Connect with us

Published

on

“If I go back, I’ll be murdered. And it will be the government’s fault that I was murdered.” That is the stark assessment of Anna, a victim of sex trafficking, who faces removal from the UK under the new Illegal Migration Act.

Anna, not her real name, was trafficked to the UK from Albania, to be sold for sex. She is intelligent and highly articulate. She had a bright future. One that was cruelly snatched away by a criminal gang.

“I was all the time threatened. I was getting raped all the time,” she tells me, fighting back tears.

“And not even in Albania, but in every country that I’ve been through, I’ve been raped. I didn’t have an option to tell no, or to say anything because I was being threatened for my parents. I was being threatened for my life.”

Anna is a victim of sex trafficking,

Anna’s case is currently being considered by the National Referral Mechanism (NRM), the official framework for identifying victims of modern slavery.

But she entered the UK illegally, using a fake passport. And as a result of that fact, under the terms of the Illegal Migration Act, she and others like her would lose the protections of the NRM and could face detention and removal.

Dr Victoria Tecca, from the Modern Slavery Policy and Evidence Centre, said: “The Act denies protection to potentially thousands of people who arrived in the UK by irregular means.

More from UK

“In such cases, after being identified as a potential victim, rather than being protected, the Act orders people to be detained and removed from the country.”

The Salvation Army, which is supporting Anna, is one of the few organisations with legal authority to help victims of modern slavery.

Data shared exclusively with Sky News shows that last year, 3,533 people were rescued by the charity alone, a rise of 5% on the previous year.

But it estimates that for every survivor that escapes, another seven people remain trapped in slavery.

The fear is that by threatening survivors with punishment, the new law will mean even fewer people come forward.

Read more:
Plan to clamp down on illegal migration could spark ‘perma-backlog’
More foreign prisoners to be deported to free-up cells

Major Kathy Beveridge, the Salvation Army's Director of Anti-Trafficking
Image:
Major Kathy Beveridge, the Salvation Army’s Director of Anti-Trafficking

‘I’m really in danger’

Major Kathy Beveridge, the Salvation Army’s director of anti-trafficking, said: “We want to ensure the government are aware of the implications of the policies they are developing at the moment.

“That somebody’s life will be affected if they don’t receive the support that they’re entitled to.”

Anna’s message is clear. She may have entered the UK illegally, but not willingly: “Being here, it’s my last desire, you know? I’m being forced here. I don’t want to stay here. I really need to stay here because I’m really in danger.”

She fears being deported would put her life at risk.

Under the terms of the Illegal Migration Act, individuals who receive a notice of removal could submit a claim that removal to their home country might pose them serious harm.

If that’s upheld, they might be removed to a third country, such as Rwanda, rather than their country of origin.

Anna is a victim of sex trafficking,

The Home Office said: “Modern Slavery is a barbaric crime and we provide support to thousands of victims each year.

“We are reforming our response to modern slavery to make the system more robust and ensure genuine victims are supported.”

Ministers have promised to publish guidance clarifying the law’s modern slavery provisions in due course.

‘The government has my life in their hands’

Until then, Anna’s future hangs in the balance. Our conversation turns to her hopes and dreams.

She said: “Well, in my dreams I would be where I left my life in Albania. Happy, nice, really happy. But right now I don’t know because the government has my life in their hands. If they decide that I will get the protection, then at least I will breathe for the next six months. I don’t know what to say beyond that.”

For people in Anna’s position, even dreaming is a luxury.

Continue Reading

UK

Government accused of ‘cover-up’ over collapse of China spy trial

Published

on

By

Government accused of 'cover-up' over collapse of China spy trial

Kemi Badenoch has accused the government of a “cover-up” over the collapse of a China spy trial.

The Tory leader said there were a “lot of questions to answer” as to why the trial involving two men did not proceed.

Politics latest: Starmer pledges support for Middle East peace plan

It is expected that ministers will have to answer questions about the case today, as parliament returns from recess.

In particular, there are questions around the role played by Jonathan Powell, the prime minister’s national security adviser, in the trial not going ahead.

Ministers have repeatedly said Mr Powell played no role in the decisions that led to the collapse of the trial – but Ms Badenoch said she was “worried that there is a cover up taking place”.

Speaking to broadcasters in Grantham today, Ms Badenoch said: “We will be making sure that we ask questions in parliament about exactly who knew what, where and when, but Jonathan Powell certainly has questions to answer.”

More on China

She refuted suggestions from ministers that Mr Powell had had no involvement in the collapse of the trial, saying: “We are seeing information that contradicts that.

“That is why it is very important that the government come clean about who knew what, where, when, and why this has happened.”

Former parliamentary researcher Christopher Cash, 30, of Whitechapel, east London, and teacher Christopher Berry, 33, of Witney, Oxfordshire, were charged with passing politically sensitive information to a Chinese intelligence agent between December 2021 and February 2023. They have both denied the allegations.

👉Listen to Politics at Sam and Anne’s on your podcast app👈

Over the past week, Sir Keir Starmer, his ministers and Mr Powell have faced accusations they were involved in the trial being dropped.

Last week Stephen Parkinson, the director of public prosecutions and the head of the Crown Prosecution Service, took the unusual step of sending MPs a letter to claim that the government repeatedly refused to provide evidence that China represented a national security threat at the time of the allegations.

Mr Parkinson said the CPS had tried “over many months” to get the evidence it needed to carry out the prosecution, but it had not been forthcoming from the government.

Downing Street also said today it was “entirely false” to suggest the government influenced the collapse of the case because of concerns Beijing could withdraw investment in the UK.

Asked about reports in the Sunday Times which suggested a decision was taken high up in government to abandon the case, the prime minister’s official spokesman told reporters: “It is entirely false. The CPS (Crown Prosecution Service) decision to drop the case was entirely a matter for the CPS.

“There was no role for any member of this government, no minister, or special adviser, to take any decision in relation to this case. That is entirely for the CPS.”

The government had argued that China needed to have been branded an “enemy” during the period it was accused of spying for the prosecution to go ahead – effectively blaming the previous Conservative government.

The Conservatives claim the government’s rationale is an excuse because it had said many times Beijing was a national security threat while it was in government.

Read more from Sky News:
Dozens dead after bus crash in South Africa
Man charged with stalking after allegedly targeting Lib Dem leader

The prime minister has said he wanted to be “absolutely clear no ministers were involved” in any decisions relating to the case, but notably sidestepped answering whether Mr Powell was involved.

Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary, yesterday gave the government’s most definitive answer yet about whether Mr Powell was part of the reason the case was dropped weeks before they were set to go on trial.

Asked on Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips if she could assure him that the national security adviser played no role in the decision, Ms Phillipson said: “Yes, I can give that assurance.

“We’re very disappointed that the CPS were not able to take forward the prosecution.”

The Liberal Democrats have called on the government to hold an inquiry into the collapse of the case.

Calum Miller, the party’s foreign affairs spokesman, said the case had “exposed appalling gaps in our government’s ability and willingness to challenge China’s espionage efforts”.

“We cannot let the government sweep this case under the rug in its efforts to cosy up to President Xi. An inquiry – preceded by rigorous scrutiny through parliament – would provide the answers the public deserves.”

Continue Reading

UK

Tommy Robinson refused to give phone pin to police as he drove his Bentley to Benidorm, court hears

Published

on

By

Tommy Robinson refused to give phone pin to police as he drove his Bentley to Benidorm, court hears

Tommy Robinson refused to hand over his phone pin when police stopped his Bentley on the way to Benidorm, a court has heard.

He allegedly told officers “Not a chance, bruv” and said he was a journalist when they pulled him aside at the Channel Tunnel at Folkestone in July 2024.

Robinson, real name Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, is accused of “frustrating” counter-terrorism powers by refusing to give access to the phone.

He denies the charge.

The right-wing political activist was flanked by security guards as he arrived at Westminster Magistrates Court for the opening of the trial on Monday.

The 42-year-old faces three months in prison and/or a £2,500 fine if found guilty.

Robinson had £13,000 and 1,900 euros on him when he was stopped and told police he was going to Benidorm in Spain for a few days, said prosecutor Jo Morris.

More on Tommy Robinson

He allegedly refused to give the pin as he claimed the phone had sensitive “journalist material” on it.

He’s said to have told police: “It’s my work, I’m a journalist,” claiming it contained information about “vulnerable girls”.

The court heard Robinson was stopped in his silver Bentley SUV because he gave “short, vague replies” about what he was doing and “made no eye contact”.

PC Mitchell Thorogood told the court it was also “unusual” he bought tickets on the day rather than in advance and was in an expensive car not registered in his name.

Pic: PA
Image:
Pic: PA

When police took Robinson into an interview room and demanded his phone, he allegedly told them: “Not a chance bruv… you look like a c*** so you ain’t having it.”

Officers said they recognised Robinson when they stopped him and his lawyer, Alisdair Williamson KC, suggested the stop may have been “discriminatory” against his political beliefs.

Police can stop anyone at a UK port and hold them for six hours if they suspect they may be involved in planning or committing acts of terrorism.

They are legally obliged to answer questions and must give access to their electronic devices or face a criminal charge.

In a video on X before the hearing, Robinson said Elon Musk had “picked up the legal bill” for “this absolute state persecution”.

The case comes a month after Robinson led a huge rally in central London under the banner ‘Unite the Kingdom’.

The trial continues.

Continue Reading

UK

Man arrested over 1994 murder of 13-year-old Lindsay Rimer

Published

on

By

Man arrested over 1994 murder of 13-year-old Lindsay Rimer

A man has been arrested on suspicion of the 1994 murder of 13-year-old Lindsay Rimer.

Police said the man was arrested at an undisclosed prison where he is serving a sentence for other offences.

The man, who is being interviewed today and tomorrow, is expected to be bailed and returned to prison while enquires continue.

Officers are also interviewing a number of potential witnesses in the Hebden Bridge and wider Halifax area.

Lindsay left her home to buy a box of corn flakes late during the evening of 7 November, 1994, but didn’t return home.

Her body was then found in a canal close to her home six months later.

Following today’s arrest, senior investigating officer, detective chief inspector James Entwistle, said: “We remain very firmly committed to doing everything we can to get justice for Lindsay, and to give her family the answers they still so desperately need after all these years.

Lindsay Rimer's body was found in a canal close to her home six months later. Pic: West Yorkshire Police
Image:
Lindsay Rimer’s body was found in a canal close to her home six months later. Pic: West Yorkshire Police

“The arrest we have made today comes as a result of our continued focus on progressing the investigation.

“We are keeping Lindsay’s family updated and, while we appreciate the understandable public interest that today’s arrest will bring, we do not anticipate any immediate developments at this stage.

“Although it is now more than thirty years since Lindsay was murdered, we remain convinced there is someone out there who has vital information that could finally help to ease her family’s pain, and we urge them do the right thing and tell us what they know.”

Anyone with further information has been urged to contact police by calling 101 quoting Operation Posemill, or sending a text or voicemail to 07707147314.

Continue Reading

Trending