Connect with us

Published

on

A former Tory MP failed to declare where he received £39,000 in political donations from, a crown court jury has heard.

David Mackintosh, who represented Northampton South between 2015 and 2017, is alleged to have accepted three donations of £10,000 and six of £1,500 that were made in an allegedly “underhand way”, Warwick Crown Court was told on Tuesday.

Mr Mackintosh, the former lead of Northampton Borough Council, is standing trial alongside property developer Howard Grossman, who is accused of using third parties to conceal the source of the nine separate donations to the Northampton South Conservative Association.

Mr Mackintosh and Mr Grossman both deny two counts of failing to ensure details were provided in relation to political donations during 2014.

Prosecutor William Boyce KC said the donations had been made through other people without properly declaring they were from Mr Grossman.

Politics latest: Poll boost for Labour after double by-election success

The prosecutor said Mr Grossman “donated £39,000 to Mr Mackintosh’s fighting fund not in his own name… pretending in essence that they [other people] were the donors”.

More on Conservatives

He alleged Mr Grossman did not want it to be known that he was the source of the funds.

“They were close friends and they worked together,” Mr Boyce said. “The case against Mr Mackintosh is that he received those donations knowing that Mr Grossman was doing it in that underhand way.”

Mr Boyce said Mr Grossman had become friends with Mackintosh after they both worked on a project to develop Northampton Town football club’s Sixfields Stadium, which was funded by council loans.

“On Mr Mackintosh’s case, Mr Grossman’s generosity must have extended to helping him… without telling his friend what he was doing,” Mr Boyce said.

“This case is not about why he [Grossman] wished to donate money – it’s about the methodology he employed in doing so. The prosecution do not have to prove why he did it.”

Mr Boyce said Mr Grossman and Mr Mackintosh met for the first time in 2012 after the former began discussions with the owners of Northampton Town about redeveloping Sixfields Stadium.

The court was told that a year later, the borough council resolved to lend the football club up to £12m.

Mr Boyce said Mr Grossman then became involved in a fundraiser for Mr Mackintosh at London’s Carlton Club in November 2014 – which charged guests £295 each – showcasing their close relationship.

The court was told that when Mr Mackintosh was interviewed by the police in March 2018 he answered “no comment” to the questions asked of him, but said in a statement that two other councillors had also benefitted from funds donated to the local Conservatives.

Mr Grossman also provided investigators with a prepared statement, saying he was “genuinely impressed” by Mr Mackintosh and wished to support him, having first met him in June 2013.

The trial continues.

Continue Reading

Politics

Italy sets hard MiCA deadline for crypto platforms to comply

Published

on

By

Italy sets hard MiCA deadline for crypto platforms to comply

Italy’s securities regulator set a firm timetable for applying the European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) in the country, warning that unlicensed crypto platforms face a deadline to either seek authorization or leave the market.

The move directly affects virtual asset service providers (VASPs) currently operating under Italy’s regime and the retail investors who use them.​

In a news release published Thursday, Italy’s Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (CONSOB) reminded the market that Dec. 30 is the last day VASPs registered with the Organismo Agenti e Mediatori (OAM) can operate under the existing national framework.

Italy, European Union, MiCA
Italy sets hard stop for MiCA authorization. Source: CONSOB

After that date, only entities authorized as crypto asset service providers (CASPs) under MiCA, including firms passporting into Italy from another EU member state, will be allowed to offer crypto‑asset services in the country.​

CONSOB notes that, under Italy’s MiCA‑implementing legislation, VASPs that submit an application to be authorized as CASPs in Italy or another European Union member state by Dec. 30 may continue operating while their applications are assessed, but no later than June 30, 2026.

This transitional operating period is available only to operators who file by the deadline and ends once authorization is granted or refused, or when the June 30, 2026, limit is reached.​

Related: ECB president calls to address risks from non-EU stablecoins

Obligations for firms that do not apply

For VASPs that decide not to seek authorization under MiCA, CONSOB outlined specific obligations. These operators must cease their activities in Italy by Dec. 30, terminate existing contracts, and return clients’ crypto‑assets and funds in accordance with customers’ instructions.

CONSOB also said that VASPs registered in the OAM list must publish adequate information on their websites and inform clients directly about the measures they intend to adopt, either to comply with MiCA or to ensure an orderly closure of existing relationships.

This framework stems from Italy’s legislative decree implementing MiCA, which introduced a transitional regime for existing VASPs and set the conditions under which they can continue operating while moving to the new CASP authorization system. The decree makes use of the flexibility allowed by MiCA’s transitional provisions to set national deadlines, including the June 30, 2026 date referred to in CONSOB’s communication.​

Warnings to retail investors

CONSOB’s news release includes a separate section titled “warnings for investors.”

The regulator points out that VASPs currently operating in Italy may no longer be authorized to do so after Dec. 30, and stresses that investors should check whether they have received the necessary information from their provider on its plans to comply with MiCA.

If not, CONSOB advises investors to ask the operator for clarification or request the return of their funds.

EU‑level context under MiCA

CONSOB’s communication sits within the wider EU framework for MiCA’s application and transitional measures. On the same day, the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published a statement on the end of MiCA transitional periods, highlighting that member states can provide temporary continuation of existing licenses for existing providers, but these periods are limited and will expire.

Related: EU plan would boost ESMA powers over crypto and capital markets

The ESMA’s statement explains that firms operating under national transitional regimes are not automatically MiCA‑authorized and emphasizes the need for “orderly wind-down plans” where providers do not obtain authorization before transitional periods end.​

Italy’s hard stop for applications and continued operation shows how member states are using the discretion MiCA gives them over transitional regimes. The Italian transitional period now has defined end‑points, and continued activity in the market will require MiCA‑compliant authorization.

Magazine: EU’s privacy-killing Chat Control bill delayed — but fight isn’t over