Connect with us

Published

on

Moving away from remote working is costing parents more than £600 extra per month in childcare, Sky News has learned.

Figures shared by Pebble, a flexible childcare service, show that half of the 2,000 parents polled said they were planning on quitting their jobs as a result.

A third said they have already moved to a company with more flexible working.

The research indicates that employers are requesting an additional two days per week in the office.

Two in five parents said they are subsequently struggling to pay the extra childcare costs.

Figures given to Sky News from the professional networking site, LinkedIn, also show that remote job postings have gone down by 28% since August 2021 – the height of the pandemic.

The number of hybrid job postings, however, has gone up by 34% compared with the same period last year.

More from UK

Statistics from Adzuna, the jobs website, also show the proportion of hybrid vacancies is at nearly 20%, compared to less than 1% in January 2020.

Remote working job adverts are down to just over 5% from a peak of more than 14% in February 2021.

Kevin Ellis, chair and senior partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers, a professional services company which has 26,000 UK staff, told Sky News the company is sticking with its two to three days in the office rule.

That has not changed since 2020 because the company values what it describes as “consistency”.

Mr Ellis added, however, that going into the office more would help further careers.

“I wouldn’t change it from two to three days a week,” he said, “because I think it’s really hard to message 26,000 people a kind of moving target.

“So I’ll stay with two to three days a week as our policy.

“If asked a personal question, ‘what would you do to make your career more successful?’… I’d say come in more, learn through observation, learn through building networks, and actually meet your mates in the office.”

Sarah, not her real name, has told Sky News she was forced to quit her job at a tech company after they rolled back on remote working.

She was recruited during COVID and worked mostly from home.

She said the company decided this year they wanted her to work from the office three days a week but because of her commute and childcare times it was “impossible”.

“I literally couldn’t do that job anymore. It just wasn’t possible,” she said.

“There are not enough hours in the day for me to be able to be a good worker, be a good mum, let alone have time for myself.

“I was sat there trying to figure out all the hours and the amount of spreadsheets… and calendars I was looking at down to the minute.

“‘(I was thinking to myself) ‘If I dropped (my daughter) off at that time, and I get to the train station at that time’.

“There are only a certain number of hours in the day, right?”

Read more:
‘Rise in staff working from home’ as cost of living bites
Zoom asks staff to return to the office

‘Disaster for working parents and a disaster for the economy’

Sarah faced a four-hour long commute per day and said she “had no choice but to leave” the company she worked for.

The charity Pregnant Then Screwed is highlighting how the childcare landscape has changed dramatically since COVID.

The cost has rocketed alongside fewer available places and reduction in hours for services.

It has meant remote working has become necessary for many parents.

Joeli Brearley, founder of the charity, said a lot of people being told to return to the office would have been recruited at a time when positions were “much more flexible”.

She has described it as a “disaster for working parents and a disaster for the economy”.

Ms Brearley said: “To suddenly pull the rug out means that the costs for those parents will drastically increase… because you’re looking at a childcare bill of £14,000 a year for a full time place.”

She added: “When we know there are real issues with availability ultimately it means you have to lose your job/reduce hours because you cannot cope with the cost or get the childcare you need.”

Ngaire Moyes, LinkedIn UK country manager, said the rise in hybrid working posts on the site demonstrates “just how much hybrid has become a part of mainstream working life”.

She described how businesses and employees are seeking “to get the best of both worlds”.

“There are many advantages to remote work, but it’s not without its challenges,” she continued.

“There is some work that simply lends itself better to being done in-person – be that collaborative or creative work, as well as some training and development.”

She said that some feel “strongly about maintaining the flexibility they gained during the pandemic”.

“It gives people a much better work life balance,” she added, “and many believe they can be just as productive working from home for some of the time.”

Continue Reading

Business

Christmas food price shock looms, chancellor warned

Published

on

By

Christmas food price shock looms, chancellor warned

Food inflation will rise to 6% by the end of the year – posing a “significant challenge” to household budgets in the run-up to Christmas, industry leaders have predicted.

The British Retail Consortium is warning that the chancellor risks “fanning the flames of inflation” if she hikes taxes in the coming budget.

Despite intense price competition between supermarket chains, the BRC has sounded the alarm over the pace of grocery price hikes.

As of this month, food inflation has risen 4% year on year – its highest level since February 2024.

The BRC said this increase is linked to global factors, such as high demand and crop struggles.

Beef, chicken and tea prices are among those that have risen the most this year – but some of the blame is being laid squarely at the chancellor’s door too.

The BRC said it was inevitable that a £7bn burden, through changes to employers’ national insurance contributions and minimum pay rules after last October’s budget, had been partly passed on to customers in the form of higher prices.

More from Money

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Will we see tax rises in next budget?

It published the results of a survey of retail industry finance chiefs to illustrate its point – that nerves about what Ms Reeves’s second budget could bring were not helping companies invest in either new employment or prices.

Business was promised it would be spared additional pain after it was put on the hook for the bulk of the chancellor’s tax-raising measures last year.

However, speculation is now rife over who will feel the pain this autumn as she juggles a deterioration in the public finances.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Options for wealth tax

A widening black hole is estimated at around £20bn.

The cost of servicing government debt has risen since the last budget, while U-turns on welfare reforms and winter fuel payment cuts have made her job even harder – making further tax-raising measures inevitable.

The survey of chief financial officers for the BRC showed the biggest current fear ahead was for the “tax and regulatory burden”.

Two-thirds of the CFOs predicted further price rises in the coming year, at a time when the headline rate inflation already remains stuck way above the Bank of England’s target of 2%.

It currently stands at 3.6%.

Helen Dickinson, chief executive of the BRC, said: “Retail was squarely in the firing line of the last budget, with the industry hit by £7bn in new costs and taxes.

“Retailers have done everything they can to shield their customers from higher costs, but given their slim margins and the rising cost of employing staff, price rises were inevitable.

“The consequences are now being felt by households as many struggle to cope with the rising cost of their weekly shop.

“It is up to the chancellor to decide whether to fan the flames of inflation, or to support the everyday economy by backing the high street and the local jobs they provide.”

She concluded: “Retail accounts for 5% of the economy yet currently pays 7.4% of business taxes and a whopping 21% of all business rates.

“It is vital the upcoming reforms offer a meaningful reduction in retailers’ rates bill, and ensures no store pays more as a result of the changes.”

The Treasury has been approached for comment.

Continue Reading

Business

US Federal Reserve defies calls from Donald Trump to cut interest rate

Published

on

By

US Federal Reserve defies calls from Donald Trump to cut interest rate

The Federal Reserve has defied calls from US President Donald Trump for a cut to the interest rate by leaving it unchanged.

The decision means it has an effective rate of 4.3%, where it has remained after the central bank, known as the Fed, reduced it three times last year.

“We’re keeping the rates high, and it’s hurting people from buying houses,” Mr Trump told reporters. “All because of the Fed.”

Money latest: Three major broadband firms hike prices

Mr Trump has repeatedly been asked whether he would fire Fed chair Jerome Powell if he failed to heed his demand to cut the rate.

In June, the US president labelled Mr Powell a “stupid person” after the Fed decided not to change rates. Then less than two weeks later, in a further attack, he said the Fed’s chair should “ashamed” and would “love” him to resign.

The US president has spent months verbally attacking Mr Powell.

More from US

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Fed chair has ‘done a bad job’, says Trump

There were clear tensions between the pair last Thursday as they toured the Federal Reserve in Washington DC, which is undergoing renovations.

When taking questions, Mr Trump said: “I’d love him to lower interest rates,” then laughed and slapped Powell’s arm.

Donald Trump and Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell
Image:
There were clear tensions between the US President and Mr Powell during last week’s visit to the Federal Reserve. Pic: Reuters

The US president also challenged him, in front of reporters, about an alleged overspend on the renovations and produced paperwork to prove his point. Mr Powell shook his head as Trump made the claim.

When Mr Trump was asked what he would do as a real estate mogul if this happened to one of his projects, he said he’d fire his project manager – seemingly in reference to Mr Powell.

Donald Trump challenges Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell about the cost of renovations
Image:
Donald Trump challenged Mr Powell in front of reporters. Pic: Reuters

Unlike the UK, the US interest rate is a range to guide lenders rather than a single percentage.

The Fed has expressed concern about the impact of Mr Trump’s signature economic policy of implementing new tariffs, taxes on imports to the US.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Trump’s tariffs: What you need to know

On Wednesday, the president said he was still negotiating with India on trade after announcing the US will impose a 25% tariff on goods imported from the country from Friday.

Mr Trump also signed an executive order on Wednesday implementing an additional 40% tariff on Brazil, bringing the total tariff amount to 50%, excluding certain products, including oil and precious metals.

Follow The World
Follow The World

Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday

Tap to follow

Read more from Sky News:
Visa blamed for payment errors
Care provider nears collapse
Apollo set to buy £7bn stake in MFG

The committee which sets rates voted 9 to 2 to keep the benchmark rate steady, the two dissenters were appointees of President Trump who believe monetary policy is too tight.

In a policy statement to explain their decision, the Federal Reserve said that “uncertainty about the economic outlook remains elevated” but growth “moderated in the first half of the year,” possibly bolstering the case to lower rates at a future meeting.

Nathan Thooft, chief investment officer at Manulife Investment Management, described the rate decision as a “kind of a nothing burger” and it was “widely expected”.

Tony Welch, chief investment officer at SignatureFD, agreed that it was “broadly as expected”. He added: “That explains why you’re not seeing a lot of movement in the market right now because there’s nothing that’s surprising.”

Continue Reading

Business

Apollo charges in for stake in £7bn petrol retailer Motor Fuel Group

Published

on

By

Apollo charges in for stake in £7bn petrol retailer Motor Fuel Group

The investment giant Apollo Global Management is close to snapping up a stake in Motor Fuel Group (MFG), one of Britain’s biggest petrol forecourt empires, in a deal valuing it about £7bn.

Sky News has learnt that Apollo could announce as soon as Thursday that it has agreed to buy a large minority stake in MFG from Clayton Dubilier & Rice (CD&R), its current majority-owner.

The transaction will come after several months of talks involving CD&R and a range of prospective investors in a company which is rapidly expanding its presence in the electric vehicle charging infrastructure arena.

Money latest: Three major broadband providers confirm price hikes

Banking sources said there had been a “large appetite” to invest in the next phase of MFG’s growth, with CD&R having built the company from a mid-sized industry player over the course of more than a decade.

Lazard and Royal Bank of Canada are understood to be advising on the deal.

A stake of roughly 25-30% in MFG has been expected to change hands during the process, with Apollo’s investment said to be broadly in that range.

MFG is the largest independent forecourt operator in the UK, having grown from 360 sites at the point of CD&R’s acquisition of the company.

It trades under a number of brands, including Esso and Shell.

CD&R, which also owns the supermarket chain Morrisons, united MFG’s petrol forecourt businesses with that of the grocer in a £2.5bn transaction, which completed nearly 18 months ago.

MFG now comprises roughly 1,200 sites across Britain, with earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) of about £700m anticipated in this financial year.

It is now focused on its role in the energy transition, with hundreds of electric vehicle charging points installed across its network, and growing its high-margin foodservice offering.

MFG has outlined plans to invest £400m in EV charging, and is now the second-largest ultra-rapid player in the UK – which delivers 100 miles of range in ten minutes – with close to 1,000 chargers.

It aims to grow that figure to 3,000 by 2030.

CD&R, which declined to comment on Wednesday afternoon, will retain a controlling stake in MFG after any stake sale, while Morrisons also holds a 20% interest in the company.

Read more from Sky News:
Visa blamed for payment errors
Care provider nears collapse
Gary Neville attacks NI rise

Bankers expect that the minority deal with Apollo will be followed a couple of years later with an initial public offering on the London stock market.

CD&R invested in MFG in 2015, making its investment a long-term one by the standards of most private equity holding periods.

The sale of a large minority stake at a £7bn enterprise valuation will crystallise a positive return for the US-based buyout firm.

CD&R and its investors have already been paid hundreds of millions of pounds in dividends from MFG, having seen its earnings grow 14-fold since the original purchase.

Morrisons’ rival, Asda, has undertaken a similar transaction with its petrol forecourts, with EG Group acquiring the Leeds-based grocer’s forecourt network.

EG Group, which along with Asda is controlled by private equity firm TDR Capital, is now being prepared for a listing in the US.

Apollo declined to comment.

Continue Reading

Trending