The fallout from the banking crisis earlier this year continues as the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision considers requiring banks to disclose their crypto asset holdings. The committee, which operates under the aegis of the Bank for International Settlements, identified holding crypto as one of the factors that led to the demise of several banks in March.
According to the committee’s report, three structural trends may have indirectly contributed to the banks’ failures: the increasing role of nonbank intermediation in recent years, crypto assets concentrated in a small number of banks and the ability of customers to move their funds faster due to increasing digitalization.
The report also examined policy issues in detail.
The report especially highlighted the role of crypto in the failure of Signature Bank. The committee found:
SBNY’s significant client concentration of digital asset companies put it in a precarious position when the “crypto winter” hit in 2022. […] SBNY’s poor governance and inadequate risk management practices put the bank in a position where it could not effectively manage its liquidity in a time of stress.
The discussion is not an indication of planned revisions to the Basel Framework, the report said. In January, the committee amended its framework to limit crypto assets in bank reserves to 2%.
— Bank for International Settlements (@BIS_org) October 5, 2023
A statement accompanying the report said a consultation paper on crypto asset exposure disclosure would be published soon.
This is only the latest rehash of the banks’ difficult days in March. The United States Federal Reserve Bank and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) published their conclusions on the events in April, with the FDIC taking another look at it in August.
Solana is becoming the preferred cryptocurrency for retail investors, bolstering analyst expectations for another year of significant gains as the industry awaits the first US spot SOL ETF.
Two Russian nationals face charges of conspiracy to commit money laundering and operating an unlicensed money-transmitting business, while one remains at large.
A proposed CFPB rule could allow crypto users to have protections similar to those of US bank account holders by considering the definition of “funds.”