Connect with us

Published

on

Share on Pinterest A recent investigation has found that food and beverage companies are paying influencers on Tiktok and Instagram to spread misinformation and downplay health risks associated with the artificial sweetener aspartame. SrdjanPav/Getty ImagesAn investigation by Washington Post has revealed that many dietitians were paid to spread misinformation about aspartame by the food and beverage industry.Influencers used the #safetyofaspartame hashtag to discredit WHO warnings about the artificial sweetenerAccording to the WHO, aspartame is possibly carcinogenic when consumed in high quantities.Experts agree that its generally safe to consume in moderation, but you can cut back by substituting it with maple syrup, honey, or dates.

A Washington Post investigation has found that dozens of influencer dietitians on TikTok and Instagram were paid by the food and beverage industry to spread misinformation about the safety of the artificial sweetener aspartame.

The promotion was designed to blunt warnings from The World Health Organization (WHO) published in July that said aspartame is ineffective for weight loss and possibly carcinogenic.

Many influencers claimed the WHO warnings were clickbait and based on low-quality science. The campaign was shown to have reached 11 million followers and counting.

Aspartame is found in a wide range of foods and drinks, including sugar-free soda and diet foods.

Research indicates around 6,000 products are manufactured with aspartame.

The sweetener, often used as a weight-management tool, is about 200 times sweeter than table sugar, but low in calories, packing around four calories per gram.

However, health bodies recommend a daily limit of 40 mg/kg body weight to limit its potentially cancer-causing effects.

Nutritionist Rebecca Heald says its very concerning to hear that some dietitians are spreading misinformation about the safety of this popular artificial sweetener.

As a responsible source of nutrition information, dietitians should base their advice on credible scientific evidence. However, its not entirely surprising that this happens, as the internet and social media platforms have been known to amplify unverified claims and sensational information, she points out.

Misinformation may have caused confusion about the health risks posed by aspartame. So, just how safe is the sweetener? Health risks associated with aspartame

You may be relieved to know that in small quantities aspartame is unlikely to cause you any harm. However, there are some things to consider before including it in your diet.

Aspartame has undergone extensive safety testing and is considered safe for consumption by regulatory agencies like the FDA and EFSA. However, some individuals may have specific sensitivities or allergies to aspartame, resulting in adverse reactions, says Heald.

In very high doses, it can cause headaches, gastrointestinal disturbances, and allergic reactions.

Whats more, it may not be the best appetite and weight management tool.

Some studies have suggested that artificial sweeteners like aspartame may disrupt the bodys natural appetite regulation mechanisms, Heald explains. This can potentially lead to overeating or cravings for sweeter, high-calorie foods, which, in turn, may affect gut health and contribute to weight gain.

Like Heald, clinic nutritionist Nishtha Patel agrees that aspartame appears to be safe in moderation, but doesnt necessarily recommend it.

A large number of scientific research and regulatory agencies around the world seem to agree that aspartame is safe for consumption when taken within the recommended daily intake, Patel points out.

Furthermore, it seems that the risk factors are most relevant to certain conditions such as phenylketonuria (PKU), a genetic disorder that stops you from metabolizing a specific amino acid found in aspartame called phenylalanine.

Still, Patel isnt sold on the benefits of adding artificial sweeteners like aspartame to your diet.

I personally do not like to use artificial sweeteners or anything artificial. My philosophy is to go as close to nature as possible, she says. How much aspartame is safe to consume?

If youre counting calories in a bid to lose or maintain weight, consuming foods and drinks that contain aspartame is one way to continue enjoying usually high-calorie and high-sugar treats like soda.

It may sound obvious to say that moderation is key, but when it comes to aspartame, what does moderation actually look like?

According to the WHO, a can of diet soft drink contains 200 or 300 mg of aspartame, and an adult weighing 70kg would need to consume more than 914 cans per day to exceed the acceptable daily intake, assuming no other intake from other food sources.

As the WHO guidance suggests, Heald says you dont need to eliminate aspartame completely unless you have an allergy or sensitivity.

Her advice?

Just be sure to maintain a balanced diet that includes a variety of foods alongside it. How to limit artificial sweeteners

If you are looking to cut down on artificial sweeteners like aspartame, or hoping to eliminate them completely, Heald says getting curious about food labels is the best place to start.

You can identify aspartame on food labels by looking for its presence in the ingredient list, but if in doubt, its typically found in sugar-free or diet products, like diet drinks, sugar-free chewing gum, sugar-free desserts, and some low-calorie foods, she explains.

You might want to consider eating these less frequently or making room for the non-diet versions of these foods assuming you can enjoy them as part of a balanced diet.

Alternatively, if you want to avoid aspartame, you should choose products that are explicitly labeled as aspartame-free or no artificial sweeteners, Heald says.

And if you want to add a little sweetness to your food? Patel recommends a little maple syrup, honey, or dates as potential substitutes. Takeaway

In the social media age, misinformation can be difficult to spot and, when it comes to dietary advice, scrutiny is needed to assess the reliability of any claim.

Where aspartame is concerned, Heald says its essential to approach this topic with nuance and consideration for your individual tolerance and preferences.

Aspartame may allow you to enjoy foods and drinks that are conventionally off-limits while losing weight, but moderation is definitely key.

Continue Reading

UK

The winners and losers in Rachel Reeves’s spending review

Published

on

By

The winners and losers in Rachel Reeves's spending review

“It’s a big deal for this government,” says Simon Case.

“It’s the clearest indication yet of what they plan to do between now and the general election, a translation of their manifesto.

“This is where you should expect the chancellor to say, on behalf of the government: ‘This is what we’re about’.”

As the former cabinet secretary, Mr Case was the man in charge of the civil service during the last spending review, in 2021.

On Wednesday, Rachel Reeves will unveil the Labour government’s priorities for the next three years. But it’s unclear whether it will provide all that much of an answer about what it’s really about.

Unlike the Autumn budget, when the chancellor announced her plans on where to tax and borrow to fund overall levels of spending, the spending review will set out exactly how that money is divided up between the different government departments.

Since the start of the process in December those departments have been bidding for their share of the cash – setting out their proposed budgets in a negotiation which looks set to continue right up to the wire.

This review is being conducted in an usual level of detail, with every single line of spending assessed, according to the chancellor, on whether it represents value for money and meets the government’s priorities. Budget proposals have been scrutinised by so called “challenge panels” of independent experts.

It’s clear that health and defence will be winners in this process given pre-existing commitments to prioritise the NHS – with a boost of up to £30bn expected – and to increase defence spending.

On Sunday morning, the government press release trumpeted an impressive-sounding “£86bn boost” to research and development (R&D), with the Science and Technology Secretary Peter Kyle sent out on the morning media round to celebrate as record levels of investment.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What will be in spending review?

We’re told this increased spending on the life sciences, advanced manufacturing and defence will lead to jobs and growth across the country, with every £1 in investment set to lead to a £7 economic return.

But the headline figure is misleading. It’s not £86bn in new funding. That £86bn has been calculated by adding together all R&D investment across government for the next three years, which will reach an annual figure of £22.5bn by 2029-30. The figure for this year was already set to be £20.4bn; so while it’s a definite uplift, much of that money was already allocated.

Read More:
Reeves turning around UK finances ‘like Steve Jobs did for Apple’

Government struggles to slash foreign aid spent on asylum hotels

Peter Kyle also highlighted plans for “the most we’ve ever spent per pupil in our school system”.

I understand the schools budget is to be boosted by £4.5bn. Again, this is clearly an uplift – but over a three-year period, that equates to just £1.5bn a year (compared with an existing budget of £63.7bn). It also has to cover the cost of extending free school meals, and the promised uplift in teachers’ pay.

In any process of prioritisation there are losers as well as winners.

We already know about planned cuts to the Department of Work and Pensions – but other unprotected departments like the Home Office and the Department of Communities and Local Government are braced for a real spending squeeze.

We’ve heard dire warnings about austerity 2.0, and the impact that would have on the government’s crime and policing priorities, its promises around housing and immigration, and on the budgets for cash-strapped local councils.

The chancellor wants to make it clear to the markets she’s sticking to her fiscal rules on balancing the books for day-to-day spending.

👉 Click here to listen to Electoral Dysfunction on your podcast app 👈

But the decision to loosen the rules around borrowing to fund capital investment have given her greater room to manoeuvre in funding long-term infrastructure projects.

That’s why we’ve seen her travelling around the country this week to promote the £15.6bn she’s spending on regional transport projects.

The Treasury team clearly wants to focus on promoting the generosity of these kind of investments, and we’ll hear more in the coming days.

But there’s a real risk the story of this spending review will be about the departments which have lost out – and the promises which could slip as a result.

Continue Reading

UK

Water cremation and human composting could be offered instead of traditional funerals

Published

on

By

Water cremation and human composting could be offered instead of traditional funerals

Water cremation and human composting could soon be offered as an alternative to traditional funerals.

A Law Commission consultation is proposing legal approval of new methods beyond burial, cremation, and the rarely used burial at sea.

The paper published earlier this week highlights two methods used in other countries – alkaline hydrolysis and human composting.

Alkaline hydrolysis – also known as water cremation or resomation – involves placing a person’s body into woollen shroud or other organic pouch, using water, alkaline chemicals, heat and pressure to break down the tissue.

Bones leftover from water cremations can be powered to be scattered like ashes. Pic: Kindly Earth
Image:
Bones left from water cremations can be ground to be scattered like ashes. Pic: Kindly Earth

The resulting liquid is checked and treated if necessary to enter the wastewater system, while remaining pieces of bone and teeth are dried and can be ground to a powder and scattered like ashes.

Water cremation, which mimics the process of natural decomposition when someone is buried, takes between four and 14 hours.

The method, which has been suggested as a greener alternative to traditional cremation, was used for the bodies of five dead people in 2019, as part of a study facilitated by Middlesex and Sheffield universities.

Anti-apartheid campaigner Archbishop Desmond Tutu, who died in 2021, chose resomation for his own funeral in South Africa.

Read more: What is water cremation?

Co-op Funeralcare said it hoped to offer the service in the UK in 2023 but backed out because of the current regulations.

The firm welcomed the Law Commission review, which will run until spring next year, ending in a final report and draft Bill.

New funerary methods are not currently regulated, other than by more general legislation such as environmental and planning laws.

Provisional proposals suggest a legal framework to enable new methods to be regulated in the future.

A Co-op Funeralcare spokesperson said: “At Co-op Funeralcare, we are committed to serving the needs of our member-owners and clients and offering the most sustainable and affordable services.

“In 2023, we announced our ambition to pilot resomation in the UK, and we subsequently worked closely with government to explore the regulatory requirements to introduce this service across the nation.

“However, we did not proceed with this as, at the time, we were unable to find a path through the current regulatory framework.

“We welcome the Law Commission’s review and encourage exploration into alternative methods that provide consumers with greater choice and deliver environmental benefits.”

The consultation paper also highlights human composting, where a body is placed into a sealed chamber, or vessel, with carbon-rich organic matter, such as straw and wood chips, to enable quicker decomposition.

The process takes around two to three months and resulting soil can be returned to bereaved loved ones.

Other methods involving the freezing of human remains have also been suggested, although none have them are yet viable, according to the paper.

Continue Reading

UK

Two men charged with murder after teenager hit by car in Sheffield

Published

on

By

Two men charged with murder after teenager hit by car in Sheffield

Two men have been charged with murder after the death of a teenager in Sheffield.

Abdullah Yaser Abdullah al Yazidi, 16, died after being hit by a car.

He had only recently come to the UK from Yemen, looking “for a better future”, his loved ones previously said.

Zulkernain Ahmed, 20, and Amaan Ahmed, 26, both of Locke Drive, Sheffield, have been charged with murder and three counts of attempted murder.

They are due to appear before Sheffield Magistrates’ Court on Monday.

Flowers at the scene of the crash in Darnall.
Pic: PA
Image:
Flowers at the scene of the crash in Darnall.
Pic: PA

‘Innocently walking down the street’

South Yorkshire Police said Abdullah was “innocently walking” down a street in the Darnall area of the city, just after 4.50pm on 4 June, when a car collided with him.

The force said they understood a grey Audi had driven towards three electric bikes, hitting one.

As the car continued following the collision with the electric bike, it then hit Abdullah, police said.

According to the force, the driver failed to stop at the scene.

Abdullah was taken to hospital where he later died.

The rider of the electric bike, 18, suffered serious but non-life-threatening injuries and remains in hospital.

Two people, a man, 46, and a woman, 45, who were previously arrested on suspicion of assisting an offender, remain on bail.

Police at the scene of the collision in the Darnall area of Sheffield.
Pic: PA
Image:
Police at the scene of the collision in the Darnall area of Sheffield.
Pic: PA

A ‘kind boy’

Abdullah’s relative, Saleh Alsirkal, runs a corner shop that the teenager popped into just before he was hit by the car on Wednesday.

“His dad brought him over to change his life, to get a better future for his son, but this has happened and destroyed everything,” said Mr Alsirkal.

Read more from Sky News:
British soldier arrested on suspicion of rape in Kenya
Water cremation could be offered instead of traditional funerals
Body found in search for missing woman

He said Abdullah was a “kind boy” who just wanted to look after his family, including his three sisters and was really enjoying learning English.

“Every time he had a new word to learn, he was so excited about it,” he said.

“It meant a lot to him and he learned quick. Sometimes he would stay in the shop just so he could talk to people. He tried to be friends with everyone.”

“He wanted to be the main guy for the family. He was 16 years old, but he was a clever man,” said Mr Alsirkal.

Continue Reading

Trending