672 The teepee fire is quick to build and quick to burn.
Many campers and outdoor enthusiasts who are working with campfires start by building a teepee fire, whether they realize thats what theyre constructing or not. I know this was the first fire type I ever started building with because it is so easy to construct. We built them regularly in Cub Scouts. I see kids all over making teepee fires adults too! What is a Teepee Fire?
A teepee fire is a campfire constructed by stacking sticks into the shape of a teepee. It looks much like a cone shape when complete. It differs from other common campfire types because the sticks are stacked almost vertically rather than horizontally.
The teepee fire is probably the most common campfire type. Its regularly taught in outdoor survival classes and in programs like the Boy Scouts, Cub Scouts, etc. Its a favorite of many people because its so fast and easy to construct. The teepee fire has some downsides, however.
Rather watch than read? I cover the teepee fire and 3 other types of campfires in the video below. Pros and Cons of a Teepee Fire Pros Quick Ignition: Its design allows the fire to rise quickly from the tinder to the kindling and then to the larger logs, making it relatively easy to start. High Flames: The teepee structure tends to produce tall flames, which can be visually pleasing and useful for signaling in emergency situations. Self-Feeding (to a degree): As the logs burn, they collapse inward, which can help in maintaining the fire for a certain duration without much interference. Ideal for Quick Cooking: The tall flames can be used for boiling or cooking food quickly under a campfire tripod, especially if you only need the fire for a short period of time. This is certainly the fire best suited to rapidly boiling water with firewood, but there are of course other methods of boiling water while camping that dont involve a campfire. Cons Not Long-Lasting: Without intervention, the teepee structure burns out quicker than some other fire layouts. Inefficient Fuel Consumption: It tends to burn wood faster due to its design, which might not be ideal in situations where you have a limited wood supply. Requires Monitoring: As the fire burns and the logs collapse, it may need rearranging or rebuilding to maintain a consistent fire. Less Stable: The teepee structure, especially if built tall, can be less stable than other configurations. This can lead to logs falling out of alignment, which could be a safety hazard. Not Ideal for Extended Cooking: For cooking foods that require a long time (like roasting), the short lifespan of a teepee fire isnt ideal. Youd need a more consistent heat source. How to Build a Teepee Fire The frame of this teepee fire is ready to ignite.
The teepee fire method is one of the most basic and popular ways to start a campfire. Heres a step-by-step guide on how to do it. Building the Teepee Frame Start by placing a handful of tinder in the center of your pit. Arrange the kindling over the tinder in the shape of a teepee. Stick them into the ground slightly to help them stand upright. Place the larger pieces of firewood around the kindling in a similar teepee structure. Ensure that theres enough space for air to flow, as fire needs oxygen to burn. Light the Tinder Light the tinder in several places. As it catches fire, the kindling will begin to ignite. Once the kindling is burning steadily, the outer firewood will catch fire. Maintain the Fire As the teepee structure burns, the logs will fall inward. Thats okay. This method is designed to give the fire a strong start. Once the fire is well-established, you can add more logs as needed, placing them on top or around the burning wood. Always monitor your fire closely and keep water or a fire extinguisher nearby for safety. Fire Making: The Forgotten Art of Conjuring Flame with Spark, Tinder, and Skill Hardcover BookHume, Daniel (Author) Buy on Amazon Best Fire for You?
Whats your favorite style of campfire? Im also curious what the first type of fire you ever made is. Let me know in the comments section. Burn on!
Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelenskyy are set to hold talks over the Ukraine peace plan.
US and Ukrainian officials have held discussions in Geneva about a controversial 28-point proposal drawn up by America and Russia, which has since been countered by an amended deal drawn up by Kyiv’s European allies.
The White House said there were still a “couple of points of disagreement” as of Monday night, but spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said there was a “sense of urgency” to strike an agreement.
“The president wants to see this deal come together, and to see this war end,” she added.
Mr Zelenskyy echoed that message, saying “there is still work for all of us to do to finalise the document”.
“We must do everything with dignity,” he said in his nightly video address, adding: “The sensitive issues, the most delicate points, I will discuss with President Trump.”
Image: Karoline Leavitt speaks with reporters at the White House. Pic: AP
It comes after Mr Trump, who had accused Ukraine of not being grateful enough for US military support while the Geneva talks were under way, suggested the process could be moving in the right direction.
He had earlier given Kyiv until Thursday to agree to the plan, but US Secretary of State Marco Rubio downplayed the deadline, saying officials could keep negotiating.
Moscow, however, has already signalled its opposition to the European version of the peace plan.
It would halt fighting at present front lines, leaving discussions of territory for later, and also include a NATO-style US security guarantee for Ukraine.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:41
Russian drones devastate Kharkiv
The talks in Geneva, Switzerland, had begun with Mr Rubio denying the original plan was written by Russia.
It appeared to include a number of longstanding Kremlin demands that have proved impossible for Kyiv, including sacrificing territory Russian forces have not even seized since the war began.
Ms Leavitt has also insisted the US is not favouring the Russians.
Image: Ukrainian troops fire near the frontline town of Pokrovsk. Pic: Reuters
Starmer to lead talks of Ukraine’s allies
Ukraine’s allies in the so-called “coalition of the willing” will hold a virtual meeting today, chaired by Sir Keir Starmer.
The British prime minister said the alliance was focused on achieving a “just and lasting peace”.
It “matters for all of us, because the conflict in Ukraine has had a direct impact here in the UK”, he added.
Russia and Ukraine report overnight attacks
The talks will begin hours after the governor of Russia’s Rostov region reported three people had been killed and 10 more injured in a Ukrainian attack overnight.
The Russian defence ministry said 249 Ukrainian drones were downed over Russian regions in total.
Meanwhile, Russian drone strikes in Kyiv left at least two dead and triggered fires on residential buildings – forcing evacuations, and leaving several people injured.
Image: Drone strikes rocked Kyiv in the early hours of Tuesday. Pic: Ukrainian emergency services/Telegram
The war was also a topic of discussion in a call between Mr Trump and China’s Xi Jinping on Monday.
Mr Xi urged “all parties” in the conflict to “reduce differences”, according to Chinese state news agency Xinhua.
He reiterated that China supported all efforts conducive to peace.
China has remained a consistent ally of Russia throughout its invasion of Ukraine, and is the top buyer of Russian oil, along with India.
Taiwan’s prime minister has warned that a “return” to China is not an option.
Cho Jung-tai’s remarks came hours after President Xi Jinping mentioned the issue on a phone call with his US counterpart Donald Trump.
Mr Xi had described Taiwan’s return to mainland China as “an integral part of the post-war international order”.
But the island’s democratically elected government has rejected this – describing Taiwan as a “fully sovereign and independent country”.
“For the 23 million people of our nation, ‘return’ is not an option – this is very clear,” Mr Cho added.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
25:53
Is Taiwan ready for a Chinese invasion?
China has offered Taiwan a “one country, two systems” model, but this position is not supported by any mainstream political party.
Meanwhile, relations between Beijing and Tokyo recently plunged to fresh lows after Japan’s prime minister suggested any attack on Taiwan would spark a military response.
Sanae Takaichi’s remarks were swiftly denounced by China’s foreign ministry, which said Japan had “crossed a red line that should not have been touched”.
Sun Yun from the Stimson Centre thinktank said: “My best guess is China is worried about the escalation with Japan.
“The reference to Taiwan and the post-World War II order directly points to the spat with Japan over Taiwan.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:02
Trump scores Xi meeting out of 10
The US has not taken a side when it comes to Taiwan’s sovereignty but is opposed to any use of force to seize the territory.
Mr Trump’s administration has also been ambiguous over whether it would deploy US troops if war broke out in the Taiwan Strait.
Yesterday, Taiwan’s defence ministry spotted a single balloon from China flying over the strait and claims this is part of a campaign of harassment by Beijing.
Chinese officials have previously dismissed these complaints, arguing the balloons are for meteorological purposes.
In other developments, Mr Trump has confirmed that he will visit Beijing in April – with Mr Xi set to travel to Washington for a state visit later in 2026.
The SEC has just issued its second “no-action letter” toward a decentralized physical infrastructure network (DePIN) crypto project in recent months, giving its native token “regulatory cover” from enforcement.
The no-action letter was sent to the Solana DePIN project Fuse, which issues a network token, FUSE, as a reward to those actively maintaining the network.
Fuse initially submitted a letter to the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance on Nov. 19, asking for official confirmation that it would not recommend the SEC take enforcement action if the project continues to offer and sell FUSE tokens.
Fuse also outlined in its letter that FUSE is designed for network utility and consumptive purposes, not for speculation. They can only be redeemed for an average market price via third parties.
“Based on the facts presented, the Division will not recommend enforcement action to the Commission if, in reliance on your opinion as counsel, Fuse offers and sells the Tokens in the manner and under the circumstances described in your letter,” the Division of Corporation Finance’s deputy chief counsel, Jonathan Ingram, wrote on Monday.
SEC’s no-action letter to Fuse Crypto. Source: SEC
The latest SEC no-action letter comes just a few months after the SEC issued a similar “highly coveted” letter to Double Zero, which was seen as a result of a new, more crypto-friendly leadership at the SEC.
At the time, DoubleZero co-founder Austin Federa said such letters are common in TradFi but are “very rare” in the crypto space.
“It was a months long process, but we found the SEC to be quite receptive, we found them to be quite professional, quite diligent, there was no crypto animosity.”
The SEC was put under new leadership in April, after Paul Atkins was sworn in as the 34th chairman, and the agency has since been seen taking a more balanced approach to crypto. As part of the leadership, crypto-friendly Hester Peirce also heads up the agency’s crypto task force.
SEC no-action letters are a form of regulatory clarity
Adding to the discussion on X, Rebecca Rettig, a legal representative of Solana MEV infrastructure platform Jito Labs, said that no-action letters are sought after by many crypto projects.
“Why do crypto teams want them? ‘Regulatory clarity.’ If you’re planning to issue a token, a NAL provides reasonable assurance you won’t face immediate enforcement for violations of securities laws. It’s a kind of ‘regulatory cover,’” she wrote.
SEC giving a pass to Fuse wasn’t unexpected: Crypto lawyer
The no-action letter doesn’t necessarily set any new precedents, however.
Commenting on the subject via X on Monday, Consensys lawyer Bill Hughes said this was “an easy case,” given the nature of Fuse’s token.
“The take away is that there is not a lawyer in crypto that would have thought this token was a security. And maybe not even any lawyer who is merely familiar with Howey,” Hughes said.
The same month that Double Zero secured its no-action letter, the SEC also issued a similar no-action letter for crypto-custodians that don’t qualify as banks.
While they still have to meet strict conditions, the no-action letter provides clear guidelines for acceptable ways for these types of firms to operate and deal with crypto, something which the industry has been begging for over the past few years.