Police in Belgium have launched a manhunt after two Swedish people were shot dead in a terror attack in Brussels.
The shooting caused Belgium’s Euro 2024 qualifier against Sweden to be abandoned at half-time on Monday night.
Fans were also kept in the stadium as armed officers searched for the suspected shooter – who has not yet been found.
The shooting took place about three miles (5km) from the 50,000-seater King Baudouin Stadium shortly after 7pm local time – around 45 minutes before kick-off.
Shortly after, a man who claimed to be the shooter appeared on social media in a video in which he claimed to be a member of Islamic State (IS) and a “fighter for Allah”.
Image: A map showing the location of the shooting and the King Baudouin Stadium in Brussels
He also claimed he had carried out the attack in “revenge in the name of Muslims”.
One Belgium newspaper said a witness heard the shooter shout “Allahu Akbar” – “God is great” in Arabic – before the shots were fired.
Another video, reported to be of the incident, which has not been verified by Sky News, showed a gunman in a fluorescent orange jacket and a white helmet chasing a man into a building before shooting at him.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:32
Moments before fatal Brussels shooting
Belgium’s interior minister, Annelies Verlinden, said the suspect was “actively being tracked down”.
Belgium’s National Crisis Centre raised the terror alert in the city to the highest level on Monday night. It was also moved to the second highest for the rest of Belgium.
Brussels has a painful history with terrorism – this shooting will make it a nervous city
Brussels is now a nervous city – and with good reason. Somewhere out there is a gunman who has already killed two people and apparently claimed to owe an allegiance to Islamic State. And the police can’t find him.
The reaction has been swift and significant – the threat level raised to its highest point, with people told to stay at home.
The Belgian Prime Minister, Alexander de Croo, denounced the killings as an act of terrorism, and then held a late-night phone call with the French President, Emmanuel Macron.
The football game between Belgium and Sweden was abandoned, with both sets of players unwilling to carry on. Then came the problem of how the spectators could be released safely. At times like this, anxiety can be infectious and debilitating.
Brussels has a painful history with terrorism. Seven years ago, the city was struck by twin attacks at its airport and then at a metro station.
Some of the perpetrators had also been involved in the attacks on Paris, including at the Bataclan.
Salah Abdeslam, a prominent figure in both of these horrendous incidents, had been hidden and sheltered in Molenbeek, very near the point where these latest killings took place.
So the echoes are painful, and the ripples of what has happened now will run far. Brussels is scarred by what has happened in the past, fearful about what has happened now, and very nervous about what might happen next.
A spokesperson for Belgium’s federal prosecutor’s office told reporters that the investigation was focusing on “a possible terrorist motivation for the shooting”.
Eric Van Duyse said: “During the evening, a claim of responsibility was posted on social media, having been recorded by a person claiming to be the assailant. This person claims to be inspired by Islamic State.”
He said the Swedish nationality of the victims had been put forward as the probable motive for the attack – but said there was nothing to suggest a possible link with the current situation between Israel and Gaza.
Image: Forensic teams at the scene
A police spokesperson confirmed that two people had been killed in a shooting, but declined to give further details.
The country’s prime minister, Alexander de Croo, meanwhile, appeared to link the incident to terrorism.
In a post on X, formerly known as Twitter, he wrote: “I have just offered my sincere condolences to the Swedish prime minister following tonight’s harrowing attack on Swedish citizens in Brussels.
“Our thoughts are with the families and friends who lost their loved ones. As close partners, the fight against terrorism is a joint one.”
In an earlier post, he offered his “deepest condolences” to the relatives of those killed in what he described as a “cowardly attack”.
He also urged the residents of Brussels to “be vigilant”.
Swedish justice minister, Gunnar Strommer, said his government was working with authorities in Belgium “to get more information about what happened”.
Prime Minister, Ulf Kristersson, urged Swedes in Belgium to stay vigilant and follow the instructions of the local authorities.
Image: Sweden fans at the game at the King Baudouin Stadium
Image: A Belgian supporter is comforted in the stands. Pic: AP
Meanwhile, France’s President Emmanuel Macron described the incident as an “Islamist terrorist attack”.
Speaking in Albania on Monday evening – days after his own country was rocked by the fatal stabbing of a teacher in a suspected terror attack – Mr Macron said: “Europe is being shaken”.
The shooting in Brussels took place near Boulevard d’Ypres – in an area to the north of the city centre.
The area is around three miles (5km) from the King Baudouin Stadium, where the Euro 2024 qualifier was held.
A UEFA spokesperson confirmed the game had been suspended on Monday.
In a statement, UEFA said: “Following a suspected terrorist attack in Brussels this evening, it has been decided, after consultation with the two teams and the local police authorities, that the qualifying match between Belgium and Sweden is abandoned.”
Image: Fans leave the King Baudouin Stadium in Brussels
Sweden coach Janne Andersson later told Swedish website Fotbollskanalen: “We can’t play football in this situation. We and Belgium completely agree that we shouldn’t play.”
Laura Demullier, of Belgium’s OCAD anti-terror centre, said getting the thousands of football fans attending the match safely out of the stadium was their top priority.
Over two hours after the game was suspended, a message flashed on the big stadium screen which said: “Fans, you can leave the stadium calmly.”
Sweden has in recent months faced rioting following a string of Koran-burning incidents in both Sweden and neighbouring Denmark.
Muslim leaders in Sweden have called on the government to find ways to stop the Koran burnings, but police have allowed them, citing freedom of speech.
Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov has said the US and Russia are moving in the “right direction” to end the war in Ukraine.
“We are ready to reach a deal, but there are still some specific points – elements of this deal which need to be fine-tuned,” Mr Lavrovtold CBS News’ Face The Nation show, which will air on Sunday.
“We continue our contacts with the American side on the situation in Ukraine, there are several signs that we are moving in the right direction.”
Image: A Ukrainian serviceman carries a dog out of a house damaged by the Russian airstrike in Kyiv. Pic: AP
Ukraine’s air force said a total of 215 drones and missiles were launched at the country by Russia on Wednesday night, with Kyiv among the areas worst hit.
Ukrainian officials said rescuers were still recovering bodies from the rubble.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
The US president was then asked about the Russian attacks while hosting Norway’s prime minister in the Oval Office, and said he “wasn’t happy” but insisted “we’re putting a lot of pressure on Russia”.
He was also asked about Crimea following reports that his peace plan includes the US acknowledging Moscow’s control of the territory.
Mr Trump admitted it would be “very difficult” for Ukraine to get the territory back, but reiterated his belief that “we’re getting close to a deal”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
16:55
Day 96: ‘Vladimir STOP!’ Will Trump’s plea to Putin make a difference?
US secretary of state Marco Rubio said the US wanted to see both Ukraine and Russia step up to finalise a deal and further discussions were planned for the weekend.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has repeated many times that recognising occupied territory as Russia’s is a red line for his country.
Speaking about the airstrikes, he said: “It is very important that everyone in the world sees and understands what is really happening.”
Mr Zelenskyy was on a visit to South Africa when the missiles hit his country, prompting him to cut the trip short.
He said preliminary information indicated that Russia “used a ballistic missile manufactured in North Korea” and Ukraine’s special services were verifying the details.
He added if the missile was found to have been made in North Korea, it would be further proof “of the criminal nature of the alliance between Russia and Pyongyang”.
Events in Ukraine over the last 24 hours have been utterly barbaric. Bad even by the standards of this horrendous war.
Multiple Iranian drones and North Korean missiles laden with explosives brought carnage to swathes of the country, killing yet more civilians.
This was Russia’s answer to President Donald Trump’s peace plan and ultimatum. Normally, strangely reluctant to criticise Russia, even Trump was moved to implore Vladimir Putin to “STOP”.
Image: Ukrainian personnel clear rubble after a Russian ballistic missile attack in Kyiv. Pic: AP
Image: A woman is helped after an apartment building was hit by a Russian ballistic missile strike. Pic: Reuters
Image: A Ukrainian serviceman carries a dog out of a house damaged by a Russian airstrike in Kyiv. Pic: AP
But in truth, throughout Trump’s Ukraine peace process – if it can be called that – most of America’s pressure has been on Ukraine.
The peace plan that has emerged from direct US talks, which were mainly with Russia, is one-sided, and to Ukraine and its European partners, it is a surrender plan which is impossible for Ukraine to accept.
Even Russia’s supporter in this war, China, has problems with it, in particular with America’s proposal that Russia is rewarded for its invasion with sovereignty of Crimea.
More on Donald Trump
Related Topics:
Far from heading towards a peace deal, we are now, it seems, careering towards a crunch point that could see America give up on Ukraine completely, possibly blaming Kyiv for failure and renewing relations with Moscow.
Might will be proven right, and Vladimir Putin will be emboldened to do it all over again in a few years, possibly against other countries too. That is the fear in chancelleries across Europe.
There are two key questions now.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:26
‘Russia is winning peace talks’
Image: A drone explosion over Kyiv. Pic: Reuters
Does Trump mean he will walk away from trying to broker peace or supporting Ukraine entirely?
And if he does, can Ukraine carry on without US help?
European nations have said they will carry on supporting Ukraine. They see its survival and victory as essential for their own security.
They already give Ukraine €40bn in financial and military help. Ukraine would need another €20bn or so to fill the US gap – not that tall an order.
Image: Destruction in Kyiv following a Russian airstrike. Pic: Telegram
Image: A large-scale Russian missile and drone attack hit Kyiv overnight. Pic: Reuters
And they are beefing up their defence industries to do more to give Ukraine what it needs to fight Russia.
Ukraine’s defence increasingly depends on a homegrown drone industry, which doesn’t rely on American backing.
But Ukraine does need US intelligence, aerial defence support and satellite coverage provided by Starlink.
Were they to lose all that, they could be in trouble.
What exactly Trump does if and, as seems increasingly likely, when his deal fails, he is not making clear.
But what seems certain is America is caring less and less for Ukraine’s plight under this president.
Pakistan has halted trade and India has revoked visas as tit-for-tat retaliatory actions ramp up between the two powers after an attack in Kashmir that killed 26 people.
The victims were mostly Indian tourists who had been visiting Pahalgam, a popular tourist destination in the Indian-held part of the territory, which both nuclear-armed nations claim as their own.
In response to the attack, India closed a border crossing, suspended a water-sharing treaty and downgraded diplomatic ties with Pakistan – which it blames for the assault.
Image: Indian security force personnel stand guard at the site of a militant attack on tourists in Pahalgam. Pic: Reuters/Adnan Abidi
The Indian government did not publicly produce any evidence connecting the attack to its neighbour, but said it had “cross-border” links to Pakistan.
Pakistan has denied the accusations and a previously unknown militant group calling itself Kashmir Resistance has claimed responsibility.
On Thursday, India’s foreign ministry said all visas issued to Pakistani nationals would be revoked, effective from Sunday.
It also advised Indian citizens not to travel to Pakistan and announced other measures including cutting the number of diplomatic staff and closing the only functional land border crossing between the nations.
More on India
Related Topics:
In return, Pakistan said it was closing its airspace to all Indian-owned and operated airlines and suspending all trade with India – including to and from any third country.
Similarly, it also announced the cancellation of all visas under the SAARC Visa Exemption Scheme – which allows some people to have a “Special Travel” document exempting them from visas.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:41
Kashmir’s ‘terror attack’: What happened?
‘Act of war’
The moves are just the latest escalation of tensions between the two, as Pakistan warned that any suspension of water supplies by India would be viewed as an “act of war”.
Both Pakistan and India saw protesters turn out on the streets, calling on their respective governments to go further.
Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif chaired a meeting of the National Security Committee to respond to India’s measures.
He warned that any attempt to disrupt the Indus Waters Treaty would be met with “full force” from Pakistan.
The landmark treaty has so far survived two wars between the countries, in 1965 and 1971, as well as a major border skirmish in 1999.
It allows for a water-sharing system that is a lifeline for both countries – in particular for Pakistan’s agriculture.
‘Ends of the Earth’
It comes after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi promised to pursue those responsible for the attack “to the ends of the Earth”.
Speaking on Thursday at a public meeting in the eastern state of Bihar, he said: “I say to the whole world, India will identify, track, and punish every terrorist and their backers.
“We will pursue them to the ends of the Earth.”
Police in Indian Kashmir published notices on Thursday naming three suspected militants it claimed were “involved in” the attack.
Two of the three suspects were Pakistani nationals, according to the notice.
Image: Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif chairs the meeting of the National Security Committee, in Islamabad.
Pic: AP/Prime Minister’s Office
Image: India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi addresses a rally in Madhubani in the eastern state of Bihar.
Pic: Reuters/Stringer
A contested Kashmir
India and Pakistan each administer a part of Kashmir, but both claim the territory in its entirety.
The region has a long, volatile and complex history.
Recent years has seen India claim that violence in the area has calmed – despite a bloody rebellion against New Delhi raging for decades.
India claims the militancy in Kashmir is Pakistan-backed terrorism.
Pakistan denies this. In a statement Thursday, the country said it supported the self-determination of the Kashmiri people.
Many Muslim Kashmiris, in a Muslim-majority territory, consider the militants part of a home-grown struggle for freedom.
Diplomatic relations between the two were already weak before the latest escalation as Pakistan had expelled India’s envoy after India revoked the semi-autonomous status of Kashmir in 2019.
This deepened tensions in the region but things have largely held stable after the two countries renewed a previous ceasefire agreement in 2021.
Image: A demonstrator shouts as he is stopped by police during a protest near the Pakistan High Commission in New Delhi after the attack.
Pic: Reuters/Stringer
Tens of thousands of people have been killed in Kashmir since the uprising began in 1989, but violence has tapered off in recent years and tourism has surged in the scenic region.
Until the most recent episode, tourists have not been the targets of such attacks.