Connect with us

Published

on

Our culture has become increasingly captivated by apocalyptic themes and storylines, with a plethora of popular TV shows and feature films embracing zombies, plagues, and other terrifying end-of-day scenarios.

But the idea of a future Armageddon-like scenario isnt merely reserved for fictional plots, as the concept is deeply embedded in Christian theology, impacting the way believers have read and interpreted biblical Scripture over the past two millennia.

READ ALSO: End Times Expert Breaks Down Hamas, the Prophet Ezekiel, and History That Led to This Harrowing Moment

And with Hamas’ horrific terror attack against Israel making headlines this month, it’s no surprise prophecy discussions are ramping up in some circles.

The conversation comes as many contemporary theologians and pastors believe the world is currently observing numerous signs that mirror the supposedly prophetic contents of verses in Old and New Testament books like Ezekiel, Daniel, and Revelation. Some of these apparent signs, of course, involve Israel, which is why news about the nation sparks so much intrigue.

Click here to listen to “Billy Hallowell’s Playing With Fire” podcast to hear the signs that have so many people wondering if the end times are upon us.

What has convinced these theologians and pastors that the end times could be ramping up? Thats a question I covered in-depth in my book, The Armageddon Code, through interviews with about 20 of the most prevalent eschatology experts.

Many of these theologians and pastors told me that sweeping moral decay, biblical disconnectedness, and ongoing violence in the Middle East are just a few of the prophetic markers they believe were foretold thousands of years ago in both the Old and New Testaments.

But how can Christian leaders be so sure the biblical end times are approaching?

Jesus himself foretold of his future Second Coming. The problem? Christ also proclaimed in Matthew 24:36 that no one knows the day or the hour of his return. While the Bible proclaims that humanity cannot know the when, Jesus did reveal to the disciples some signs of his second coming in Matthew 24:6-8:

You will hear of wars and rumors of wars, but see to it that you are not alarmed Nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. There will be famines and earthquakes in various places. All these are the beginning of birth pains.

Surely war has always been with us, though the 20th and 21st century thus far have seen broader and more sweeping world wars that involve many nations, with the contemporary battle against Islamic terror crossing international borders.

So, let’s dive in and explore in detail the purported signs that some theologians cite:1) Chaos in the Middle East:

With all this in mind, the first sign that has some Bible scholars positing that the world is either in or is rapidly approaching the end times is the ramped-up chaos in the Middle East. In recent years, the situation in the region has been raising more than a few eyebrows as the seemingly never-ending tensions between Israel and her neighbors most recently exemplified in Hamas’ terror attack continue to intensify.2) Hamas, the Islamic State, and Other Bad Actors:

From Hamas’ barbaric attack that killed at least 1,400 Israelis to the Islamic States murderous and bloodthirsty quest for power that has plagued nations across the globe, there’s no shortage of chaos. Taking those events into account, many Bible experts will point out that some of the battles described in scripture clashes that they believe are still unfulfilled are slated to take place in the Middle East.

Many of the experts I interviewed for The Armageddon Code couldnt help but wonder if the groundwork is currently being set for the fulfillment of the Gog and Magog battles that are referenced in the books of Ezekiel and Revelation a concept I address in detail (you can read more about that here).3) Israel’s Re-Emergence:

That brings me to the next modern-day phenomenon that has piqued the interest of Bible experts: the 1948 re-emergence of Israel after a Jewish state was noticeably absent from the map for nearly 1,900 years.

Heres why that matters: futurists who see many Bible prophecies as being currently unfulfilled believe that the Old and New Testament scriptures consistently predicted that a state of Israel would once again emerge at some point in the future.

Consider Ezekiel 36:24, which was written 2,500 years ago, and includes the following words that are attributed to God: For I will take you out of the nations; I will gather you from all the countries and bring you back into your own land.

Futurists believe that the Old Testament verses clearly reference a future restoration of Israel that was unlike anything that unfolded prior to the end of the Holocaust and World War II. Modern-day Israel is seen by these theologians and pastors as a super sign of the end of days events to come.

I cannot fathom how this modern-day prophetic fulfillment a super sign of the end times can be ignored, author Jeff Kinley, who takes a futurist approach, told me in interviews for The Armageddon Code.

Other experts, though, would counter that this verse, among others, related to the Babylonian captivity during which the Jews were forcefully taken by King Nebuchadnezzar II and were held in Babylonia after being expelled from Judah following its conquest around 597 BC. and not to the 1948 re-creation of Israel.

Persian leader Cyrus the Great later permitted the Jews to head back to their land in 538 BC, which could be perceived as a fulfillment of those prophecies, though the temple and Jerusalem again came under assault by the Romans in 70 AD, leaving the Jews scattered throughout the world for centuries.4) Shifts in Morality:

The fourth issue that is sparking intrigue about the worlds proximity to the end times is the fact that American culture is changing at a rapid rate, with traditional understandings of marriage and gender transforming as a more progressive view on sexuality takes root.

Theres a sense among many that immorality is intensifying, which seems to be one of the biblical signs we’re told to look for as love waxes cold and people become lovers of themselves.5) The Spread of the Gospel:

Last but not least is the idea that the Christian Gospel continues to be preached in even the most remote and hard-to-reach geographic areas throughout the world. This matters to many Bible experts due to the fact that Christ, after his resurrection, gave the disciples the commandment in Matthew 28:19 to go and make disciples of all nations. Jesus also mentioned this preaching of Scripture throughout the world earlier in the Book of Matthew as a sign of the end times.

This Gospel of the kingdom will be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come, Christ said in Matthew 24:14. So, there you have it: just a few of the reasons why some Christian leaders believe that the biblical end times are approaching, though, as I document in the book, the debate over prophecy can be a heated one. Why does this matter, you ask?

Whether or not you believe in the Bible or, more specifically, in end-times prophecy, understanding what so many Christians believe and why they believe it helps provide a lens through which all of us atheists and believers alike can better see how certain viewpoints have been formed. Find out more about The Armageddon Code.

This article was originally published by CBNs Faithwire. Used with permission. 

Photo Courtesy: Pixabay/Eberhard Grossgasteiger

Billy Hallowell is a journalist, commentator and digital TV host who has covered thousands of the biggest faith and culture stories. He’s written more than 14,000 stories on faith, culture and politics, has interviewed hundreds of celebrities, authors and influencers and is the author of four books.READ: THE CONFLICT IN ISRAEL: WHAT CAN I DO?Immediate Humanitarian Aid Needed3 Ways to Pray for Israel5 Powerful Prayers for IsraelA Prayer against Anti-SemitismLISTEN: Special Upate – Biden in Israel (#7 below)

The views and opinions expressed in this podcast are those of the speakers and do not necessarily reflect the views or positions of Salem Web Network and Salem Media Group. WATCH: A Prayer for Israel

Continue Reading

Business

Nvidia signals strong AI chip demand despite DeepSeek threat

Published

on

By

Nvidia signals strong AI chip demand despite DeepSeek threat

Nvidia has signalled no drop in demand for its flagship chips among big artificial intelligence (AI) spenders despite the low-cost challenge posed by Chinese rival DeepSeek.

The leading AI chipmaker said it expected Blackwell sales to continue to grow after its latest earnings beat market expectations.

Nvidia forecast revenue of around $43bn (£34bn) for its first quarter after achieving a figure of $39.3bn (£31bn) over its last three months – up 12% from the previous quarter and 78% from one year ago.

Just a month ago, its shares took a hammering when it emerged DeepSeek‘s primary chatbot, which uses lower-cost chips, had become the most popular free application on Apple’s App Store across the US.

Nvidia’s shares lost almost $600bn in market value in a day.

It also prompted investors to question whether the AI-led stock market rally of recent years was overblown.

There was anxiety ahead of Nvidia’s earnings report though shares only fell fractionally in after-hours dealing.

More from Money

Market analysts suggested demand from Microsoft, Amazon and other heavyweight tech companies racing to build
AI infrastructure remained robust, given Nvidia’s revenue guidance even though the bulk of it is accounted for through data centres.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Who will win the AI battle?

Read more: What is DeepSeek?

Nvidia founder Jensen Huang said Nvidia has ramped up the massive-scale production of Blackwell and achieved “billions of dollars in sales in its first quarter”.

“Demand for Blackwell is amazing as reasoning AI adds another scaling law – increasing compute for training makes models smarter and increasing compute for long thinking makes the answer smarter.

“AI is advancing at light speed as agentic AI and physical AI set the stage for the next wave of AI to revolutionise the largest industries,” he said.

Derren Nathan, head of equity research at Hargreaves Lansdown, said of the report: “The longer-term investment case for the driver of the AI train is looking difficult to pick holes in, with Meta’s $200bn just one of the latest mega investments in data centres to be unveiled recently.

“By virtue of scale, growth may be slowing a little but upgrades to analysts full-year numbers can be expected off the back of today’s results. At a around 30x forward earnings, the valuation still doesn’t look overcooked.”

Continue Reading

US

Starmer insists on security guarantee for Ukraine as he arrives in Washington for talks with Trump

Published

on

By

Starmer insists on security guarantee for Ukraine as he arrives in Washington for talks with Trump

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has arrived in Washington for talks with US President Donald Trump, discussions that could help shape the relationship between the UK and the US for the next four years.

In a short speech at the British ambassador’s residence he was keen to emphasise the things the two countries have in common.

“We want to work with you, we want to welcome you to Britain,” he said. “We want a new partnership, because our history shows that when we work together great things happen.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Starmer: ‘We want to strike a new partnership’

On Wednesday, the prime minister had brushed aside growing tensions between the White House and Europe over Ukraine, saying he trusted Mr Trump and wanted the “special relationship” to go “from strength to strength”.

Speaking to reporters ahead of the White House meeting, Sir Keir insisted that the UK was working “in lockstep” with the president on the matter of Ukraine.

Asked if he could trust President Trump in light of what has happened in recent weeks, the prime minister replied “yes”.

“I’ve got a good relationship with him,” Sir Keir said.

“As you know, I’ve met him, I’ve spoken to him on the phone, and this relationship between our two countries is a special relationship with a long history, forged as we fought wars together, as we traded together.

“And as I say, I want it to go from strength to strength.”

Politics latest: PM’s ‘very stupid decision’ condemned

Even before Sir Keir arrived in Washington, the choreography of the trip hit a little turbulence as President Trump appeared to pour cold water on the prospect of a US military backstop for Ukraine as part of any peace deal – a key UK and European demand.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Can Starmer ‘win’ in Washington?

“I’m not going to make security guarantees beyond very much,” Mr Trump said at his first cabinet meeting on Wednesday.

“We’re going to have Europe do that because Europe is the next-door neighbour.”

His remarks seemed at odds with those made by the prime minister on the way to Washington as he reiterated how important a US military backstop was for Ukraine.

“We all want a peaceful outcome,” the prime minister said.

“It’s got to be a lasting peace, and that requires us to put in place an effective security guarantee.

“Exactly what the configuration of that is, exactly what the backstop is, is obviously the subject of intense discussion.”

He added: “But the reason I say the backstop is so important is that the security guarantee has to be sufficient to deter Putin from coming again because my concern is if there is a ceasefire without a backstop, it will simply give him the opportunity to wait and to come again because his ambition in relation to Ukraine is pretty obvious, I think, for all to see.”

Read more:
CIA asked to look at UK ‘order’
Trump threatens 25% tariffs on EU

While European allies such as the UK and France are preparing to put peacekeeping troops on the ground to police the Ukraine-Russian borders, leaders have been clear that US support is essential to containing President Putin and securing that support is the key purpose of the prime minister’s trip to Washington.

President Zelenskyy has also demanded that clear guarantees of US military backing and security be part of his deal with the US on critical minerals, but a framework agreed this week by both sides did not include an explicit reference to any such support.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Trump’s top moments with UK prime ministers

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Putin is ‘very cunning’

Ahead of the trip to Washington, the prime minister pledged to increase UK defence spending – a key ask of all NATO members by President Trump – and reiterated his commitment to putting British boots on the ground in Ukraine as he attempts to lower tensions between Europe and the US and demonstrate to President Trump that the UK is willing to play its part.

“When it comes to defence and security, we have for decades acted as a bridge because of the special relationship we have with the US and also our allegiance to our European allies,” Sir Keir said.

“I’ve been absolutely resolute that we’re not going to choose between one side of the Atlantic and the other. We will work with the US, we will work with our European allies, that’s what we’ve done for decades, and it’s what we’ll do whilst I’m prime minister.”

👉Listen to Politics At Jack And Sam’s on your podcast app👈

Sir Keir also gave the British public a “message of reassurance” after his decision to accelerate defence spending in the face of Russian aggression, saying he had done it to “ensure their safety” and increased investment would bring opportunities.

“I want to reassure the British public that what we’re doing is to ensure their safety, their security and defence of our country.

“I want to also be clear that this is an opportunity because, as we increase defence spending, then that gives an opportunity for our industrial strategy, for jobs across the UK, good well-paid jobs in defence.”

Continue Reading

US

Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos announces changes to opinion section

Published

on

By

Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos announces changes to opinion section

Jeff Bezos, the owner of The Washington Post, has said the newspaper’s opinion section will write “every day in support and defence of… personal liberties and free markets” – appearing to align the publication with the US political right.

In an email to staff that he shared on X, Mr Bezos added: “We’ll cover other topics too of course, but viewpoints opposing those pillars will be left to be published by others.”

Marty Baron, a former editor of The Washington Post, has said he was “appalled” and “disgusted” by Mr Bezos’s decision.

Marty Baron speaking to Sky News
Image:
Marty Baron speaking to Sky News

“I couldn’t believe that he was doing that. Jeff Bezos has always talked about having a variety of points of view on the op-ed page and welcoming that,” he told Gillian Joseph on Sky News’ The World programme.

“This runs totally counter to that. So I was certainly disappointed, but really disgusted.”

“For decades, the Post has prided itself on running a whole variety of opinions on its opinion pages.

“But now what he’s signalled is that only one sort of opinion will be reflected on those pages. And that will be the opinion that he himself holds.”

More on Jeff Bezos

Mr Baron said that he believes Mr Bezos is “yielding to pressure from Donald Trump”.

Referring to Mr Bezos’s other businesses Amazon and space company Blue Origin, Mr Baron said: “He realises how dependent his commercial interests are on the US government.

“He realises how vengeful Donald Trump is and he’s concerned about the potential consequences for his other businesses. He’s now prioritising his other commercial interests over the interests of the Washington Post.”

Mr Bezos, who also owns Amazon, has typically had a hands-off approach to the paper’s editorial policy since he bought the Post in 2013.

But this appeared to change during last year’s US presidential election when he blocked the Post’s editorial board from publishing an endorsement for Donald Trump’s rival Kamala Harris.

He also refused to publish a satirical cartoon in January that depicted Mr Bezos kneeling at the feet of a figure of Mr Trump offering him a bag of money.

Read more:
Trump shares bizarre AI video of vision for Gaza
Shots fired near murder trial at German court
How Sudan’s children are being erased by war

The newspaper lost 250,000 subscribers after Mr Bezos blocked the endorsement of Ms Harris, with several employees resigning over Mr Bezos’s direction in recent months.

The day after the election, Mr Bezos congratulated Trump “on an extraordinary political comeback and decisive victory”, while Amazon was among the companies that donated $1m to Trump’s inauguration fund in what critics say is an effort to curry favour with the president.

In Wednesday’s statement by Mr Bezos, he said the Post’s opinion editor David Shipley had “decided to step away” – but it is unclear if he resigned or was fired.

Mr Bezos said: “There was a time when a newspaper, especially one that was a local monopoly, might have seen it as a service to bring to the reader’s doorstep every morning a broad-based opinion section that sought to cover all views. Today, the internet does that job.

“I am of America and for America, and proud to be so. Our country did not get here by being typical.”

He added: “A big part of America’s success has been freedom in the economic realm and everywhere else. Freedom is ethical – it minimises coercion – and practical – it drives creativity, invention, and prosperity.

“I’m confident that free markets and personal liberties are right for America. I also believe these viewpoints are underserved in the current market of ideas and news opinion. I’m excited for us together to fill that void.”

Jeff Stein, chief economics reporter at the Post, wrote on X after the email was published: “Massive encroachment by Bezos into The Washington Post’s opinion section – makes clear dissenting views will not be published.

“I still have not felt encroachment on my journalism on the news side, but if Bezos tries interfering with the news side I will be quitting immediately and letting you know.”

Continue Reading

Trending