Connect with us

Published

on

Mercedes invited us out to Santa Monica to drive its EQS in some of the worst possible traffic conditions – and we were happy about it, because it let us test its new DRIVE PILOT system, the first actual hands-free “Level 3” autonomous drive system certified to operate in the US.

Autonomous drive systems are ranked from level 0-5, describing how much capability the system has. In general, levels 0-2 are primarily human-driven, and levels 3-5 are primarily autonomously driven.

Most manufacturers selling cars today have some sort of driver assistance system that can be categorized as level 2. Every other system in the US (except driverless taxis like Waymo/Cruise, which are geofenced level 4 systems) caps out at level 2, which means that drivers still have ultimate liability for anything that happens while they are behind the wheel.

(A note: GM calls “Super Cruise” a “hands-free” system, which does let you drive without touching the wheel, but it is still a level 2 system, and drivers must keep their eyes on the road and are still ultimately responsible for the vehicle while behind the wheel.)

But Mercedes Drive Pilot is a level 3 system – the first validated to work in the US. Mercedes described this gulf between level 2 and level 3 as a “moonshot,” a step change in how people can use their vehicles.

What that means is this is the first system in the US that is actually validated to take full control of the vehicle, under certain circumstances, freeing you to do other tasks than driving. The system has been out in Germany for about a year now (and Mercedes claims it has tallied zero accidents while enabled, so far), but is only just coming stateside.

To do this, the vehicle uses a dizzying array of sensors and redundancies (including three types of rain sensors – as opposed to zero) to ensure that it has a good view of everything around it. It takes advantage of vision, radar, lidar, GPS, ultrasonic, and acoustic recognition of its environment (did we miss any?):

However, level 3 is still conditional automation, which means that it only works within Mercedes’ “Operational Design Domain.” This basically means heavy traffic conditions under 40 mph, with a lead car available, good weather, good road conditions, and in well-mapped areas. Also, a fallback driver needs to always be available to take over control whenever the car tells you to.

It has been known for quite some time that your commute is killing you. The more time you spend driving to and from work in traffic, the more exhaust you breathe, the more engine vibration you experience, the more money you spend on car fuel and maintenance, etc., the worse your life is. This is true in many measurable ways.

So anything we can do to take back some of that time, and some of that attention, to give us something else that we want to do instead, is positive. And if you live in that is choked with traffic because it has no public transit (because real-life cartoon villains conspired to destroy it, as retold in the movie Who Framed Roger Rabbit?, which, amazingly, is based on a true story).

So, given the need for high traffic and good weather, where better to test it than rush hour in Santa Monica where the 10 meets the 405 (seriously, I’ve hit traffic there at midnight on a Sunday night, it’s always bad). This was no choreographed demonstration on a test track, like Seth tried out last year, but a real test with a bunch of real Angelenos doing the same weird things they do every day on the freeway.

Imagine being happy about traffic

The first thing I did was sit in the car and… watch a seven-minute video describing Drive Pilot’s operation and limitations. Mercedes requires that all drivers watch this video before activating the system.

Then I noticed the “augmented reality heads-up display,” which was more extensive than any other heads-up display I’ve tried (and which actually worked with polarized sunglasses, well done Mercedes). The HUD shows a lot of the information that Drive Pilot is basing its decisions on, and the in-car visualization is quite detailed (compared to Tesla’s, it’s not quite as detailed/responsive, but feels less nervous/jiggly). The quality of this visualization, especially being able to see it at a glance in the window in front of you, gives a lot of confidence in the system.

Then, upon getting on the freeway and being stuck at 8 mph, the EQS quickly notified me that Drive Pilot is available by lighting up white lights on the steering wheel. The system is activated by pressing the buttons associated with the lights, then pressing “OK.” After this, the lights turn turquoise, which Mercedes has proposed as a standard “this car is using self-driving” indicator (the car is surrounded by turquoise exterior lighting, as well, so other drivers know).

And once the system is active, I was now officially not driving the car. I could use the car’s screen for whatever function I like, I could read a newspaper (though CA regulations say not to hold anything hard between yourself and the airbag), I could relax (without sleeping).

Mercedes has included several apps, though these basically seemed to boil down to a browser, a media player, YouTube, and some simple games, so far (no Steam or Twitch app, unlike Tesla). We were told the German version has an e-mail app, but that this doesn’t currently exist on the US model. We expect more apps may come later.

So I took the chance to watch some videos in traffic without a care in the world:

I was surprised how comfortable I got, and how quickly

Honestly, it was kind of amazing how immediately comfortable I was with this system. I’ve spent plenty of time in Teslas, driving both Autopilot and FSD, and frankly I generally prefer to drive without those aids turned on. And other manufacturers’ systems all have their pluses and minuses as well.

They have their place (traffic, hours-long straight roads), but they also make a lot of weird decisions. I’ve never had one that I didn’t feel like I had to keep my eyes on at all times (and I do – that’s what level 2 is about).

So when I spent two minutes playing shufflepuck, or 20 minutes (and about two miles of road…) discussing the nuances of the system with my Mercedes rep while the car took care of the driving (if you can call ~6 mph “driving”), I found that I had been paying little enough attention to the road that I wasn’t sure which exits had passed and which were up ahead.

This brings up a potential ownership consideration: You might want to keep the navigation lady’s voice turned on to warn you if you’re going to miss your exit, as one thing level 3 won’t do is change lanes. My Mercedes rep wasn’t sure if the car would issue a fallback warning asking you to take over if your exit was coming soon. This could be nice to see in a future update…

But even with drivers acting as inattentively as myself, Drive Pilot tries to be a courteous road user. With the myriad cameras all around it, it will even attempt to detect lane-splitting motorcycles (it’s legal in California) and move slightly over in the lane to give them a little more room. During my test, one of the motorcyclists even put his hand up to wave and thank “me” for moving over for him. Thanks for earning me some bonus social credit, car.

While level 3 won’t change lanes, Mercedes has added Automatic Lane Change to its DISTRONIC level 2 system, which worked confidently in my test. It will only change lanes when there’s a wide opening, but will make sure you’re in the proper lane for interchanges and exits and will choose faster lanes for passing, then move to the right when not passing (very important in Germany… and almost entirely unheard-of in Los Angeles).

One issue I could see happening is if people forget the difference between level 2 and level 3. While there are a lot of indicators, drivers might get comfortable enough with hands-free level 3 mode that, when activating level 2 mode, they might find themselves treating it like level 3. Mercedes has a lot of redundancies and indicators to remind drivers what mode they’re in, but drivers do tend to pay less attention than they’re supposed to on a level 2 system already, and given how quickly I got comfortable with Drive Pilot, I could see drivers having some lapses while only level 2 Distronic is activated.

Liability – who’s really driving?

Mercedes was careful not to explicitly say that they take liability for things that happen when Drive Pilot is activated. Instead, they repeatedly stated “we stand behind our product.” The question of the trolley problem also came up, and Mercedes dodged it stating that the car wouldn’t get into a situation like that, since it only operates in traffic jams. So we’re still kicking philosophy down the road for the time being (or letting Waymo and Cruise deal with it for now, anyway).

In reality, liability will end up being decided on a case-by-case basis depending on the accident report, how responsive drivers were to fallback warnings, information recorded on the car’s data recorder, and so on. Mercedes also says that drivers must maintain the vehicle to be in proper working condition, including recommended tire pressures, tread depth, kept clean so sensors work properly, and so on (surely every automaker has wanted an excuse to require that their cars stay looking pretty – and Mercedes finally found it).

When Drive Pilot is activated and the car decides that it can no longer drive on its own, it will issue a fallback warning. These warnings are quite obvious – the screen turns red, media stops playing, audio warnings chime, the car tugs at your seatbelt, and so on. At that point, you have 10 seconds to take over. If you don’t, the car will come to a stop as safely as possible (but without changing lanes), turn on the hazard lights and the dome lights, unlock the doors, and call emergency services.

Fallback warnings can happen if any of the previous conditions end (rain starts, sunset happens, etc.), if the fallback driver is no longer deemed as present (eyes looking at the back of the car, seat reclined, asleep, etc.), or if something abnormal intrudes onto the road (pedestrians on the freeway, emergency vehicles, construction zone, etc.).

On the emergency vehicle point, the car has stereo internal microphones to detect siren noises and issue a fallback warning if detected (though you can’t trick them with a YouTube video, as I tried testing):

I got fallback warnings several times on the drive, mostly on purpose. The driver camera at the top of the instrument cluster needs to be able to see your eyes, so looking toward your passenger, into the backseat, or having the steering wheel or any other object in the way will trigger a warning (but you can wear sunglasses – even polarized ones).

I did notice one odd behavior when driving alongside a school bus, wherein the car decided that I needed to take over due to an emergency vehicle nearby. I suspect this had to do with the (non-illuminated) stop signs on the side of the bus – or maybe another nearby Drive Pilot car told us an emergency vehicle was coming, which the system is supposedly able to do. Regardless, it was easy enough to re-activate the system a few seconds later without complaints from the car.

Price & availability

The system will be available on Mercedes’ EQS and S-Class (but who would want that one? it runs on gas, yuck) in the US later this year. Significant hardware is required and can’t be retrofitted, so you’ll need to get a level 3-capable car on purchase. The hardware itself won’t change the vehicle’s price, but using the system requires a subscription, which costs $2,500 for the first year. Mercedes hasn’t yet committed to prices for subsequent years.

Drive Pilot will only work in areas with a high-resolution map available. These maps are precise down to an inch or two, and even account for continental drift.

Mercedes said that the system will initially cover Los Angeles, San Francisco and the Bay Area, Sacramento, San Diego, Las Vegas, and the freeways in between these big cities. A map showing its coverage area will be available from Mercedes soon.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

Europe has rare earths but, for now, it’s at China’s mercy like everyone else

Published

on

By

Europe has rare earths but, for now, it's at China's mercy like everyone else

Workers transport soil containing rare earth elements for export at a port in Lianyungang, Jiangsu province, China.

China Stringer Network | Reuters

Like the U.S., Europe is also feeling the pressure to keep China sweet in order to maintain supplies of rare earth elements, which are vital for its strategic industries in the region such as auto production, green energy and defense.

Europe is heavily dependent on China for supplies of the world’s 17 rare earth elements and has been looking to calm stormy waters with Beijing over supplies, while looking for alternative sources of critical minerals — including in its own back yard.

That’s a long process, however, and for now, Europe is as vulnerable as other major consumers of rare earths, and particularly the U.S., when it comes to Beijing’s ability to turn the tap off on supplies.

Officials from Germany and the Netherlands are in Beijing this week for talks with their Chinese counterparts on China’s controls on rare earths exports and semiconductor chips which have made European industries vulnerable to global supply chain disruptions.

China dominates the rare earths market from mining to refining, with data from the International Energy Agency showing that, in 2024, China was responsible for 59% of the world’s rare earths mining, 91% of its refining and 94% of the manufacuring of permanent magnets which are commonly used in electric vehicles, wind turbines, industrial motors, data centers and defense systems.

As the world’s single largest supplier of a component that’s critical to so much manufacturing, China’s dominance has made “global supply chains in strategic sectors – such as energy, automotive, defense and AI data centres – vulnerable to potential disruptions,” the IEA noted.

That potential for disruption came to the fore this year when, in April and October, Beijing announced licensing requirements, and later export controls, on its rare earth supplies and technologies.

Those controls were suspended for a year as a result of a trade truce reached in October between China and the U.S. reached but major rare earth importers such as the U.S. and EU, which imports around 70% of rare earth supplies — and almost all of its rare earth magnets — from China, are all too aware of its vulnerabilities to geopolitical disruptions.

Barriers to diversification

Last month, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced that the bloc was launching the “RESourceEU” plan aimed at reducing reliance on critical raw materials from China “in the short, medium and long term.” She said the bloc could do this by recycling existing raw materials, such as those in batteries, and by joint purchasing to stockpiling.

Von der Leyen also said the EU would boost investment in strategic projects “for the production and processing of critical raw materials here in Europe,” and would speed up work on critical raw materials partnerships with countries like Ukraine, Australia, Canada, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Chile and Greenland.

“The world we face today rewards speed, not hesitation, because today’s world is unforgiving. And the global economy is completely different than it was even a few years ago. Europe cannot do things the same way anymore. We learned this lesson painfully with energy; we will not repeat it with critical materials,” she said, referencing the bloc’s reliance, before the Ukraine war, on Russian oil and gas.

EU economy resilient despite ‘complicated context': EU’s Dombrovskis

Valdis Dombrovskis, European Commissioner for Economy and Productivity, told CNBC Monday that the bloc was working to diversify its rare earth supplies but that this would take time.

“I would say there is some positive news, so China has suspended now for 12 months those additional export controls, which were announced in October, which gives us some time. But I also would say it emphasizes the need for the EU to diversify its rare earth and critical minerals supplies, because of many on those rare earths, we are depending more than 90% on China’s supplies,” Dombrovskis said.

Necessity the mother of invention?

Europe itself has reserves of rare earth materials with deposits found in Turkey, Sweden and Norway but the problem is that it doesn’t have the operations to mine those materials, let alone refine and process them — unlike China, which has decades of experience, investment and infrastructure that has fueled its global processing dominance.

Europe is also more encumbered with long approval processes and environmental standards when it comes to mining, meaning any regional plans to develop those rare earth deposits could take years. Public opposition is also a factor that has not shackled China.

A view of the NEO magnetic plant in Narva, a city in northeastern Estonia. A plant producing rare-earth magnets for Europe’s electric vehicle and wind-energy sectors.

Xinhua News Agency | Xinhua News Agency | Getty Images

The need to diversify from China quickly could cause officials to lower those barriers, however and there are already signs of action, with Europe’s first rare earth magnet production plant being opened in Estonia in September. Backed by funding from both Canada and the EU, the plant’s raw materials are coming from Australia and Malaysia.

“There’s probably a lot more deposits in Europe but … there are barriers to bringing that online,” Willis Thomas, principal consultant at CRU Group, told CNBC.

“But if we’re getting into a world where risks are being realized on trade tensions, I think that that will continue to push everyone to build out the supply chain and a bit more resilience on it, but it does take some time, and there’s limited expertise.”

What’s also worrying for Europe is that being unable to control the sources and supply of raw materials could mean that its technological and green ambitions suffer.

“Europe’s race towards net zero and digital leadership depend on materials it does not control,” Hamed Ghiaie, professor of Economics and Public Policy at ESCP Europe, and Filippo Gorelli, an analyst at Nexans, said in analysis for the World Economic Forum.

“For decades, Europe treated raw materials as a commodity issue, rather than a strategic one. That complacency is becoming costly,” they added.

“What is at stake is climate targets and economic resilience. Shortages of rare earths, gallium or germanium could slow semiconductor fabrication, AI development and even wind-power installation. In short, Europe cannot build a green or digital future on supply chains it doesn’t control,” they concluded.

Continue Reading

Environment

Small runways, big tech: hybrid-electric aircraft shows off some uSTOL magic

Published

on

By

Small runways, big tech: hybrid-electric aircraft shows off some uSTOL magic

Aviation startup Electra made history last month when its EL2 became the first hybrid-electric Ultra Short Take-off and Landing (uSTOL) aircraft to successfully complete helicopter-like take-offs and landings at the Watertown International Airport.

Founded to provide affordable air travel without airports, emissions, or noise, Electra’s stated goal was to build an aircraft that could deliver on the promises of eVTOL aircraft at a significantly reduced cost compared to its more drone-like competitors. In that context, the demonstration at Watertown isn’t a publicity stunt, but part of concerted effort to validate Electra’s uSTOL performance under real-world conditions at a commercial airport — exactly the kind of place that regional operators, cargo carriers, and emergency responders actually fly in and out of.

Hitting those marks now will help Electra clear a path for FAA certification and prove that the company can deliver on the $9 billion worth of promises its made (so far).

“Electra is grateful to the team at Watertown International Airport for enabling this demonstration of the EL2’s Ultra Short capabilities in an off-runway capacity,” explains Tom Carto, director of market development at Electra. “Our Ultra Short aircraft will offer the potential to increase the use of general aviation airports and expand the capacity of larger hubs by enabling takeoffs and landings on ramps and taxiways instead of runways, feeding in regional connections without adding to runway congestion. These transformative and practical capabilities will open the door to Direct Aviation and point-to-point connections in a way that will make it easier for people to get from the where they are to where they want to go.”

Advertisement – scroll for more content

The EL2’s innovative “blown lift” design features eight electric motors on the plane’s wings, enabling take-off and landing in as little as 150 feet.

Electra says the final version of its aircraft will be able operate from airfields as small as 300 x 100 ft (90 x 30 m), or about one-tenth the length of a standard airport runway. That means that, even if these eSTOL aircraft don’t open up quite as many spaces for air travel as eVTOLs, do, they’ll still be extremely flexible – and more than capable of operating from the roofs of many existing buildings and parking structures.

Obviously


And, of course, the Air Force wants one.

NOTEin response to some of the comments, I want to point out that the Electra is capable of sustained, electric-only powered flight and uses the genset for remote operations/extended range. I should have made that clearer. This is arguably more EREV than EV.

SOURCES | IMAGESElectra; via Oswego County Business.


If you’re considering going solar, it’s always a good idea to get quotes from a few installers. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them. 

Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Environment

Trump admin OKs $1B loan for Three Mile Island nuclear reboot

Published

on

By

Trump admin OKs B loan for Three Mile Island nuclear reboot

The US Department of Energy’s Loan Programs Office (LPO) closed a $1 billion loan to restart Three Mile Island Unit 1, a nuclear reactor at Three Mile Island in Londonderry Township, Pennsylvania.

The money is being loaned to Constellation Energy Generation, which is renaming the 835 megawatt (MW) Three Mile Island Unit 1 the Crane Clean Energy Center. Constellation said in September 2024 that it would restart the reactor under a power purchase agreement with Microsoft, which needs more clean power to feed its growing data-center demand.

The project is estimated to cost around $1.6 billion, and the DOE says the project will create around 600 jobs. The reactor is expected to start generating power again in 2027.

Three Mile Island Unit 1 (in the foreground in the photo above) went offline in 2019 because it could no longer compete with cheaper natural gas, but it wasn’t decommissioned. It’s capable of powering the equivalent of approximately 800,000 homes. It’s on the same site as the Unit 2 reactor (in the background in the photo above) that went into partial nuclear meltdown in 1979, and is known as the worst commercial nuclear accident in US history.

Advertisement – scroll for more content

When asked about the loan’s timing, Greg Beard, senior adviser to the Loan Programs Office, told reporters on a call that it would “lower the cost of capital and make power cheaper for those PJM [Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland] ratepayers.” Data centers are driving up electricity costs for consumers.

Read more: DOE props up dying coal with $625M days after Wright mocks clean energy subsidies 


If you’re looking to replace your old HVAC equipment, it’s always a good idea to get quotes from a few installers. To make sure you’re finding a trusted, reliable HVAC installer near you that offers competitive pricing on heat pumps, check out EnergySage. EnergySage is a free service that makes it easy for you to get a heat pump. They have pre-vetted heat pump installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high quality solutions. Plus, it’s free to use!

Your personalized heat pump quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here. – *ad

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Continue Reading

Trending