Channing Tatum and Zoe Kravitz have become engaged, according to US media reports.
The pair have been dating for around two years after working together on Kravitz’s upcoming directorial debut Pussy Island.
Actress and singer Kravitz, 34, seemingly showed off her engagement ring when the couple attended a Halloween party hosted by model Kendall Jenner in Los Angeles on Saturday.
Tatum, 43,was pictured wearing a baby outfit while holding hands with Kravitz, who was seen with a ring on her finger.
Multiple sources confirmed the engagement to US media.
Image: Tatum and Kravitz are seen arriving at Kendall Jenner’s Halloween party at the weekend. Pic: Mega/Getty Images
Speaking to GQ last year, Kravitz confirmed she was in a relationship with the Magic Mike actor and praised him as “a wonderful human”.
She added: “He makes me laugh and we both really love art and talking about art and the exploration of why we do what we do.
“We love to watch a film and break it down, and talk about it and challenge each other.”
Kravitz also described Tatum as her “protector” during stressful moments while filming Pussy Island.
“I think if you can do something like that together, it’s a good test. And we came out even stronger,” she said.
Tatum has been more secretive about their relationship. However, speaking to Variety magazine last year, he described Kravitz as “a perfectionist in the best way”.
The actress, who starred in 2022’s The Batman, is the only child of rock icon Lenny Kravitz and American actress Lisa Bonet.
She was previously married to actor Karl Glusman, and before that dated You star Penn Badgley.
Tatum has a daughter from his previous marriage to Jenna Dewan, who he met while filming Step Up 2. They got divorced in 2019 after nearly nine years of marriage.
A handwriting expert has said the signature on a controversial birthday message to paedophile Jeffrey Epstein is “absolutely” US President Donald Trump’s.
Graphologist Emma Bache compared the signature with others the president wrote at the time, and told Sky News: “It is very much the signature he had in the 2000s. I can absolutely say it is Donald Trump’s.”
Newly released files handed to the United States Congress appear to contain birthday messages to billionaire paedophile Epstein from both the US president and the current British ambassador to the US, Peter Mandelson.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
2:20
Who’s in the Epstein ‘birthday book’?
They include a hand-drawing of a woman’s body, signed “Donald”, a picture of Epstein holding an outsized cheque, signed by “DJTRUMP”, and a message appearing to show Lord Mandelson calling Epstein his “best pal”.
Addressing the release of the image in a post on X, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said: “As I have said all along, it’s very clear President Trump did not draw this picture, and he did not sign it.”
Image: Emma Bache said it was ‘almost impossible’ to forge President Trump’s signature
But Ms Bache was unequivocal.
“It’s incredibly distinctive. If we look at the way he has formed the ‘o’ of Donald, it’s actually a circle.
“He also has a very long horizontal stroke at the end of his name – which funnily enough is saying to people ‘keep away’ – and it’s absolutely identical in pressure, in length and formation of about every single stroke (to his current official signature).”
Image: The note released on Monday. Pic: X/OversightDems
She said the capital ‘D’ of his name in the Epstein message, was also very distinctive and exactly the same as another letter written in 1996 and 2000.
The files were handed over following a demand by the Oversight Committee of the US Congress and are from a book compiled by Epstein’s co-conspirator, Ghislaine Maxwell, to celebrate his 50th birthday in 2003.
The White House said the president’s legal team was “aggressively pursuing litigation”.
Ms Bache said she was “not surprised he would deny it”.
She added: “He has an awful lot to lose, but it doesn’t affect my analysis of it.”
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
After examining a number of his signatures under a microscope, she concluded: “The idea that it could be forged would be almost impossible. I certainly wouldn’t be able to get anywhere close to Donald Trump’s handwriting.
“It’s a very confident, very speedy signature and when you forge something, you do it more slowly.”
She said his modern signature had changed a little but still had clear similarities.
Image: Donald Trump’s signature in more recent times as president
She added: “His modern signature is all angles and in graphology, angles are about energy, aggression, there’s a tension there.
“There’s no softness and his communication style is one of ‘you will listen to me and I am right’.
Image: A letter sent by Trump to radio host Larry King in 1999. Pic: Julien*s auction house
Image: And another in 2006 to lawyer George Conway shows a similar signature. Pic: George Conway/X
Ambassador’s denial
Lord Mandelson has also come under scrutiny for his relationship with Epstein – and the release of the files has compounded the issue.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:40
Lord Mandelson tells Sky: ‘I wish I’d never met Epstein’
They appear to include a glowing contribution from the Labour grandee, with him calling Epstein his “best pal” and writing of the friend “taking you by surprise… in one of his glorious homes he likes to share with his friends (yum yum)”.
Lord Mandelson’s spokesman said he “very much regrets ever having been introduced to Epstein”.
Donald Trump’s bid to fire a US central bank rate-setter has suffered a setback after a federal judge blocked the move.
The president revealed last month that he was removing Lisa Cook from her post at the Federal Reserve on alleged mortgage fraud grounds.
The move was widely seen by commentators as a bid to destroy the Fed’s independence through the appointment of a new governor who would support his bid for interest rate cuts to boost the trade war-hit US economy.
Ms Cook, who denies wrongdoing and any cause to dismiss her, was appointed to the Fed’s board by former US president Joe Biden. The board forms part of the panel that votes on US interest rate decisions.
She secured a preliminary court ruling late on Tuesday which found that the Trump administration’s claims she committed mortgage fraud prior to taking office were likely not sufficient grounds for her removal.
The White House has claimed she inaccurately described three separate properties on mortgage applications, which could have allowed her to obtain lower interest rates and tax credits.
More from Money
Image: Lisa Cook is the first black woman to serve as a Fed governor. File pic: AP
But US District Judge Jia Cobb said: “President Trump has not identified anything related to Cook’s conduct or job performance as a Board member that would indicate that she is harming the Board or the public interest by executing her duties unfaithfully or ineffectively.”
The ruling, which could yet be appealed, means she can continue in her role while her own lawsuit proceeds.
It could end up in the Supreme Court.
Mr Trump’s demands this year that the Fed cuts rates have so far fallen on deaf ears as the central bank voting has shown too much concern over trade war-linked inflation. Prices have risen as higher import duties have been passed on.
He has repeatedly called for Fed chair Jay Powell to resign but retracted threats to fire him.
The president may actually get his wish for a cut this month amid a deterioration in the employment market – also widely blamed on his trade war – as hiring has slumped.
The central bank, unlike the Bank of England, has a dual mandate to ensure maximum employment as well as keeping inflation in check.
Any rate cut would be unlikely to extinguish the Trump administration’s effort to influence monetary policy.
The Fed’s ability to set interest rates without regard to politicians’ demands is critical to market confidence, let alone the central bank’s ability to keep inflation under control.
Neither the Fed or the White House commented on the ruling.
Ms Cook’s lawyer, Abbe Lowell, said: “This ruling recognises and reaffirms the importance of safeguarding the independence of the Federal Reserve from illegal political interference.”
The fallout continues from the overnight release of the Epstein files. Hundreds of pages released, including correspondence penned by – it appears – our man in Washington, Lord Peter Mandelson, the UK ambassador.
And Israel launches pinpoint strikes on Qatar for the first time. What did they tell Trump, and did they keep him out of the loop? The Qataris are furious. What will happen next?