Supply cuts from heavyweight crude producers have helped drive oil prices near $100 per barrel — fueling some to consider the potential for future demand destruction.
Brent crude futures rose 63 cents per barrel from the Thursday settlement to $96.01 per barrel on Friday at 11 a.m. London time and sit well above prices observed in the first half of the year.
The gains could prove short lived, some analysts warn. Sushant Gupta, research director of Asia refining at Wood Mackenzie, on Monday said “there are all signs that we could potentially see $100 per barrel in quarter four,” but warned that global economic fragility and incoming seasonal demand drops in the first quarter would make this unsustainable long term. In a Friday report, ING analysts signaled the oil market is “clearly in overbought territory.”
At the heart of price support are a series of voluntary cuts that fall outside of the official policy of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies, known as OPEC+. First is a 1.66 million-barrel-per-day decline implemented by some OPEC+ members until the end of 2024. Topping this, Saudi Arabia and Russia pledged to respectively remove another 1 million barrel per day of production and 300,000 barrels per day of exports until the end of this year.
Some say buyers can weather the storm of high prices. Seven European refiners and traders, who spoke under anonymity because of contractual obligations, told CNBC that local buyers can withstand oil prices veering into triple digits without lowering their output runs. All of the sources pointed to firm refining margins, meaning the difference between the value of refined products and the price of the crude feedstock to generate them is favorable.
Uncertainty lingers over further China fuel export quotas, while Russia’s indefinite ban of its fuel exports — which Europe cannot purchase because of sanctions that followed Moscow’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine — has tightened availabilities of refined products and could particularly worsen global diesel shortages. Sanctions-disrupted access to Russian crude and OPEC+ cuts have shrunk availabilities of high-density and high-sulfur crude to Western buyers, encumbering their task to produce certain refined products.
Refinery margins so far have nevertheless been attractive enough that some refiners have lightened their seasonal maintenance to take advantage, one refiner said. Refined oil product demand could yet stay strong in the West, as Thanksgiving and winter vacations boost travel in the U.S. and Europe, and the hurricane season looms — which can historically disrupt both local refining and crude production.
“We estimate a high-impact hurricane event this year could result in a temporary loss of monthly offshore crude oil production of about 1.5 million barrels per day (b/d) and a nearly equivalent temporary loss of refining capacity,” the U.S. Energy Information Administration said in July.
“Outages on that scale could increase monthly average U.S. retail gasoline prices by between 25 cents per gallon and 30 cents per gallon.”
‘Self-fulfilling prophecy’
Some European market participants polled by CNBC doubted triple-digit oil prices are sustainable in the long term, with three pointing to possible demand destruction — where customers gradually answer persistently high prices with fewer purchases. A fourth said demand destruction is a potential question, once prices hit $110 per barrel.
“Sometimes high oil prices can become a self-fulfilling prophecy,” Indian Energy Minister Hardeep Singh Puri warned in August. “The self-fulfilling prophecy means that at a particular point of time comes a tipping, and then there’s a fall of demand.”
One of the market sources also noted that steep backwardation — where current prices exceed future ones and a key metric to assess the viability of storage — discourages stocking refined products, leaving the market vulnerable to any disruptions.
“OPEC+ production cuts, including the voluntary extra cut by Saudi Arabia, are bearing fruit, lowering oil inventories and supporting prices,” UBS Strategist Giovanni Staunovo said in a Thursday note, pegging the bank’s oil price estimate at $90-100 per barrel over the coming months.
The oil price hike has benefitted Moscow despite sanctions. Under a program by the G7 largest global economies, non-G7 buyers may only use Western shipping and insurance to import Russian crude purchased at or below $60 per barrel.
But Moscow has been deploying its own dark fleet, and traders say Russia’s flagship Urals crude currently sells at roughly $8-10-per-barrel discounts to benchmark oil prices, implying values $25 per barrel above the G7 price cap. The Russian energy ministry did not respond to a CNBC request for comment.
OPEC+ move
An OPEC+ technical committee meets on Oct. 4 to review market fundamentals and individual production compliance. While incapable of adjusting OPEC+ policy, the Joint Ministerial Monitoring Committee can call an emergency ministerial meeting to do so. Three OPEC+ delegates, speaking anonymously because of the sensitivity of the discussions, told CNBC it is unlikely this upcoming JMMC meeting will result in policy tweaks.
The White House has previously vocally entreated OPEC+ producers to hike output, ease prices at the pump and alleviate inflation — but Washington has been largely silent in response to the production declines. In October last year, the U.S. levied accusations of coercion over other OPEC+ members against de-facto group leader Saudi Arabia, which depends on oil revenues for its economic diversification giga-projects.
The White House faces a difficult balancing act, as it pushes for a normalization of ties between Israel and Saudi Arabia, two top allies in the Middle East. Riyadh has also shown signs of steering closer toward China and Russia after rekindling relations with Iran through Beijing-mediated talks and receiving an invitation to join the emerging economies’ BRICS alliance. A spate of high-profile U.S. official visits to Saudi Arabia over the summer suggests ongoing discussions — though it remains to be seen if oil re-enters the diplomatic agenda.
RBC Head of Global Commodity Strategy Helima Croft, who says “we clearly see momentum” for Brent at $100 per barrel, stressed the absence of many options left in the U.S. toolkit.
“Will there be an energy component of a potential U.S.-Saudi deal? I think the Saudi administration would clearly like more Saudi barrels on the market, because, look, there are not a lot of great options for this administration to get prices down,” she said on Wednesday.
“They’ve already done the big [Strategic Petroleum Reserve] release, the question is are they really going do more … they’ve done deals with Iran, but those barrels are already in the market, so it’s not clear where the administration goes next for additional barrels.”
Toyota’s $14 billion US battery plant is now up and running. The mega site spans 1,850 acres, or about 121 football fields, but Toyota is saying it will be even bigger.
Toyota’s new US battery plant is set for an expansion
The first batteries rolled off the production line at Toyota’s new battery plant in Liberty, North Carolina, last Wednesday, marking a “pivotal moment” in the automaker’s nearly 70-year history in the US.
Toyota’s new plant houses 14 battery production lines, which will be used to power battery electric vehicles (BEVs), hybrids (HEVs), and plug-in hybrids (PHEVs).
At full capacity, the battery plant can produce 30 GWh per year. The plant is phasing in batteries imported from Japan through a joint venture with LG Electronics, which will power the Camry HEV, Corolla Cross HEV, and RAV4 HEV. It also ships hybrid battery modules to its Kentucky assembly plant and to another plant in Alabama, which it co-owns with Mazda.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Toyota’s battery plant is already massive, spanning about 121 football fields, but company executives are saying it will likely be even bigger than expected.
2026 Toyota RAV4 PHEV (Source: Toyota)
“Our plans are to go 70% electrified by 2030. So obviously that could fuel additional expansion here at the plant,” David Christ, head of the Toyota brand in North America, said during a media briefing on Wednesday (via Triad Business Journal) following a tour of the facility.
Building on its commitment, Toyota announced an additional $10 billion investment over the next five years in electrified mobility.
Toyota US battery plant (Source: Toyota)
Toyota didn’t say exactly how it plans to invest the $10 billion, but the new battery plant is likely to see some of it. The battery modules that Toyota produces at the plant vary from hybrid to EV, but the cells are the same, enabling it to adjust based on demand.
It can also adapt to different battery types, which could possibly include solid-state batteries, according to Toyota’s plant president, Don Stewart.
2026 Toyota C-HR electric SUV (Source: Toyota)
Toyota, which has been one of the biggest laggards in the shift to all-electric vehicles, will continue pushing hybrids as it aims to overcome the new US tariffs.
The plant can supply batteries for around 600,000 hybrid vehicles a year while Toyota builds capacity for another 74,000 PHEVs and 45,000 EVs, including its first three-row electric SUV.
Starting next year, Toyota’s best-selling vehicle, the RAV4, will be sold exclusively as a hybrid. Toyota is also launching several new BEVs, including the C-HR and BZ Woodlands electric SUVs, as well as the 2026 electric Lexus ES.
Electrek’s Take
It’s not a surprise to see Toyota standing by hybrids at this point. What will be interesting is to see how Toyota’s new electric vehicles sell.
After solving many of the issues with its first EV, the bZ4X, will Toyota’s upcoming models sell? Several EVs, like the Hyundai IONIQ 5 and Chevy Equinox EV, have proven that an affordable electric car with enough range and features will sell.
With longer driving ranges, faster charging, and an improved interior and exterior design, Toyota’s upcoming electric vehicles are already a significant upgrade over the outgoing bZ4X. If Toyota sees EV sales improve, we could see production plans at the facility shift once again.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Bluetti launches new Elite 400 ‘luggage’ power station with up to 53% exclusive savings starting from $1,409
Running alongside its ongoing early Black Friday Sale, which includes returning exclusive lows on the Pioneer Na(Sodium) power station and others, we’ve now secured exclusive savings on Bluetti’s next big release, the Elite 400 Portable Power Station starting solo at $1,409.06 shipped, after using the code 9TO5TOYS6OFF at checkout. This new modular power solution will cost $2,999 at full price after these savings go, with this being quite the combined 53% markdown that saves you $1,590 off that rate and sets an impressive bar for future discounts down the line. Head below to learn more and/or browse the lineup of exclusive bundle offers we’re seeing too.
The new Bluetti Elite 400 power station is similar to Anker’s SOLIX F3800 series, but lacks the expansive capabilities at this time. Still, it brings quite the punch at its starting 3,840Wh LiFePO4 capacity, with nine output ports to connect devices and appliances for up to 3,900W of steady power delivery, surging as high as 5,200W. And it’s nice to see it come in a convenient, wheeled-and-handled design “that fits like luggage,” making it more manageable when taking it camping, on roadtrips, and more.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Like most of the Elite 400 power station’s counterparts and competitors these days, you’ll get a full array of in-app smart controls, as well as four primary means to top off the station’s battery after depletion. Using an AC outlet alone will have you back to 80% in about 1.9 hours, or you can wait 2.5 hours to reach full. There’s a max 1,000W solar input to top things off in up to six hours, while connecting that much solar input and using an AC outlet simultaneously can recharge to 80% in 70 minutes, and full in up to 1.8 hours. Picking up the bundle with the alternator charger gives you on-the-go juice-ups in 7.5 hours from empty.
***Note: Make sure to use the exclusive code 9TO5TOYS6OFF at checkout to score these prices below!
Rad Power drops RadWagon 4 cargo e-bike to $1,299 Black Friday low for first time since launching (Save $500)
As part of its ongoing Black Friday Sale, Rad Power Bikes has given us the largest price cut on its RadWagon 4 Cargo e-bike that we haven’t seen since it launched back in 2020. You can now hop on this cargo-hauling commuter at $1,299 shipped for as long as supplies last. Normally priced at $1,799, we’ve mostly been seeing it get minor $100 or $200 discounts over 2025, or else just getting bundled gear at full price. The deal here gives you a $500 markdown that only matches its original pre-sale launch pricing from 2020, returning it to the all-time lowest rate we have ever tracked.
EcoFlow offers new DELTA 3 Max Plus power station with a FREE TRAIL 200 DC unit at $1,099 in flash sale, more (ends tonight)
As part of its ongoing early Black Friday Sale, EcoFlow has another short-term flash sale that is ending tonight at midnight PST, providing up to 62% discounts on four offers for that timeframe, including the new DELTA 3 Max Plus power station that comes with a FREE Trail 200 DC 60,000mAh power station at $1,099 shipped, which sadly can’t use any of the extra savings codes from the overall sale. While it carries an $1,899 MSRP since releasing in September, it launched and has been regularly dropped down to $1,099 in the time since when apart of sales, which is where Amazon currently has it priced, though you won’t be getting the FREE Trail 200 DC station with it (valued at $200). We’ve only seen this rate beaten by its $1,044 launch deal (with a bonus savings code), so you’re looking at the next-best price here, especially bundled with the extra power station, giving you a total $1,000 in savings.
Make up to 100 cuts on one charge with Worx’s 20V 5-inch cordless mini chainsaw at $72.50 (Reg. up to $130)
Amazon is offering the Worx 20V 5-inch Mini Cordless Chainsaw at $72.50 shipped. While it carries a $160 MSRP direct from the brand, it has more often gone for $90 to $130 at Amazon this year, with other discounts over 2025 having mostly kept costs above $84, though there was a one-time fall to its $63 low in mid-September. Aside from that pricing, you’re looking at the next-best rate here today while this deal lasts, giving you $57.50 off the full price and allowing you to manage pruning and cutting in tighter spaces. You can also find its boosted 20V Nitro counterpart down at $109.99 shippedright now.
Tackle storm cleanup, firewood, and more with SKIL’s PWR CORE 40 14-inch cordless chainsaw kit at $142 (Reg. $199)
Amazon is offering the SKIL PWR CORE 40 14-inch 40V Lightweight Cordless Chainsaw at $142.40 shipped. Normally fetching $199 at full price, discounts over the year have almost entirely dropped costs to $149, though we did see it fall to its $139 low once during July’s Prime Day event. Today’s deal gives you a 28% markdown that cuts $57 off the going rate for the second-lowest price we have tracked – just $3 above the one-time low.
Lectric XP4 Standard Folding Utility e-bikes with $326 bundle: $999 (Reg. $1,325)
Lectric XP Lite 2.0 Long-Range e-bikes with $449 bundles: $999 (Reg. $1,448)
Heybike Mars 2.0 Folding Fat-Tire e-bike with Black Friday gift: $999 (Reg. $1,499)
Heybike Ranger S Folding Fat-Tire e-bike with Black Friday gift: $999 (Reg. $1,499)
Best new Green Deals landing this week
The savings this week are also continuing to a collection of other markdowns. To the same tune as the offers above, these all help you take a more energy-conscious approach to your routine. Winter means you can lock in even better off-season price cuts on electric tools for the lawn while saving on EVs and tons of other gear.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Tesla has settled another lawsuit involving its Autopilot driver-assist system, which is alleged to have caused a crash. This time, a 2020 Model Y on Autopilot crashed into a stationary police vehicle in Texas.
This is Tesla’s fourth known settlement in lawsuits involving Autopilot crashes since losing its first trial earlier this year.
The case, James Tran vs. Tesla, Inc., was filed in Harris County, Texas, after an incident on November 15, 2020.
According to the lawsuit, James Tran was traveling on the I-10 freeway in his 2020 Model Y with the Autopilot feature engaged. Up ahead on the same road, three Harris County Constable (police) vehicles were blocking several lanes of traffic for a prior accident.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Tran’s Model Y, while operating on Autopilot, collided with one of the stationary constables’ vehicles.
In his petition, Tran alleged that Tesla’s “Autopilot… system safety features failed to detect” the emergency vehicles or “function in any way to avoid or warn of the hazard”. His lawyers claimed the system had a “failure to warn” about its known “inability to detect emergency cars with flashing lights” and sought over $1 million in damages.
As it almost always does, Tesla’s defense centered on blaming the driver. In a March 2024 “No-Evidence” motion, Tesla’s lawyers alleged that Tran had been “gambling and drinking at a casino” before the 2:40 a.m. crash and “dozed off” behind the wheel.
From the beginning of the case, Tesla’s legal strategy was to argue that Tran was the “sole cause” of his injuries. By 2024, they argued he had “no evidence” and, crucially, “no experts” to prove Autopilot was at fault.
Tesla sought dismissal, but the judge allowed it to proceed, and the case was set for trial on November 11.
Despite this aggressive defense, Tesla didn’t let a jury decide the case.
Days before the trial was set to start, Tesla’s lawyers quietly filed a “Notice of Settlement” on November 6, 2025. The document simply states that “the parties in the above-captioned case have reached a settlement”. The terms, as usual, are not disclosed in the filing.
Shortly after Tran’s crash, Tesla was investigated by NHTSA regarding Autopilot-equipped vehicles crashing into emergency vehicles. The federal agency found 11 incidents that resulted in 17 injuries and one death.
NHTSA eventually concluded that Tesla’s driver monitoring system for Autopilot was “inadequate” and Tesla had to issue a recall.
For the first time, a case went to trial before a jury, and they assigned a third of the blame for the crash to Tesla for the role Autopilot played. The rest of the blame was put on the driver, who had already settled with the victims and their families before the Tesla trial began.
The jury awarded the plaintiffs $243 million. The automaker has made clear its intentions to appeal the verdict.
Before the trial, the plaintiffs offered Tesla a $60 million settlement, but the company refused.
The trial was costly for Tesla, not only because of the more than $240 million award, but also because of the information that came out during the trial, which didn’t make Tesla look good.
There are dozens of other cases currently going through the court process, and now they can take advantage of what was learned through the trial.
To avoid further discovery, Tesla appears to be increasingly willing to settle these cases.
With the Tran case, it now marks at least Tesla’s fourth known settlement of lawsuits involving Autopilot/FSD crashes since losing the trial in August.
Electrek’s Take
As I have been highlighting over the last few months, this is just the beginning. We are just now starting to see cases that come from crashes that happened in 2018-2019-2020 go to trial.
It’s a long process, but we know that the number of crashes involving Autopilot and FSD significantly ramped up in 2021-2025 due to higher volumes and the launch of FSD.
All these accidents, many of them unfortunately fatal, are going to go through the legal process, and Tesla will have to settle for billions of dollars when everything is said and done.
Simply blaming the driver for abusing Tesla’s ADAS system is not working anymore. Tesla is consistently taking at least part of the blame for misleading drivers into believing its ADAS systems are more than they are or for their monitoring system’s lack.
In fact, there’s another similar lawsuit in the same county as the Tran lawsuit, which is about to go to trial unless Tesla settles it soon. It involves a drunk driver on Autopilot crashing into 5 police officers, injuring them in the process. The officers are suing Tesla with a similar approach to that of Tran in this case.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.