Connect with us

Published

on

Wes Streeting has acknowledged people have been “upset and hurt” by Labour’s initial reaction to the Israel-Hamas war.

The shadow health secretary told the Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge that people wanted his party to be “louder and clearer” about the humanitarian crisis unfolding in Gaza.

Politics Live: Starmer accused of ‘shying away’ from crisis in Gaza

There have been tensions in the Labour Party after leader Sir Keir Starmer appeared to suggest in an LBC interview that Israel had the right to cut off water and power to the besieged Gaza Strip following the deadly attack by Hamas on 7 October.

Although the Labour leader has sought to clarify his remarks, there is still anger in the Muslim community.

Asked if voters could be turned away from Labour, Mr Streeting said: “No, I think people have been upset and hurt and wanted us to be louder and clearer on the humanitarian crisis.”

He went on to say Sir Keir “doesn’t think it’s ok cut off power and water” and he misspoke in the interview.

“It was never Keir’s intention to give the impression that we support those measures,” he said.

“In interviews you have a sustained line of questioning – he was answering a previous question and not that one.”

In the interview with LBC’s Nick Ferrari, Sir Keir was asked what a “proportionate” response would look like to the surprise Hamas attacks, which killed at least 1,400 people.

Starmer is under the spotlight over his party’s stance on Gaza

Taking to the dispatch box at PMQs, Sir Keir Starmer could have been mistaken for a man having a good week.

In high spirits, galvanised by a double by-election win last Thursday, he leapt to his feet and quizzed the prime minister on mortgages and no-fault evictions.

What he failed to address was the story overshadowing all else and threatening Labour Party unity.

The Israel-Hamas War has seen Sir Keir in the spotlight. Anger over an interview on LBC (where he suggested Israel had a right to cut off supplies to Gaza, a position later clarified) has led to councillor resignations and calls for a repositioning from the party leadership on a ceasefire.

On Wednesday, Keir Starmer and Angela Rayner sought to ease tensions in the parliamentary party by meeting Muslim MPs.

The meeting was described as “constructive”.

One shadow cabinet minister told me that reports of dissent were “exaggerated” but there is genuine concern among some MPs I have spoken to that the party is losing Muslim voters.

Labour’s shadow health secretary Wes Streeting admitted that people have been “upset and hurt” by the LBC interview and “wanted us to be louder and clearer on the humanitarian crisis”.
He said Sir Keir had been misinterpreted.

The Labour leader certainly has a delicate path to tread in the coming weeks.

He has fought hard to move his party on from the past and present a united front – unity though can unravel very quickly.

He said that responsibility “lies with Hamas” and that Israel “has the right to defend herself”.

The presenter interjected, asking: “A siege is appropriate? Cutting off power, cutting off water?”

The Labour leader responded: “I think that Israel does have that right. It is an ongoing situation.”

The comments, which he has since rowed back on, prompted resignations among Labour councillors and angered the party’s MPs, even those on the frontbenches as shadow ministers.

Sir Keir sought to cool tensions by visiting a mosque on Sunday and holding a meeting with Muslim MPs today.

Read More:
A third of Gaza hospitals shut due to lack of fuel
How Gaza went from desperately poor to even poorer

But while sources described the meeting as “constructive”, Sir Keir did not back calls for a ceasefire, instead saying Labour supports “humanitarian pauses”.

This position was repeated by Mr Streeting, who said UK politicians need to prioritise supporting Israel in getting hostages back from Gaza “and making sure this sort of thing doesn’t happen again”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘All Hamas militants are doomed’ says Netanyahu

However, he said there is a “responsibility” to minimise the loss of civilian life and get humanitarian aid in to Gaza.

“That is why US secretary of state Antony Blinken, our allies in France and our government are right to call for a humanitarian pause to allow the safe flow of aid through,” he said.

Asked what the difference was between a “humanitarian pause” and a “ceasefire”, he said: “This is the difficulty with the concept of a ceasefire.

“We’re dealing with a terrorist organisation in Hamas.”

Asked if Israel has committed war crimes, as some MPs have suggested, Mr Streeting added: “I’m not qualified to make that judgement.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Bitstamp granted MAS license to operate in Singapore

Published

on

By

Bitstamp granted MAS license to operate in Singapore

Bitstamp granted MAS license to operate in Singapore

The license was granted after a new policy from Singapore’s Monetary Authority required all crypto firms based in the country to register.

Continue Reading

Politics

IRS division failed to meet standards for seizing crypto, says watchdog

Published

on

By

IRS division failed to meet standards for seizing crypto, says watchdog

IRS division failed to meet standards for seizing crypto, says watchdog

Based on an evaluation between December 2023 and January 2025, the IRS Criminal Investigation did not always follow guidelines around seizing and holding crypto in cases.

Continue Reading

Politics

Chancellor Rachel Reeves says she is ‘totally’ up for the job of chancellor in first comments since tearful PMQs

Published

on

By

Chancellor Rachel Reeves says she is 'totally' up for the job of chancellor in first comments since tearful PMQs

The chancellor has said she was having a “tough day” yesterday in her first public comments since appearing tearful at Prime Minister’s Questions – but insisted she is “totally” up for the job.

Rachel Reeves told broadcasters: “Clearly I was upset yesterday and everyone could see that. It was a personal issue and I’m not going to go into the details of that.

“My job as chancellor at 12 o’clock on a Wednesday is to be at PMQs next to the prime minister, supporting the government, and that’s what I tried to do.

“I guess the thing that maybe is a bit different between my job and many of your viewers’ is that when I’m having a tough day it’s on the telly and most people don’t have to deal with that.”

Politics latest: PM sets out 10-year NHS plan

She declined to give a reason behind the tears, saying “it was a personal issue” and “it wouldn’t be right” to divulge it.

“People saw I was upset, but that was yesterday. Today’s a new day and I’m just cracking on with the job,” she added.

More on Rachel Reeves

Ms Reeves also said she is “totally” up for the job of chancellor, saying: “This is the job that I’ve always wanted to do. I’m proud of what I’ve delivered as chancellor.”

Pic: PA
Image:
Reeves was seen wiping away tears during PMQs. Pic: PA

Asked if she was surprised that Sir Keir Starmer did not back her more strongly during PMQs, she reiterated that she and the prime minister are a “team”, saying: “We fought the election together, we changed the Labour Party together so that we could be in the position to return to power, and over the past year, we’ve worked in lockstep together.”

PM: ‘I was last to appreciate’ that Reeves was crying

The chancellor’s comments come after the prime minister told Sky News’ political editor Beth Rigby that he “didn’t appreciate” that she was crying behind him at Prime Minister’s Questions yesterday because the weekly sessions are “pretty wild”, which is why he did not offer her any support while in the chamber.

He added: “It wasn’t just yesterday – no prime minister ever has had side conversations during PMQs. It does happen in other debates when there’s a bit more time, but in PMQs, it is bang, bang, bang. That’s what it was yesterday.

“And therefore, I was probably the last to appreciate anything else going on in the chamber, and that’s just a straightforward human explanation, common sense explanation.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Starmer explains to Beth Rigby his reaction to Reeves crying in PMQs

During PMQs, Tory leader Kemi Badenoch branded the chancellor the “human shield” for the prime minister’s “incompetence” just hours after he was forced to perform a humiliating U-turn over his controversial welfare bill, leaving a “black hole” in the public finances.

The prime minister’s watered-down Universal Credit and Personal Independent Payment Bill was backed by a majority of 75 in a tense vote on Tuesday evening – but a total of 49 Labour MPs voted against the bill, which was the largest rebellion in a prime minister’s first year in office since 47 MPs voted against Tony Blair’s lone parent benefit in 1997, according to Professor Phil Cowley from Queen Mary University.

Reeves looks transformed – but this has been a disastrous week for the PM

It is a Rachel Reeves transformed that appears in front of the cameras today, nearly 24 hours since one of the most extraordinary PMQs.

Was there a hint of nervousness as she started, aware of the world watching for any signs of human emotion? Was there a touch of feeling in her face as the crowds applauded her?

People will speculate. But Ms Reeves has got through her first public appearance, and can now, she hopes, move on.

The prime minister embraced her as he walked on stage, the health secretary talked her up: “Thanks to her leadership, we have seen wages rising faster than the cost of living.”

A show of solidarity at the top of government, a prime minister and chancellor trying to get on with business.

But be in no doubt today’s speech on a 10-year-plan for the NHS has been overshadowed. Not just by a chancellor in tears, but what that image represents.

A PM who, however assured he appeared today, has marked his first year this week, as Sky News’ political editor Beth Rigby put to him, with a “self-inflicted shambles”.

She asked: “How have you got this so wrong? How can you rebuild trust? Are you just in denial?”

They are questions Starmer will be grappling with as he tries to move past a disastrous week.

Ms Reeves has borne a lot of the criticism over the handling of the vote, with some MPs believing that her strict approach to fiscal rules has meant she has approached the ballooning welfare bill from the standpoint of trying to make savings, rather than getting people into work.

Ms Badenoch also said the chancellor looked “absolutely miserable”, and questioned whether she would remain in post until the next election.

Sir Keir did not explicitly say that she will, and Ms Badenoch interjected to say: “How awful for the chancellor that he couldn’t confirm that she would stay in place.”

Downing Street scrambled to make clear to journalists that Ms Reeves was “going nowhere”, and the prime minister has since stated publicly that she will remain as chancellor “for many years to come”.

Continue Reading

Trending