Connect with us

Published

on

Share on Pinterest A new study looks at how racial and ethnic discrimination can affect the gut. nazar_ab/Getty ImagesRacial discrimination increases the risk of poorer mental health, sleep problems, inflammation and obesity in adults and children.The link between racial discrimination and obesity may be due to a stress-related disruption of the communication between the brain and gut microbiome.Coping strategies can help people reduce the impact of racial discrimination on their health, but policy changes are needed to reduce peoples exposure to discrimination.

People who experience frequent racial or ethnic discrimination are more susceptible to obesity and related conditions, with some research showing that these higher risks begin to appear in childhood.

Obesity is a major public health issue in the United States, affecting more than four in 10 American adults, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Black and Hispanic adults face even higher rates of obesity.

Similar patterns are seen in children and teens, with Black and Hispanic youth more likely to be affected by obesity than white youth, CDC data shows. Overall, one in five American youth have obesity.

Some research shows that higher rates of obesity among certain racial and ethnic groups may stem from factors such as genetics; individual physical activity levels; access to healthy, affordable foods; and exposure to unhealthy food product marketing.

Other research has focused on another known stressor racial or ethnic discrimination which increases the risk of poorer mental health, sleep problems, and physical issues such as cardiovascular disease and inflammation.

Discrimination has also been linked to higher body mass index (BMI), waist circumference and rates of obesity in adults and youth.

A new study suggests that this link to obesity may be partly due to stressful discrimination changing how peoples brains process food cues and disrupting communication between the gut microbiome and the brain.

The gut microbiome, which consists of bacteria and other microbes living in the intestines, plays a role in health and disease, including mental health and may also influence behavior.

Our results show that a persons brain-gut crosstalk may change in response to ongoing experiences of discrimination affecting food choices, cravings, brain function, and contributing to alterations in gut chemistry that have been implicated in stress and inflammation, Arpana Gupta, PhD, a researcher and co-director of the UCLA Goodman-Luskin Microbiome Center and the UCLA G. Oppenheimer Center for Neurobiology of Stress and Resilience, said in a news release. Discrimination affects food cue responses

The study, published Oct. 2 in Nature Mental Health, included 107 people 87 women and 20 men of diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds.

Participants completed a questionnaire that measures chronic experiences of unfair treatment. Based on their responses, researchers divided people into high discrimination exposure and low discrimination exposure groups.

People had MRI brain scans while completing a food-cue task involving looking at pictures of four different types of food two healthy and two unhealthy and one non-food picture as a comparison.

In addition, people provided a stool sample, which researchers used to measure changes in the levels of 12 glutamate metabolites, or breakdown products.

Glutamate is a neurotransmitter that is linked with inflammation related to conditions such as anxiety and depression. Research also shows that glutamate is involved in the brains reward system and related behaviors like impulsivity.

In the study, people who reported greater levels of discrimination had higher levels of two glutamate breakdown products associated with inflammation, oxidative stress and an increased risk of obesity, researchers found.

People who reported more experiences of discrimination also had greater activation in certain areas of the brain in response to unhealthy food cues. The activated regions are involved in reward processing, motivation, cravings and appetite responses.

Discrimination-related stress was also associated with changes in brain responses involved in self-regulation this occurred only with cues for unhealthy foods, not for healthy foods.

In addition, unhealthy sweet food was involved in changing the two-way communication between the brain and the gut microbiome, the results showed.

Researchers say that the new study and earlier research suggest that racial or ethnic discrimination may lead to changes in communication between the brain and gut microbiome, which shifts people toward unhealthy eating behaviors.

It appears that in response to stressful discrimination experiences, we seek comfort in food, manifested as increased cravings, and increased desire, for highly palatable foods, such as high-calorie foods and, especially, sweet foods, Gupta said in the release.

These alterations may ultimately cause people exposed to discrimination to be more vulnerable to obesity and obesity-related disorders, she added.Impact of discrimination is real

Rebecca Hasson, PhD, associate professor of movement science and director of the Childhood Disparities Research Laboratory at the University of Michigan School of Kinesiology, emphasized that discrimination is one particular form of toxic stress, one that is known to have negative health effects.

Discrimination also comes in many forms, including that based on race or ethnicity, weight, gender or other social identity.

So when you look at discrimination, youre now talking about a specific toxic stressor that can cause both psychological and physiological changes in the human body which leads to a whole host of diseases, she told Healthline.

Studies like the new one, which focus on racial discrimination, provide more evidence that this is a serious stressor that we need to pay attention to, she said.

In a paper published this month in Psychosomatic Medicine, she and her colleagues found that teens who experienced racial discrimination from other teens peer discrimination had unhealthy levels of the stress hormone cortisol throughout the day.

Disruptions in cortisol levels and patterns are connected to chronic health conditions such as depression, fatigue and cardiovascular disease.

Adolfo Cuevas, PhD, assistant professor of social and behavioral sciences at the NYU School of Global Public Health, said the new study also provides some understanding of what connects experiences of discrimination to obesity.

Studies [such as this] are showing us that discrimination has a real impact on our physiology and increases the risk of disease, he told Healthline. In other words, this is not simply happening in someones head.

In fact, these experiences are embodied, and are contributing to poor health outcomes and short life expectancy for a large group of Americans in the United States, he said.

Research by Cuevas and his colleagues found that greater racial discrimination in children and adolescents is associated with higher BMI and waist circumference.

While the results, published earlier this year in JAMA Network Open, showed that the effect of discrimination was small, Cuevas pointed out that the study looked at only a snapshot of these childrens lives.

These experiences of discrimination are not just happening one time, he said. This is happening over and over, at a critical period in these kids lives.

The effects of discrimination accumulate as children move into adulthood, which Cuevas said has huge implications for public health. So we have to find psychological and social resources to help mitigate that, he said.

This might include finding ways for clinicians, teachers, principals and even children to work together to create a greater appreciation of different cultures within the school system, he added, in order to reduce exposure to discrimination. Reducing the effects of discrimination

Hasson said children, teens and adults dont have to be exposed to a lot of racial discrimination to e negatively impacted by it.

So we need to be paying attention to it, in terms of how do we help people build resilience or develop coping strategies? she said.

Some research suggests that exercise may help buffer the stress response, she said, which means having a smaller cortisol response when you encounter a stressor.

Exercise may also act as a coping mechanism, she added, helping people distract themselves from an experience of discrimination or rebalance their system.

Physical activity can also build social relationships and support networks.

A great example of this is GirlTrek, an organization that is using physical activity to help African American women cope with race-related stressors, said Hasson.

Gupta said in the release that the results of the new study may help researchers develop treatments that target the brain or gut in order to reduce the effects of stress and discrimination.

This might involve taking a probiotic supplement or making changes to the diet to reduce inflammation associated with discrimination.

However, Cuevas cautions that the burden for reducing the impacts of these stressors should not fall on the victims of discrimination.

We should begin thinking about ways that we can change social structures to reduce childrens exposure to discrimination and also the risk of obesity, he said.

Hasson agrees that while its important to help individuals learn coping mechanisms for dealing with stressors, she emphasized that policy solutions are needed to eliminate exposure to these stressors in the first place.

For example, how do we create safe environments, through policy, to promote positive relationships that help people see the humanity of every individual? she said.

This approach is not just important to those most affected by racial discrimination but to everyone.

While communities of color experience racial discrimination at a much higher rate, it is important to know that this is a universal problem, said Hasson. So we need to find a universal solution to help all communities combat the negative effects of racism. Takeaway

Black and Hispanic youth and adults are at higher risk of obesity. A new study suggests that racial discrimination may contribute to this health disparity by disrupting the communication between the brain and the gut microbiome.

People who reported higher exposure to racial discrimination had greater activation in certain areas of the brain in response to pictures of unhealthy foods. They also had a decrease in activity in areas of the brain involved in self-regulation, but only for unhealthy food cues.

Exercise programs and other interventions may help people cope with racial discrimination and reduce the negative health effects. But experts say policy changes are needed to reduce peoples exposure to discrimination in the first place.

Continue Reading

Science

Crystalline Ice Discovered in Space: New Study Reveals Hidden Order in Cosmic Ice

Published

on

By

Crystalline Ice Discovered in Space: New Study Reveals Hidden Order in Cosmic Ice

Water ice coats many outer solar system bodies – from Jupiter’s icy moon Ganymede (above) to interstellar dust. On Earth, ice freezes into a neat crystal lattice, but in the deep cold of space it was assumed to form a completely amorphous (glassy) solid. A new study by University College London and Cambridge scientists challenges this picture. Their computer simulations and X-ray tests on cosmic “low-density” ice suggest it actually contains tiny crystalline grains. In some models roughly 20–25% of the ice was in crystal form, overturning the long-held view that space ice is entirely structureless.

Simulations reveal hidden nanocrystals

According to the paper, computer simulations of space ice showed it contains nanocrystals. In one approach, researchers cooled virtual water to –120 °C at different rates to form model “ice cubes.” Depending on the cooling speed, the simulated ice ranged from fully amorphous to partly ordered. Structures with roughly 16–19% of the molecules in tiny crystal clusters best matched published X-ray data for low-density ice. In another simulation, thousands of nanometer-sized ice grains were packed together and then the remaining water molecules were randomized. This produced ice about 25% crystalline, yet still reproduced the known diffraction pattern.

In laboratory experiments the team also made actual low-density amorphous ice by vapor deposition and gentle compression. When these samples were slowly warmed to crystallize, the resulting ice showed a “memory” of its formation method.

Implications for planets and origins of life

The findings give “a good idea of what the most common form of ice in the Universe looks like at an atomic level,” which is important for models of planet and galaxy formation. They also bear on theories of life’s origins. Partly crystalline ice has less internal space to trap organic molecules, potentially making it a less efficient vehicle for amino acids or other prebiotic compounds. However, Dr. Davies notes that pockets of fully amorphous ice still exist, so cosmic dust grains and cometary ices could continue to harbor organic ingredients in those disordered regions.

For the latest tech news and reviews, follow Gadgets 360 on X, Facebook, WhatsApp, Threads and Google News. For the latest videos on gadgets and tech, subscribe to our YouTube channel. If you want to know everything about top influencers, follow our in-house Who’sThat360 on Instagram and YouTube.


NASA Deploys High-Tech Aircraft to Support Texas Flood Relief and Recovery Efforts



MIT Develops Low-Resource AI System to Control Soft Robots with Just One Image

Related Stories

Continue Reading

Business

Chancellor Rachel Reeves considering ‘changes’ to ISAs – and says there’s too much focus on ‘risk’ in investing

Published

on

By

Chancellor Rachel Reeves considering 'changes' to ISAs - and says there's too much focus on 'risk' in investing

The chancellor has confirmed she is considering “changes” to ISAs – and said there has been too much focus on “risk” in members of the public investing.

In her second annual Mansion House speech to the financial sector, Rachel Reeves said she recognised “differing views” over the popular tax-free savings accounts, in which savers can currently put up to £20,000 a year.

She was reportedly considering reducing the threshold to as low as £4,000 a year, in a bid to encourage people to put money into stocks and shares instead and boost the economy.

However the chancellor has shelved any immediate planned changes after fierce backlash from building societies and consumer groups.

In her speech to key industry figures on Tuesday evening, Ms Reeves said: “I will continue to consider further changes to ISAs, engaging widely over the coming months and recognising that despite the differing views on the right approach, we are united in wanting better outcomes for both savers and for the UK economy.”

She added: “For too long, we have presented investment in too negative a light, quick to warn people of the risks, without giving proper weight to the benefits.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Rachel Reeves’s fiscal dilemma

Ms Reeves’s speech, the first major one since the welfare bill climbdown two weeks ago, appeared to encourage regulators to focus less on risks and more on the benefits of investing in things like the stock market and government bonds (loans issued by states to raise funds with an interest rate paid in return).

She welcomed action by the financial regulator to review risk warning rules and the campaign to promote retail investment, which the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is launching next year.

“Our tangled system of financial advice and guidance has meant that people cannot get the right support to make decisions for themselves”, Ms Reeves told the event in London.

Read more:
Should you get Lifetime ISA? Two key issues to consider
Building societies protest against proposed ISA reforms
Is there £15bn of wiggle room in Reeves’s fiscal rules?

Last year, Ms Reeves said post-financial crash regulation had “gone too far” and set a course for cutting red tape.

On Tuesday, she said she would announce a package of City changes, including a new competitive framework for a part of the insurance industry and a regulatory regime for asset management.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Reeves is ‘totally’ up for the job

In response to Ms Reeves’s address, shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride said: “Rachel Reeves should have used her speech this evening to rule out massive tax rises on businesses and working people. The fact that she didn’t should send a shiver down the spine of taxpayers across the country.”

👉Listen to Politics at Sam and Anne’s on your podcast app👈  

The governor of the Bank of England, Andrew Bailey, also spoke at the Mansion House event and said Donald Trump’s taxes on US imports would slow the economy and trade imbalances should be addressed.

“Increasing tariffs creates the risk of fragmenting the world economy, and thereby reducing activity”, he said.

Continue Reading

Politics

Chancellor Rachel Reeves considering ‘changes’ to ISAs – and says there’s too much focus on ‘risk’ in investing

Published

on

By

Chancellor Rachel Reeves considering 'changes' to ISAs - and says there's too much focus on 'risk' in investing

The chancellor has confirmed she is considering “changes” to ISAs – and said there has been too much focus on “risk” in members of the public investing.

In her second annual Mansion House speech to the financial sector, Rachel Reeves said she recognised “differing views” over the popular tax-free savings accounts, in which savers can currently put up to £20,000 a year.

She was reportedly considering reducing the threshold to as low as £4,000 a year, in a bid to encourage people to put money into stocks and shares instead and boost the economy.

However the chancellor has shelved any immediate planned changes after fierce backlash from building societies and consumer groups.

In her speech to key industry figures on Tuesday evening, Ms Reeves said: “I will continue to consider further changes to ISAs, engaging widely over the coming months and recognising that despite the differing views on the right approach, we are united in wanting better outcomes for both savers and for the UK economy.”

She added: “For too long, we have presented investment in too negative a light, quick to warn people of the risks, without giving proper weight to the benefits.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Rachel Reeves’s fiscal dilemma

Ms Reeves’s speech, the first major one since the welfare bill climbdown two weeks ago, appeared to encourage regulators to focus less on risks and more on the benefits of investing in things like the stock market and government bonds (loans issued by states to raise funds with an interest rate paid in return).

She welcomed action by the financial regulator to review risk warning rules and the campaign to promote retail investment, which the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is launching next year.

“Our tangled system of financial advice and guidance has meant that people cannot get the right support to make decisions for themselves”, Ms Reeves told the event in London.

Read more:
Should you get Lifetime ISA? Two key issues to consider
Building societies protest against proposed ISA reforms
Is there £15bn of wiggle room in Reeves’s fiscal rules?

Last year, Ms Reeves said post-financial crash regulation had “gone too far” and set a course for cutting red tape.

On Tuesday, she said she would announce a package of City changes, including a new competitive framework for a part of the insurance industry and a regulatory regime for asset management.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Reeves is ‘totally’ up for the job

In response to Ms Reeves’s address, shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride said: “Rachel Reeves should have used her speech this evening to rule out massive tax rises on businesses and working people. The fact that she didn’t should send a shiver down the spine of taxpayers across the country.”

👉Listen to Politics at Sam and Anne’s on your podcast app👈  

The governor of the Bank of England, Andrew Bailey, also spoke at the Mansion House event and said Donald Trump’s taxes on US imports would slow the economy and trade imbalances should be addressed.

“Increasing tariffs creates the risk of fragmenting the world economy, and thereby reducing activity”, he said.

Continue Reading

Trending