Connect with us

Published

on

It’s October, which means it is time for alarmist cops and credulous reporters to start warning parents about the purported menace of cannabis edibles in trick-or-treat bags. KSNT, the NBC affiliate in Topeka, Kansas, got a jump on that annual rite last month, when it amplified a “community advisory” from the St. Mary’s Police Department about “THC-infused gummies and snacks marketed to children ahead of the holidays.”

That framing is misleading in at least two ways. First, it assumes that producers of marijuana edibles that resemble popular candy brands are targeting children, who cannot legally buy such products even in states where adults can, as opposed to nostalgic grownups with a sweet tooth. Second, it implies that nefarious adults are apt to distribute THC treats on Halloween, requiring extra vigilance by parents who already worry about the danger allegedly posed by needles, glass shards, or poison that might be lurking in their kids’ candy hauls.

The KSNT story features a photograph of cannabis candy made in California, where medical marijuana was legalized in 1996, followed by recreational marijuana in 2016. At a glance, the package looks a lot like cherry-flavored Airheads Xtremes, a blatant trademark violation that surely is cause for concern at Perfetti Van Melle, which makes the genuine article. But the package carries several clues that the product is not intended for children. The front includes a “medicated candy” descriptor, along with a state-mandated cannabis label and a statement of THC content. A label on the back warns: “Contains Cannabis, A Schedule I Controlled Substance. Keep out of Reach of Children.”

KSNT nevertheless describes the product as “disguised THC candies.” Citing police, it says “the THC edibles are very dangerous in the hands of children and are disguised as popular brands such as Air Heads, Fruit Gushers, Sour Skittles, Sour Patch Kids, Buzzy Peaches and Cherry Blasters.” The implication is that the manufacturers want to trick kids into getting high, although it’s not clear why that would be a sensible business strategy. And while the reference to “the holidays” implies that the risk of dangerous confusion is especially acute around Halloween, the article cites no evidence to support that premise.

That’s par for the course with Halloween-related warnings about cannabis edibles, which police departments and news outlets have been issuing for many years despite a dearth of actual incidents involving malicious distribution of such products to children. “Doctors are warning about the risks of dangerous drugs being mistaken for candy,” WLS, the ABC affiliate in Chicago, reported last year. “Those incidents increase around Halloween, especially now with some drugs looking more and more like colorful treats.”

In addition to “marijuana edibles,” that article mentioned “rainbow fentanyl,” colorful opioid tablets that, like “medicated” Airheads, are frequently portrayed, even less plausibly, as deliberately designed to entice children. “Rainbow fentanyl, pot gummies or other colorful pills could all be mistaken for normal candy by children or people unfamiliar with them,” WLS warned. “If children get their hands on them during the trick or treat season they can be deadly, so parents should be on guard.”

WLS was vague about exactly how children might “get their hands on them.” Although it alluded to perennial fears of sadistic pranks by adults who surreptitiously pass off drugs as candy on Halloween, the expert it quotedSteven Aks, a toxicologist and emergency physicianseemed to be more worried about accidental confusion.

“People can buy gummies or chocolate products,” Aks said. “I think good labeling and then good storage of something like cannabis is key. If there are pills in the home or anything like that, they should be in locked medicine cabinets and away from toddlers. You know Halloween, there’s a lot of candy. Make sure that all the medications locked up so that there’s no confusion.”

But Aks also implicitly lent credence to the idea that people might deliberately give drugs to children on Halloween. “It’s key that people don’t confuse these things with candy at all,” he said. “I think good common sense would be get your candy from a well-recognized manufacturer that’s sealed.” Although WLS asserted that “incidents” of such confusion “increase around Halloween,” it cited no numbers to back up that claim.

Generally speaking, reports that supposedly reinforce the fear of inadvertent juvenile drug consumption do not withstand close scrutiny. “Should parents worry about drug-infused Halloween candy?” theAkron Beacon Journal wondered in October 2022. Suggesting that the answer might be yes, the paper cited “news that some Akron middle schoolers last month were sickened after ingesting cannabis-infused gummies.” But it turns out those kids knew what they were eating.

“We investigated and disciplined multiple students according to the [Akron Public Schools] Code of Conduct,” Litchfield Community Learning Center Principal Jessica Sax reported. “We were not able to determine where the gummies came from. They were in possession of student A, and student statements from others involved all indicate that student A was the one distributing them. Student A and guardian of student A deny that they actually belonged to student A.”

Middle-schoolers who deliberately consume cannabis gummies, of course, are a far cry from trick-or-treaters who inadvertently eat them based on the assumption that they are ordinary candy. Regarding the latter risk, Heather Trnka, injury prevention supervisor at Akron Children’s Hospital, was appropriately skeptical, telling the Beacon Journal “people typically aren’t going to be handing out any cannabis-infused candy or other drugs to trick or treaters,” in the paper’s paraphrase.

“That is a low-risk item,” Trnka said. “We know that those folks who get their hands on fentanyl or other drugs are going to be using it for themselves. It shouldn’t be a concern that we’re going to be worried that we’re going to get it from our neighbors or passed out as candy on Halloween night.”

Getting closer to that scenario, WLS reported in November 2022 that “Halloween candy possibly contaminated with cannabis” had been “handed out in South Chicago Heights.” In that case, a man allegedly handed out gummy bears in bags that had formerly contained marijuana: “Police said Jarod Feilen, 25, has been charged with child endangerment and has acknowledged handing out at least 20 of the packages. Police said he told investigators he ran out of Halloween candy and so he filled empty marijuana packets with gummy bears….Police said they are not aware of any children ingesting the potentially drug-laced candy and are working to recover any that was distributed.”

Did those gummy bears contain THC? WLS said the candy was “in the process of being tested by a crime lab to see if the candy itself [had] been tampered with.” When I called the South Chicago Heights Police Department to ask about the results of that testing, I was told I could get the answer only by filing a Freedom of Information Act request.

Finally, after many years of searching in vain, we have an actual case of cannabis candy distributed to children on Halloweenin Canada rather than the United States. In February, CTV News reported that a Winnipeg couple, 63-year-old Sheldon Chochinov and 52-year-old Tammy Sigurdur, were “facing 13 counts of causing bodily harm by criminal negligence, 13 counts of administering a noxious thing with intent to endanger life or cause bodily harm, 13 counts of distributing cannabis to a young person and 13 counts of distributing illicit cannabis.” Chochinov and Sigurdur allegedly handed out marijuana edibles such as “THC infused Nerds candy” to trick-or-treaters in 2022.

According to a search warrant application, CTV News said, Chochinov told Richard Wolson, a criminal defense lawyer, “the entire incident was a ‘mistake’ made when ‘under the influence.'” He said “the two had run out of candy and decided to hand out their own personal ‘stash’ of THC candy, adding e and his wife regretted their actions.” But police said “there was an ample supply of normal non-THC infused candy at the ready and therefore the THC infused Nerds candy was not distributed as a result of a rushed last minute mistake but [was] instead [due to] criminal negligence.”

Last week, CBC News reported that Sigurdur had pleaded guilty to “inadvertently” handing out cannabis candy. Consistent with her claim that she and her husband did not execute a deliberate prank, photographs of the incriminating evidence taken by the Winnipeg Police Service show bags of cannabis candy clearly labeled as such. The Winnipeg Free Press, which noted that “none of the children who received the THC edibles ate them,” reported that the couple’s neighbors, who described them as “friendly,” did not believe they would have intentionally given kids pot candy.

For decades, police and the press have been warning parents that strangers with candy are bent on tricking their kids into getting high on Halloween. Yet in all that time, this Canadian case of what looks like a stoned mistake is the closest thing to a documented example that I have seen.

The same contrast between public fears and actual incidents is apparent when you look at the broader class of purported Halloween hazards. “My research stretches back to 1958,” University of Delaware sociologist Joel Best, who specializes in debunking such claims, recently told Fox News. “I have been unable to find any evidence that any child has been killed or seriously injured by a contaminated treat picked up in the course of trick-or-treating.”

Still, you can never be too safe, right? Although “there are no records of a child being seriously harmed by razor-filled or drug-laced candies during Halloween,” Fox News notes, “law enforcement and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration strongly urge that all candy be inspected as a preventative measure.”

Then again, parents obsessed with the possibility of contaminated candy may be taking their eyes off the ball. Although “Halloween is the most dangerous night for kids,” Trnka told the Beacon Journal, that’s not because of booby-trapped treats: “We see more kids who get hit by cars on Halloween night than any other night of the year.”

Continue Reading

Business

Jobless rate hits four-year high- but makes interest rate cut more likely

Published

on

By

Jobless rate hits four-year high- but makes interest rate cut more likely

The UK’s unemployment rate has risen to a four-year high, in a surprise deterioration that boosts the case for a Bank of England interest rate cut.

The Office for National Statistics (ONS) reported a rise in the jobless rate from 4.6% to 4.7% in the three months to May.

No change had been expected after the 0.1 percentage point rise seen just last month.

The ONS data, which still comes with a health warning due to poor participation rates, also showed a reduction in the pace of wage rises, with average weekly earnings rising by 5%. That was down from the 5.2% level reported a month ago.

Money latest: The rising cost of airport drop-off fees

ONS director of economic statistics, Liz McKeown, said of its findings: “The labour market continues to weaken, with the number of employees on payroll falling again, though revised tax data shows the decline in recent months is less pronounced than previously estimated.

“Pay growth fell again in both cash and real terms, but both measures remain relatively strong by historic standards.

More from Money

“The number of job vacancies is still falling and has now been dropping continuously for three years.”

The data was released 24 hours after a surprise rise in the rate of inflation, to 3.6%, was revealed by the ONS.

It was seen as muddying the waters as the Bank considers the timing of its next interest rate cut.

But a quarter point reduction, to 4%, is widely expected at the next meeting of the rate-setting committee in early August,

The Bank, experts say, will be looking past the headline inflation numbers and see scope to introduce the third cut of the year due to the softening labour market seen in 2025 – a factor the Bank’s governor Andrew Bailey had suggested would come more into focus in a recent interview with The Times.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What does ‘inflation is rising’ mean?

Weaker pay awards remain a compulsory element to bringing down borrowing costs as there are fears the UK’s difficulties in bringing down inflation are partly linked to wage growth outpacing price hikes since August 2023.

Add to that the slowdown in economic growth and you have a Bank seemingly grappling the effects of so-called stagflation – as scenario of weak growth with inflation persistently well above the Bank’s 2% target.

While there are conflicting forces at play for the Bank’s interest rate deliberations, rising inflation, coupled with weakening growth and jobs data, are all unwelcome for a chancellor under growing pressure.

Rachel Reeves was accused on Wednesday of contributing to inflation through taxes on employment deployed from April – with industry bodies in the grocery sector claiming an element of rising food price growth was down to businesses passing on those extra costs, alongside hikes to minimum pay requirements.

At the same time, those budget measures have clearly held back hiring since the spring.

One crumb of comfort for her is that the prospect of a rate cut next month remains on – with any reduction helping bring down the cost of servicing government debt as the headroom she has within the public finances remains under severe pressure.

Government U-turns on winter fuel payment curbs and welfare reforms have squeezed her fiscal rules, leaving her to cover likely at the autumn budget to cover shortfalls either through further tax hikes or spending cuts.

Yael Selfin, chief economist at KPMG UK, said of the rate cut prospects: “Slowing activity in the labour market, coupled with pay pressures easing, will likely prompt the Bank of England to lower interest rates next month.

“The impact of April’s tax and administrative changes has led to a marked slowdown in hiring activity among firms. With domestic activity remaining sluggish, the MPC will likely want to provide support via looser policy to prevent a more significant deterioration in the labour market.”

Continue Reading

Politics

‘We’re a team’: Jess Phillips defends PM’s decision to suspend Labour rebels

Published

on

By

Starmer suspends four Labour MPs for breaches of party discipline

A minister has defended Sir Keir Starmer’s decision to discipline rebellious MPs, saying they would have used “stronger” language against those who are “continually causing trouble”.

Home Office minister Jess Phillips told Sky News’ Matt Barbet that Labour MPs were elected “as a team under a banner and under a manifesto” and could “expect” to face disciplinary action if they did not vote with the government.

It comes after the prime minister drew criticism for suspending four Labour MPs who voted against the government on its flagship welfare bill earlier this month, while stripping a further three of their roles as trade envoys.

Politics latest: PM to welcome German chancellor

Brian Leishman, Chris Hinchliff, Neil Duncan-Jordan and Rachael Maskell.
Pic: Uk Parliament
Image:
Brian Leishman, Chris Hinchliff, Neil Duncan-Jordan and Rachael Maskell.
Pic: Uk Parliament

Brian Leishman, Chris Hinchliff, Neil Duncan-Jordan and Rachael Maskell all lost the whip, meaning they are no longer part of Labour’s parliamentary party and will sit as independent MPs.

Labour backbenchers lined up to criticise the move last night, arguing it was a “terrible look” that made “a Reform government much more likely”.

But speaking to Sky News, Ms Phillips said: “We were elected as a team under a banner and under a manifesto, and we have to seek to work together, and if you are acting in a manner that is to undermine the ability of the government to deliver those things, I don’t know what you expect.

“Now I speak out against things I do not like, both internally and sometimes externally, all the time.

“There is a manner of doing that, that is the right way to go about it. And sometimes you feel forced to rebel and vote against.”

Referring to a description of the rebels by an unnamed source in The Times, she said: “I didn’t call it persistent knob-headery, but that’s the way that it’s been termed by some.”

She said she would have described it as “something much more sweary” because “we are a team, and we have to act as a team in order to achieve something”.

More than 100 MPs had initially rebelled against the plan to cut personal independent payments (PIP). Ultimately, 47 voted against the bill’s third reading, after it was watered down significantly in the face of defeat.

Three other MPs – who also voted against the government – have had their trade envoy roles removed. They are Rosena Allin Khan, Bell Ribeiro-Addy and Mohammed Yasin.

However, it is understood this was not the only reason behind the decision to reprimand all seven MPs, with sources citing “repeated breaches of party discipline”.

Ms Maskell was one of the lead rebels in the welfare revolt, and has more recently called for a wealth tax to fund the U-turn.

Mr Hinchliff, the MP for North East Hertfordshire, proposed a series of amendments to the flagship planning and infrastructure bill criticising the government’s approach.

Read more:
Why suspended Labour MPs clearly hit a nerve with Starmer
Who are the suspended Labour MPs?

Mr Duncan-Jordan, the MP for Poole, led a rebellion against the cut to the winter fuel payments while Alloa and Grangemouth MP Mr Leishman has been critical of the government’s position on Gaza as well as the closing of an oil refinery in his constituency.

Ian Byrne, the Labour MP for Liverpool West Derby, wrote on X on Wednesday that the prime minister’s actions “don’t show strength” and were “damaging Labour’s support and risk rolling out the red carpet for Reform”.

Leeds East MP Richard Burgon added that “challenging policies that harm our communities” would “make a Reform government much more likely”.

Ian Lavery, Labour MP for Blyth and Ashington, warned the suspensions were “a terrible look”.

“Dissatisfaction with the direction the leadership is taking us isn’t confined to the fringes,” he wrote.

Continue Reading

Business

Jaguar Land Rover to cut hundreds of UK jobs

Published

on

By

Jaguar Land Rover to cut hundreds of UK jobs

Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) has revealed plans to cut 500 jobs as it moves to save costs while battling a sharp decline in sales.

The UK-based firm said the reduction in management roles, which amounted to 1.5% of its workforce, would be completed through a voluntary redundancy programme.

JLR has been struggling recently on the back of the US trade war.

Money latest: The rising cost of airport drop-off fees

It temporarily paused exports to the US, its biggest single foreign market, in April after Donald Trump’s hike to duties covering cars to 25%.

It was later trimmed to 10% under the US-UK trade truce agreement, but that rate only covers the cars it makes in the UK.

The terms of the deal also cap total annual car exports to the US at 100,000 models, so the higher rate will apply to those vehicles exceeding the threshold.

More on Tariffs

KEIR STARMER JLR
Image:
Sir Keir Starmer told JLR workers in April that he would protect their jobs

The tariff uncertainty, coupled with a planned wind-down of older Jaguar models, meant sales were 15% down over the three months to June to just over 94,000.

JLR confirmed its job cut plans on the day the UK’s jobless rate hit a four-year high.

It also follows on the back of a Kier Starmer speech to staff, promising to protect their jobs, back in April.

The company had said, after the US-UK truce in May, that the deal would do just that.

A spokesperson said: “As part of normal business practice, we regularly offer eligible employees the opportunity to leave JLR through limited voluntary redundancy programmes.”

Continue Reading

Trending