Connect with us

Published

on

This article was featured in One Story to Read Today, a newsletter in which our editors recommend a single must-read from The Atlantic, Monday through Friday. Sign up for it here.

To spend time around Dean Phillips, as I have since his first campaign for Congress in 2018, is to encounter someone so earnest as to be utterly suspicious. He speaks constantly of joy and beauty and inspiration, beaming at the prospect of entertaining some new perspective. He allows himself to be interrupted oftenby friends, family, staffersbut rarely interrupts them, listening patiently with a politeness that almost feels aggravating. With the practiced manners of one raised with great privilegeboasting a net worth he estimates at $50 millionthe gentleman from Minnesota is exactly that.

But that courtly disposition cracks, Ive noticed, when hes convinced that someone is lying. Maybe its because at six months old he lost his father in a helicopter crash that his family believes the military covered up, in a war in Vietnam that was sold to the public with tricks and subterfuge. I can hear the anger in his voice as he talks about the treachery that led to January 6, recalling his frantic search for some sort of weaponhe found only a sharpened pencilwith which to defend himself against the violent masses who were sacking the U.S. Capitol. I can see it in his eyes when Phillips, who is Jewish, remarks that some of his Democratic colleagues have recently spread falsehoods about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and others in the party have refused to condemn blatant anti-Semitism.

Deception is a part of politics. Phillips acknowledges that. But some deceptions are more insidious than others. On the third Saturday of October, as we sat inside the small, sun-drenched living room of his rural-Virginia farmhouse, Phillips told me he was about to do something out of character: He was going to upset some people. He was going to upset some people because he was going to run for president. And he was going to run for president, Phillips explained, because there is one deception he can no longer perpetuate.

My grave concern, the congressman said, is I just dont think President Biden will beat Donald Trump next November.

This isnt some fringe viewpoint within the Democratic Party. In a years worth of conversations with other party leaders, Phillips told me, everybody, without exception, shares his fear about Joe Bidens fragilitypolitical and otherwiseas he seeks a second term. This might be hyperbole, but not by much: In my own recent conversations with party officials, it was hard to find anyone who wasnt jittery about Biden. Phillipss problem is that they refuse to say so on the record. Democrats claim to view Trump as a singular threat to the republic, the congressman complains, but for reasons of protocol and self-preservation they have been unwilling to go public with their concerns about Biden, making it all the more likely, in Phillipss view, that the former president will return to office.

Read: The case for a primary challenge to Joe Biden

Phillips spent the past 15 months trying to head off such a calamity. He has noisily implored Biden, who turns 81 next monthand would be 86 at the end of a second termto pass the torch, while openly attempting to recruit prominent young Democrats to challenge the president in 2024. He name-dropped some Democratic governors on television and made personal calls to others, urging someone, anyone, to jump into the Democratic race. What he encountered, he thought, was a dangerous dissonance: Some of the presidents allies would tell him, in private conversations, to keep agitating, to keep recruiting, that Biden had no business running in 2024but that they werent in a position to do anything about it.

What made this duplicity especially maddening to Phillips, he told me, is that Democrats have seen its pernicious effects on the other side of the political aisle. For four years during Trumps presidency, Democrats watched their Republican colleagues belittle Trump behind closed doors, then praise him to their base, creating a mirage of support that ultimately made them captives to the cult of Trumpism. Phillips stresses that there is no equivalence between Trump and Biden. Still, having been elected in 2018 alongside a class of idealistic young Democratsthe Watergate babies of the Trump era, Phillips saidhe always took great encouragement in the belief that his party would never fall into the trap of elevating people over principles.

We dont have time to make this about any one individual. This is about a mission to stop Donald Trump, Phillips, who is 54, told me. Im just so frustratedIm growing appalledby the silence from people whose job it is to be loud.

Phillips tried to make peace with this. As recently as eight weeks ago, he had quietly resigned himself to Bidens nomination. The difference now, he saidthe reason for his own buzzer-beating run for the presidencyis that Bidens numbers have gone from bad to awful. Surveys taken since late summer show the presidents approval ratings hovering at or below 40 percent, Trump pulling ahead in the horse race, and sizable majorities of voters, including Democratic voters, wishing the president would step aside. These findings are apparent in district-level survey data collected by Phillipss colleagues in the House, and have been the source of frenzied intraparty discussion since the August recess. And yet Democrats reaction to them, Phillips said, has been to grimace, shrug, and say its too late for anything to be done.

Theres no such thing as too late, Phillips told me, until Donald Trump is in the White House again.

In recent weeks, Phillips has reached out to a wide assortment of party elders. He did this, in part, as a check on his own sanity. He was becoming panicked at the prospect of Trumps probable return to office. He halfway hoped to be told that he was losing his grip on reality, that Trump Derangement Syndrome had gotten to him. He wanted someone to tell him that everything was going to be fine. Instead, in phone call after phone call, his fears were only exacerbated.

Im looking at polling data, and Im looking at all of it. The presidents numbers are just not goodand theyre not getting any better, James Carville, the Democratic strategist, told me, summarizing his recent conversations with Phillips. I talk to a lot of people who do a lot of congressional-level polling and state polling, and theyre all saying the same thing. Theres not an outlier; theres not another opinion The question is, has the country made up its mind?

From the November 2023 issue: The Kamala Harris problem

Jim Messina, who ran Barack Obamas 2012 campaign, told me the answer is no. This is exactly where we were at this stage of that election cycle, Messina said. He pointed to the November 6, 2011, issue of The New York Times Magazine, the cover of which read, So, Is Obama Toast? Messina called the current situation just another case of bedwetting. If there was real concern, then youd have real politicians running, he said. Id never heard of Dean Phillips until a few weeks ago.

The bottom line, Messina said, is that Bidens already beaten Trump once. Hes the one guy who can beat him again.

Carville struggles with this logic. The White House, he said, operates with what I call this doctrine of strategic certainty, arguing that Biden is on the same slow-but-steady trajectory he followed in 2020. Joe Biden has been counted out by the Beltway insiders, pundits, DC media, and anonymous Washington sources time and time again, the Biden campaign wrote in a statement. Time and time again, they have been wrong. The problem is that 2024 bears little resemblance to 2020: Biden is even older, there is a proliferation of third-party and independent candidates, and the Democratic base, which turned out in record numbers in the last presidential election, appears deflated. (The most under-covered story in contemporary American politics, Carville said, is that Black turnout has beenmiserable everywhere since 2020.) Carville added that in his own discussions with leading Democrats, when he argues that Bidens prospects for reelection have grown bleak, Nobody is saying, James, youre wrong, he told me. Theyre saying, James, you cant say that.

Hence his fondness for Phillips. Remember when the Roman Catholic Church convicted Galileo of heresy for saying that the Earth moves around the sun? He said, And yet, it still moves, Carville told me, cackling in his Cajun drawl. The truth is, Carville said, Bidens numbers arent movingand whoever points that out is bound to be treated like a heretic in Democratic circles.

Phillips knows that hes making a permanent enemy of the party establishment. He realizes that hes likely throwing away a promising career in Congress; already, a Democratic National Committee member from Minnesota has announced a primary challenge and enlisted the help of leading firms in the St. Paul area to take Phillips out. He told me how, after the news of his impending launch leaked to the press, a colleague from New Hampshirethe congressman grinned, as that description narrowed it down to just two peopletold him that his candidacy was not serious and offensive to the states voters. In the run-up to his launch, Phillips tried to speak with the presidentto convey his respect before entering the race. On Thursday night, he said, the White House got back to him: Biden would not be talking to Phillips.

Cedric Richmond, the onetime Louisiana congressman who is now co-chair of Bidens reelection campaign, told me Phillips doesnt give a crap about the party and is pursuing a vanity project that could result in another Trump presidency. History tells us when the sitting president faces a primary challenge, it weakens him for the general election, Richmond said. No party has ever survived that.

But Phillips insistsand his friends, even those who think hes making a crushing mistake, attestthat he is doing this out of genuine conviction. Standing up and leaning across a coffee table inside his living room, Phillips pulled out his phone and recited data from recent surveys. One showed 70 percent of Democrats under 35 wanting a different nominee; another showed swing-state voters siding with Trump over Biden on a majority of policy issues, and independents roundly rejecting Bidenomics, the White House branding for the presidents handling of the economy. These are not numbers that you can massage, Phillips said. Look, just because hes old, thats not a disqualifier. But being old, in decline, and having numbers that are clearly moving in the wrong direction? Its getting to red-alert kind of stuff.

Phillips sat back down. Someone had to do this, the congressman told me. It just was so self-evident.

If the need to challenge the president is so self-evident, I asked, then why is a third-term congressman from Minnesota the only one willing to do it?

I think about that every day, Phillips replied, shaking his head. If the data is correct, over 50 percent of Democrats want a different nomineeand yet theres only one out of 260 Democrats in the Congress saying the same thing?

Phillips no longer wonders whether theres something wrong with him. He believes theres something wrong with the Democratic Partya disease that discourages competition and shuts down dialogue and crushes dissent. Phillips said his campaign for president wont simply be about the generational schism that pits clinging-to-power Baby Boomers against the rest of the country. If hes running, the congressman said, hes running on all the schisms that divide the Democrats: cultural and ideological, economic and geographic. He intends to tell some hard truths about a party that, in its attempt to turn the page on Trump, he argued, has done things to help move him back into the Oval Office. He sounded at times less like a man who wants to win the presidency, and more like someone who wants to draw attention to the decaying state of our body politic.

Over the course of a weekend on Phillipss farm, we spent hours discussing the twisted incentive structures of Americas governing institutions. He talked about loyalties and blind spots, about how truth takes a back seat to narrative, about how we tell ourselves stories to ignore uncomfortable realities. Time and again, I pressed Phillips on the most uncomfortable reality of all: By running against Bidenby litigating the presidents age and fitness for office in months of town-hall meetings across New Hampshireisnt he likely to make a weak incumbent that much weaker, thereby making another Trump presidency all the more likely?

I want to strengthen him. If its not me, I want to strengthen him. I wont quit until I strengthen him. I mean it, Phillips said of Biden. I do not intend to undermine him, demean him, diminish him, attack him, or embarrass him.

Phillipss friends tell me his intentions are pure. But they fear that what makes him specialhis guileless, romantic approach to politicscould in this case be ruinous for the country. They have warned him about the primary campaigns against George H. W. Bush in 1992 and Jimmy Carter in 1980, both of whom lost in the general election.

Phillips insisted to me that he wouldnt be running against Biden. Rather, he would be campaigning for the future of the Democratic Party. There was no scenario, he said, in which his candidacy would result in Trump winning back the White House.

And in that moment, it was Dean Phillips who was telling himself a story.

He didnt see the question comingbut he didnt try to duck it, either.

It was July of last year. Phillips was doing a regular spot on WCCO radio, a news-talk station in his district, when host Chad Hartman asked the congressman if he wanted Biden to run for reelection in 2024. No. I dont, Phillips replied, while making sure to voice his admiration for the president. I think the country would be well served by a new generation of compelling, well-prepared, dynamic Democrats to step up.

Phillips didnt think much about the comment. After all, hed run for Congress in 2018 promising not to vote for Nancy Pelosi as speaker of the House (though he ultimately did support her as part of a deal that codified the end of her time in leadership). While he has been a reliable vote in the Democratic caucusalmost always siding with Biden on the House floorPhillips has simultaneously been a squeaky wheel. Hes a centrist unhappy with what he sees as the partys coddling of the far left. Hes a Gen Xer convinced that the partys aging leadership is out of step with the country. Hes an industrialist worried about the partys hostility toward Big Business. (When he was 3 years old, his mother married the heir of a distilling empire; Phillips took it over in his early 30s, then made his own fortune with the gelato company Talenti.)

When the blowback to the radio interview arrivedparty donors, activists, and officials in both Minnesota and Washington rebuked him as disloyalPhillips was puzzled. Hadnt Biden himself said, while campaigning in 2020, that he would be a bridge to the future of the Democratic Party? Hadnt he made that remark flanked by Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer on one side and future Vice President Kamala Harris on the other? Hadnt he all but promised that his campaign was about removing Trump from power, not staying in power himself?

Read: So much for Biden the bridge president

Phillips had never seriously entertained the notion that Biden would seek reelection. Neither had many of his Democratic colleagues. In fact, several House Democrats told meon the condition of anonymity, as not one of them would speak on the record for this articlethat in their conversations with Bidens inner circle throughout the summer and fall of 2022, the question was never if the president would announce his decision to forgo a second term, but when he would make that announcement.

Figuring that hed dealt with the worst of the recoiland still very much certain that Biden would ultimately step asdePhillips grew more vocal. He spent the balance of 2022, while campaigning for his own reelection, arguing that both Biden and Pelosi should make way for younger Democratic leaders to emerge. He was relieved when, after Republicans recaptured the House of Representatives that fall, Pelosi allowed Hakeem Jeffries, a friend of Phillipss, to succeed her atop the caucus.

But that relief soon gave way to worry: As the calendar turned to 2023, there were rumblings coming from the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue that Biden might run for reelection after all. In February, Phillips irked his colleagues on Capitol Hill when he gave an extensive interview to the Politico columnist Jonathan Martin shaming Democrats for suppressing their concerns about Biden. At that point, his friends in the caucus still believed that Phillips was picking a fight for no reason. When Biden announced his candidacy two months later, several people recalled to me, some congressional Democrats were stunned.

Many actually felt, I think, personally offended, Phillips said. They felt he had made a promiseeither implicitly, if not explicitly.

Around the time Biden was launching his reelection campaign, Phillips was returning to the United States from an emotional journey to Vietnam. He had traveled to the country, for the first time, in search of the place where his father and seven other Americans died in a 1969 helicopter crash. (Military officials initially told his mother that the Huey was shot down; only later, Phillips says, did they admit that the accident was weather related.) After a local man volunteered to lead Phillips to the crash site, the congressman broke down in tears, running his hands over the ground where his father perished, reflecting, he told me, on the magnificence and the consequence of the power of the American presidency.

Phillips left Vietnam with renewed certainty of his missionnot to seek the White House himself, but to recruit a Democrat who stood a better chance than Biden of defeating Donald Trump.

Back in Washington, Phillips began asking House Democratic colleagues for the personal phone numbers of governors in their states. Some obliged him; others ignored the request or refused it. Phillips tried repeatedly to get in touch with these governors. Only two got back to himWhitmer in Michigan, and J. B. Pritzker in Illinoisbut neither one would speak to the congressman directly. They had their staff take the call, Phillips told me. They wouldnt take the call.

With a wry grin, he added: Gretchen Whitmers aide was very thoughtful J. B. Pritzkers delegate was somewhat unfriendly.

Read: Why not Whitmer?

By this point, Phillips was getting impatient. Trumps numbers were improving. One third-party candidate, Cornel West, was already siphoning support away from Biden, and Phillips suspected that Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who had declared his candidacy as a Democrat, would eventually switch to run as an independent. (That suspicion proved correct earlier this month.) As a member of the elected House Democratic leadership, Phillips could sense the anxiety mounting within the upper echelons of the party. He and other Democratic officials wondered what, exactly, the White House would do to counter the obvious loss of momentum. The answer: Bidens super PAC dropped eight figures on an advertising blitz around Bidenomics, a branding exercise that Phillips told me was viewed as a joke within the House Democratic caucus.

Completely disconnected from what we were hearing, Phillips said of the slogan, which is people getting frustrated that the administration was telling them that everything is great.

Everything was not greatbut it didnt seem terrible, either. The RealClearPolitics average of polls, as of late spring, showed Biden and Trump running virtually even. As the summer wore on, however, there were signs of trouble. When Phillips and certain purple-district colleagues would compare notes on happenings back home, the readouts were the same. Polling indicated that more and more independents were drifting from the Democratic ranks. Field operations confirmed that young people and minorities were dangerously disengaged. Town-hall questions and donor meetings began and ended with questions about Bidens fitness to run against Trump.

Phillips decided that he needed to push even harder. Before embarking on a new, more aggressive phase of his missionhe began booking national-TV appearances with the explicit purpose of lobbying a contender to join the Democratic racehe spoke to Jeffries, the House Democratic leader, to share his plans. He also said he called the White House and spoke to Bidens chief of staff, Jeff Zients, to offer a heads-up. Phillips wanted both men to know that he would be proceeding with respectbut proceeding all the same.

In August, as Phillips dialed up the pressure, he suddenly began to feel the pressure himself. He had spent portions of the previous year cultivating relationships with powerful donors, from Silicon Valley to Wall Street, who had offered their assistance in recruiting a challenger to Biden. Now, with those efforts seemingly doomed, the donors began asking Phillips if he would consider running. He laughed off the question at first. Phillips knew that it would take someone with greater name identification, and a far larger campaign infrastructure, to vie for the partys presidential nomination. Besides, the folks hed met with wanted someone like Whitmer or California Governor Gavin Newsom or Georgia Senator Raphael Warnock, not a barely known congressman from the Minneapolis suburbs.

In fact, Phillips had already consideredand rejectedthe idea of running. After speaking to a packed D.C.-area ballroom of Gold Star families earlier this year, and receiving an ovation for his appeals to brotherhood and bipartisanship, he talked with his wife and his mother about the prospect of doing what no other Democrat was willing to do. But he concluded, quickly, that it was a nonstarter. He didnt have the experience to run a national campaign, let alone a strategy of any sort.

Phillips told his suitors he wasnt their guy. Flying back to Washington after the summer recess, he resolved to keep his head down. The congressman didnt regret his efforts, but he knew they had estranged him from the party. Now, with primary filing deadlines approaching and no serious challengers to the president in sight, he would fall in line and do everything possible to help Biden keep Trump from reclaiming the White House.

No sooner had Phillips taken this vow than two things happened. First, as Congress reconvened during the first week of September, Phillips was blitzed by Democratic colleagues who shared the grim tidings from their districts around the country. He had long been viewed as the caucus outcast for his public defiance of the White House; now he was the partys unofficial release valve, the member whom everyone sought out to vent their fears and frustrations. That same week, several major polls dropped, the collective upshot of which proved more worrisome than anything Phillips had witnessed to date. One survey, from The Wall Street Journal, showed Trump and Biden essentially tied, but reported that 73 percent of registered voters considered Biden too old to run for president, with only 47 percent saying the same about Trump, who is just three and a half years younger. Another poll, conducted for CNN, showed that 67 percent of Democratic voters wanted someone other than Biden as the partys nominee.

Phillips felt helpless. He made a few last-ditch phone calls, pleading and praying that someone might step forward. No one did. After a weekend of nail-biting, Phillips logged on to X, formerly Twitter, on Monday, September 11, to write a remembrance on the anniversary of America coming under attack. Thats when he noticed a direct message. It was from a man hed never met but whose name he knew well: Steve Schmidt.

Some of the greatest acts of cowardice in the history of this country have played out in the last 10 years, Schmidt told me, picking at a piece f coconut cream pie.

Agreed, Phillips said, nodding his head. Agreed.

The three of us, plus the congressmans wife, Annalise, were talking late into the night around a long, rustic table in the farmhouse dining room. Never, not even in the juicy, adapted-to-TV novels about presidential campaigns, has there been a stranger pairing than Dean Phillips and Steve Schmidt. One is a genteel, carefully groomed midwesterner who trafficks in dad jokes and neighborly aphorisms, the other a swaggering, bald-headed, battle-hardened product of New Jersey who specializes in ad hominem takedowns. What unites them is a near-manic obsession with keeping Trump out of the White Houseand a conviction that Biden cannot beat him next November.

The modern era of political campaigning began in 1896, Schmidt told us, holding forth a bit on William McKinleys defeat of William Jennings Bryan. There has never been a bigger off-the-line mistake by any presidential campaigneverthan labeling this economy Bidenomics. The result of that is going to be to reelect Donald Trump, which will be catastrophic.

Schmidt added: A fair reading of the polls is that if the election were tomorrow, Donald Trump would be the 47th president of the United States.

Schmidt, who is perhaps most famous for his work leading John McCains 2008 presidential campaignand, specifically, for recommending Sarah Palin as a surprise vice-presidential picklikes to claim some credit for stopping Trump in the last election. The super PAC he co-founded in 2019, the Lincoln Project, combined quick-twitch instincts with devastating viral content, hounding Trump with over-the-top ads about everything from his business acumen to his mental stability. Schmidt became something of a cult hero to the left, a onetime conservative brawler who had mastered the art and science of exposing Republican duplicity in the Trump era. Before long, however, the Lincoln Project imploded due to cascading scandals. Schmidt resigned, apologizing for his missteps and swearing to himself that he was done with politics for good.

Andrew Ferguson: Leave Lincoln out of it

He couldnt have imagined that inviting Phillips onto his podcast, via direct message, would result in the near-overnight upending of both of their lives. After taping the podcast on September 22, Schmidt told Phillips how impressed he was by his sincerity and conviction. Two days later, Schmidt called Phillips to tell him that hed shared the audio of their conversation with some trusted political friends, and the response was unanimous: This guy needs to run for president. Before Phillips could respond, Schmidt advised the congressman to talk with his family about it. It happened to be the eve of Yom Kippur: Phillips spent the next several days with his wife and his adult daughters, who expressed enthusiasm about the idea. Phillips called Schmidt back and told him that, despite his familys support, he had no idea how to run a presidential campaignmuch less one that would have to launch within weeks, given filing deadlines in key states.

Listen, Schmidt told him, if youre willing to jump in, then Im willing to jump in with you.

Phillips needed some time to thinkand to assess Schmidt. Politics is a tough business, but even by that standard his would-be partner had made lots of enemies. The more the two men talked, however, the more Phillips came to view Schmidt as a kindred spirit. They shared not just a singular adversary in Trump but also a common revulsion at the conformist tactics of a political class that refuses to level with the public. (People talk about misinformation on Twitter, misinformation in the media, Schmidt told me. But how is it not misinformation when our political leaders have one conversation with each other, then turn around and tell the American people exactly the opposite?) Schmidt had relished working for heterodox dissenters like McCain and California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. Listening to Schmidt narrate his struggles to prevent the Republican Partys demise, Phillips felt a strange parallel to his own situation.

Back on January 6, 2021, as hed crawled for cover inside the House gallerylistening to the sounds of broken glass and the gunshot that killed the Trump supporter Ashli Babbitt, overhearing his weeping colleagues make goodbye calls to loved onesPhillips believed that he was going to die. Later that night, reflecting on his survival, the congressman vowed that he would give every last measure to the cause of opposing Trump. And now, just a couple of years later, with Trumps recapturing of power appearing more likely by the day, he was supposed to do nothingjust to keep the Democratic Party honchos happy?

My colleagues, we all endured that, and youd think that we would be very intentional and objective and resolute about the singular objective to ensure he does not return to the White House, Phillips said. We need to recognize the consequences of this silence.

On the first weekend of October, Phillips welcomed Schmidt to his D.C. townhome. They were joined by six others: the congressmans wife and sister; his campaign manager and one of her daughters; Bill Fletcher, a Tennessee-based consultant; and a Democratic strategist whom I later met at the Virginia farmone whose identity I agreed to keep off the record because he said his career would be over if he was found to be helping Phillips. Commanding the room with a whiteboard and marker, Schmidt outlined his approach. There would be no org chart, no job titlesonly three groups with overlapping responsibilities. The first group, Headquarters, would deal with day-to-day operations. The second, Maneuver, would handle the mobile logistics of the campaign. The third, Content, would be prolific in its production of advertisements, web videos, and social-media posts. This last group would be essential to Phillipss effort, Schmidt explained: They would contract talent to work across six time zones, from Manhattan to Honolulu, seizing on every opening in the news cycle and putting Bidens campaign on the defensive all day, every day.

When the weekend wrapped, Phillips sat alone with his thoughts. The idea of challenging his partys leader suddenly felt real. He knew the arguments being made by his Democratic friends and did his best to consider them without prejudice. Was it likely, Phillips asked himself, that his candidacy might achieve exactly the outcome he wanted to avoidelecting Trump president?

Phillips decided the answer was no.

Running in the Democratic primary carried some risk of hurting the party in 2024, Phillips figured, but not as much risk as letting Biden and his campaign sleepwalk into next summer, only to discover in the fall how disengaged and disaffected millions of Democratic voters truly are.

If its not gonna be me, and this is a way to elevate the need to listen to people who are struggling and connect it to people in Washington, that to me is a blessing for the eventual nominee, Phillips said. If its Joe Bidenif he kicks my tuchus in the opening stateshe looks strong, and that makes him stronger.

It sounds fine in theory, I told Phillips. But thats not usually how primary campaigns work.

He let out an exaggerated sigh. I understand why conventional wisdom says thats threatening, Phillips said. But my gosh, if its threatening to go out and listen to people and talk publicly about whats on peoples minds, and thats something we should be protecting against, we have bigger problems than I ever thought.

Eliot A. Cohen: Step aside, Joe Biden

It was two weeks after that meeting in D.C. that Phillips welcomed me to his Virginia farmhouse. Hed been staying there, a 90-minute drive from the Capitol, since far-right rebels deposed House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, sparking a furious three-week search for his replacement. The irony, Phillips explained as he showed me around the 38-acre parcel of pastureland, is that he and Schmidt couldnt possibly have organized a campaign during this season had Congress been doing its job. The GOPs dysfunctional detour proided an unexpected opportunity, and Phillips determined that it was his destiny to take advantage.

With Congress adjourned for the weekend as Republicans sought a reset in their leadership scramble, Phillips reconvened the kitchen cabinet from his D.C. summit, plus a Tulsa-based film production crew. Content was the chief priority. Phillips would launch his campaign on Friday, October 27the deadline for making the New Hampshire ballotat the state capitol in Concord. From there, he would embark on a series of 120 planned town-hall meetings, breaking McCains long-standing Granite State record, touring in a massive DEAN -stamped bus wrapped with a slogan sure to infuriate the White House: Make America Affordable Again.

The strategy, Schmidt explained as we watched his candidate ad-lib for the roving camerasshooting all manner of unscripted, stream-of-consciousness, turn-up-the-authenticity footage that would dovetail with the campaigns policy of no polling or focus groupingwas to win New Hampshire outright. The president had made a massive tactical error, Schmidt said, by siding with the Democratic National Committee over New Hampshire in a procedural squabble that will leave the first-in-the-nation primary winner with zero delegates. Biden had declined to file his candidacy there, instead counting on loyal Democratic voters to write him onto the primary ballot. But now Phillips was preparing to spend the next three months blanketing the state, drawing an unflattering juxtaposition with the absentee president and maybe, just maybe, earning enough votes to defeat him. If that happens, Schmidt said, the media narrative will be what mattersnot the delegate math. Americans would wake up to the news of two winners in the nations first primary elections: Trump on the Republican side, and Dean Phillipswait, who?yes, Dean Phillips on the Democratic side. The slingshot of coverage would be forceful enough to make Phillips competitive in South Carolina, then Michigan. By the time the campaign reached Super Tuesday, Schmidt said, Phillips would have worn the incumbent downand won over the millions of Democrats whove been begging for an alternative.

At least, thats the strategy. Fanciful? Yes. The mechanical hurdles alone, starting with collecting enough signatures to qualify for key primary ballots, could prove insurmountable. (He has already missed the deadline in Nevada.) That said, in an age of asymmetrical political disruption, Phillips might not be the million-to-one candidate some will dismiss him as. Hes seeding the campaign with enough money to build out a legitimate operation, and has influential donors poised to enter the fray on his behalf. (One tech mogul, who spoke with Phillips throughout the week preceding the launch, was readying to endorse him on Friday.) He has high-profile friendssuch as the actor Woody Harrelsonwhom hell enlist to hit the trail with him and help draw a crowd. Perhaps most consequentially, his campaign is being helped by Billy Shaheen, a longtime kingmaker in New Hampshire presidential politics and the husband of the states senior U.S. senator, Jeanne Shaheen. I think the people here deserve to hear what Dean has to say, Billy Shaheen told me. If nothing else, with Schmidt at the helm, Phillipss campaign will be energetic and highly entertaining.

Yet the more time I spent with him at the farm, the less energized Phillips seemed by the idea of dethroning Biden. He insisted that his first ad-making session focus on saluting the president, singing his opponents praises into the cameras in ways that defy all known methods of campaigning. He told me, unsolicited, that his red line is March 6, the day after Super Tuesday, at which point he will wrap it up and get behind the president in a very big way if his candidacy fails to gain traction. He repeatedly drifted back to the notion that he might unwittingly assist Trumps victory next fall.

Whereas he once spoke with absolute certainty on the subjectshrugging off the comparisons to Pat Buchanan in 1992 or Ted Kennedy in 1980I could sense by the end of our time together that it was weighing on him. Understandably so: During the course of our interviewsperhaps five or six hours spent on the recordPhillips had directly criticized Biden for what he described as a detachment from the countrys economic concerns, his recent in-person visit to Israel (unnecessarily provocative to Arab nations, Phillips said), and his lack of concrete initiatives to help heal the country the way he promised in 2020. Phillips also ripped Hunter Bidens appalling behavior and argued that the presidentwho was acting heroically by showing such devotion to his troubled sonwas now perceived by the public to be just as corrupt as Trump.

All of this from a few hours of conversation. If youre running the Biden campaign, its fair to worry: What will come of Phillips taking thousands of questions across scores of town-hall meetings in New Hampshire?

At one point, under the dimmed lights at his dinner table, Phillips told me he possessed no fear of undermining the eventual Democratic nominee. Then, seconds later, he told me he was worried about the legacy hed be leaving for his two daughters.

Because of pundits attaching that to me Phillips suddenly paused. If, for some circumstance, Trump still won He trailed off.

Schmidt had spent the weekend talking about Dean Phillips making history. And yet, in this moment, the gentleman from Minnesotathe soon-to-be Democratic candidate for president in 2024seemed eager to avoid the history books altogether.

In other words, if youre remembered for helping Trump get elected I began.

He nodded slowly. There are two paths.

Phillips knows what path some Democrats think hes following: that hes selfish, maybe even insane, recklessly doing something that might result in another Trump presidency. The way Phillips sees it, hes on exactly the opposite path: He is the last sane man in the Democratic Party, acting selflessly to ensure that Trump cannot reclaim the White House.

Two paths, Phillips repeated. Theres nothing in the middle.

Continue Reading

Sports

New rules for EBUGs? 84 games? What to know about the NHL’s new CBA

Published

on

By

New rules for EBUGs? 84 games? What to know about the NHL's new CBA

The NHL’s board of governors and the NHLPA’s membership have ratified a new collective bargaining agreement. The current CBA runs through the end of the 2025-26 season, with the new one carrying through the end of the 2029-30 season.

While the continuation of labor peace is the most important development for a league that has endured multiple work stoppages this millennium, there are a number of wrinkles that are noteworthy to fans.

ESPN reporters Ryan S. Clark, Kristen Shilton and Greg Wyshynski break it all down for you here:

Draft recap: All 224 picks
Grades for all 32 teams
Winners and losers

When does this new CBA take effect?

The new NHL CBA is set to begin on Sept. 16, 2026 and runs through Sept. 15, 2030. Including the coming season, that gives the NHL five years of labor peace, and would make the fastest both sides have reached an extension in Gary Bettman’s tenure as NHL commissioner.

It’s also the first major negotiation for NHLPA head Marty Walsh, who stepped into the executive director role in 2023 — Shilton

What are the big differences in the new CBA compared to the current one?

There are a few major headlines from the new CBA.

First are the schedule changes: the league will move to an 84-game regular season, with a shortened preseason (a maximum of four games), so each team is still able to play every opponent while divisional rivals have four games against one another every other season.

There will also be alterations to contract lengths, going to a maximum seven-year deal instead of the current eight-year mark; right now, a player can re-sign for eight years with his own team or seven with another in free agency, while the new CBA stipulates it’ll be seven or six years, respectively.

Deferred salaries will also be on the way out. And there will be a new position established for a team’s full-time emergency backup goaltender — or EBUG — where that player can practice and travel with the team.

The CBA also contains updated language on long-term injured reserve and how it can be used, particularly when it comes to adding players from LTIR to the roster for the postseason — Shilton

What’s the motivation for an 84-game season?

The new CBA expands the regular season to 84 games and reduces the exhibition season to four games per team. Players with 100 games played in their NHL careers can play in a maximum of two exhibition games. Players who competed in at least 50 games in the previous season will have a maximum of 13 days of training camp.

The NHL had an 84-game season from 1992 to 1994, when the league and NHLPA agreed to add two neutral-site games to every team’s schedule. But since 1995-96, every full NHL regular season has been 82 games.

For at least the past four years, the league has had internal discussions about adding two games to the schedule while decreasing the preseason. The current CBA restricted teams from playing more than 82 games, so expansion of the regular season required collective bargaining.

There was a functional motivation behind the increase in games: Currently, each team plays either three or four games against divisional opponents, for a total of 26 games; they play three games against non-divisional teams within their own conference, for a total of 24 games; and they play two games, home and away, against opponents from the other conference for a total of 32 games. Adding two games would allow teams to even out their divisional schedule, while swapping in two regular-season games — with regular-season crowd sizes and prices — for two exhibition games.

The reduction of the preseason would also give the NHL the chance to start the regular season earlier, perhaps in the last week of September. Obviously, given the grind of the current regular season and the playoffs, there’s concern about wear and tear on the players with two additional games. But the reduction of training camp and the exhibition season was appealing to players, and they signed off on the 84-game season in the new CBA. — Wyshynski

play

1:49

Why Mitch Marner is a great fit for Vegas

Greg Wyshynski reports on Mitch Marner getting traded from the Maple Leafs to the Golden Knights.

How do the new long-term injured reserve rules work?

The practice of teams using long-term injured reserve (LTIR) to create late-season salary cap space — only to have the injured player return for the first game of the playoffs after sitting out game No. 82 of the regular season — tracks back to 2015. That’s when the Chicago Blackhawks used an injured Patrick Kane‘s salary cap space to add players at the trade deadline. Kane returned for the start of the first round, and eventually won the Conn Smythe as playoff MVP in their Stanley Cup win.

Since then, the NHL has seen teams such as the Tampa Bay Lightning (Nikita Kucherov 2020-21), Vegas Golden Knights (Mark Stone, 2023), Florida Panthers (Matthew Tkachuk, 2024) also use LTIR to their advantage en route to Stanley Cup wins.

The NHL has investigated each occurrence of teams using LTIR and then having players return for the playoffs, finding nothing actionable — although the league is currently investigating the Edmonton Oilers use of LTIR for Evander Kane, who sat out the regular season and returned in the first round of the most recent postseason.

Last year, NHL deputy commissioner Bill Daly said that if “the majority” of general managers wanted a change to this practice, the NHL would consider it. Some players weren’t happy about the salary cap loophole.

Ron Hainsey, NHLPA assistant executive director, said during the Stanley Cup Final that players have expressed concern at different times “either public or privately” about misuse of long-term injured reserve. He said that the NHL made closing that loophole “a priority for them” in labor talks.

Under the new CBA, the total salary and bonuses for “a player or players” that have replaced a player on LTIR may not exceed the amount of total salary and bonuses of the player they are replacing. For example: In 2024, the Golden Knights put winger Stone and his $9.5 million salary on LTIR, given that he was out because of a lacerated spleen. The Golden Knights added $10.8 million in salary to their cap before the trade deadline in defenseman Noah Hanifin and forwards Tomas Hertl and Anthony Mantha.

But the bigger tweak to the LTIR rule states that “the average amounts of such replacement player(s) may not exceed the prior season’s average league salary.” According to PuckPedia, the average player salary last season was $3,817,293, for example.

The CBA does allow an exception to these LTIR rules, with NHL and NHLPA approval, based on how much time the injured player is likely to miss. Teams can exceed these “average amounts,” but the injured player would be ineligible to return that season or in the postseason.

But the NHL and NHLPA doubled-down on discouraging teams from abusing LTIR to go over the salary cap in the Stanley Cup playoffs by establishing “playoff cap counting” for the first time. — Wyshynski

What is ‘playoff cap counting’ and how will it affect the postseason?

In 2021, the Carolina Hurricanes lost to Tampa Bay in the Eastern Conference playoffs. That’s when defenseman Dougie Hamilton famously lamented that his team fell to a Lightning squad “that’s $18 million over the cap or whatever they are,” as Tampa Bay used Kucherov’s LTIR space in the regular season before he returned for the playoffs.

Even more famously, Kucherov wore a T-shirt that read “$18M OVER THE CAP” during their Stanley Cup championship celebration.

The NHL and NHLPA have attempted to put an end to this creative accounting — in combination with the new LTIR rules in the regular season — through a new CBA provision called “playoff cap counting.”

By 3 p.m. local time or five hours before a playoff game — whatever is earlier — teams will submit a roster of 18 players and two goaltenders to NHL Central Registry. There will be a “playoff playing roster averaged club salary” calculated for that roster that must be under the “upper limit” of the salary cap for that team. The “averaged club salary” is the sum of the face value averaged amounts of the player salary and bonuses for that season for each player on the roster, and all amounts charged to the team’s salary cap.

Teams can make changes to their rosters after that day’s deadline, provided they’ve cleared it with NHL Central Registry.

play

1:54

How Aaron Ekblad, Panthers benefit from staying together

Greg Wyshynski reports on Aaron Ekblad signing a new deal that keeps him with the Panthers for eight more years.

The “upper limit” for an individual team is the leaguewide salary cap ceiling minus any cap penalties for contract buyouts; 35-plus players or players with one-way contracts demoted to the minor leagues; retained salary in trades; cap recapture penalties; or contract grievance settlements.

The cap compliance is only for the players participating in a given postseason game. As one NHL player agent told ESPN: “You can have $130 million in salaries on your total roster once the playoffs start, but the 18 players and two goalies that are on the ice must be cap-compliant.”

These rules will be in effect for the first two seasons of the new CBA (2026-28). After that, either the NHL or the NHLPA can reopen this section of the CBA for “good faith discussions about the concerns that led to the election to reopen and whether these rules could be modified in a manner that would effectively address such concerns.”

If there’s no resolution of those concerns, the “playoff cap counting” will remain in place for the 2028-29 season. — Wyshynski

Did the NHL CBA make neck guards mandatory?

Professional leagues around the world have adjusted their player equipment protection standards since Adam Johnson’s death in October 2023. Johnson, 29, was playing for the Nottingham Panthers of England’s Elite Ice Hockey League when he suffered a neck laceration from an opponent’s skate blade.

The AHL mandated cut-resistant neck protection for players and officials for the 2024-25 season. The IIHF did the same for international tournaments, while USA Hockey required all players under the age of 18 to wear them.

Now, the NHL and NHLPA have adjusted their standards for neck protection in the new CBA.

Beginning with the 2026-27 season, players who have zero games of NHL experience will be required to wear “cut-resistant protection on the neck area with a minimum cut level protection score of A5.” The ANSI/ISEA 105-2016 Standard rates neck guards on a scale from A1 to A9, and players are encouraged to seek out neck protection that’s better than the minimal requirement.

Players with NHL experience prior to the 2026-27 season will not be required to wear neck protection. — Wyshynski

What’s the new player dress code?

The NHL and NHLPA agreed that teams will no longer be permitted “to propose any rules concerning player dress code.”

Under the previous CBA, the NHL was the only North American major men’s pro sports league with a dress code specified through collective bargaining. Exhibit 14, Rule 5 read: “Players are required to wear jackets, ties and dress pants to all Club games and while traveling to and from such games unless otherwise specified by the Head Coach or General Manager.”

That rule was deleted in the new CBA.

The only requirement now for players is that they “dress in a manner that is consistent with contemporary fashion norms.”

Sorry, boys: No toga parties on game days. — Wyshynski

Does the new CBA cover the Olympics beyond 2026?

Yes. The NHL and NHLPA have committed to participate in the 2030 Winter Olympics, scheduled to be held in the French Alps. As usual, the commitment is ” subject to negotiation of terms acceptable to each of the NHL, NHLPA, IIHF and/or IOC.”

And as we saw with the 2022 Beijing Games, having a commitment in the CBA doesn’t guarantee NHL players on Olympic ice. — Wyshynski

Did the NHL end three-team salary retention trades?

It has become an NHL trade deadline tradition. One team retains salary on a player so he can fit under another team’s salary cap. But to make the trade happen, those teams invite a third team to the table to retain even more of that salary to make it work.

Like when the Lightning acquired old friend Yanni Gourde from the Seattle Kraken last season. Gourde made $5,166,667 against the cap. Seattle traded him to Detroit for defenseman Kyle Aucoin, and the Kraken retained $2,583,334 in salary. The Red Wings then retained $1,291,667 of Gourde’s salary in sending him to Tampa Bay for a fourth-round pick, allowing the Lightning to fit him under their cap.

Though the NHL will still allow retained salary transactions, there’s now a mandatory waiting period until that player’s salary can be retained in a second transaction. A second retained salary transaction may not occur within 75 regular-season days of the first retained salary transaction.

Days outside of the regular-season schedule do not count toward the required 75 regular-season days, and therefore the restriction might span multiple seasons, according to the CBA. — Wyshynski

Can players now endorse alcoholic beverages?

Yes. The previous CBA banned players from any endorsement or sponsorship of alcoholic beverages. That has been taken out of the new CBA. If only Bob Beers were still playing …

While players remain prohibited from any endorsement or sponsorship of tobacco products, a carryover from the previous CBA, they’re also banned from endorsement or sponsorship of “cannabis (including CBD) products.” — Wyshynski

What are the new parameters for Emergency Goaltender Replacement?

The NHL is making things official with the emergency backup goaltender (EBUG) position.

In the past, that third goalie spot went to someone hanging out in the arena during a game, ready to jump in for either team if both of their own goaltenders were injured or fell ill during the course of play. Basically, it was a guy in street clothes holding onto the dream of holding down an NHL crease.

Now, the league has given permanent status to the EBUG role. That player will travel with and practice for only one club. But there are rules involved in their employment.

This CBA designates that to serve as a team’s emergency goaltender replacement, the individual cannot have played an NHL game under an NHL contract, appeared in more than 80 professional hockey games, have been in professional hockey within the previous three seasons, have a contractual obligation that would prevent them from fulfilling their role as the EBUG or be on the reserve or restricted free agent list of an NHL club.

Teams must submit one designated EBUG 48 hours before the NHL regular season starts. During the season, teams can declare that player 24 hours before a game. — Shilton

What’s the deal with eliminating deferred salaries?

The new CBA will prohibit teams from brokering deferred salary arrangements, meaning players will be paid in full during the contract term lengths. This is meant to save players from financial uncertainty and makes for simplified contract structures with the club.

There are examples of players who had enormous signing bonuses paid up front or had structured their deals to include significant payouts when they ended. Both tactics could serve to lower an individual’s cap hit over the life of a deal. Now that won’t be an option for teams or players to use in negotiations. — Shilton

What’s different about contract lengths?

Starting under the new CBA, the maximum length of a player contract will go from eight years to seven years if he’s re-signing with the same club, and down to just six years (from the current seven) if he signs with a new team.

So, for example, a player coming off his three-year, entry-level contract could re-sign only with that same team for up to seven years, and he’ll become an unrestricted free agent sooner than the current agreement would allow.

This could benefit teams that have signed players to long-term contracts that didn’t age well (for whatever reason) as they won’t be tied as long to that decision. And for players, it can help preserve some of their prime years if they want to move on following a potential 10 (rather than 11) maximum seasons with one club. — Shilton

What does the new league minimum salary look like? How does it compare to the other men’s professional leagues?

Under the new CBA, the minimum salary for an NHL player will rise from $775,000 to $1 million by the end of the four-year agreement. Although gradual, it is a significant rise for a league in which the salary cap presents more challenges compared to its counterparts.

For example, the NHL will see its salary cap rise to $95.5 million in 2025-26, compared to that of the NFL in which Dallas Cowboys quarterback Dak Prescott’s highest three-year average is $61.6 million.

So how does the new NHL minimum salary upon the CBA’s completion compare to its counterparts in the Big 4?

The NBA league minimum for the 2025-26 season is $1.4 million for a rookie, while players with more than 10 years can earn beyond $3.997 million in a league that has a maximum of 15 roster spots

The NFL, which has a 53-player roster, has a league minimum of $840,000 for rookies in 2025, while a veteran with more than seven years will earn $1.255 million.

MLB’s CBA, which expires after the 2026 season, has the minimum salary for the 2025 season set at $760,000, and that figure increases to $780,000 next season. — Clark

Is this Gary Bettman’s final CBA as commissioner?

Possibly. The Athletic reported in January that the board of governors had begun planning for Bettman’s eventual retirement “in a couple of years,” while starting the process to find his successor.

Bettman became the NHL’s first commissioner in 1993, and has the distinction of being the longest-serving commissioner among the four major men’s professional leagues in North America. He is also the oldest. Bettman turned 73 in June, while contemporaries Roger Goodell, Rob Manfred and Adam Silver are all in their early- to mid-60s.

That’s not to suggest he couldn’t remain in place. There is a precedent of commissioners across those leagues who remained in those respective roles into their 70s. Ford Frick, who served as the third commissioner of MLB, was 71 when he stepped down in 1965. There are more recent examples than Frick, as former NBA commissioner David Stern stepping down in 2014 when he was 71, and former MLB commissioner Bud Selig stepped down in 2015 at age 80. — Clark

Continue Reading

UK

Why did Constance Marten and Mark Gordon go on the run? Why their older children went into care – and why they thought it would happen again

Published

on

By

Why did Constance Marten and Mark Gordon go on the run? Why their older children went into care - and why they thought it would happen again

Constance Marten and Mark Gordon said they went on the run to avoid their newborn being removed after their four older children were taken into care.

“There was no way I was going to part with my child,” Marten told the jury at the Old Bailey. 

“We were hiding from the entire British public because I was worried about Victoria being taken.”

The couple said the death of baby Victoria was a tragic accident and denied wrongdoing, but were found guilty of perverting the course of justice, concealing the birth of a child, and child cruelty last year after an Old Bailey trial lasting almost five months.

The jury was discharged after failing to reach a verdict on other outstanding counts.

Gordon, 51, and Marten, 38, have now been found guilty of manslaughter by gross negligence.

Prosecutors said as soon as Marten realised she was pregnant with her fifth child, she and Gordon started planning to “go dark” so they could conceal the birth from the authorities and keep the baby.

A national manhunt was launched in January 2023 when a placenta was found in their burnt-out car – a search that would end almost two months later in a disused shed where Victoria’s body was found in a carrier bag, two days after her parents were arrested.

Marten comes from a wealthy family of landowners with links to the Royal Family and met Gordon around 2014.

The couple had four children between 2017 and 2021 before Marten became pregnant with Victoria in 2022, and the couple decided to go on the run. Marten claimed her older children were “stolen by the state” and her “number one priority” was to protect Victoria.

CCTV footage of Constance Marten holding baby Victoria under her coat outside Special Connection in East Ham.
Pic: mPA
Image:
CCTV footage of Constance Marten holding baby Victoria under her coat. Pic: PA

Why were the couple’s older children taken into care?

Social services were involved with the family from Marten’s first pregnancy in the winter of 2017. Social workers were concerned the couple had been living in a “freezing” tent where they planned to take the newborn, despite it being “wholly inappropriate for a baby”.

Hours after the baby was born, Gordon attacked two female police officers who had been called to the maternity ward over concerns about the parents’ identity after the pair gave fake names.

An interim care order was made. This can only be issued if a child has suffered or is at risk of suffering significant harm, and gives the local authority shared parental responsibility so it can make decisions about the child’s welfare and where they live. 

Marten and her child were placed in several temporary mother and baby placements – the first in a series of care interventions throughout her children’s lives. 

She sought advice from an “expert” in evading social services about how to keep her children after a domestic violence incident between her and Gordon in 2019.

The expert told her to flee to Ireland, and she stayed there until a court order in December 2019 forced her to return. In January 2020, two children were taken into care, and an emergency protection order was made when their third child was born a few months later.

In January 2022, a family court judge ruled the couple’s four children should be adopted. 

An incident of domestic violence played a part in this decision, as the judge weighed up the risk to the children of being exposed to serious physical violence.

At that point, it had been four months since the parents had been to a contact session with their three older children.

‘Mummy and daddy cancelled again’

The judge said the quality of contact was “excellent” when they attended – but there were a “huge” number of missed sessions. 

One child was described as “inconsolable” when the parents failed to turn up at the contact centre, telling nursery staff: “Mummy and Daddy cancelled again.”

In ruling the children should be adopted, the judge found as well as “inconsistent” contact, arrangements for antenatal and postnatal care were not appropriate, and the children were put at risk by the potential for domestic violence and their parents’ decision to evade the local authority when it was investigating the children’s wellbeing in late 2019.

ONLY TO BE USED ON SHORTHAND/AFTER VERDICT. Pic: Facebook
Image:
Pic: Toots Marten/Facebook

Would the older children being in care have automatically meant Victoria was removed?

Older children being in care does not automatically mean a newborn baby is removed – but it will often trigger a pre-birth assessment, explains Cathy Ashley, chief executive at the charity Family Rights Group.

“The assessment has to look at what the previous concerns were, why did those children go into care, why were they removed from their parents? It also has to look at the current situation,” she says.

If a local authority believes a newborn is at significant risk, it can apply for an interim care order. In reality, this is often on the day of birth (court orders cannot be sought before that because an unborn baby is not a legal entity). 

A family court judge must consider each case on merit to decide the best long-term care option, Lisa Harker, director of the Nuffield Family Justice Observatory, says. 

But if a significant risk of harm has meant older children have been removed, it will be a “challenge” for someone to prove they are now able to parent, she tells Sky News.

That is unless there has been a major change in their life such as a new partner, having had therapy, changing levels of addiction, or improvements in mental health.

But parents are often given little support to make those changes, Ms Harker says: “So how do you demonstrate your life has improved and you’re more able to parent than you were?

“People do demonstrate it, but it is difficult.”

What did the couple say about their children being taken into care?

Marten told the jury of the first trial she and Gordon were moving every one to three days while she was pregnant with Victoria “so she would not be taken”.

“I wanted Victoria with me for the first three to six months of her life so I could give her the love that she needs because I don’t think it’s fair for any children to be removed from her parents,” she said.

“A mother’s love for her child is incredibly strong,” she told the jury.

At the retrial, she explained they moved between places “because I didn’t want one single authority to have jurisdiction over my daughter, so if we kept moving, they couldn’t take her”.

Speaking to Sky News, senior crown prosecutor Samantha Yellend said the prosecution did not dispute the love the parents had for their children.

“It wasn’t our case that they didn’t love their children and there weren’t times where they were loving towards them.

“It was our case that when decisions had to be made in relation to them or the children they often pick themselves over that.”

After finding out she was pregnant with her fifth child, Marten’s plan was to go abroad, jurors were told.

She said: “Get away from this country and the services and my family but unfortunately there were preventatives from going abroad.”

Marten added that “Plan B” was to remain in the UK but “lay low”.

When asked to elaborate, Marten told the court she wanted to keep Victoria until she was three months old, then give her to a carer “who could then try and get her abroad”.

She told the court she would have paid the person to get Victoria out of the UK. She said: “It would have been a carer, a nanny or something. If there is a will there is a way, you can always find someone to help.”

CCTV footage of Constance Marten, Mark Gordon and baby Victoria in a German doner kebab shop in East Ham.
Pic: PA
Image:
Constance Marten, Mark Gordon and baby Victoria in a German doner kebab shop in East Ham. Pic: PA

What advice did Marten get about evading social services?

Marten told the jury she sought help from Ian Josephs, who advises parents on how to evade and oppose social services – including sometimes giving expectant mothers financial help to flee to Ireland, France and Northern Cyprus.

Mr Josephs says he has advised thousands of women since starting his website in 2003, and represented parents in court against local authorities as early as the 1960s (the former councillor is not a lawyer and a 1989 law prevents non-professionals from representing clients in court).

He tells Sky News he recalls talking to Marten when she had two children and was “desperate” to stop them being taken into care.

His advice to her at the time: “Get the hell out of there. Get to Ireland.”

This would not break any laws, he told her, and social services there would be more likely to let the family stay together than authorities in England.

Mr Josephs says Marten followed his advice and lived “successfully” in Ireland for a period, but had her children taken back into care when a court order meant she had to return to England.

She was acting out of desperation both when she called him and when she went on the run with Victoria, he says.

“If your child runs into the middle of the road when a lorry is coming and you’re trying to save it… that’s the sort of frame of mind she was in, to try and save a child from being taken, not run over by a lorry, but taken by social services, which is nearly as bad.”

While Mr Josephs’ website includes testimonials from mothers praising his approach, his methods are unpopular with those who believe social services should maintain oversight of children who could be at risk.

CCTV footage of Constance Marten and Mark Gordon in Flower and Dean Walk in Whitchapel, 
Pic: PA
Image:
The couple in east London after buying a buggy from Argos while on the run. Pic: PA

Can social services just take a child?

“There’s a misconception that social workers can just remove your children,” Ms Ashley of Family Rights Group says. 

“Of course they can’t.”

There are only three scenarios in which a child can be removed from their parents or a person with parental responsibility.

The first is if a parent voluntarily agrees to it, and the second is if police take them temporarily into police protection for a maximum of 72 hours. 

The third is the most common scenario and involves the court making a temporary order – either an interim care order or an emergency protection order. 

For this to be granted, the court must be satisfied a child has suffered or is at risk of suffering significant harm.

“It is not a decision taken lightly,” Ms Ashley says. 

Significant harm could mean the child being abused or neglected. In the case of an unborn baby, perhaps the mother hasn’t engaged with antenatal care or uses substances. 

It is a bit of a “grey area” where the worry is about future risk rather than immediate harm, Ms Harker adds. 

She gives examples of what that might look like: “This might not be an environment where a child will thrive, where there’s concerns about neglect, a chaotic lifestyle or the ability to provide a safe, warm, damp-free home for a child. 

“That child might not be at risk of immediate harm but the local authority fears for their future safety, their future wellbeing.”

The temporary orders last until the court makes a decision about longer-term care, which must be guided by the principle that – if it is safe – children are best cared for by their parents or within their family, Ms Ashley says. 

“If it wasn’t possible, legally, children’s services have to consider family and friends before they would look at unrelated carers.”

A social worker will provide a report assessing the parents’ capacity to care for their children, and a psychologist may also do the same. The judge will consider this in making their decision.

ONLY TO BE USED ON SHORTHAND/AFTER VERDICT. Pic: Facebook
Image:
Pic: Toots Marten/Facebook

How were Marten’s family involved?

Marten’s father made an application for wardship in December 2019, when Marten and Gordon had two children. When this application was granted, it meant Marten had to return from Ireland.

These types of applications are “very rare”, retired social worker Andrew Reece tells Sky News.

It does not mean the children’s grandfather was applying to be their guardian. Rather, he was applying for them to become wards of the court.

This means the High Court can be appointed the child’s supreme legal guardian and must approve any significant step in the child’s life.

An application for wardship is different to kinship care, which is when a friend or relative who is not the parent cares for a child.

Wardship proceedings are only used when the usual processes of care orders are not sufficient.

In this case, the local authority initiated care proceedings for the children the month after the wardship application.

Marten told the jury her family considered her children an “embarrassment” because they don’t come from the same “upper class privileged background”.

She said her family would “try to get my children taken off me” and “refused to take them in when they were put up for adoption”.

She claimed she was “cut off overnight” while heavily pregnant with her first child and fled to Wales.

“I had to escape my family because my family are extremely oppressive and bigoted and wouldn’t allow me to have children with my husband,” Marten said.

“They would do anything to erase that child from the family line, which is what they did end up doing.”

In an audio appeal made while the couple were on the run, Marten’s father Napier Marten said the family had lived “in great concern”.

Her mother Virginie de Selliers, who attended the start of her daughter’s first trial, said in an open letter: “You have made choices in your personal adult life which have proven to be challenging, however I respect them, I know that you want to keep your precious newborn child at all costs.”

Constance Marten's brother Tobias Marten and her mother Virginie de Selliers arriving at the Old Bailey. Pic: PA / Jordan Pettitt
Image:
Constance Marten’s brother Tobias Marten and her mother Virginie de Selliers arriving at the Old Bailey. Pic: PA

Is it common for parents to have recurrent children taken into care?

The “trauma and grief” of having a child removed at birth often leads to recurrent care proceedings, Ms Harker says.

“The chance of seeking solace from a future pregnancy is very high.

“We know from our research that 50% of newborn babies who are subject to care proceedings are the children of mothers who have previously had children subject to care proceedings.”

The risk is strongest in the first three years after the removal of a baby and it is more likely with young mothers and where the newborn has been adopted.

But there is a positive side, she says: “Where we know there are services that are able to support families who have had a child removed, you can see that there is a reduced risk of that happening.”

Continue Reading

UK

All four people killed in Southend plane crash thought to be foreign nationals, police say

Published

on

By

All four people killed in Southend plane crash thought to be foreign nationals, police say

Four people have died after a plane crashed and exploded shortly after taking off from London Southend Airport.

The medical transport plane had dropped off a patient and was beginning its journey back to the Netherlands when it crashed at about 3.48pm on Sunday.

Two Dutch pilots and a Chilean nurse were among those on board, according to a passenger listing document.

The deceased were all foreign nationals, Essex Police said.

John Johnson, who was at the airport with his wife and children, said he saw a “big fireball” exploding across the sky as the plane plunged “head first into the ground”.

“We all waved at the pilots, and they all waved back at us,” he said.

“The aircraft then turned 180 degrees to face its take-off, powered up [and] rolled down the runway.

“It took off and about three or four seconds [later] it started to bank heavily to its left, and then within a few seconds of that happening, it more or less inverted and crashed just head first into the ground.”

Mr Johnson added: “There was a big fireball. Obviously, everybody was in shock [after] witnessing it.”

Smoke rising near Southend airport. Pic: UKNIP
Image:
Plumes of black smoke. Pic: UKNIP

Chief Superintendent Morgan Cronin said the plane “got into difficulty” shortly after taking off and “crashed within the airport boundary”.

He added: “Sadly, we can now confirm that all four people on board died.

“We are working to officially confirm their identities. At this stage, we believe all four are foreign nationals.”

Southend Airport said it would be “closed until further notice” and urged people to contact their airlines.

Its staff are “working closely with the emergency services and air accident investigators”.

Zeusch Aviation, based at Lelystad Airport in the Netherlands, confirmed its flight SUZ1 had been “involved in an accident” at the airport and its thoughts were with “everyone who has been affected”.

It has been reported that the plane involved is a Beech B200 Super King Air with twin-propellers.

According to flight-tracker Flightradar, it took off at 3.48pm and was bound for Lelystad in the Netherlands.

Aerials over Southend Airport
Image:
An aerial view of the crash site

Aerials over Southend Airport

The Air Accidents Investigation Branch said it is investigating the incident “involving an aircraft near Southend Airport”.

“A multi-disciplinary team including inspectors with expertise in aircraft operations, human factors, engineering and recorded data arrived at the accident site yesterday afternoon. Enquiries are ongoing today,” a spokesperson added.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Smoke seen after small plane crashes

‘Airport was in lockdown’

Wren Stranix, 16, from Woodbridge in Suffolk, was in another aircraft waiting to take off for Newquay, Cornwall, with her family and boyfriend when the plane came down.

They watched from their aircraft as the emergency services arrived and were not able to leave their seats.

“The flight attendant didn’t know what was going on,” she told Sky News. “They said the plane had exploded and they didn’t know if it was safe or not. The airport was in lockdown.”

They were eventually allowed back in the terminal to wait before all flights were cancelled.

Southend Airport said the incident involved “a general aviation aircraft”.

Read more from Sky News:
Liverpool honours Jota at first game since his death
Trump threatens to revoke comedian’s US citizenship

The plane pictured at Amsterdam Schiphol Airport in September 2024. Pic: Pascal Weste
Image:
A photo of the plane at Amsterdam Schiphol Airport in September 2024. Pic: Pascal Weste

After the incident, EasyJet – one of just a few airlines that uses the airport – said all of its remaining flights to and from Southend had been “diverted to alternative airports or are no longer able to operate”.

The airline said it has contacted customers who were due to travel on Sunday. Anyone due to fly on Monday should check online for up-to-date information, it added.

Essex County Fire and Rescue Service said four crews, along with off-road vehicles, have attended the scene.

The East of England Ambulance Service said four ambulances, four hazardous area response team vehicles and an air ambulance had been sent to the incident.

Fire engines at the scene at Southend Airport
Image:
Fire engines at the airport

David Burton-Sampson, the MP for Southend West and Leigh, asked people to keep away from the area and “allow the emergency services to do their work” in a post on social media.

Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said she was “monitoring the situation closely and receiving regular updates”.

Essex Police asked anyone with information or footage to get in touch.

Chief Superintendent Morgan Cronin said: “In these very early stages it is vital we gather the information we need, and continue supporting the people of Essex.”

He added: “We are working closely with all at the scene, as well as the Air Accident Investigation Branch, to establish what has happened today and why.”

Continue Reading

Trending