data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/559b9/559b98bfd3050ae0c91eecf4212cb690030eb5ff" alt="How the creation of the BCS 25 years ago set the stage for the current playoff format How the creation of the BCS 25 years ago set the stage for the current playoff format"
How the creation of the BCS 25 years ago set the stage for the current playoff format
More Videos
Published
1 year agoon
By
admin-
Chris Low, ESPN Senior WriterOct 31, 2023, 07:00 AM ET
Close- College football reporter
- Joined ESPN.com in 2007
- Graduate of the University of Tennessee
Steve Spurrier loves to tell the story about playing golf years ago with then-North Carolina basketball coach Dean Smith and then-Kansas basketball coach Roy Williams.
It was sometime in the early 1990s, and the three coaches were at a charity event in Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
“Are you guys going to get a playoff in football?” Smith asked Spurrier, who was only a couple of years into his tenure as Florida’s football coach.
Spurrier shrugged and said, “Aaah, I don’t know. Everybody just sort of plays their season, then the bowls come in and pick the teams they want, and then after they play, they get a bunch of sportswriters together and they decide who the national champion is going to be.”
The Head Ball Coach then looked at his two Hall of Fame hoops counterparts and asked his own question: “How would you boys in basketball like it if you did it like that?”
Smith looked at Spurrier and quipped, “We wouldn’t, because that’s stupid.”
So, 25 years ago, the Bowl Championship Series was created in an attempt to move beyond the polls and determine a clear national champion on the field. The BCS gave way to the College Football Playoff in 2014, but it was a major step in helping shape the postseason. That evolution takes another significant turn in 2024, when the playoff field expands from four teams to 12.
As he looks back today, Spurrier, who won a national championship at Florida in 1996, wonders what fans would do if media members and active coaches still made the call on who walked away with the trophy.
“Coach Smith was right,” Spurrier said, “it was stupid.
“It took a while — too long, really. But playoff sports is what America is about.”
THE BCS WAS created in 1998 by then-SEC commissioner Roy Kramer as a way to pair the two highest-ranked teams in a national championship game at a traditional bowl site. The BCS and its precursors, the Bowl Coalition (1992-94) and Bowl Alliance (1995-97), were designed to create a No. 1 vs. No. 2 bowl matchup every year. That previously had happened only eight times.
Prior to the Coalition and Alliance, the postseason was rather chaotic with bowls scrambling to line up teams before the regular season ended. Many of the bowls had tie-ins, such as the SEC champion playing in the Sugar Bowl and the Big Ten and Pac-10 tied to the Rose Bowl, but there were also at-large slots. For the bowls, that meant the business side of locking in attractive teams with hungry fan bases flocking to their cities was the priority, not setting up matchups to determine the national champion.
“We knew we had to do something differently, especially when you had bowls cutting deals well before the end of the regular season and split national championships in three of the previous eight seasons,” said Mark Womack, who was Kramer’s right-hand man and remains the SEC’s executive associate commissioner. “Roy had the vision of putting together a game and twisting as many arms as he had to.”
New Big Ten commissioner Tony Petitti, then ABC Sports’ vice president for programming, was part of a meeting nearly 30 years ago that set the wheels in motion to get the Big Ten and Pac-10 to buy into the BCS concept, which was a critical piece. Those talks in 1995 were supposed to be about an extension of the Rose Bowl television deal.
“We started talking about how things were shifting in college and how 1 vs. 2 was becoming more important,” Petitti recalled.
After the Big Ten, Pac-10 and Rose Bowl officials huddled to talk among themselves, it was obvious they were none too pleased.
“We were basically booted out of the meeting,” Petitti said with a laugh. “They told us we should go home. I remember my boss [Dennis Swanson] saying when we got back in the car, ‘That was a good first step,’ when I was thinking it was the worst meeting I’d ever been in.”
The seed was planted, though, and Kramer traveled all over the country meeting with different parties to make the BCS a reality.
“Basically, from that first meeting, it took 12 to 15 months to really get everybody in line,” Petitti said. “Give Roy, [Big Ten commissioner] Jim Delany, [Pac-10 commissioner] Tom Hansen and all the Rose Bowl folks credit for thinking differently. But that’s how it started.”
So starting from scratch, Kramer and his trusted colleagues, Womack and Charles Bloom, went to work on their whiteboard in the SEC offices after getting the go-ahead from commissioners from the other conferences. Bloom, then director of SEC media relations, still has some of the notebooks from those early meetings and remembers getting emails from Kramer at 3 o’clock in morning on Sundays.
Bloom said they did 10 years of research prior to finalizing the formula. They worked in a small library on the first floor of the SEC offices.
“This was when everything wasn’t on the internet and we were using record books we had on file that had all the scores from games and doing all the research by hand,” Bloom said.
The plan was to utilize the AP poll, which was voted on by media members, and the coaches poll, but because the polls themselves were part of the problem and susceptible to voters’ biases, Bloom suggested they add computer rankings as part of the formula. Kramer also asked statistics guru Jeff Sagarin to come up with a strength-of-schedule rating.
The original formula included the two polls (AP and coaches), a composite of three computer rankings, a strength-of-schedule element and a point added to a team’s final ranking for every loss — all coming together to produce a score where lower was better.
Even with the BCS in place, Kramer, now 94, knew there would be detractors and that there would need to be tweaks to the system along the way.
“I don’t think anybody ever believed it was a final solution to anything, and nobody thought it was perfect,” said Kramer, who retired as SEC commissioner in 2002. “But whether you liked it or cursed it, it was a better solution to anything that we’d had in the past. So at the moment, I still think it accomplished what we wanted it to.”
And, yes, there was plenty of controversy and angry coaches and fan bases on a regular basis.
“You should have read some of my mail. I kept a lot of it,” Kramer said with a hearty laugh.
Over the years, the BCS formula was tinkered with several times. In 1999, five more computer rankings were added to the mix. In 2001, a “quality wins” component was added to emphasize strength of schedule, and margin of victory was eliminated in 2002. All the while, fans and media alike screamed that the whole thing was rigged or bordered on being a cartel for the blue bloods of the sport.
In 2010, Dan Wetzel, Josh Peter and Jeff Passan of Yahoo! Sports co-authored a book titled “Death to the BCS,” which was so popular it was later updated and revised.
“I don’t think it was so much that people hated the BCS. They just wanted a playoff, and I knew it was inevitable that we were going to get one,” Kramer said. “I also knew that as soon as we arrived at a number of teams in the playoff that everybody would want that number to increase. There’s always going to be scrutiny, and that’s not necessarily a bad thing. People were leery of the BCS computers. Now they’re leery of who’s on the selection committee and what perceived biases they may have.
“I sort of sit back and grin. It looks like they’re still having a little controversy and probably always will.”
IN ITS VERY first year, the BCS flirted with disaster. Eventual national champion Tennessee, Kansas State and UCLA all went into the final week unbeaten. During that week, Sagarin said he had run the numbers and that if all three teams won, he projected Tennessee would drop to third in the rankings and be on the outside looking in even though the Vols were No. 1 in the BCS standings that week.
Kramer called Sagarin and told him to keep his “damn mouth shut.” In the end, it worked itself out because double-digit underdog Texas A&M stunned No. 3 Kansas State in double overtime, and Miami rallied to upset No. 2 UCLA.
But that was just the start of the growing pains.
The 2000 season brought some serious drama as Florida State and Miami both finished the season 11-1, but the Hurricanes had beaten the Seminoles 27-24 the first week of October. Miami was ranked No. 2 and Florida State No. 3 in both polls to end the regular season, but the Seminoles leapfrogged the Hurricanes in the final BCS standings thanks to superior computer rankings.
Naturally, then-Miami coach Butch Davis and the Miami fans were furious, with Davis calling the BCS formula “convoluted.”
Then-FSU coach Bobby Bowden didn’t really disagree. “I feel lucky, but the thing is the formula was made before the season ever started,” he said at the time. “The formula spit this thing out that it was us. Therefore, I feel good about it.”
Florida State went on to lose an ugly 13-2 decision to Oklahoma in the title game.
Then there was 2003, which ended with a split national championship, exactly what the BCS was supposed to prevent.
LSU, under Nick Saban, beat Oklahoma in the Sugar Bowl to win the BCS national title. The Sooners had been blown out by Kansas State 35-7 in the Big 12 championship game and fell to No. 3 in both polls, but they still got a spot in the BCS title game. USC finished the regular season No. 1 in both polls but was hurt in the final computer rankings when two teams it beat, Notre Dame and Hawaii, lost to Syracuse and Boise State, respectively, in their final games.
The Trojans were further hurt by margin of victory being taken out of the computer rankings that year as BCS brass feared teams would run up scores to boost their numbers.
LSU squeezed past USC by 0.16 of a point in the final BCS standings to grab the No. 2 spot behind Oklahoma. USC was left to face Michigan in the Rose Bowl and won 28-14. The Trojans held on to the No. 1 spot in the AP poll and a share of the national title.
The coaches who voted in their poll had agreed to select the winner of the BCS National Championship game No. 1 on their ballots. But South Carolina’s Lou Holtz, Oregon’s Mike Bellotti and Illinois’ Ron Turner went against that agreement and voted USC No. 1.
“We knew there was a chance we might run into that, the AP poll voting in a different champion,” Kramer said. “Our goal never changed, though, and that was to create better matchups in bowl games, and hopefully in most years, create a consensus No. 1 vs. No. 2 matchup for the national championship. It didn’t happen that year. The computers liked Oklahoma. I would agree that we probably did change the formula too much trying to adjust to all the observations from previous years.”
In the aftermath, the BCS formula was simplified in 2004 with strength of schedule and the “quality win” component eliminated.
USC was dominant that season and won the national title, but there were five unbeaten teams entering the bowl selections, including SEC champion Auburn. Tommy Tuberville’s Tigers finished third in the final BCS standings and played in the Sugar Bowl, finishing the year 13-0.
Auburn being left out of the national championship game intensified then-SEC commissioner Mike Slive’s desire to see college football adopt a four-team playoff.
“I never wanted to see a season again where an unbeaten SEC champion didn’t even get a chance to play for a national title,” Slive told ESPN years later. “I already believed we needed a playoff in college football. I knew after 2004 that we absolutely were going to get there.”
THE BCS ERA left virtually no hope for a Group of 5 team to get into the championship game. Boise State had three unbeaten regular seasons in 2006, 2008 and 2009 and never finished higher than sixth in the final BCS standings. The Broncos won the Fiesta Bowl to cap both the 2006 and 2008 seasons, and their 43-42 win in overtime against Oklahoma in the 2007 game remains one of the more thrilling bowl finishes in history.
Chris Petersen, who went on to coach Washington, led those powerhouse Boise State teams. In 2010, the Broncos had vaulted to No. 4 in the BCS standings and were riding a 24-game winning streak, but lost a heartbreaking 34-31 road game to Nevada in overtime on the final weekend of the regular season after missing a 26-yard field goal that would have won it in regulation.
“I think that’s the best team we ever had, when we lost that last game to Nevada and Colin Kaepernick and missed the field goal there at the end,” Petersen said. “We were winning 24-7 and played one bad half of football, and it cost us.”
The Broncos won two games over nationally ranked Power 5 foes that season (Virginia Tech and Oregon State).
“I never got hung up on ‘We had to win a national championship or had to get to the BCS National Championship game,’ because I knew getting one of those top two spots was going to be hard no matter how many games we won,” Petersen said. “I just felt like if we could run the table, there was no way they could leave us out of the BCS bowl games.
“I guess it might have been interesting had we not lost that Nevada game in 2010, but there was nothing to talk about after, not with a loss.”
In 2008, Utah of the Mountain West Conference was the only unbeaten team in the FBS but didn’t get a chance to play for the title. The Utes beat four nationally ranked teams, including Michigan on the road to open the season, but finished sixth in the final BCS standings. They beat Alabama in the Sugar Bowl to close out a 13-0 campaign.
After the season, the Mountain West proposed an eight-team playoff that would have eliminated the BCS formula and created a 12-member committee to choose the at-large teams, but it was rejected by the BCS committee.
That May, Slive presented a plus-one model, which was a version of a four-team playoff, but that also was shot down.
Even President-elect Barack Obama was calling for a playoff. In a “60 Minutes” interview that November, he suggested having an eight-team playoff and added, “I don’t know any serious fan of college football who has disagreed with me on this. So I’m going to throw my weight around on this a little bit. I think it’s the right thing to do.”
NEARLY EVERYBODY ASSOCIATED with college football agrees the 2011 season sealed the fate of the BCS. If it wasn’t already inevitable, there seemed to be no doubt a playoff was coming after Alabama and LSU met in the BCS title game, a rematch of their regular-season affair that LSU won 9-6 in overtime.
Oklahoma State was the most explosive team in the country that season, averaging 51.7 points per game, and the Cowboys were No. 2 in the BCS standings when they were upset 37-31 in two overtimes by Iowa State on Nov. 18. Kramer contends that game had more to do with reshaping college football’s system for determining the national champion than any other game during his tenure. “That’s the game that put Alabama back in the mix,” Kramer said.
But OSU coach Mike Gundy and other critics of the BCS said the Crimson Tide should have never been back in the mix, especially after Oklahoma State routed Oklahoma 44-10 two weeks later to win the Big 12 championship — on a weekend when Alabama sat at home because it hadn’t won its division in the SEC. Oklahoma State finished behind LSU and Alabama in both of the polls, and although the Cowboys were No. 2 in the computer rankings, they finished No. 3 in the final BCS standings.
“We should have been in the championship game that year, and if we had gotten that chance, we would have played LSU and won,” Gundy told ESPN. “They were an overload-the-box, man-to-man team on defense, and you could not play our team in man that year. We were too good. That still bothers me, that we didn’t get a shot.”
Womack knew an all-SEC title game wouldn’t bode well for the future of the BCS.
“I agree with Roy. That was the year that ended any debate,” Womack said. “Having two teams from the same conference playing in a rematch solidified that we were going to a playoff. But once you watch those two teams and look at the talent on those teams [Alabama and LSU], it’s hard to argue those weren’t the two best teams around.”
Just as Kramer predicted, the College Football Playoff became a reality a few months later, in June 2012, beginning with the 2014 season.
THE HOOPLA SURROUNDING the first year of the playoff was immense. The goal, according to CFP executive director Bill Hancock, was to pick the “four best teams,” with the committee instructed to consider strength of schedule, head-to-head matchups, conference championships, common opponents and injuries, among other factors.
Ohio State went on to win the national title despite losing to unranked Virginia Tech the second week of the season, but expanding the field to four teams didn’t mean an end to controversy.
Entering the final weekend of the regular season, TCU was third in the CFP rankings, Ohio State was fifth and Baylor sixth, with all three teams having one loss. The Big 12 at that time had no conference championship game, and in their last games, TCU hammered unranked Iowa State 55-3, and Baylor beat No. 9 Kansas State 38-27. The Horned Frogs and Bears finished as co-Big 12 champs, although Baylor won the regular-season matchup in a wild 61-58 affair. Meanwhile, Ohio State delivered a 59-0 pasting of No. 13 Wisconsin in the Big Ten championship game.
Committee member Steve Wieberg told ESPN in 2018 that he had a “knot in his stomach” as the games played out and realized that “two somebodies are going to be left out.”
Gary Patterson, then TCU’s coach, also had a knot in his stomach. He knew what was coming despite the Frogs’ dominant showing in their last chance to impress the committee. As he and then-Iowa State coach Paul Rhoads met at midfield for their postgame handshake, Rhoads said, “Good luck in the playoff, Gary.”
Patterson grimaced and said, “No way they’re going to let us in, Paul, in the first year.”
When the final playoff rankings came out, TCU fell from No. 3 to No. 6. Ohio State moved up to fourth — and into the playoff. Baylor was fifth.
Even now, Patterson is befuddled at how TCU could fall three spots after winning by 52 points.
“I mean, we were already No. 3 and didn’t do anything to make ourselves look bad,” Patterson said. “We had a share of our conference championship, which was supposed to matter. It doesn’t do any good to bitch about it now and say we were better than those four teams that went ahead of us.
“There are good people on that committee. It’s a hard job. I wouldn’t want their job. That’s why I’ve always been an eight-to-12-team playoff guy and glad to see we’re finally getting there.
“It’s just too late for that team, and I hate it for those players.”
Hancock explained to ESPN at the time that the committee wanted to get away from the “old poll mentality” and look at the season in its entirety in picking the final four teams.
“The committee has a different mentality about it,” Hancock said. “Ohio State’s résumé improved. Baylor’s résumé improved with a victory over a good K-State team, and TCU had the misfortune of playing a team that would finish 2-10 on the last weekend. It helped people understand it’s a new day.”
By 2017, there was already some momentum for the playoff to be expanded, but it went into overdrive when two teams from the same conference made the four-team playoff for the first time. Those two teams, Alabama and Georgia of the SEC, won their semifinals and played for the national championship, with the Crimson Tide winning 26-23 in overtime.
Part of the rub was that Alabama didn’t win its division (similar to 2011 in the BCS days) but still got into the playoff as the No. 4 seed. Wisconsin was No. 4 in the next-to-last rankings but lost to Ohio State in the Big Ten championship game. The Buckeyes’ undoing was a 31-point loss in November to an Iowa team that finished 7-5.
But nobody was more upset about the way things played out that season than UCF, which won 25 straight games during the 2017 and 2018 seasons but never got higher than No. 8 in the final CFP rankings. The Knights, of the American Athletic Conference, were 13-0 in 2017 and beat Auburn in the Peach Bowl. But they were an afterthought when the committee sent in its final rankings, sitting at No. 12.
Tennessee athletic director Danny White, who was UCF’s AD at the time, still bristles at it all.
“I said it then and will say it now. It was ridiculous … to finish 12th?” White said. “I knew we weren’t getting in, but I wasn’t going to be quiet about it. Then we go undefeated again in 2018 in the regular season, and after we made all that ruckus in 2017, so many people went on record and said, ‘If they go undefeated again, then it will be another story.’ But the rhetoric quickly changed. We had ranked wins in the American, but it never really seemed like that had the same weight as even an unranked win against a Power 5 brand.
“It wasn’t a real postseason, not if we were all supposed to be part of the same subdivision in football.”
White immediately proclaimed the Knights national champions after their Peach Bowl win following the 2017 season, and quarterback McKenzie Milton said the playoff should be canceled. UCF had T-shirts and a parade to celebrate its national title, and the Colley Matrix system, a mathematical ranking that had been part of the BCS formula, designated UCF as its national champion that season, as noted in the official NCAA record book.
“It was a real-life example of why we needed to expand the playoff,” White said. “It’s really hard to go through a whole season and win every single game. Those kids and those coaches put pressure on the system, that it was time to change. It was a pretty bold statement, and that group of student-athletes from the 2017 season should feel very much responsible for a big part of playoff expansion.”
A Group of 5 team, Cincinnati, finally made the playoff in 2021, as the Bearcats went 13-0 in the regular season but lost to Alabama in the semifinal at the Cotton Bowl. Then, at the start of the 2022 season, a 12-team playoff was approved.
NOW THAT THE college football playoff is expanding to 12 teams starting in 2024, the question is: How much longer before it expands even further?
And even more pressing: How will the format change in 2024 and beyond in the wake of conference realignment? Most in the sport agree it’s going to change, but to what degree?
The late Mike Leach used to opine that college football needed to go to 64 teams, similar to college basketball. His president at Mississippi State, Mark Keenum, was not a fan of the idea. Keenum is now the chair of the College Football Playoff board of managers. He proposed a 12-team format with no automatic qualifiers last summer, but that idea did not receive enough votes to pass.
“What we’ve learned over the years, going back to the BCS, is that there’s a real desire to get it right when determining the national champion, and that desire has not changed no matter how much things have changed around us,” Keenum said. “I understand there’s great prestige in being a major conference champion. But at the end of the day, we want the best teams, period, competing in our nation’s playoff to determine the champion.”
The 12-team model that was approved last year would include the six highest-ranked conference champions and six at-large teams, with the four highest-ranked conference champions seeded 1 through 4 and receiving first-round byes. The first-round games would be played on campus sites.
But with the Pac-12 whittled to two teams, Keenum said there will be very “earnest discussions” about what the right format is going forward, not to mention what distribution of the revenue generated from the CFP will look like.
“I’m looking forward to 2024, but clearly we’ve got a good bit of work to do,” he said.
Petersen, whose 2017 Washington team was the last Pac-12 team to make the playoff, hopes that whatever tweaks are made aren’t locked in for too long.
“Let’s be sure that we’re not so far out there in a contract that we can’t assess how something is working,” said Petersen, now a Fox studio analyst. “We want to be able to look at this and say, ‘This was really good or not so good,’ whether it’s the way teams are seeded, home-field advantage or whatever it is.”
Petitti, the Big Ten commissioner, agrees that flexibility is key, as is protecting the importance of the regular season.
“Meaningful games in the regular season can never go away,” he said. “I think the 12-team format that’s been talked about does that. It doesn’t mean that it won’t evolve down the road. Postseason formats always seem to change in pretty much every sport, right? Now, how fast does that happen in college football? That’s hard to predict, but if you look at the history of postseason formats, they change.”
Kyle Whittingham, in his 19th season at Utah, isn’t sure any of this playoff debate is going to matter down the road. He’s convinced there’s more upheaval coming.
“Everything is going to be predicated and set up on where’s the most money, and that’s why you’re going to see another round, at least, of change, and it’s ultimately going to streamline into one or two superconferences,” Whittingham, whose school is jumping from the Pac-12 to the Big 12 next year, said in August. “They’ll govern themselves. They’ll break off from the NCAA. They’ll have their own playoff, and that’s just where it’s heading. I don’t think there’s any way around that.”
SEC commissioner Greg Sankey, one of 10 FBS commissioners on the playoff committee along with Notre Dame athletic director Jack Swarbrick, has run 41 marathons in his life, and he has taken on a marathon mentality in navigating the changes in college sports, including the playoff.
“It’s going to be a long run, not a sprint,” he said.
Sankey said patience will be needed as college football tries to figure out its future. He doesn’t see a drastic near-term move, such as 40 or so of the top football programs breaking away from the NCAA and having their own governance, commissioner and playoff.
“I think those have been, in my view, really unsophisticated observations,” Sankey said. “That doesn’t mean the individuals making the observations are not thoughtful. But I think it doesn’t represent a full consideration of college sports, and we still are in these positions charged with administering college sports, not just college football.”
The current CFP contract goes through the 2025 season. Negotiations for a new media rights deal, which would start with the 2026 season, will begin sometime during the first part of next year.
“I don’t think there’s any system or format that’s going to please everyone,” said Alabama coach Nick Saban, who won four national titles in the BCS era and three more in the playoff era. “We don’t all play the same schedules. We don’t play in the same conferences. It’s not the NFL.
“But once we went down the playoff road, we all had to be willing to accept the consequences. Everything now is geared toward the playoff. I’m not saying that’s necessarily a bad thing. I’m just saying that’s the way it is. I’ve always said that if we’re going to do this, let’s do it in such a way that the best teams are in the playoff regardless of conference affiliation.
“In a lot of ways, we’re still trying to figure out how to do that.”
You may like
Sports
How both ends of the baseball universe are playing out across one Arizona parking lot
Published
7 hours agoon
February 28, 2025By
admindata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc86a/fc86a767870f58795b7485f240ecf5e2804a365b" alt="How both ends of the baseball universe are playing out across one Arizona parking lot How both ends of the baseball universe are playing out across one Arizona parking lot"
-
Jesse RogersFeb 28, 2025, 07:00 AM ET
Close- Jesse joined ESPN Chicago in September 2009 and covers MLB for ESPN.com.
GLENDALE, Ariz. — One team is a worldwide attraction, fresh off its eighth World Series title. The other just lost an MLB record 121 games and hasn’t won a playoff series since 2005. The one thing they have in common?
A spring training parking lot.
Both the Los Angeles Dodgers and Chicago White Sox reside at Camelback Ranch during February and March, but life couldn’t be more different as the two franchises prepare for a new season.
When Dodgers players reported to camp earlier this month, their clubhouse looked like a who’s who of MLB All-Stars, while a trip through the White Sox’s side of the building required frequent glances at the nameplates above the locker stalls to know who was who.
In the days since arriving, the Dodgers have been asked regularly about the opportunity to repeat. The White Sox are contemplating a host of other questions: How do you restore confidence in the clubhouse? What message of optimism can you deliver after a historic season of losing?
Even the Dodgers’ morning workouts, normally a mundane early spring ritual, have served as a celebration of the team that ruled baseball last October and dominated the offseason headlines again, with 1,000-plus fans showing up to get a glimpse of their favorite players. On the White Sox side of the facility, ESPN counted only 21 fans taking in one recent workout.
Still, entering a year in which their focus will be on finding the positives wherever they can, the White Sox are looking at the upside of sharing a spring home with the team certain to be the talk of baseball all season long.
“It’s a great opportunity to be matched up in a facility with a team that won the World Series, to have something to aim towards,” general manager Chris Getz said. “How do we get to beat them? How can we compete? So yeah, the Dodgers have been a very successful organization. With that being said, we know what we need to do and we’re set out to do that.”
For Chicago, the season will be measured mostly by the steps taken by young players, and despite the ups-and-downs that come with trying to integrate them into a major league roster, the on-the-field results must add up to a better record than last year’s 41-121 mark.
“I do think we’re going to win more games than we did last year,” Getz said as camp opened. “Unfortunately, there are going to be some growing pains along the way that at times is going to challenge your emotions, but that’s part of the development of some of these players.
“Last year provided a lot of clarity for a lot of people, including myself. We had a lot of work to do, a lot more changes that needed to be made and we were able to accomplish a lot of that this offseason and that started with hiring Will Venable.”
Venable is the first-time manager who checks all the boxes the front office was looking for when it set out to find someone to guide the White Sox through a fresh start. The 42-year-old former major league outfielder retired within the last decade and has since worked under some of the best managers in the business, including Joe Maddon, Alex Cora and Bruce Bochy.
“It’s really about being present and doing the things that we can control now,” Venable said of his opening message to his team.
Venable’s roster is missing last season’s best player, left-hander Garrett Crochet, who was traded to the Red Sox during the offseason. It does feature a smattering of holdovers, such as Luis Robert Jr. and Andrew Vaughn and Andrew Benintendi (although the start of the outfielder’s season will come later after suffering a broken hand on Thursday), who are hungry for an opportunity to be remembered for something other than last season’s futility.
“When I signed here, I signed for five years knowing that there could be ups and downs, but I’m here for it and it’s my job to go out there and perform,” Benintendi said. “And last year I didn’t do that. And not only do I feel like I let the fans or team down, I think (I let) myself down. You have such high expectations going into a season and when you don’t hit them, it’s frustrating, but you just gotta keep going.”
The White Sox also added a group of journeyman free agents looking to reboot their careers — including Joey Gallo, Brandon Drury and Michael A. Taylor — who were signed to short-term deals with an opportunity to compete for the playing time they weren’t as likely to get elsewhere.
But the real excitement on Chicago’s side of Camelback Ranch this spring is about a group of prospects — six of which appear on ESPN’s Kiley McDaniel’s top 100 list, including lefties Noah Schultz and Hagen Smith, the team’s top picks in the 2022 and 2024 drafts, respectively. Both made their spring debuts last Wednesday, but won’t break camp with the big league club. Also providing promise for the future is catcher Kyle Teel, who was the centerpiece of the White Sox’s return for Crochet, and shortstop Colson Montgomery, who homered in the team’s first spring game.
“We brought in a lot of really good veterans, so it’s really cool just to talk to them, pick their brains, not even about baseball, just kind of how they go about their business, how you go about yourself as a pro,” Montgomery said. “We also have a lot of really young talent and I think that’s what the fans and everybody should be really excited for.”
Envisioning a future with Montgomery anchoring the lineup while Schultz and Hagen top the rotation has helped Getz stay the course in Chicago’s rebuild even as the losses at the major league level have piled up.
“There’s no time to complain. And there’s no one really to complain to,” Getz said. “We got our hands dirty and got to work. There honestly wasn’t a day to get away from it because we didn’t want to get away from it. We wanted to dive in and continue to build this forward.
“Physically, mentally you rid yourself of negative things, but I personally have just channeled it for motivation to get better. And I know that is a cliché, in itself, but it’s the truth of the matter.”
Across the parking lot earlier this week, after watching $325 million starter Yoshinobu Yamamoto throw a bullpen session, Dodgers president of baseball operations Andrew Friedman reflected on the plight of his White Sox counterpart.
Friedman and Getz sometimes meet on the backfields at Camelback Ranch. Friedman sympathizes with Getz, despite the vast disparity between their two rosters, which includes a payroll difference of more than $300 million. L.A. enters the season with a MLB-leading payroll that’s approaching $400 million, compared to Chicago’s 29th-ranked $83 million total, a number the franchise has pared down during its rebuild.
“It’s certainly a challenge, but in a lot of ways there are a lot of fun aspects of it, building up and growing the various departments. And it’s critical for everyone to work well together,” said Friedman, who helped build winning teams in Tampa Bay without high payrolls. “And it doesn’t mean you don’t disagree, but putting those processes in place and being more innovative when you’re at this point, it’s similar to how we were in 2006 and 2007 with the Rays.
“There is a lot of strong foundation you can build during that time period that while mired in it is not fun. But when you look back, when you’ve reached a point of a steady state of success where a lot of that can be attributed to those early years, it can be very rewarding.”
While Getz can only dream of those days for now, he is using his unique spring training vantage point to soak up how a model organization is run. Asked what he admires about the Dodgers, he pointed to the detailed ground-up approach that often gets overlooked amid the franchise’s splashy offseason signings.
“Being a former farm director and being attached to a complex with the Dodgers and seeing what they do on a regular basis, having conversations, seeing the work that’s being done, it’s almost a small-market mindset in terms of really valuing the development of players,” Getz said. “I respect how they go about it. It’s not just spending, they do a lot of little things.”
Of course, it is going to take more than little things for the White Sox to make up the distance between them and the Dodgers — or even most of the rest of the other 28 major league teams — and that was apparent as soon as the curtain dropped on a new season of Cactus League games.
Last Thursday, 10,959 fans dressed primarily in Dodger blue showed up for L.A.’s opener. Four days later, the White Sox played their first home game of the spring in front of an announced crowd of 2,636. The fans who did make their way to Camelback Ranch for the Monday afternoon matchup with the Texas Rangers were greeted with a familiar sight to anyone who followed the 2024 season: Chicago promptly gave up nine runs in the top of the first inning.
“Obviously, you’re not going to meet a fan that wants to be where we’re at right now,” Getz said. “But if they’re sticking by our side, when we get there, it’s going to be a really special moment for a lot of people.”
Sports
The teams, coaches and players who have the most to prove next season
Published
8 hours agoon
February 28, 2025By
admindata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35525/3552577a01b378b8a8ffbd3509be547fb8dac839" alt="The teams, coaches and players who have the most to prove next season The teams, coaches and players who have the most to prove next season"
With spring football just around the corner, it’s time to look ahead toward next season and see who has the most to prove.
After suffering an injury that took him out of the College Football Playoff, quarterback Carson Beck returns for another season, but in a Hurricanes jersey this time. What does Beck have to do while at Miami to get back into the first-round draft conversation?
James Franklin and the Nittany Lions look like a top-caliber team this upcoming season as they return their top running backs and an experienced quarterback in Drew Allar. After losing in the CFP semifinal to Notre Dame last season, what do Penn State and Allar have left to prove?
Our college football experts give their thoughts on teams, coaches and players who have the most to prove.
Jump to a section:
Teams | Coaches | Quarterbacks | Transfers
Freshmen | Non-QB player
1. Which team has the most to prove?
Jake Trotter: The Nittany Lions have not won a national championship in almost four decades (though they did go unbeaten in 1994). But they now have one of the most experienced quarterbacks in college football in Drew Allar, while Big Ten powerhouses Ohio State and Michigan are set to debut freshman passers. Last year’s other Big Ten playoff teams, Oregon (Dillon Gabriel) and Indiana (Kurtis Rourke), graduated their star quarterbacks. Penn State also boasts the nation’s top returning running back duo (Nicholas Singleton and Kaytron Allen) and even swiped Jim Knowles from Ohio State after he coordinated the top defense in the country. The Nittany Lions will never have a better shot to win the Big Ten — and national title — than they will this season.
Bill Connelly: Yeah, it has to be Penn State. The Nittany Lions are going all-in and might have the most proven stars in the country. We still don’t know if their receiving corps is ready for prime time, but their schedule is extremely navigable outside of a Nov. 1 trip to Columbus to face Ohio State. There will never be a better time for a breakthrough than 2025.
Chris Low: When is there not something to prove at Alabama? Nick Saban won six national championships in Tuscaloosa, and there was always an embedded responsibility to continue feeding that monster the next season. Now, as Kalen DeBoer enters his second season at Alabama, the last thing anybody in and around that Crimson Tide program wants is to go a second straight season without making the College Football Playoff. DeBoer and his staff have recruited well, and he was able to bring back Ryan Grubb as offensive coordinator after Grubb spent last season in the NFL. DeBoer will have more of his fingerprints on the 2025 team, and there should be a better overall understanding among the players of how he rolls. Either way, it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to realize how important this next season is for the program.
Andrea Adelson: Penn State is the most obvious choice, but I would argue Florida State has something more to prove after a disastrous 2024 campaign. It still seems unfathomable that the Seminoles could go from 13-1 and ACC champions in 2023 to 2-10 over just one season. But here’s the thing about Florida State in its recent history. The Seminoles have probably been closer to their performance in 2024 than what we saw in 2023. Over the past seven seasons, Florida State has had five losing seasons. Three of them belong to current coach Mike Norvell. So it is legitimate to ask whether the Seminoles’ back-to-back double-digit win seasons in 2022 and 2023 fall outside the norm for what history says should be expected. That is what makes this season so critical. Florida State appeared to turn a corner and had many believing it was ready to rejoin the elite. Last season said otherwise. So what will it be in 2025?
Adam Rittenberg: I love the Penn State answers, but I’m going across the Big Ten — and the country — with USC. Remember the excitement when USC went way outside the family to hire Lincoln Riley as head coach? The expectation was that championships and playoff appearances would follow. Perhaps those were unrealistic, given the program’s roster and resource challenges, as well as an unexpected move to the Big Ten in 2024. But Riley is just 26-14 with one division title and no league championships or CFP berths while at USC. The Big Ten is only getting deeper and tougher, and despite some key upgrades at personnel positions, USC ultimately must start delivering results. Can a team that struggled to win the close ones, especially away from home, start to break through this fall? We’ll learn a lot during a midseason stretch featuring Illinois (road), Michigan (home) and Notre Dame (road).
Ryan McGee: I’ll draft behind Rittenberg in the Pac-12-to-B1G genre, but I’m going up the coast to Oregon. The world, including me, has declared Dan Lanning as the future of college football, and looking at the W column and his recruiting prowess, we are right in doing so. But in two straight seasons, Oregon has exited the natty chase via bummer rematch losses, last year as the top-ranked team. So, new coach, but that’s the same Oregon close-but-no-title movie we’ve been watching for a few decades now.
Kyle Bonagura: After finishing in last place in the Pac-12 in 2023, Colorado took a massive step forward last season. It was a tiebreak away from reaching the Big 12 title game and went 9-4. Now comes the hard part. Travis Hunter, the Heisman Trophy winner, and Shedeur Sanders, the possible No. 1 NFL draft pick, buoyed the team at a level that is hard to quantify. Without those two this year, we’ll have a better sense of what life in Boulder will be like for Deion Sanders.
2. Which coach has the most to prove?
Bonagura: Cal coach Justin Wilcox hasn’t been messing around this offseason. He hired former Boise State and Auburn coach Bryan Harsin to be the OC; former Washington State and Hawai’i head coach Nick Rolovich as an analyst; and former NFL head coach Ron Rivera joined the program in an administrative role. Wilcox has been given a lot of chances to succeed. He’s about to start his ninth season in Berkeley and has yet to have a winning record in conference play. The last time Cal had a winning overall record was in 2019 (8-5).
Trotter: After losing to Notre Dame on a last-second field goal in last season’s playoff semifinal, James Franklin fell to 1-14 vs. AP top-five teams — and 4-20 vs. AP top-10 opponents — as Penn State’s head coach. It’s past time for Franklin to win the big game. To his credit, he has compiled a loaded team that should be able to go toe-to-toe with anyone in college football in 2025. That won’t amount to much if Franklin continues losing against the best.
Connelly: Oklahoma has suffered just two losing seasons in the past 26 years, and Brent Venables was in charge for both of them. The Sooners faced a ridiculous schedule during last season’s 6-7 campaign, and they enjoyed a bright spot with their late-November pummeling of Alabama. But that was their only win over an FBS opponent after September, and they fielded their worst offense of the 21st century. Venables has recruited well enough to fend off any major hot seat issues, but you eventually have to turn recruiting potential into on-field production, and OU’s schedule won’t get any easier in his fourth season in charge.
Low: Gotta be Lincoln Riley, right? He enters his fourth season at USC and has yet to win a conference championship. He had quarterback Caleb Williams for two seasons, and after Williams won the Heisman Trophy in 2022, the Trojans dropped off to 8-5 in 2023. Then in their first season in the Big Ten a year ago, the Trojans finished with a losing record (4-5) in league play. Riley didn’t just all of a sudden forget how to coach. He won four Big 12 championships at Oklahoma and won 11 games in his first season at USC. But the rub is that the trajectory has trended the wrong way at USC since he arrived, and there’s also the matter of the Trojans proving they can consistently be a contender in the Big Ten. The Trojans will be breaking in a new quarterback in 2025, but this should also be USC’s best defense under Riley with D’Anton Lynn returning for his second season as coordinator.
McGee: Bill Belichick needs to figure out how college football works, but Brian Kelly needs to figure out how Week 1 works.
Rittenberg: Brian Kelly for me. He left Notre Dame for LSU with the express purpose of winning national titles. But the Tigers haven’t even made the CFP under his watch, while Notre Dame just recorded its first three CFP victories under Kelly’s successor, Marcus Freeman, taking down SEC champion Georgia en route to the national title game. Each of the past three LSU coaches — Ed Orgeron, Les Miles and Nick Saban — won a national title by the end of their fourth season at the school. LSU had some obvious talent deficiencies during Kelly’s first few seasons, but the Tigers have rectified that through the portal and improved recruiting. Anything short of a CFP appearance this fall will create major doubt around Kelly, a Hall of Fame-caliber coach who hasn’t fully delivered yet in the Bayou.
Hale: The two biggest hires of the 2022 coaching carousel were Lincoln Riley and Brian Kelly. As Chris Low notes, the pressure on Riley to turn things around at USC is immense, but things aren’t exactly easy for Kelly at LSU either. In three seasons in Baton Rouge, Kelly has been … fine. He has won 29 games, which is tied for the 15th most over that span, right alongside fellow SEC coach Lane Kiffin, who’s viewed as far more successful. But the problem is, LSU didn’t hire Kelly to lead a top-15 team. It hired him to win a national championship, and he has not come close. LSU has lost its opener in each of Kelly’s three seasons, letting the air out of the balloon before it ever got off the ground. LSU has been ranked eighth or better in each of Kelly’s three seasons, too — but hasn’t finished inside the top 12. And last year, it was Kelly’s former team, Notre Dame — a program he suggested couldn’t win it all in the modern era — that made it to the College Football Playoff final. Kelly might not be on the hot seat exactly, but the clock is absolutely ticking.
Adelson: Is it strange to say Bill Belichick? This has nothing to do with whether he can coach X’s and O’s. We all know that he can. This has everything to do with whether he can win in college doing it his way. I would argue there is no coach with a greater spotlight on him than Belichick because we are all completely fascinated to see how this is going to play out. Does Super Bowl success automatically translate into college victories at a place that has traditionally underperformed based on its talent? North Carolina has not won an ACC title since 1980 — not even College Football Hall of Famer Mack Brown could bring home that elusive title. Belichick says he wants UNC to be run just like an NFL team. Is that feasible in college? The entire roster has been overhauled and there is no clear-cut quarterback at this point. What about his long-term future? Only a few months into the job and there was already speculation he wanted back in the NFL. No matter what happens this season, Belichick will have proved either that his way works or that it might not be the answer in college. Either way, people will tune in to watch.
3. Which quarterback has the most to prove?
Hale: This time last season, Carson Beck was the clear-cut No. 1 quarterback in the country and a likely first-round draft pick. Then he had a mediocre campaign in which he got hurt late in Georgia’s SEC title game matchup against Texas and missed the playoff, and suddenly a lot of the shine is off the once-touted prospect. After a brief flirtation with the draft, Beck opted to return to college for one more year — and a boatload of money — at Miami, a move that caught the Dawgs by surprise. Now he’ll follow in Cam Ward‘s footsteps, and that’s no simple task, either. Beck has shown what he can do when things are clicking, and the truth is, he didn’t have a full assortment of playmakers around him last year at UGA. But expectations are high at Miami, and Beck needs to get back to his 2023 form if he wants to rekindle that first-round draft pick hype.
Trotter: Texas quarterback Arch Manning has become one of the most hyped players in recent college football history. And yet, he has played only sparingly backing up Quinn Ewers the past two years. Ewers is now gone, and all eyes will be on Manning as he attempts to lead Texas to its first national championship since 2005, when Vince Young propelled the Longhorns to an undefeated season. Behind Young’s game-winning touchdown pass, that Texas team knocked off Ohio State in Columbus early in the year, setting the stage for the Horns’ magical run. Manning will lead Texas back to the Horseshoe in the season opener with a prime opportunity to make his own statement.
Rittenberg: I saw the tears from Penn State’s Drew Allar after the loss to Notre Dame in the CFP semifinal. Quarterbacks and coaches are often linked through the attention (good and bad) they receive, and Allar and James Franklin will feel the burden of not having won the big game until things change on the field. Penn State having arguably its best team under Franklin increases the pressure on Allar, who, with a strong season, could be the top quarterback drafted to the NFL in 2026. I’m also fascinated to see how Oregon’s Dante Moore plays in taking over for Dillon Gabriel, who helped the Ducks win the Big Ten and go 13-0 but struggled against Ohio State in the Rose Bowl. Who will be the quarterback to finally lead Oregon to a national title? Perhaps Moore is that man.
Adelson: I am looking forward to seeing how Miller Moss does at Louisville. The former ESPN 300 quarterback waited his turn at USC, got his opportunity to start a year ago, and it did not quite go the way both he and the Trojans had planned as he was ultimately benched. But Louisville coach Jeff Brohm has a long track record of success with his quarterbacks — especially with his transfers in his first two seasons with the Cards. In Year 1, transfer Jack Plummer led Louisville to the ACC title game. Then last season, Tyler Shough had a career year, throwing for more than 3,000 yards with 23 touchdowns to six interceptions. Moss said Brohm was a huge reason he decided to join the Cards. With ACC Rookie of the Year Isaac Brown returning to the backfield, top receivers Chris Bell and Caullin Lacy back and an improved offensive line, there is reason to believe Moss can take Louisville back to the ACC championship game.
McGee: Arch Manning has been hyped since he was in middle school. He’s the only backup quarterback I’ve ever seen attract more reporters than the starter at a CFP media day, and I’ve seen it happen multiple times. Texas fans just told the quarterback who took them to two consecutive CFPs that he should just go on and leave. Oh, and when Arch was in high school, I was at an Ole Miss game when it painted the end zones with “MANNING,” supposedly because Uncle Eli was being honored, but everyone knew it was to try to catch the eye of Arch should he be in town for the festivities. If he does anything less than win the SEC title and make the CFP, Austin will turn on him like he’s overcooked brisket.
Connelly: Drew Allar finished the 2024 season with 3,327 passing yards and a 24-to-8 TD-to-INT ratio, and while he had a wonderful security blanket in tight end Tyler Warren, he also produced those numbers with a weak set of wide receivers. It was a lovely step forward for the former blue-chipper, but the campaign ended with a dud: In a semifinal loss to Notre Dame, he went just 12-for-23 passing for 135 yards and a devastating and ill-advised interception in the final minute. He proved his upside to a certain degree, but he was also a merely solid 17th in Total QBR. If he genuinely transitions into a top-tier quarterback in 2025, Penn State will be ridiculously hard to beat.
Low: It should be a fascinating season in the world of SEC quarterbacks with several promising players returning, others getting their first shot as a starter and some talented new faces. Tennessee‘s Nico Iamaleava has elite arm talent and showed some real toughness last season. Now, in his third season on campus and pulling in a reported $8 million in NIL money, it’s time for him to go from being solid to being a difference-maker in a Tennessee offense that desperately needs more pop in its downfield passing game. Iamaleava is 11-3 as a starter going back to the bowl game at the end of his freshman season and has protected the football well, but he passed for more than 200 yards only twice in his nine games last season against SEC foes and then Ohio State in the playoff. The Vols will need more from him next season if they’re going to make a return trip to the playoff.
4. Which transfer has the most to prove?
Low: In one season as Tulane’s starting quarterback, Darian Mensah put up impressive numbers (2,723 yards and 22 touchdowns) and, as a result, received a massive payday of a reported $8 million over two years to transfer to Duke. Even by today’s NIL standards, that’s some serious cash. Clearly, Duke thinks he’s worth it, and Mensah’s best football would seem to be ahead of him. The spotlight will be exceedingly bright as he does his part to take Duke from a nine-win team to potentially a playoff team.
Connelly: I thought Patrick Payton was going to be a breakout star for Florida State in 2024. Some of his rate stats were better than his former teammate Jared Verse‘s in 2023, and I thought both Payton and the Seminoles’ defensive front could withstand the loss of Verse and others and still thrive. I was incorrect. Payton’s sack total fell from seven to four, his TFLs from 12.5 to 11 and his pressure rate from 12.4% to 10.1%. Now he’s heading to LSU for a rebound year, and if he still has a breakthrough in him, he could transform both his own draft stock and LSU’s CFP prospects.
Trotter: Carson Beck entered the 2024 season as a favorite to become the No. 1 pick in the 2025 draft. Beck, however, battled through an up-and-down season at Georgia before suffering an ulnar collateral ligament injury in his throwing elbow that knocked him out of the playoff and prompted him to return to college. Beck has since transferred to Miami, where he’s succeeding Heisman Trophy finalist Cam Ward, who could become the top draft pick instead. The pressure is on Beck to live up to his talent for the Hurricanes and show NFL scouts he’s worthy of first-round consideration.
Rittenberg: The excitement around John Mateer is real, and so is the pressure on him. He could be the quarterback to reboot Oklahoma‘s offense, get the Sooners competitive in the SEC and CFP races and possibly secure coach Brent Venables’ future. Mateer dazzled for Washington State in his lone season as the primary starter, passing for 3,139 yards and 29 touchdowns, while adding 15 rushing touchdowns and 826 yards. He will once again play under coordinator Ben Arbuckle, who also made the move to OU, but faces much tougher competition in the SEC. Oklahoma hit big with quarterback transfers such as Baker Mayfield, Kyler Murray and Jalen Hurts under coach Lincoln Riley. Venables needs a similar impact from Mateer this fall.
Bonagura: Devon Dampier‘s transfer from New Mexico to Utah might not have generated the most headlines this offseason, but it could end up being one of the most consequential. Utah’s offense was a disaster the past two seasons as Cam Rising couldn’t shake the injury issues. Dampier showed he can produce in the Mountain West, and a lot will be riding on him as questions about how long coach Kyle Whittingham will postpone retirement continue to linger.
5. Which freshman has the most to prove?
Low: Dakorien Moore is one of the highest-ranked recruits ever to sign with Oregon and plays a position, wide receiver, that could use an influx of talent. It was big for the Ducks that Evan Stewart decided to return for another season, but they’re losing Tez Johnson to the NFL. Moore (5-11, 182 pounds) plays bigger than his size and has elite speed. He’s dynamic after the catch and scored 18 touchdowns his senior year of high school in Duncanville, Texas. Moore, ESPN’s No. 1-ranked receiver prospect nationally, could have gone anywhere in the country. The Ducks would love it if he can make a similar impact as Ohio State’s Jeremiah Smith and Alabama’s Ryan Williams did a year ago as freshmen.
Trotter: Quarterback Bryce Underwood, the No. 1 overall recruit in the country, was given millions to switch his commitment from LSU and sign with Michigan, just a 20-minute drive from his hometown. With all of that come immense expectations. The Wolverines brought in veteran Mikey Keene from Fresno State to serve as a bridge quarterback. But ultimately, the onus is going to fall on Underwood to prove he’s worth the hype and money.
Adelson: Keep an eye on Clemson running back Gideon Davidson, an early enrollee with a big opportunity to not only play as a true freshman but potentially earn a starting spot. This is the biggest area on the Clemson offense without a proven returning player. Phil Mafah is gone to the NFL, while backup Jay Haynes will miss spring rehabbing from a knee injury sustained in the ACC championship game. Clemson is going to have receiver Adam Randall play running back this spring, after he played there in the CFP quarterfinal against Texas, to see if he should permanently move to the position. That leaves Keith Adams Jr. as the only running back on the roster with significant carries — 30 last year — available for the spring. So, Davidson will no doubt be in the mix at a position that has produced 1,000-yard backs at a frequent clip.
Rittenberg: Julian “Ju Ju” Lewis’ drawn-out recruitment process brought added attention to the quarterback, who continued to visit schools despite his commitment to USC, and eventually flipped and signed with Colorado. Coach Prime and the Buffs need a new on-field face of the program following the NFL departures of Shedeur Sanders and Travis Hunter. Lewis, ESPN’s No. 12 recruit in the class, could be the front man for Phase 2 of the Deion Sanders experience in Boulder. He must beat out a more experienced quarterback in Liberty transfer Kaidon Salter, but at some point, Lewis should get an opportunity to run an offense that last season ranked No. 6 nationally in passing.
Connelly: Underwood’s the most obvious answer, but he might not be the only true freshman with a chance to shine for a highly ranked team. Alabama would probably benefit significantly if Keelon Russell, the No. 2 overall recruit in the country, pulled a Jalen Hurts and seized control of the starting job in Tuscaloosa. He’ll have to beat out two-year backup Ty Simpson and Washington transplant Austin Mack, both of whom are former blue-chippers themselves. But it’s fair to guess that Russell has the highest upside of the bunch, and Bama’s ceiling rises if Russell’s ready from day one.
6. Which non-quarterback player has the most to prove?
Trotter: After a pedestrian regular season, Notre Dame wide receiver Jaden Greathouse exploded in the playoff. In the semifinal and national championship, Greathouse totaled 13 receptions for 233 yards and three touchdowns. In the title game loss to Ohio State, he ignited a second-half comeback that came up short with a series of electric plays. Can Greathouse build on those postseason performances and prove he’s one of the top wideouts in the country? If so, the Fighting Irish also have the players elsewhere for another deep playoff run.
Connelly: Kyron Hudson was a top-10 receiver prospect in the 2021 class but produced just 807 receiving yards in parts of four seasons at USC. That makes him a little bit disappointing … but it also makes him nearly the most proven member of the Penn State receiving corps. He and Troy transfer Devonte Ross will need to make immediate impacts for Drew Allar and PSU to meet their 2025 hype. They don’t have to be Jeremiah Smith-level good, but they have to produce.
Low: Francis Mauigoa has already proved that he’s one of the most promising offensive linemen in the country as he enters his junior season at Miami, but he has everything it takes to blossom into the best tackle in the country in 2025. The 6-foot-6, 320-pound Mauigoa was a second-team All-ACC selection last season. He came to Miami as a five-star prospect and ranked No. 1 nationally at his position. The Hurricanes are hoping to see him showcase that kind of dominance every time out next season.
Hale: Peter Woods is a force up front, but he wasn’t at his best for much of 2024. He battled an early injury, and he was playing out of position at edge rather than on the interior of Clemson’s D-line. Moreover, the entire Clemson front struggled — which led directly to the decision to part ways with coordinator Wes Goodwin. Now, Tom Allen arrives with the express purpose of rejuvenating the Tigers’ pass rush, and he’ll have some fun players to incorporate — including a healthy Woods. With more depth surrounding him and a scheme that should play to his strengths, Woods has the tools to turn his five-star pedigree into All-America production. If he does, it could mean Clemson’s defense looks more like it did during its playoff heyday from 2015 to 2020. If he doesn’t, Woods risks becoming one of the more disappointing prospects on the Tigers’ defense in years.
Adelson: LSU linebacker Harold Perkins Jr. saw his past season cut short by an ACL injury in Week 4, yet another setback for a player who is looking to return to the potential and production that saw him be named to multiple Freshman All-America teams in 2022. There is little doubt Perkins has the physical gifts to prove to the nation once again why he made such a celebrated debut. But much of what has happened since then has been out of his control — a move from edge rusher to inside linebacker in 2023 limited his game-changing ability, and the injury last season obviously hurt. Defensive coordinator Blake Baker recently said he plans to have Perkins play the hybrid safety/linebacker position this season. LSU will need Perkins to be the best version of himself, particularly after the team’s defensive struggles at times last season. That leaves him with plenty to prove.
Rittenberg: Zachariah Branch was among the buzziest players entering the 2024 season, as he had become USC’s first-ever true freshman All-American, returning a punt and a kickoff for a touchdown while leading the nation in punt return average. But his encore fell a bit flat, as he averaged 10.7 yards per reception with only one touchdown, and didn’t have a punt return longer than 20 yards. Branch transferred to Georgia along with his brother, Zion, a safety. Georgia needs more playmakers at wide receiver and returns, where Zachariah should slide right in. A big season awaits the former top-10 national recruit in Athens.
Sports
Brayden Schenn joins brother with 1,000th game
Published
8 hours agoon
February 28, 2025By
admindata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1793/f1793f2580208b79faf08e06325db7b0b8a8d1d6" alt="Brayden Schenn joins brother with 1,000th game Brayden Schenn joins brother with 1,000th game"
-
Associated Press
Feb 27, 2025, 08:59 PM ET
WASHINGTON — Brayden Schenn played his 1,000th regular-season NHL game when he and the St. Louis Blues beat the Washington Capitals 5-2 on Thursday night.
Older brother Luke played his 1,000th game Oct. 17 with the Nashville Predators. The Schenns are the eighth set of brothers to each reach that milestone and the first to do so in the same season.
“I’ve always said you don’t get there without the help of tons of people,” Brayden said after his team’s morning skate. “Family being one and coaches and players and teammates and people in the organization. Obviously, you have to embrace the day-to-day grind of the ups and downs and just how hard this league is, but, yeah, pretty special that we have best buddies that push each other every day and get to do it in the same year.”
Blues players celebrated the occasion with Schenn shirts and hats with the captain’s No. 10 on them. Father Jeff gave a pregame speech in the locker room after coach Jim Montgomery said, “Schenner and his bro both getting 1,000 games in the same season is a tribute to the great family raised by Jeff and his wife.”
Jeff Schenn said Brayden was his favorite player on the Blues and tied for his favorite overall, of course, with Luke.
“Honored and privileged and very proud to be part of the big day and the big journey that goes along with it,” their dad said. “You see the hard work and the dedication and the bumps and the bruises and everything you guys put into it. … Just so excited and happy to be here and awful proud of him.”
Montgomery said after the win that Jeff Schenn looked very comfortable speaking in front of the group.
“Jeff and his wife, Brayden’s parents, they raised four great kids and two have played 1,000 games in the NHL,” Montgomery said. “His message was well-received, and you could tell by our start that we wanted to play for our captain.”
Dylan Holloway, who scored twice, said because it was Schenn’s 1,000th game, the Blues “wanted this one bad.”
The Capitals acknowledged the milestone with a message on arena videoboards and an announcement during the first period.
Brayden getting to 1,000 comes amid talk ahead of the March 7 trade deadline that teams are interested in acquiring both of them in separate moves. The Blues are on the fringe of the playoff race in the Western Conference, while the Predators are far out of contention.
“The times I’ve gotten traded, I didn’t expect to get traded, so you really never know,” Brayden said, adding he has loved his time with St. Louis. “It’s a business and that just comes with the flows of kind of where we’re positioned, five points out of the playoffs. But it’s the trade deadline, so some people make rumors. … You just take it a day at a time and just focus on your game and play.”
Brayden, 33, has three years left on his contract at an annual salary cap hit of $6.5 million. Luke, 35, has one more season left after this one at $2.75 million.
The Schenn brothers have played together in the NHL before, spending 3½ seasons with the Philadelphia Flyers from 2013 to 2015. Brayden won the Stanley Cup with the Blues in 2019, then Luke back to back with the Tampa Bay Lightning in 2020 and 2021.
Trending
-
Sports2 years ago
‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports11 months ago
Story injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports1 year ago
Game 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports2 years ago
MLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports3 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment2 years ago
Japan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment2 years ago
Game-changing Lectric XPedition launched as affordable electric cargo bike
-
Business2 years ago
Bank of England’s extraordinary response to government policy is almost unthinkable | Ed Conway