Connect with us

Published

on

Critical mass is a tricky thing. You cant make it happen by sheer force of will or by dropping a viral video at just the right moment.

The mad scientists at South Park? The folks behind the Comedy Central series can muster it with one perfectly timed episode.

The enduring creation of Trey Parker and Matt Stone has a knack for sharing thoughts were all having on challenging subjects were too shy to share in public.

Once the shows foul-mouthed lads have a crack at it, suddenly its acceptable to speak on it loud and clear.

Kevin Mazur/Getty Images for Comedy Central

They did just that earlier this year with The World-Wide Privacy Tour, an episode featuring Canadian royalty who looked and sounded just like the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. Cultural voices had struggled to critique Harry and Meghan up until then, fearing a similar backlash to what British pundit Piers Morgan faced for defying the royal couple.

Morgan lost a lucrative gig with Good Morning Britain for suggesting Meghan wasnt telling the whole truth about the alleged racism she faced within the royal family and her suicidal thoughts.

The fiery pundit faced an investigation into the comments as well. It wasnt worth it for other high-profile voices to weigh in on the former Suits star.

Cartman and co. had no such fears. And, after South Parks Privacy Tour, it was open season on the royals. The commentary dam had broken. Suddenly, we began to hear stories about how dismissive Meghan Markle was about her podcast gig, for example.

One brilliantly satirical episode made that happen.

We just saw something similar with the premiere of Joining the Panderverse. The South Parkspecial episode skewered Disney executive Kathleen Kennedy for pushing woke on many Mouse House products, including movie reboots like the short-lived shows National Treasure: Edge of History and Willow, and franchise extensions like Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny.

It also mocked Hollywoods aggressive diversity mandates, where classic characters are routinely race-swapped in the name of progress and equity.

US producer Kathleen Kennedy speaks during a press conference during the Morelia Film Festival in Morelia, Michoacan State, Mexico, on October 26, 2023. (Photo by ENRIQUE CASTRO/AFP via Getty Images)

YouTubers and Right-leaning influencers have said as much repeatedly over the past few years, but the subject was mostly off-limits to mainstream journalists. Or, if the topic came up, journalists would dismiss it as the ravings of right wing trolls.

Suddenly, the hilarious South Park satire had even The Hollywood Reporter weighing in on the topic, exposing it to readers who may not follow the aforementioned YouTube stars. The news site even quoted Gina Carano, the Terror on the Prairie star who was famously fired for sharing opinions that clashed with her far-Left industry, in the process.

The magazine wouldnt share Caranos views on the subject under normal conditions. When South Park brought the issues up, however, it forced the outlet to expand its coverage.

Plus, viewers who never made the connection between inferior Disney content and Kennedy, a veteran Hollywood executive, suddenly did just that.

None of this is new for South Park.

The series, which began in 1997, routinely hits controversial subjects sans fear or regret. The Jeffersons episode skewered pop superstar Michael Jackson all the way back in 2004, offering an unflinching perspective on the icons relationship with young children and plastic surgery overkill.

Even longtime Jackson fans worried about his mental state and accusations of improper behavior with children. South Park shouted it from the Comedy Central rooftop, and the public could now reference the series as a portal into difficult conversations around the King of Pop.

The show introduced its PC Principal character in 2015, several years before the woke mindset took hold in both Hollywood and the culture at large. The characters virtue signaling, combined with an aggressive mien that took no prisoners, captured what many would soon fear about the far-Left movement.

Some South Park fans even embraced that episodes title, Stunning and Brave, to describe woke theatrics meant to inspire applause (or else), such as declaring trans star Caitlyn Jenner in such fawning fashion.

Sometimes the South Park magic doesnt happen overnight.

The prime example is the 2019 Board Girls episode which skewers trans female athletes competing against biological women. The show featured a Randy Macho Man Savage-inspired character who becomes a trans woman and crushes the competition.

Im not here to talk about my transition, Im here to kick some f***ing a**, the character, who transitioned two weeks prior, says.

South Park Board Girls episode. IMDB.

The installment drew some mild media heat at the time, but hardly as much as if it had come out this year or last.

Ironically, a clip from the episode went viral a few months ago, with even The Clay and Buck Show bringing it up on their nationally syndicated radio show.

How does South Park do it? The series carved a unique niche in pop culture, one that gives it leeway in the raging culture wars. Its been outrageous for so long that people no longer judge it like other Hollywood content.

Its just South Park being South Park.

That, plus the crude and cutesy animation, help it steer clear of cancel cultures clutches. It helps that the show hits both sides of the cultural and political aisle, to, leaving no one safe from its satire.

The Panderverse episode poked fun at conservatives who cry woke at every opportunity, for example.

Best of all? Parker and Stone arent interested in apologizing for their past offenses. Why apologize for sharing what the rest of us already think?

Christian Toto is an award-winning journalist, movie critic and editor ofHollywoodInToto.com. He previously served as associate editor with Breitbart News Big Hollywood. Follow him at@HollywoodInToto.

The views expressed in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

Continue Reading

Sports

Lightning sign McDonagh to 3-year, $12.3M deal

Published

on

By

Lightning sign McDonagh to 3-year, .3M deal

TAMPA, Fla. — The Tampa Bay Lightning have signed veteran defenseman Ryan McDonagh to a three-year extension worth $12.3 million.

General manager Julien BriseBois announced the deal Thursday. McDonagh will be 37 when the new contract kicks in; it counts $4.1 million against the salary cap through the 2028-29 season.

McDonagh helped the Lightning win back-to-back Stanley Cups in 2020 and 2021 and reach the Final in 2022 before losing in six games to the Colorado Avalanche.

They traded him to the Nashville Predators that summer to clear cap space at a time when it was not going up much because of the pandemic and reacquired him in 2024.

Record cap increases will have McDonagh account for less than 4% of the cap each of the next three years.

McDonagh is currently injured, one of several players Tampa Bay has been missing, along with No. 1 defenseman Victor Hedman. The team has still won 16 of 26 games and leads the Atlantic Division.

Continue Reading

UK

Officials accused of ‘failing’ to tell Lords about three large-scale illegal waste sites

Published

on

By

Officials accused of 'failing' to tell Lords about three large-scale illegal waste sites

Environment Agency bosses have been accused of “failing” to tell a cross-party committee of peers about three large-scale illegal waste sites – including one that was recently exposed by Sky News. 

Our investigation into waste crime in Wigan heard from residents who repeatedly complained to the Environment Agency that 20 to 30 lorries a day drove down their street last winter and dumped industrial amounts of waste.

The rubbish now sits at a staggering 25,000 tonnes. It burnt for nine days in July, and has seen local homes infested with rats and flies.

Since then, a similarly sized site in Kidlington near the River Cherwell in Oxfordshire sparked national outrage. One man has been arrested in connection with the dumping.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘Epidemic’ of waste crime in Britain

Despite the scale of these two locations – which were well known to the Environment Agency – it neglected to name them when asked by the Lord’s Environment Committee’s inquiry into waste crime how many “significant” sites there were around the country.

Phil Davies and Steve Molyneux of the Environment Agency gave evidence on 17 September.

Just six sites were cited, but three more have been exposed in the past few weeks alone. These are Wigan, Kidlington and a mound of dumped waste in Wadborough.

Now, the Lords are worried there are more environmentally destructive locations the public aren’t aware of.

Read more:
A community plagued by 25,000 tonnes of illegal waste

Urgent action needed to stop fly-tipping by gangs, peers say

In a letter to the EA’s chair Alan Lovell and chief executive Philip Duffy, Baroness Sheehan, chair of the Environment and Climate Change Committee, said: “We are increasingly concerned that there may be other sites of a similarly large and environmentally damaging scale.”

She asked how much progress has been made to remove waste from the various sites, why restriction notices in places like Wigan weren’t served sooner – and for a full list of other sites of a similar size.

Baroness Sheehan also expressed her “disappointment” that these three new locations “were not deemed necessary to bring to the committee’s attention”, though she thanked journalists for “bringing these sites to the public attention”.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

UK’s ‘biggest ecological disaster’

Her original report saw the Lords call for an independent “root and branch” inquiry into how waste crime is tackled. She said the crime, which costs the UK £1bn every year, has been “critically under-prioritised”.

Sky News has been investigating the scourge of waste crime all year, exposing how criminal gangs involved in drugs, weapons and people trafficking can make “millions” from illegally dumping waste.

In the summer, we tracked down a group of suspected organised fly-tippers who waved wads of cash on TikTok after dumping waste in the countryside.

It’s so lucrative, it was dubbed the “new narcotics” by a former head of the Environment Agency.

Continue Reading

UK

Starmer wants to lift half a million children out of poverty – but does his plan go far enough?

Published

on

By

Starmer wants to lift half a million children out of poverty - but does his plan go far enough?

A new long-awaited child poverty strategy is promising to lift half a million children out of poverty by the end of this parliament – but critics have branded it unambitious. 

The headline announcement in the government’s plan is the pledge to lift the two-child benefit cap, announced in Rachel Reeves’s budget last week.

It also includes:

• Providing upfront childcare support for parents on universal credit returning to work
• An £8m fund to end the placement of families in bed and breakfasts beyond a six-week limit
• Reforms to cut the cost of baby formula
• A new legal duty on councils to notify schools, health visitors, and GPs when a child is placed in temporary accommodation

Many of the measures have previously been announced.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Two-child cap ‘a real victory for the left’

The government also pointed to its plan in the budget to cut energy bills by £150 a year, and its previously promised £950m boost to a local authority housing fund, which it says will deliver 5,000 high-quality homes for better temporary accommodation.

Downing Street said the strategy would lift 550,000 children out of poverty by 2030, saying that would be the biggest reduction in a single parliament since records began.

More on Poverty

But charities had been hoping for a 10-year strategy and argue the plan lacks ambition.

A record 4.5 million children (about 31%) are living in poverty in the UK – 900,000 more since 2010/11, according to government figures.

Phillip Anderson, the Strategic Director for External Affairs at the National Children’s Bureau (NCB), told Sky News: “Abolishing the two-child limit is a hell of a centre piece, but beyond that it’s mainly a summary of previously announced policies and commitments.

“The really big thing for me is it misses the opportunity to talk about the longer term. It was supposed to be a 10-year strategy, we wanted to see real ambition and ideally legally binding targets for reducing poverty.

“The government itself says there will still be around four million children living in poverty after these measures and the strategy has very little to say to them.”

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

‘A budget for benefits street’

‘Budget for benefits street’ row

The biggest measure in the strategy is the plan to lift the two-child benefit cap from April. This is estimated to lift 450,000 children out of poverty by 2030, at a cost of £3bn.

The government has long been under pressure from backbench Labour MPs to scrap the cap, with most experts arguing that it is the quickest, most cost-effective way to drive-down poverty this parliament.

The cap, introduced by Conservative chancellor George Osborne in 2017, means parents can only claim universal credit or tax credits for their first two children. It meant the average affected household losing £4,300 per year, the Institute for Fiscal Studies calculated in 2024.

The government argues that a failure to tackle child poverty holds back the economy, and young people at school, cutting their employment and earning prospects in later life.

However, the Conservatives argue parents on benefits should have to make the same financial choices about children as everyone else.

Shadow chancellor Mel Stride said: “Work is the best way out poverty but since this government took office, unemployment has risen every single month and this budget for Benefits Street will only make the situation worse. “

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

OBR leak: This has happened before

‘Bring back Sure Start’

Lord Bird, a crossbench peer who founded the Big Issue and grew up in poverty, said while he supported the lifting of the cap there needed to be “more joined up thinking” across government for a longer-term strategy.

He has been pushing for the creation of a government ministry of “poverty prevention and cure”, and for legally binding targets on child poverty.

“You have to be able to measure yourself, you can’t have the government marking its own homework,” he told Sky News.

Lord Bird also said he was a “great believer” in resurrecting Sure Start centres and expanding them beyond early years.

The New Labour programme offered support services for pre-school children and their parents and is widely seen to have improved health and educational outcomes. By its peak in 2009-2010 there were 3,600 centres – the majority of which closed following cuts by the subsequent Conservative government.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Lord Bird on the ‘great distraction’ from child poverty

PM to meet families

Sir Keir Starmer’s government have since announced 1,000 Best Start Family Hubs – but many Labour MPs feel this announcement went under the radar and ministers missed a trick in not calling them “Sure Starts” as it is a name people are familiar with.

The prime minister is expected to meet families and children in Wales on Friday, alongside the Welsh First Minister, to make the case for his strategy and meet those he hopes will benefit from it.

Several other charities have urged ministers to go further. Both Crisis and Shelter called for the government to unfreeze housing benefit and build more social rent homes, while the Children’s Commissioner for England, Dame Rachel de Souza, said that “if we are to end child poverty – not just reduce it” measures like free bus travel for school-age children would be needed.

The strategy comes after the government set up a child poverty taskforce in July 2024, which was initially due to report back in May. The taskforce’s findings have not yet been published – only the government’s response.

Sir Keir said: “Too many children are growing up in poverty, held back from getting on in life, and too many families are struggling without the basics: a secure home, warm meals and the support they need to make ends meet.

“I will not stand by and watch that happen, because the cost of doing nothing is too high for children, for families and for Britain.”

Continue Reading

Trending