Phil Spencer, chief executive officer of gaming at Microsoft Corp., center, arrives to court in San Francisco on June 28, 2023.
Shelby Knowles | Bloomberg | Getty Images
When Phil Spencer took the helm of Microsoft’s gaming division in 2014, he and newly appointed CEO Satya Nadella weren’t sure if the company should keep investing in the Xbox, which was losing to Sony.
Less than a decade later, Spencer and the Xbox are at the center of the software company’s largest acquisition ever. With the close of the $69 billion purchase of video game publisher Activision Blizzard on Friday, Microsoft has made clear that gaming is no longer a question mark and is, in fact, central to the company’s future.
“It is an extraordinary amount of money for Microsoft, whose core business is not gaming,” said Don Coyner, who was the first person to work on marketing inside the company’s Xbox unit. Coyner, who left Microsoft in 2018, said he’s confident that smart people at the company can explain the high price.
Spencer’s profile at Microsoft has grown immensely in a short period of time. He told an interviewer from gaming website Shacknews in 2020 that he only got to become head of Microsoft’s gaming division because so many other people had left, and he was still there.
Activision marks one of the priciest deals ever in technology. In addition to the hefty costs, it’s also been extremely time-consuming.
Regulatory pushback from the European Commission, the executive body of the EU, and agencies in the U.S. and U.K. kept the deal at bay for nearly 21 months and forced Microsoft and Activision to extend the deadline to close, which had been mid-July, by three months.
There were numerous moments of uncertainty along the way. In July, Spencer sat in on five days of hearings before a federal judge in San Francisco, who ultimately denied the Federal Trade Commission’s attempt to quash the deal. The FTC took its effort to an appeals court, which refused to grant a motion that would have temporarily stopped the transaction from closing.
Until now, gaming has been a small piece of Microsoft and a relatively slow grower. Revenue increased 1% in the latest quarter, while the company as a whole grew by about 8%. In the most recent fiscal year, gaming revenue was $15.5 billion, accounting for 7.3% of total Microsoft sales.
Rather than ceding the market to Sony and Nintendo, Microsoft’s highest-ranking managers decided to sacrifice most of the software maker’s $111 billion cash pile on a game company.
Bobby Kotick (L), CEO of Activision Blizzard at the Allen & Company Sun Valley Conference on July 11, 2023 in Sun Valley, Idaho.
David A. Grogan | CNBC
Spencer has been vocal in touting Activision’s strengths and was a key force in driving the deal. He’s enjoyed a yearslong relationship with Activision CEO Bobby Kotick, even though the companies have had some tense moments. For example, Microsoft failed to secure the publisher’s titles for the subscription-based Game Pass library during negotiations in 2020.
In November 2021, Spencer approached Kotick and said Microsoft was interested in discussing strategic opportunities between the two companies. His outreach came just three days after The Wall Street Journal reported that Kotick hadn’t told his board what he knew about misconduct inside the company. Activision shares tumbled 11% in the next three trading sessions.
According to a regulatory filing, Spencer asked if Kotick would talk with Nadella, and Kotick agreed. The CEOs spoke the next day, and Nadella conveyed Microsoft’s interest in buying Activision. Some 59 days later the two companies announced their intent to combine.
Microsoft didn’t make Spencer available for an interview.
From intern to boss
Spencer arrived at Microsoft as a software development intern in 1988. Two years later, after graduating from the University of Washington with a bachelor’s degree in technical and scientific communication, he accepted a full-time job at the company as an engineer. He worked on Encarta, Microsoft Money, Microsoft Works and other products.
In the early days of Xbox, Spencer directed an internal game development studio, and in 2008 he took over all of its studios. In 2014, following the launch of the Xbox One console and the appointment of Nadella as CEO, Spencer took charge of Xbox.
Spencer has long understood the importance of top-shelf content. He was instrumental in getting Nadella onboard with the purchase of Minecraft developer Mojang, which Microsoft acquired in 2014 for $2.5 billion. Minecraft has since become the bestselling video game, with more than 300 million copies sold as of this week.
Spencer also took on a big role in the $8.1 billion purchase of ZeniMax Media, the publisher of Doom and Fallout games, in 2021. And at one point he was working on a bid for Warner Bros. Games, whose titles include the Batman: Arkham games, he told two marketing executives in a 2020 email. That deal never materialized.
Spencer and his Microsoft peers then turned to mobile gaming. They considered FarmVille publisher Zynga, Pokemon Go developer Niantic and others before going much bigger with Activision Blizzard.
“Mobile is the largest segment in gaming, with nearly 95% of all players globally enjoying games on mobile,” Microsoft said in its press release announcing the deal. While Activision is known for franchises such as Call of Duty and Overwatch, it also publishes Candy Crush puzzle titles that are among the most popular games on Android and iOS.
Spencer, a lifelong gamer, plays Candy Crush, he said during the July hearings. In total, he plays video games for about 15 hours per week, he told Bloomberg in an interview last year. He’s a fan of Banjo-Kazooie, a game from Microsoft’s Rare studio, and Halo Infinite. In 2021 he played Bungie’s Destiny 2 while another participant streamed the action live on Twitch.
While Microsoft dominates in PC operating systems and productivity software, Xbox remains smaller than Sony in gaming, even after two decades of battle.
“I feel we are in a huge hole with our games lineup both for platform marketing/differentiation and our Gamepass content,” Spencer wrote in a 2022 email to Xbox executives that was made public in the FTC case. This year Xbox has gained a handful of well-received titles, including Zenimax’s Starfield and Forza Motorsport, published by Xbox Game Studios.
Spencer has also recognized some improvements. In 2020, as Sony revealed details of the PlayStation 5, Spencer wrote in a message to Nadella and Microsoft finance chief Amy Hood, “After almost 12 hours of soaking in their unveil, taking apart their specs and looking at the community responses I just wanted to say that I’m proud of our team.” Microsoft had better gaming hardware, software and services, Spencer wrote.
He likes to recognize the achievements of others.
David Hufford, who works in communications and analyst relations at Microsoft, recalled asking Spencer to speak at an event in 2021 honoring the 20th anniversary of the original Xbox launch. Hufford told CNBC in an email that Spencer declined because he wanted to focus on Robbie Bach, who ran entertainment and devices until 2010, and Jeff Henshaw, an Xbox co-founder.
Hufford said that Spencer “preferred we spotlight” those people, “who played more visible leadership roles back then.” Even Bach, once Microsoft’s chief Xbox officer, couldn’t talk Spencer into offering on-stage remarks, Hufford wrote.
Correction: Gaming revenue increased 1% in the latest quarter, while the company as a whole grew by about 8%. An earlier version misstated a percentage.
The Alibaba office building is seen in Nanjing, Jiangsu province, China, on Aug 28, 2024.
CFOTO | Future Publishing | Getty Images
Alibaba on Wednesday said that it has made its video generation artificial intelligence models free to use, further ramping up competition with rivals like OpenAI.
The Chinese giant said it is open sourcing four models that are part of its Wan2.1 series, the latest version of the company’s foundational AI model that can generate images and video from text and image inputs.
These models will be available via Alibaba Cloud’s Model Scope and Hugging Face, a huge repository of AI models. They will be accessible to academics, researchers and commercial institutions globally.
Alibaba’s Hong Kong-listed shares closed nearly 5% higher.
Open-source AI tech has been thrown into the spotlight since Chinese firm DeepSeek rattled global markets in January, after claiming its artificial intelligence model was trained at a fraction of the cost of leading AI players and on less-advanced Nvidia chips.
DeepSeek’s model is open source, like Alibaba’s, meaning it can be downloaded and modified by others.
Open source differs from proprietary models such as those created by OpenAI and do not produce revenue for companies. Open sourcing a technology serves a number of purposes, including driving innovation and building a community around a product.
Chinese firms in particular have been pushing forward with open source models, Alibaba’s and DeepSeek’s now among the most popular used globally. Alibaba published its first open source model in August 2023, while Meta is leading the open source charge with its Llama models in the U.S.
Alibaba’s stock has been on a tear this year, with the Hong Kong listing up 66% in 2025 to date due to factors including the company’s improved financial performance, its perception as one of the key AI players in China and recent signals of further support from Chinese president Xi Jinping for the domestic private sector.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk postponed a scheduled trip to India this week where he was to meet Prime Minister Narendra Modi, citing “heavy Tesla obligations.”
Anadolu | Anadolu | Getty Images
India has been striving to become a global manufacturing hub, having successfully invited major companies such as Apple to set up as well as expand production in the country.
To further bolster its manufacturing prowess, the South Asian nation has been eyeing Tesla to set up its base in the country. And the carmaker that has appeared reluctant for long is now signaling interest in the market as the Indian government attempts to welcome it by implementing a new EV tariff policy.
Tesla is reportedly recruiting and scouting showroom locations in the country, following a meeting between Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Tesla CEO Elon Musk earlier this month.
“One thing is for sure, Tesla is coming to India based on the recent news, and the government is also very serious about it,” Puneet Gupta, Director for the Indian automotive market at S&P Global Mobility, told CNBC.
India introduced an EV policy last year that proposes to lower the import duties on EVs to 15% from about 70%, with the government set to start accepting applications under this policy before March-end, according to domestic news agency IANS.
This relaxation only applies to premium EVs priced at over $35,000 and requires investments totaling nearly $500 million and long-term plans to set up local manufacturing.
The EV policy represents a targeted move to appeal to Tesla’s business interests, signaling India’s readiness to support EV manufacturing, Ammar Master, a South Asia director of Automotive at GlobalData, told CNBC.
“The Indian government has been proactive in its attempts to lure Tesla into establishing its manufacturing base in India,” he said.
The automaker, however, faces several headwinds to breaking into the world’s third-largest auto market.
It’s unclear if Tesla’s entry makes sense under India’s investment scheme, with any plans the automaker might have likely to be rolled out slowly and in a measured way due to several entry barriers, Gupta and other analysts said.
Price and commitment issues
According to a recent research note by Bank of America, if Tesla were to enter this scheme, it would translate to minimum landed car prices of $40,000.
At this price, Tesla EVs would enter India’s market at a very high price point, above what existing Indian OEMs cater to and implying a small addressable market, BofA said.
Under the planned EV scheme, Tesla would also need to follow a 3-year timeline for setting up manufacturing facilities in India, reaching a 50% domestic value addition within 5 years.
Analysts say jumping into this commitment would be premature for Tesla, based on their current price points.
A research note from BNP Paribas on Monday stated that local production in India won’t make sense unless Tesla can reduce its vehicle prices to below $30,000 to allow for mass volumes in India.
Meanwhile, Tesla has yet to signal significant interest in setting up a manufacturing base in the country, with its recent job openings consisting of mostly consumer-facing positions.
Additionally, geopolitical barriers may influence Telsa’s decision to produce cars in India under the new Donald Trump administration. In an interview alongside Tesla CEO Elon Musk last week, President Trump said that Tesla manufacturing in India would be “very unfair.”
The company has also been working on completing the production of manufacturing plants in Germany and Texas.
‘Slow and measured’
Given the price and investment challenges, experts told CNBC that Tesla’s India foray will start with exporting cars to the market to test the waters first.
“We expect Tesla’s entry into India to be slow and measured, given the low average price point in the market,” BNP Paribas said, noting that the company has plans to launch more affordable models later this year.
Meanwhile, S&P Global Mobility’s Gupta said that Tesla will likely push India to tweak its EV tariff policy further, allowing it to start shipping to the country more easily before making any investment promises.
Some local media sources in India have reported that government may further tweak the EV policy to attract Tesla considers the market.
“Even if they commit to the current proposal, it will be after six months or so,” added Gupta.
However, while the Indian EV market remains small, getting a foothold there could be a valuable endeavor for Tesla as it looks for new markets amid intense competition with Chinese EV makers such as BYD.
“With the current momentum, we project that Passenger BEV sales in India will reach 1 million units by 2030, accounting for 20% of total sales,” said GlobalData’s Ammar Master.
For the third year in a row, CNBC is working with market research firm Statista to list the world’s top financial technology companies.
Including startups, scaleups and established tech players, the top global fintech list aims to assess companies using an objective, key performance indicator-based methodology.
You can find out more information on the research project and methodology by clicking here.
Woman using digital tablet and credit card to do shopping.
John Lamb | Digital Vision | Getty Images
Applications are now open for companies to register their information for consideration by Statista’s researchers. To qualify, a company must focus primarily on developing innovative, technology-based financial products and services.
This year, we’re also digging deeper into the research to name the standout companies operating in the U.K. — the largest fintech market in Europe, as measured by the amount of funding raised.
Applications from companies headquartered in the U.K. will — in addition to being considered for the global fintech list — also be considered for a separate list of the U.K.’s top fintech companies. Firms do not need to fill in a separate application to be considered for the U.K. ranking.
Last year, fintech startups in the U.K. raised $3.6 billion in venture capital, ranking second worldwide and first in Europe for funding, according to industry trade body Innovate Finance. The country is also home to Revolut, Europe’s biggest fintech unicorn with a $45 billion valuation.
How to apply
Companies can submit their information for consideration by clicking here. The form, hosted by Statista, includes questions about a company’s business model and certain key performance indicators, including revenue growth and employee headcount.
The deadline for submissions is April 25, 2025.
If you have any questions about the lists or need assistance filling out the form, please reach out to Statista: topfintechs@statista.com.
Successful companies will be listed in the category that most closely reflects their business model. This year, insurance technology will be included as a category in the global fintech list. The other categories are payments, neobanking, digital assets, alternative financing, wealth technology, and enterprise fintech.
You can check out last year’s list here, which included well-known brands such as Mastercard and China’s Ant Group, global unicorns such as Brazilian digital lender Nubank and buy now, pay later firm Klarna, as well as smaller disruptors including payments platform Primer and investing app Stash.