could not provide evidence to that effect, which the director of public prosecutions Stephen Parkinson said was required to meet the threshold for prosecution.
Mr Parkinson had blamed ministers for failing to provide the crucial evidence needed to proceed.
More on China
Related Topics:
During a trade visit to India, the prime minister was asked whether any minister, or Mr Powell, were involved in the decision not to provide the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) with evidence that, at the time of the alleged offences, China represented a threat to national security.
He replied: “I can be absolutely clear no ministers were involved in any of the decisions since this government’s been in in relation to the evidence that’s put before the court on this issue.”
Sir Keir reiterated his line that the case could only rely on evidence from the period the pair were accused of spying, from 2021 to 2023, when the Conservatives were in government.
He said: “The evidence in this case was drawn up at the time and reflected the position as it was at the time,” the PM said in India.
“And that has remained the situation from start to finish.
“That is inevitably the case because in the United Kingdom, you can only try people on the basis of the situation as it was at the time.
“You can’t try people on the basis of the situation, as it now is or might be in the future, and therefore, the only evidence that a court would ever admit on this would be evidence of what the situation was at the time.
“It’s not a party political point. It’s a matter of law.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:40
Is China an enemy to the UK?
Sir Keir’s assertion has been called into question by former top civil servants and legal experts.
Mark Elliott, professor of public law at the University of Cambridge, told Sky News there is no legal requirement for a country to be declared an enemy for someone to be tried for breaching the Official Secrets Act.
He said the current government was “cherry picking” what the previous government had said about China to claim they did not regard them as a threat to national security.
However, there are several examples of the Tory government saying China was a national security threat during the time Berry and Cash were accused of spying.