Connect with us

Published

on

A former prime minister of Israel has said Benjamin Netanyahu should not remain the leader of the country in the long run after Hamas’s unprecedented incursion.

In an interview with Sky News’s Mark Austin, Ehud Barak said the attack was “shocking for everyone in the country”.

“It’s a barbarian murderous act that reminds you of al Qaeda or Daesh-like operations, unheard of.

“It was the most severe blow Israel suffered since the day of its establishment,” he said.

War latest: ‘Major conundrum’ facing ‘imminent’ offensive

Asked if Mr Netanyahu can survive as prime minister in the long run, he said: “I think he shouldn’t. I think that in a normal place he would have resigned.

“Just by looking at the kind of thing that happened under his responsibility, even if he were not involved in any way, that put a huge responsibility on him personally.”

Mr Barak, who served as Israel’s prime minister from 1999 to 2001 and is now the voice of the opposition, said the purpose of the Israeli response was “well defined”, explaining: “It is to make sure that any military capability of Hamas will be paralysed and erased.

“No military cover, not a single launcher for rockets, not a single magazine dump or lab, or training site. And that’s the purpose.

“We [would have been] lucky if it could have been completed from the air, [but] it cannot be accomplished, so you have to come on the ground, so highly probably there will be a wide-scale operation on the ground.”

Read more:
Couple’s desperate messages before massacre revealed
How the war has escalated since shocking surprise attack

Asked how Israel can avoid civilian casualties, Mr Barak said: “Israel is not going to deteriorate into the behaviour of Hamas. We are committed to international law.

“[To] the population, we said we are going to hit every asset of Hamas. So any one of you citizens of Gaza who knows that in his residential place, in the working place, there is any installation of Hamas, asset of Hamas now or in the last, let’s say a year or two, be careful.

“This is a target. Leave the area. Don’t stay there. We are serious.”

Discussing the blockade on Gaza, he said: “Israel will not let people die in the hospital of Gaza because we blocked a medical kind of drugs or whatever the hospital needs. No baby will die because there is no milk because of Israel.”

A siren sounded midway through the interview, bringing it to a momentary pause.

“Take it from me, it won’t land here, the missile,” Mr Barak said.

Asked if his attempt to negotiate a peace deal in 2000 with Yasser Arafat, then the Palestinian president, was a missed opportunity, Mr Barak said: “You cannot judge whether it’s a missed chance. People tell me you were so close, so close with Arafat. How come you didn’t come to an agreement?

“I say when you want to measure the size of a gap, you have to multiply the width by the depth. We were probably very close, but very deep.

“Myself and [then US president Bill] Clinton put on the table a far-reaching proposal that covered metaphorically more than 90% of whatever Arafat can dream of.

“The fact that he rejected it… And till these days, Clinton still, when he’s asked, he says Arafat is responsible because we were very serious and he rejected it.”

US president Bill Clinton with Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak and Palestinian president Yasser Arafat
Image:
The then Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak with US president Bill Clinton and Palestinian president Yasser Arafatin the 1990s

He said “we are further than 25 years ago” from a genuine peace.

However, he added: “But I never lose eye contact with the objective.

“The objective should be engagement with the Palestinians and solving with a border inside the Holy Land, where we have 80% of our settlers and all the strategic interests of Israel to live side by side with the Palestinian state, which [is] demilitarised but kind of viable.

“That’s the vision because we need it.”

Continue Reading

World

Minister ‘not going to speculate’ on alleged UK involvement in Ukrainian drone attack

Published

on

By

Minister 'not going to speculate' on alleged UK involvement in Ukrainian drone attack

A government minister has declined to say if the UK was involved in a Ukrainian drone strike after the Russian ambassador partially blamed Britain for the attack.

More than a hundred drones were used to attack sites inside Russia over the weekend, leading to more than 40 warplanes being destroyed.

Speaking to The World With Yalda Hakim on Sky News following the attack, Russia’s UK ambassador warned it could risk escalating the conflict to “World War III”.

Follow live: Russia hits ‘almost all of Ukraine’ with more than 400 drones and 40 missiles – Zelenskyy

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Russia’s ambassador points finger at UK

Andrei Kelin pointed the finger at the UK because of the nature of the strike.

“[This] kind of attack involves, of course, provision of very high technology, so-called geospaced data, which only can be done by those who have it in possession. And this is London and Washington,” he told Hakim.

“I don’t believe that America [is involved], that has been denied by President Trump, definitely, but it has not been denied by London.

“We perfectly know how much London is involved, how deeply British forces are involved in working together with Ukraine.”

Asked if the UK had provided Ukraine with this technology, Steve Reed, the environment secretary, told Sky News: “I’m not going to speculate on something when I don’t know what the facts were.”

He said that “we as a government, cross-party actually, are standing foursquare alongside Ukraine as they fight – try to defend themselves – against a brutal, unprovoked and illegal attack and invasion”.

Mr Reed added: “We want there to be peace talks. We want this conflict to end. But it’s quite right that we should support Ukraine.”

Environment Secretary Steve Reed leaves 10 Downing Street, London, following a Cabinet meeting. Picture date: Tuesday June 3, 2025.
Image:
Environment Secretary Steve Reed. Pic: PA

Challenged if this escalation could risk Britain getting sucked into the conflict with Russia more directly, the cabinet minister responded: “I do know that the people of this country and the government of this country, want to stand alongside Ukraine.

“We need peace to happen in that region, we can’t allow Russia to get away with invading any more countries.”

It comes at a time of escalating tensions in the region, with both Russia and Ukraine upping their attacks. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said his country’s drone strikes at the weekend “will undoubtedly be in history books”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

New Ukraine drone attack video analysed

The blow is seen as one of the most daring of the war so far, though the US estimated only around 10 Russian bombers were blown up – and Russia said none were.

Overnight, Russia claimed it downed 174 Ukrainian drones and three cruise missiles across the country.

👉Search for The Wargame on your podcast app👈

Meanwhile, Ukrainian authorities said Russia attacked towns and cities across Ukraine overnight.

Mr Zelenskyy said the assault was formed of more than 400 drones and 40 missiles.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Russian ambassador interview in full

US President Donald Trump had urged Mr Putin not to retaliate on Thursday. He told reporters: “I don’t like it, I said don’t do it, you shouldn’t do it, you should stop it.”

In response to the allegations of British involvement, a Downing Street spokesperson said: “We never comment on operational matters at home or abroad.”

Continue Reading

World

Russian ambassador partly blames UK for Ukrainian drone attack

Published

on

By

Russian ambassador partly blames UK for Ukrainian drone attack

Russia’s UK ambassador has told Sky News that Ukraine’s recent attacks risk escalating the conflict to “World War III” as he partly blamed the UK.

Andrei Kelin warned that Ukraine’s actions “are bringing the conflict to a different level of escalation”, in an interview with Sky News’ Yalda Hakim, and said Kyiv should “not try to engulf World War III”.

“That’s the very worst case scenario that we can imagine,” he said.

More than a hundred Ukrainian drones were deployed inside Russia over the weekend, destroying more than 40 warplanes in an attack Volodymyr Zelenskyy said “will undoubtedly be in history books”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

New Ukraine drone attack video analysed

Mr Kelin pointed the finger at the UK when he said Ukraine must have had assistance in the attacks.

“[This] kind of attack involves, of course, provision of very high technology, so-called geospaced data, which only can be done by those who have it in possession. And this is London and Washington,” he said.

“I don’t believe that America [is involved], that has been denied by President Trump, definitely, but it has not been denied by London.

More on Russia

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Explosion recorded on Crimea bridge

“We perfectly know how much London is involved, how deeply British forces are involved in working together with Ukraine.”

On Wednesday, Donald Trump said Vladimir Putin told him “very strongly” that Russia “will have to respond to the recent attack on the airfields”.

The US president said that he discussed the attack with Mr Putin during a phone call that lasted more than an hour.

“It was a good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate peace,” he wrote.

Mr Kelin repeated this sentiment, telling Sky News: “It is up to the Ministry of Defence to make a right solution, but we have to respond to it.”

A Downing Street spokesperson said: “We never comment on operational matters at home or abroad.”

Continue Reading

World

Trump and China’s Xi have ‘very good’ phone call and agree to more talks amid trade war

Published

on

By

Trump and China's Xi have 'very good' phone call and agree to more talks amid trade war

Donald Trump says he has had a “very good” phone call with Xi Jinping amid their ongoing trade war, during which they agreed to more tariff talks.

Trade negotiations between the United States and China stalled shortly after a 12 May agreement between the two countries to reduce their rates on levies while talks took place.

The call was first reported by Chinese state media and confirmed by the Chinese foreign ministry. According to Chinese state media, Mr Trump initiated the call with the Chinese president.

In a post on his Truth Social platform, the US president said: “I just concluded a very good phone call with President Xi of China, discussing some of the intricacies of our recently made, and agreed to, trade deal.”

He said the call lasted around an hour and a half and “resulted in a very positive conclusion for both countries”.

There “should no longer be any questions” on rare earth products, he said.

“The conversation was focused almost entirely on trade. Nothing was discussed concerning Russia/Ukraine, or Iran,” Mr Trump added.

He said the two nations had agreed to further tariff talks, and both leaders invited each other to visit their respective countries.

According to Chinese state media, Mr Xi “pointed out that it is especially important to correct the course of the big ship of China-US relations, which requires us to keep the rudder and set the direction, especially to remove all kinds of interference and even sabotage”.

Mr Xi “emphasised that the US should handle the Taiwan issue carefully” to avoid the two countries being dragged “into a dangerous situation of conflict and confrontation”.

According to the readout of the call, Mr Trump “expressed great respect for President Xi Jinping and the importance of the US-China relationship”.

It came a day after Mr Trump declared it was difficult to reach a deal with his Chinese counterpart.

“I like President Xi of China, always have, and always will, but he is very tough, and extremely hard to make a deal with!!!,” Mr Trump said in a post on Truth Social.

The US president has cut his 145% tariffs on Chinese goods to 30% for 90 days to allow for talks, while China reduced its taxes on US goods from 125% to 10%.

The trade war has produced sharp swings in global markets and threatens to damage trade between the two nations.

Read more:
Trump travel ban: The notable countries omitted
What a weakening dollar means for US president

Mr Trump’s treasury secretary Scott Bessent had suggested only a conversation between the two leaders could resolve their differences in order for talks to begin in earnest.

Mr Trump and Mr Xi last spoke in January, three days before his inauguration, where they discussed trade, as well as Mr Trump’s demand for China to do more to stop the drug fentanyl from entering the US.

Continue Reading

Trending