During the October Monthly Meeting , we took questions directly from Investing Club members. Here are Jim Cramer’s and portfolio director Jeff Marks’ responses. Their answers have been edited for clarity. 1. Why do rising interest rates have such a negative effect on technology stocks? (Rod) Jim Cramer: When the Federal Reserve started raising rates, we made sure to reiterate that we prefer companies that are profitable, generate cash flow, and return cash to shareholders because these characteristics help mitigate the risk of higher funding costs associated with higher rates. Mega-cap tech names have been holding up because they earn a lot of money. As an example, during the period when rates started to soar, Nvidia (NVDA) initially got hurt but the company proved resilient as it kept getting more orders from customers. Jeff Marks: It’s frequently viewed that the present value of a company is based on the sum of future cash flows discounted back at a certain rate – the rate often used to discount back is based on Treasury yields. The higher the interest rate, the lower the present value of each cash flow and thus, a low stock price. Funding costs also matter for growth companies, which are often in tech. If rates are higher, it becomes more expensive to borrow to fund growth and expansion plans if the company doesn’t have the cash. That’s why we made the change last year and said you have to own profitable companies that generate cash flow when the Fed starts hiking rates. 2. Why haven’t the stocks of oil companies risen at the same rate as the price of oil? Is this just a lag effect or are fears about a slowdown offsetting the higher oil prices? (Todd) Jim Cramer: I believe that the rally in oil was a short squeeze that is now over. I don’t think it deserved to be in the $90’s because it didn’t have the economic growth. President Joe Biden mistakenly did not refill the strategic petroleum reserve so he was not able to offload oil. I do think Russia ordered oil and sent it to China which kept it off the market. Our own producers surprisingly did not break ranks. What has happened is the artificial nature of the short squeeze engineered by traders and whole countries came apart when we realized that there were no bids and there was not enough oil in the market. We own Coterra (CTRA), our play on natural gas, which keeps edging higher. CEO Tom Jorden was right when he said that he was putting his bet on natural gas and he’s crushing it. If you don’t own Coterra, I think you’re making a mistake. Jeff Marks: I think the market sniffed out that oil was closer to making a near-term top and that’s why the stocks weren’t being priced like oil was making a run to $100. But if the price of oil stocks remains disconnected from the price of the commodity for long, then what tends to happen is you get some M & A chatter around one of the bigger fishes looking to acquire an independent. That’s exactly what played out last week when the story about Exxon’s interest in Pioneer (PXD) was renewed. And, that deal was announced Wednesday. We plan to sell our PXD stake as soon as our trading rules allow. 3. I am concerned with Apple’s decline. Is it time to begin trimming or still “own it, don’t trade it?” (Donald) Jim Cramer: Many years ago when Apple (AAPL) traded in the $20s and $30, Shark Tank investor Daymond John came on “Mad Money” and recommended the stock, saying “stick with it, it’s a winner.” John appeared on “Mad Money” on Tuesday and said he believes the upcoming Vision Pro from Apple is going to be a winner too. There’s an opportunity for Apple to create a partnership with ESPN and pull content onto the miraculous Vision Pro mixed reality headset. Jeff Marks: Still in the “own it, don’t trade it” camp. It’s served us well for many years – through rate hiking cycles, pandemics, and trade wars – and it’s been better to hold it through all those events instead of trying to time the sell-point but also the re-entry level. Our Club analyst Zev Fima recently showed us the math behind it . 4. I’ve had Salesforce for quite a while on your recommendation and have a solid gain. But It’s fallen roughly 10% in the past month – more or less in line with the Nasdaq. Do you still think this is a long-term hold? (Peter) Jim Cramer: Marc Benioff, co-founder and CEO of Salesforce (CRM), is determined that artificial intelligence is going to produce more profits for companies which will then produce more money to hire people. The stock jumped after it announced a better-than-expected quarter . There are people who say their business is weak but this business is on fire. Jeff Marks: Yes, I do, the company has made great strides expanding margins and increasing free cash flow, while keeping its steady cadence of around 10% revenue growth despite the uncertain macro. Salesforce has gotten better at managing dilution with its buybacks. The company is still the leader in customer relationship management and its generative AI tools could add a layer of incremental growth. 5. In light of the government’s anti-trust challenge, is Amazon “dead” money? (John) Jim Cramer: FTC chair Lina Khan does not have a strong antitrust case against Amazon (AMZN) – her arguments don’t make sense. Khan has had it out for Amazon since she was in law school and the case is garbage and it will be thrown out rather quickly. Jeff Marks: I don’t think so because I don’t think anything is going to come of it. And if anything, we’re in the camp that a breakup of Amazon into different parts could unlock value for shareholders. And by the way, I know Amazon recently has made great strides on the cost side and improving profitability, but if Amazon’s different businesses – the AWS cloud unit and retail – were independent, there would be increased scrutiny on each to expand margins and grow profits. 6. Over/Under in the next 12 months that Costco distributes a special cash dividend. (David) Jim Cramer: I spoke with Costco CFO Rich Galanti and he said it’s only a matter of “when, not if” the company distributes a special dividend. We love Costco (COST) because, unlike its retail peers, it doesn’t have theft problems. Costco is one of my absolute favorites in the portfolio. Costco is crushing it. Jeff Marks: I’m going to take “the over” on the special cash dividend because I think Costco likes collecting the 5% interest on its cash. But I’m going to “take the under” on a membership fee hike. 7. Can you review the concept of trading around a core position and give an example of how and when to do so? (Peter) Jeff Marks: What we did with Eli Lilly (LLY) recently is a great example. It’s been a core name since we bought it because we’ve been believers that Lilly had the best growth profile of any large-cap pharma name due to the value of its pipeline. But periodically, when everyone gets bulled up around one idea, the stock becomes a “crowded trade” and gets extended in the short term, which is why we recently trimmed some a few dollars below $600. Sure enough, the stock pulled back to the low $500s over the next few weeks. We didn’t pull the trigger and repurchase what we sold higher at those lower levels, but that cash became of good use when the whole market was getting clobbered last month. And, now with all the positive attention GLP-1s — those diabetes/weight loss drugs like Mounjaro — have gotten recently, the stock looks ready to break above that $600 price. Diabetes drug Mounjaro is expected to get approval to treat obesity soon. Jim Cramer: When you have a core position in a company where you have a long-term thesis, when the stock makes a huge move, you take a little bit of and redeploy it somewhere else in the portfolio. We did this in Humana (HUM) when we sold some HUM shares to secure a 12% gain. With the extra cash on hand, we felt that we had the case to buy, and traded around Procter & Gamble (PG). 8. Why do you like Stanley Black & Decker when you currently state invest in stocks that are making money and not losing money? (Norman) Jim Cramer: We like to have something related to the housing cycle that could make money. The decline in the stock is kind of ridiculous because this is the premier tool company in the world valued at $12 billion, has a strong 4% annual dividend yield, a management team that’s focused, and has gotten its costs down. Jeff Marks: Yes, Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) has had a few unprofitable quarters this year, but this is a special situation. Over the past year, the company was plagued by too much inventory, a bad cost structure, and a complex supply chain. But, the company is in the process of fixing all three. After losing money for three straight quarters, the company is expected to return to profitability in the upcoming reported quarter and the earnings recovery is expected to pick up into 2024 with expectations that it earns more that year than it did in 2022. 9. When you speak of buying on the way down and waiting for the next level, how do you determine what the next level down is? (James) Jim Cramer: This is more of an art, not a science. I learned a strategy from Michael Steinhardt, who is an unbelievable hedge fund manager, called a pyramid style of buying. It’s where you start small and build up, but only if it means it lowers your cost basis. Jeff Marks: You can do this a few ways. Sometimes we use a percentage basis – so on every 3% to 5% pullback. You could also use dividend yields – so if you bought a stock at a 3.75% yield, the next level could be at 4%. But conviction levels matter and what’s happening in the market is important as well. 10. I had a sizeable position in Honeywell for years and the stock is well off its 2021 highs. Should I continue to hold it? (Rhonda) Jim Cramer: We were expecting business changes at Honeywell (HON) and management followed through Tuesday when it announced a reorganization of the company. CEO Vimal Kapur, who replaced Darius Adamczyk earlier this year is reorganizing the business into different divisions starting in the first fiscal quarter next year. We want to see what he does with these changes but need to give the new leader some time to show us how he can bring out value for shareholders. Jeff Marks: I know CEO Vimal Kapur is early in his tenure, but I think the clock is ticking on Honeywell to bring out value and that’s worth owning it for. Yesterday (Tuesday) he announced the strategic reorganization of the company – that’s a positive first step. Next, I’d like to see acquisitions that accelerate growth and dispositions of non-core assets. Otherwise, I wouldn’t be surprised to see chatter around an activist wanting to break the company up, based on the success of the General Electric (GE) and Raytheon Technologies splits. (Jim Cramer’s Charitable Trust is long NVDA, CTRA, AAPL, CRM, AMZN, COST, LLY, HUM, PG, SWK, HON. See here for a full list of the stocks.) As a subscriber to the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer, you will receive a trade alert before Jim makes a trade. Jim waits 45 minutes after sending a trade alert before buying or selling a stock in his charitable trust’s portfolio. If Jim has talked about a stock on CNBC TV, he waits 72 hours after issuing the trade alert before executing the trade. THE ABOVE INVESTING CLUB INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY , TOGETHER WITH OUR DISCLAIMER . NO FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION OR DUTY EXISTS, OR IS CREATED, BY VIRTUE OF YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH THE INVESTING CLUB. NO SPECIFIC OUTCOME OR PROFIT IS GUARANTEED.
During the October Monthly Meeting, we took questions directly from Investing Club members. Here are Jim Cramer’s and portfolio director Jeff Marks’ responses. Their answers have been edited for clarity.
That network of dependable high-speed chargers, paired with solid app integration that makes it easy for Tesla drivers to find available chargers just about anywhere in the US, gave the brand a leg up – but no more. By opening up the Supercharger network to brands like Ford, Hyundai, Kia, and others, Tesla has given away its biggest competitive advantage.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Add in charging and route-planning apps like Chargeway, that make navigating the transition from CCS to NACS easier than ever with its intuitive colors and numbers and easy on/off switch for vehicles equipped with NACS adapters, and it feels like the time is right to start suggesting alternatives to the old EV industry stalwarts. As such, that’s exactly what I’m going to do.
Here, then, are my picks for the best Tesla S3XY (and Cybertruck) alternatives you can buy.
Less Model S, more Lucid Air
Lucid Air sedans; via Lucid.
Developed by OG Tesla Model S engineers with tunes from Annie Get Your Gun playing continuously in their heads, the Lucid Air promises to be the car Tesla should and could have built, if only Elon had listened to the engineers.
With panel fit, material finish, and overall build quality that’s at least as good as anything else in the automotive space, the Lucid Air is a compelling alternative to the Model S at every price level – and I, for one, would take a “too f@#king fast” Lucid Air Sapphire over an “as seen on TV” Model S Plaid any day of the week. And, with Supercharger access reportedly coming later this quarter, Air buyers will have every advantage the Supercharger Network can provide.
HONORABLE MENTIONS
Less Model 3, more Hyundai IONIQ 6
2025 Hyundai IONIQ 6 Limited; via Hyundai.
Hyundai has been absolutely killing it these days, with EVs driving record sales and new models earning rave reviews from the automotive press. Even in that company the IONIQ 6 stands out, with up to 338 miles of EPA-rated range and lickety-quick 350 kW charging available to make road tripping easy – especially now that the aerodynamically efficient IONIQ 6 has Supercharger access through a NACS adapter (the 2026 “facelift” models get a NACS port as standard).
Once upon a time, Mrs. Jo Borrás and I were shopping three-row SUVs and found ourselves genuinely drawn to the then-new Model X. Back then it was the only three-row EV on the market, but it wasn’t Elon’s antics or access to charging, or even the Model X’s premium pricing that squirreled the deal. It was the stupid doors.
We went with the similarly new Volvo XC90 T8 in denim blue, and followed up the big PHEV with a second, three years later, in Osmium Gray. When it’s time to replace this one, you can just about bet your house that the new 510 hp EX90 with 310 miles of all-electric range will be near the top of the shopping list.
The sporty EV6 GT made its global debut by drag racing some of the fastest ICE-powered cars of the day, including a Lamborghini, Mercedes-AMG GT, a Porsche, even a turbocharged Ferrari – and it beat the pants off ’em. Combine supercar-baiting speed with an accessible price tag, NACS accessibility, $10,000 in customer cash on remaining 2024 models ($3,000 on 2025s) and just a hint of Lancia Stratos in the styling, the EV6 is tough to beat.
If you disagree with that statement and feel like driving a new Tesla Cybertruck is the key to happiness, I’m not sure an equally ostentatious GMC Hummer EV or more subtle Rivian R1T will help you scratch that particular itch – but maybe therapy might!
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. The best part? No one will call you until after you’ve elected to move forward. Get started, hassle-free, by clicking here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
BYD Shenzhen, the world’s largest car transport ship (Source: BYD)
Republicans launched multiple attacks against EVs, clean air and American jobs this week, at the behest of the oil industry that funds them. These attacks won’t be successful, and EVs will continue to grow regardless, and inevitably take over for outdated gasoline vehicles.
However, these republican attacks on EVs will still have some effect: they will diminish the US auto industry globally, leading to job losses and surrendering one of the jewels in the crown of American industry to China, where there is no similar effort to destroy its own domestic EV industry.
But they should inspire worry for Americans, because they will only harm the country’s domestic manufacturing base in the face of a changing auto industry.
Republicans keep trying to kill clean cars
The last time a republican occupied the the White House, we saw similar efforts to try to raise fuel and health costs for Americans, and to block superior EV technology from flourishing. That didn’t work in the end, and EVs continued to grow both during that period and after.
All the while, fossil fuels have maintained their privileged policy position, being allowed to pollute with impunity and costing the US $760 billion per year in externalized costs. Much of that subsidy is accounted for in the cost of pollution from gas cars, which are one of the primary uses of fossil fuels, which means that, in fact, gasoline vehicles receive much more subsidy than EVs do.
And yet, EVs still managed to grow substantially, despite these headwinds. EV sales have continued to grow, both in the US and globally, even as headlines incorrectly say otherwise. The republican party’s attempts to kill them were futile, and will continue to be.
It didn’t work, but it did delay progress
However, anti-EV actions from Mr. Trump and the republican party did manage to delay progress from where it could have been if America actually instituted smart industrial policy earlier.
Surely the American auto industry would be ahead of where it is now if those investments had had time to come online. But instead, republicans are currently trying to kill those jobs, which has already led to several manufacturing projects being cancelled this year, depriving Americans of the economic boost they need right now.
Meanwhile, there’s one place that this sort of stumbling isn’t happening: China.
China is taking advantage
China has spent more than a decade focusing on securing material supply, building refining capacity, developing their own battery technology, and encouraging local EV manufacturing startups.
This has paid off recently, as Chinese EVs have been rapidly scaling in production in recent years. It took a lot of the auto industry by surprise how rapidly Chinese companies have scaled, and how rapidly Chinese consumers have adopted them, after having an initially slow start.
But that adoption hasn’t just been local, it’s also global. Last year, China became the largest auto exporter in the world, taking a crown that Japan had held for decades. But the change was even more dramatic than that – as recently as 2020, China was the sixth-largest auto exporter in the world, just behind the US in 5th place.
China’s dramatic turn upward started in 2020, and now it’s in first place. Meanwhile, because of all the faffing about, the US remains exactly where it was in 2020 – still in fifth place. Well, sixth now, since China eclipsed us (and everyone else).
But tariffs have been tried before, and they didn’t work. When Japan had a similarly meteoric rise to global prominence as an auto manufacturer in the 1970s and 80s, largely due to their adoption of new technology, processes, and different car styles which incumbents were ignoring, the US tried to stop it with tariffs.
All this did was make US manufacturers complacent, and Japan still managed to seize and maintain the crown of top auto exporter (occasionally trading places with Germany) from then until now.
Then as now, the true way to compete is to adapt to the changing automotive industry and take EVs seriously, rather than giving the auto industry excuses to be complacent. But instead, republicans aren’t doing that, and in fact are working to ensure the American auto industry doesn’t adapt, by actively killing the incentives that were leading to a boom in domestic manufacturing investment.
US auto industry jeopardized by republicans
Make no mistake about it: destroying EV incentives, and allowing companies to pollute more and innovate less, will not help the US auto industry catch up with a fast moving competitor.
As we at Electrek have said for years, you cannot catch up to a competitor that is both ahead of you and moving faster than you.
It also applies to nations, which could have spent the last decade doing what the Chinese auto industry has been doing, but instead non-Chinese automakers have been begging their governments for more time, even though it’s not the regulations that threaten them, it’s competition from a new and motivated rival that is moving faster and in a more determined manner towards the future.
The way that we get around this should be clear: take EVs seriously.
But that’s not what republicans are doing, and in doing so, they are signing the death warrant for an important US industry in the long term.
Another thing republicans are trying to kill is the the rooftop solar credit, which means you could have only until the end of this year to install rooftop solar on your home before the cost of doing so goes up by an average of ~$10,000. So if you want to go solar, get started now, because these things take time and the system needs to be active before you file for the credit.
To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here. – ad*
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
International equipment manufacturer Vermeer has unveiled a full-scale prototype of its Interlune excavator, a machine designed to ingest 100 metric tons of rocks and dirt per hour, extracting valuable helium as it makes its way across the surface … of the Moon.
Helium plays a critical role in the manufacturing of semiconductors, chips, optics, and all the other stuff that makes EVs, autonomy, the Internet, and the rest of twenty-first century life possible. The problem is that, despite being the second-most common element in the universe, helium is pretty rare on Earth – and we are rapidly running out. As such, there are intense economic and political pressures to find new and reliable sources of helium somewhere, anywhere else, and that demand has sparked a new modern space race focused on harvesting helium on the Moon and getting it back home.
To that end, companies like American lunar mining startup Interlune and the Iowa-based equipment experts at Vermeer are partnering on the development of suite of interplanetary equipment assets capable of digging up lunar materials like rocks and sand from up to three meters below the surface, extract helium-3 (a light, stable isotope of helium believed to exist in abundance on the Moon), then package it, contain it, and ship it back to Earth.
“When you’re operating equipment on the Moon, reliability and performance standards are at a new level,” says Rob Meyerson, Interlune CEO. “Vermeer has a legacy of innovation and excellence that started more than 75 years ago, which makes them the ideal partner for Interlune.”
The company showed a scaled prototype of the machine at the 2025 Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in Las Vegas (above), emphasizing the need to develop new ways to operate equipment assets in the extreme temperatures of extraplanetary environments beyond diesel or even hydrogen combustion.
On the airless surface of the moon, it would be impossible for an internal combustion engine to operate on the moon’s surface because there is no oxygen for combustion. Electrically powered machines seem the obvious solution with solar power generation supplying the electricity. But the answer is not that simple.
Temperature changes on the surface of the moon are extreme. They can soar to 110° C and plummet to -170° C. Developing electric construction machinery to perform in this environment is no easy task, but Komatsu is tackling issues one by one as they appear. Using thermal control and other electrification technologies, we are engineering solutions.
Despite Komatsu’s apparent head start, however, Vermeer seem to pulled ahead – not just in terms of machine development, but in terms of extraction potential as well.
“The high-rate excavation needed to harvest helium-3 from the Moon in large quantities has never been attempted before, let alone with high efficiency,” said Gary Lai, Interlune co-founder and CTO. “Vermeer’s response to such an ambitious assignment was to move fast. We’ve been very pleased with the results of the test program to date and look forward to the next phase of development.”
Interlune is funded by grants from the US Department of Energy and NASA TechFlights. In 2023, the company received a National Science Foundation (NSF) Small Business Innovation Research award to develop the technology to size and sort lunar regolith (read: dirt). Interlune has raised $18 million in funding so far, and is planning its first mission to the Moon before 2030.
Electrek’s Take
Interlune helium harvester concept; via Interlune.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. The best part? No one will call you until after you’ve elected to move forward. Get started, hassle-free, by clicking here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.