In the immediate aftermath of the Hamas terror attack on Israel, its Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu described the US and UK as the “two countries in the frontline of support”.
And it is in that spirit Rishi Sunak will on Thursday follow President Biden in a diplomatic dash to the region.
This visit is intended as a show of solidarity with Israel.
Mr Sunak will also use it to try to build on the work of the US in pushing for humanitarian aid for Palestinian civilians, prevent the escalation of the Israel-Hamas war into a broader regional conflict, and show support for British nationals in Gaza, while raising the cases of the nine missing Britons.
“The PM’s main message will be to urge calmness and cool heads,” says one government figure.
“No one, especially not Israel, wants this to escalate into regional conflict. We have good diplomatic relations in the region and we think we can help.”
But, at such a febrile and tense time in this war, Mr Sunak’s visit comes with obvious risk.
You only have to look at how President Biden’s carefully choreographed visit unravelled mid-flight following the devastating blast at al Ahli hospital in Gaza City, which killed hundreds of people and prompted Arab leaders to cancel a previously scheduled summit with the US leader.
After “unfortunate timing” for President Biden, the PM’s team are keen to downplay expectations of what, if anything, he can achieve in the coming couple of days.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:35
What happened at the Gaza hospital?
His team are keeping under wraps what other countries he might visit beyond Israel, with one eye on security concerns and the other on what happened to carefully laid US plans in light of the bombing.
To that end, government figures are downplaying expectations, cautioning that they don’t expect a “rabbit out of a hat” or agreement on some of the very live issues around this war, not least the opening of the Rafah crossing to let Palestinian civilians flee Gaza, despite allied optimism earlier this week that this humanitarian corridor would be opened.
At such a pivotal and unpredictable time in this war, with so much uncertainty about how the coming days will unfold, what the prime minister hopes to do – alongside allies President Biden and German Chancellor Scholz who also visited Israel this week – is demonstrate public solidarity with Israel, while working furiously for de-escalation behind closed doors.
As the prime minister himself said “too many lives have been lost following Hamas’s horrific act of terror”, while the al Ahli hospital attack should be a “watershed moment” for leaders in the region and around the world to contain and limit this war.
But Mr Sunak only has to look to the global leader in chief President Biden, to see how delicate diplomatic missions like this carry real risk; and as much as Number 10 will try to lower expectations of what can be achieved, Mr Sunak will want to come out of his visit with some concrete progress around his aims.
The government has said the £3 cap would stay in place for another year, until December 2025.
But speaking on Sunday morning with Trevor Phillips, Transport Secretary Louise Haugh indicated the government was considering abolishing the cap beyond that point to explore alternative methods of funding.
She said: “We’ve stepped in with funding to protect it at £3 until 31 December next year. And in that period, we’ll look to establish more targeted approaches.
“We’ve, through evaluation of the £2 cap, found that the best approach is to target it at young people.
“So we want to look at ways in order to ensure more targeted ways, just like we do with the concessionary fare for older people, we think we can develop more targeted ways that will better encourage people onto buses.”
Pressed again on whether that meant the single £3 cap would be removed after December 2025, and that other bus reliefs could be put in place, she replied: “That’s what we’re considering at the moment as we go through this year, as we have that time whilst the £3 cap is in place – because the evaluation that we had showed, it hadn’t represented good value for money, the previous cap.”
Advertisement
It comes after Ms Haigh also confirmed that HS2 would not run to Crewe.
There had been reports that Labour could instead build an “HS2-light” railway between Birmingham and Crewe.
But Ms Haigh said that while HS2 would be built from Birmingham to Euston, the government was “not resurrecting the plans for HS2”.
“HS2 Limited isn’t getting any further work beyond what’s been commissioned to Euston,” she added.
Last month the prime minster confirmed the £2 bus fare cap would rise to £3 – branded the “bus tax” by critics – saying that the previous government had not planned for the funding to continue past the end of 2024.
He said that although the cap would increase to £3, it would stay at that price until the end of 2025 “because I know how important it is”.
Manchester mayor to keep £2 cap
The cap rise has been unpopular with some in Labour, with Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham opting to keep the £2 cap in place for the whole of 2025, despite the maximum that can be charged across England rising to £3.
The region’s mayor said he was able to cap single fares at £2 because of steps he took to regulate the system and bring buses back into public ownership from last year.
He also confirmed plans to introduce a contactless payment system, with a daily and weekly cap on prices, as Greater Manchester moves towards a London-style system for public transport pricing.
Under devolution, local authorities and metro mayors can fund their own schemes to keep fares down, as has been the case in Greater Manchester, London and West Yorkshire.
Shelves will not be left empty this winter if farmers go on strike over tax changes, a cabinet minister has said.
Louise Haigh, the transport secretary, said the government would be setting out contingency plans to ensure food security is not compromised if farmers decide to protest.
Farmers across England and Wales have expressed anger that farms will no longer get 100% relief on inheritance tax, as laid out in Rachel Reeves’s budget last month.
Welsh campaign group Enough is Enough has called for a national strike among British farmers to stop producing food until the decision to impose inheritance tax on farms is reversed, while others also contemplate industrial action.
Asked by Trevor Phillips if she was concerned at the prospect that shelves could be empty of food this winter, Ms Haigh replied: “No, we think we put forward food security really as a priority, and we’ll work with farmers and the supply chain in order to ensure that.
“The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs will be setting out plans for the winter and setting out – as business as usual – contingency plans and ensuring that food security is treated as the priority it deserves to be.”
From April 2026, farms worth more than £1m will face an inheritance tax rate of 20%, rather than the standard 40% applied to other land and property.
However, farmers – who previously did not have to pay any inheritance tax – argue the change will mean higher food prices, lower food production and having to sell off land to pay.
Tom Bradshaw, the president of the National Farmers Union, said he had “never seen the united sense of anger that there is in this industry today”.
“I don’t for one moment condone that anyone will stop supplying the supermarkets,” he said.
“We saw during the COVID crisis that those unable to get their food were often either the very most vulnerable, or those that have been working long hours in hospitals and nurses – that is something we do not want to see again.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
7:06
Farmers ‘betrayed’ over tax change
Explaining why the tax changes were so unpopular, he said food production margins were “so low”, and “any liquid cash that’s been available has been reinvested in farm businesses” for the future.
“One of the immediate changes is that farms are going to have to start putting money into their pensions, which many haven’t previously done,” he said.
“They’re going to have to have life insurance policies in case of a sudden death. And unfortunately, that was cash that would previously have been invested in producing the country’s food for the future.”
Sir Keir has staunchly defended the measure, saying it will not affect small farms and is aimed at targeting wealthy landowners who buy up farmland to avoid paying inheritance tax.
However, the Conservatives have argued the changes amount to a “war on farmers” and have begun a campaign targeting the prime minister as a “farmer harmer”.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:19
‘Farmers’ livelihoods are threatened’
Speaking to Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips, shadow home secretary Chris Philp said he was happy with farmers protesting against the budget – as long as their methods and tactics were “lawful”.
“What the Labour government has done to farmers is absolutely shocking,” he said.
“These are farmers that, you know, they’re not well off particularly, they’re often actually struggling to make ends meet because farming is not very profitable these days. And of course, we rely on farmers for our food security.
Addressing the possible protests, Mr Philp said: “I think people have a right to protest, and obviously we respect the right to protest within the law, and it’s up to parliament to set where the law sits.
“So I think providing they’re behaving lawfully, legally, then they do have a right to protest.”