Lexus plans to launch a next-generation EV with super-low drag, high range, and a gigacast vehicle structure, in the most significant electric vehicle announcement to come out of this year’s Japan Mobility Show.
While the LF-ZC may still be a concept, it’s one that the luxury mark owned by Toyota is committing to, with production set to begin in 2026. That’s two-plus years from now, and while it’s hard to say how the vehicle landscape will change during that period, it’s not that far off, all things considered. Given what Lexus is saying about the LF-ZC, this sounds like a legitimately next-gen vehicle, using prismatic batteries, steer-by-wire, and a gigacast modular vehicle structure (initially pioneered by Tesla, but now being pursued by many automakers).
Lexus says the LF-ZC will have a drag coefficient under 0.2, and based on the concept’s Prius-esque teardrop design, this does look like an aero-first EV. The front doors on the concept version of the car are even shaped to channel air from the wheels.
Lexus isn’t sharing any details on range, saying only that the LF-ZC will have twice the range of “conventional” battery electric vehicles. It’s impossible to know what Lexus considers conventional, but I’d suspect nothing in the Tesla lineup qualifies. Anything in excess of 400 miles would certainly be impressive, and if Lexus was working with a “conventional” figure of less than 200 miles, I think we’d all be pretty disappointed! But this is just speculation, and that’s all Lexus has really left us to do here: speculate. (Edit: Some outlets are saying Lexus considers 500 kilometers to be the “conventional” figure, putting the LF-ZC at 1000 kilometers or around 620 miles of range. If true, that could be a game-changer. It also sounds pretty optimistic.)
One thing that may not be apparent from the images is that this is a small sedan, not a mid-size crossover. The LF-ZC has a wheelbase just 15 mm longer than a Tesla Model 3’s, at 2,890 mm. It’s also 50 mm shorter (vertically) than the Model 3, coming in at 1,390 mm — I’d suspect rear headroom is not going to be especially great in this car. With Lexus’s aggressive aerodynamic goals, that does make sense, though. Overall vehicle length is around the same, with the LF-ZC slightly longer than the Tesla.
Using steer-by-wire, it’s possible Toyota will be able to lay out the cabin of the LF-ZC to be roomier than its diminutive wheelbase would suggest. That’s because steer-by-wire requires no steering column — or any other components connecting the steering wheel to the vehicle wheels. The steering wheel (or yoke) becomes, effectively, a digital joystick. Everything happens via electronic position sensors on the yoke, with control modules relaying those inputs to the electric power steering system, which then adjusts the wheel angle accordingly.
Steer-by-wire as a technology isn’t new, per se, but it’s rarely been seen outside concept cars. The momentum behind a steer-by-wire transition, though, is the greatest it’s ever been. (Tesla recently patented such a system.) Getting the feel and responsiveness of a steer-by-wire system right has long proven challenging, though. Such designs lack the direct and instantaneous connection to the rolling components of traditional hydraulic and electric-assist power systems. Initial driving impressions of Lexus’s prototypes for such systems have been mixed.
So why keep trying to make steer-by-wire happen, Gretchen? Cost and packaging: By eliminating big, stress-bearing connective components from the steering system, manufacturers can save money and dramatically reduce the overall footprint of that system. In short: The steering wheel (or yoke) becomes just a steering wheel — a computerized control interface, nothing more. That, in turn, frees up a lot of volume in the dash area, potentially opening up more of the cabin as usable passenger space. In vehicular design, centimeters count just as much as dollars and cents, and a steer-by-wire system theoretically optimizes for both. For vehicle manufacturers, it’s a win-win. But for consumers, if steer-by-wire doesn’t feel reassuringly safe and communicative during driving, it could end up being a huge turn-off. (Some people position steer by wire as a liability risk, but I think this is a red herring — all modern cars use throttle by wire, and many now use brake by wire, too. There’s nothing special about steering from a liability perspective for a carmaker.)
As for the rest of the LF-ZC, we just don’t have much to work with yet. Aesthetically, the car looks like a 4th Gen Prius someone ran through a Tron filter. The design isn’t brutal, exactly, but form closely follows function here, likely reflecting the price positioning of this car as an entry-level premium sedan.
The interior of the LF-ZC is so dark and vague that I’d take almost none of what you see inside as reflective of final production intent — though if steer-by-wire does happen, that yoke could end up being pretty close to reality. (Steer-by-wire systems don’t require hand-over-hand steering since they can infinitely adjust the steering ratio by vehicle speed. This makes a yoke more practical.) The interior concept looks pretty spartan overall, aside from that massive passenger infotainment display. The driver gets two smartphone-sized screens mounted at an angle, one to the left of the steering yoke, and one to the right, along with an instrumentation display above it at the top of the dash. The number of hard buttons and switches in the LF-ZC appears to be “as near to zero as humanly possible” — call it cost-cutting or Tesla copycatting; either shoe fits.
Electrek’s Take
This is as close as Toyota (well, Lexus) has ever come to offering a response to Tesla. The LF-ZC is very plainly positioned in the same small luxury sedan space the Model 3 is, and it’s a segment that a manufacturer as large as Toyota can’t ignore if it’s going to be a serious player in EVs. But without details on range, power, or pricing, it’s very difficult to say how competitive Lexus’s offering will be. If the alleged estimate of over 600 miles of range is even close to reality, though, that feels worth the wait on other details.
Assuming the LF-ZC does go on sale in 2026, that will likely put it smack in the middle of the lifecycle of the new Model 3 Highland refresh, but still potentially ahead of whatever Tesla’s “next-gen” mass market vehicle ends up being.
Given this car is badged as a Lexus, that also opens the door for a cheaper Toyota variant down the road. The Prius-like styling, in my view, is no accident here. Drop some of the more aspirational aero, add some plastic trim, and take away a few of those displays, and it’s not hard to imagine a more basic Toyota take on this concept. Launching on Lexus, a luxury brand, would also be a way to offset some of the high initial cost of a new electric model as it scales up.
Steer-by-wire is a technology Toyota and Lexus seem highly motivated to adopt, and the space and cost-saving implications clearly illustrate their reasoning. While I’ve never driven a steer-by-wire car, everything I’ve read and heard to date has been underwhelming. Let’s hope Lexus irons out the kinks before the LF-CZ comes to market. My most optimistic take on steer-by-wire is that it at least makes a yoke a defensible design decision, since the steering controls no longer need to rotate to the extreme multi-turn angles of a traditional wheel (Lexus’s most recent steer-by-wire concept has 200 degrees of total rotation — meaning a little over 90 degrees left and right).
Toyota has given a lot of lip service when it comes to BEVs and offered some wild concepts, but the LF-ZC seems like a pretty concrete promise to actually build something.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Last week, we reported that the e-bike world had a new motor claiming to be the lightest and most efficient. Now, we’re already seeing TQ’s new TQHPR40 motor proliferate on more road and gravel e-bikes, including the recently announced E-ASTR from Ridely.
Ridley’s new E‑ASTR brings lightweight electric assistance to its already impressive ASTR gravel platform, powered by the cutting-edge TQ HPR40 mid-drive system. Unlike bulkier e‑bike setups, this system adds just 1.17 kg (2.6 lb) at the crank and a discreet 1.46 kg (3.2 lb) and 290 Wh battery hidden within the downtube, keeping the frame’s silhouette nearly identical to the non-electric version of the same bike. According to BikeRumor, riders looking closely might spot only a slightly fatter downtube, internal cable routing, and a handlebar-end LED indicator, giving visual clues without shouting “electric bike.”
What the E‑ASTR gives up in sheer power from the petite motor, it gains in ride feel. The HPR40 is said to deliver a modest 40 Nm of torque and up to 200W of assist, or enough to smooth out climbs or offer a tailwind on gravel without overpowering the rider. With support cut off at 25 km/h (15.5 mph), pedal responsiveness remains natural and fluid. Combined with the ASTR’s race-inspired geometry, the bike looks to offer sharp handling and comfort suited to the rigors of modern gravel routes.
Ridley is currently offering the E‑ASTR in three spec levels: a value SRAM Apex XPLR AXS build €7,199 (or approximately US $8,500), a mid-range SRAM Rival XPLR AXS 1×13 version for €8,199 (or approximately US $9,700), and a top-tier Shimano GRX 2×12 Di2 model for €8,899 (or approximately US $10,500). Each features high-end drivetrains, integrated cockpit options, carbon wheels, and industry-standard gravel brakes and tires. With its race-ready frame and stealthy, lightweight e‑assistance, the E‑ASTR is positioning itself as a high-performance gravel machine that stays true to its roots, delivering help when needed, without overshadowing the rider.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Wait, you’re telling me that’s an electric bike?!
Ultra-lightweight motors like the TQHPR40 are quietly reshaping the e-bike industry by making electric assistance almost invisible, both in looks and in feel. As systems shrink and integrate more seamlessly into traditional bike frames, they’re opening the door to new categories of performance-oriented e-bikes that preserve the ride dynamics of analog bikes while offering just enough support when it counts.
For riders who value a natural pedaling experience but still want a little help on climbs or longer days, and especially for aging riders who want to maintain their riding habits despite father time taking an impact on joints and muscles, these minimalist systems are proving that you don’t need a bulky battery or a massive motor to get the benefits of going electric. The result is a wave of stealthy, high-performance e-bikes that are less about replacing effort and more about enhancing the ride.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
After a month off trying to wrap our heads around all the chaos surrounding EVs, solar, and everything else in Washington, we’re back with the biggest EV news stories of the day from Tesla, Ford, Volvo, and everyone else on today’s hiatus-busting episode of Quick Charge!
It just gets worse and worse for the Tesla true believers – especially those willing to put their money where Elon’s mouth is! One believer is set to lose nearly $50,000 betting on Tesla’s ability to deliver a Robotaxi service by the end of June (didn’t happen), and the controversial CEO’s most recent spat with President Trump had TSLA down nearly 5% in pre-morning trading.
New episodes of Quick Charge are recorded, usually, Monday through Thursday (and sometimes Sunday). We’ll be posting bonus audio content from time to time as well, so be sure to follow and subscribe so you don’t miss a minute of Electrek’s high-voltage daily news.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Got news? Let us know! Drop us a line at tips@electrek.co. You can also rate us on Apple Podcasts and Spotify, or recommend us in Overcast to help more people discover the show.
If you’re considering going solar, it’s always a good idea to get quotes from a few installers. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Hyundai is getting ready to shake things up. A new electric crossover SUV, likely the Hyundai IONIQ 2, is set to debut in the coming months. It will sit below the Kona Electric as Hyundai expands its entry-level EV lineup.
Is Hyundai launching the IONIQ 2 in 2026?
After launching the Inster late last year, Hyundai is already preparing to introduce a new entry-level EV in Europe.
Xavier Martinet, President and CEO of Hyundai Europe, confirmed that the new EV will be revealed “in the next few months.” It will be built in Europe and scheduled to go on sale in mid-2026.
Hyundai’s new electric crossover is expected to be a twin to the Kia EV2, which will likely arrive just ahead of it next year.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
It will be underpinned by the same E-GMP platform, which powers all IONIQ and Kia EV models (EV3, EV4, EV5, EV6, and EV9).
Like the Kia EV3, it will likely be available with either a 58.3 kWh or 81.4 kWh battery pack option. The former provides a WLTP range of 267 miles while the latter is rated with up to 372 miles. All trims are powered by a single electric motor at the front, producing 201 hp and 209 lb-ft of torque.
Kia EV2 Concept (Source: Kia)
Although it may share the same underpinnings as the EV2, Hyundai’s new entry-level EV will feature an advanced new software and infotainment system.
According to Autocar, the interior will represent a “step change” in terms of usability and features. The new system enables new functions, such as ambient lighting and sounds that adjust depending on the drive mode.
Hyundai E&E tech platform powered by Pleos (Source: Hyundai)
It’s expected to showcase Hyundai’s powerful new Pleos software and infotainment system. As an end-to-end software platform, Pleos connects everything from the infotainment system (Pleos Connect) to the Vehicle Operating System (OS) and the cloud.
Pleos is set to power Hyundai’s upcoming software-defined vehicles (SDVs) with new features like autonomous driving and real-time data analysis.
Hyundai’s next-gen infotainment system powered by Pleos (Source: Hyundai)
As an Android-based system, Pleos Connect features a “smartphone-like UI” with new functions including multi-window viewing and an AI voice assistant.
The new electric crossover is expected to start at around €30,000 ($35,400), or slightly less than the Kia EV3, priced from €35,990 ($42,500). It will sit between the Inster and Kona Electric in Hyundai’s lineup.
Hyundai said that it would launch the first EV with its next-gen infotainment system in Q2 2026. Will it be the IONIQ 2? Hyundai is expected to unveil the new entry-level EV at IAA Mobility in September. Stay tuned for more info. We’ll keep you updated with the latest.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.