Connect with us

Published

on

When Sir Keir Starmer appointed Sue Gray as his chief of staff, he said her “unrivalled experience” in Whitehall would help get Labour ready to form a “mission-led” government.

But nearly two months into the job, as the scale of discontent around his positioning on the Israel-Hamas war has grown, the top civil servant has found herself plunged instead into the heart of an emotionally charged internal party rift.

Insiders say she has been seen comforting MPs and staff “in tears” over the unfolding drama and the backlash they have received from constituents, with one Labour source telling Sky News she had “literally been putting her arms around people”.

Sir Keir’s refusal to call for an outright ceasefire, and an interview with LBC which led to him clarifying remarks he made about Israel’s decision to limit supplies to Gaza, has prompted outrage in Muslim communities and beyond.

Those who have watched her operate up close say Ms Gray has been adding a “human element” to the party’s approach – which some critics have described as previously being “a bit macho”.

“She’s been providing so much of what has been missing. She’s breaking up the boys’ club.”

Like Labour leaders before him, Sir Keir inherited a party split along left and right when he replaced Jeremy Corbyn following the 2019 election defeat.

More on Labour

He sought to manage the threat posed by the left by hiring aides who sought to minimise their influence – for example, by disciplining those who failed to toe the party line and by keeping a tight control over parliamentary selections.

That approach, spearheaded by Ms Gray’s predecessor Morgan McSweeney, has been seen as successful – if unpopular with some.

Read more from Sky News:
How Hamas carried out deadly Israel attack
Labour’s ostracised left wingers believe they could hold sway

But some Labour sources suggest the situation in which Sir Keir now finds himself has exposed the vulnerabilities that remain in the party – that the leader of the opposition’s office (LOTO) is functioning more as a campaign machine distracted by “factionalism” than a party of government.

Instead of engaging with MPs, some of the Labour leader’s aides are seen as having a dismissive attitude towards them.

“The ‘boys’ in LOTO basically think that MPs aren’t important,” one source said. “They think that everything happens in HQ.

“We’re in a different phase of the Labour Party and they are not recognising that. The Corbyn war is over and they now need to engage with MPs.”

By contrast, some sources have praised Ms Gray for taking a more “conciliatory” approach that looks to bring people into the conversation rather than exclude them.

“Sue doesn’t have the baggage of years of Labour infighting,” the source explained. “She has come in with a fresh pair of eyes and a different attitude.

“I think people suspect she’s not really got any politics because she’s a former civil servant – but she’s got more politics and experience in her little finger than probably most of them put together.”

A Labour frontbencher agreed, telling Sky News: “She is a grown-up who wants us to function – for the country, not for the factions.”

Another party official said that while Ms Gray was more “approachable” and “communicative” with the shadow cabinet, Mr McSweeney “instantly understood” the implications of the Gaza row for MPs – dismissing suggestions to the contrary.

“He knows better than anyone the different constituencies of Labour support,” they added.

Politics and people

Ms Gray has been operating in Whitehall for decades, holding senior positions such as director general of propriety and ethics and second permanent secretary in the Cabinet Office.

But it was her investigation into partygate during the COVID pandemic that made her a household name and caught the eye of Sir Keir.

Alex Thomas, a programme director at the Institute for Government, who knows Ms Gray and has worked with her, told Sky News the people skills she picked up in the civil service would be useful in managing the current situation.

“It makes her well-equipped to advise and broker and understand where people are coming from in potentially hot and fractious environments and to play that peacemaker role,” he said.

What may have provided some training ground for Ms Gray is the 2006 war between Israel and Lebanon, which plunged Tony Blair into a crisis of his own. Ms Gray was serving in Whitehall at the time.

“It is likely her role would have been less about foreign policy and the diplomatic aspects and more about the ministerial side of things such as managing the domestic government fallout,” Mr Thomas said.

One senior union figure also agreed that decades of experience in Whitehall had led to her becoming a critical adviser to Sir Keir.

“Sue has dealt with some of the most sensitive issues in government,” they explained. “She’s advised prime ministers; she’s investigated prime ministers.

“Her job as a civil servant was to advise. She can’t dominate, she can’t enforce, she has to make people agree with her point of view by persuading them.”

Stepping on toes?

As well as managing tensions within the party, Sir Keir has also had to grapple with unhappy stakeholders, including metro mayors with whom relations have been strained over a number of policy issues.

One Labour insider accused Sir Keir’s office of having previously adopted a “brand of Millwall politics” – a reference to the club’s supporter’s chant: “No one likes us, we don’t care.”

They argue this alienated mayors and led to poor relations, whereas Ms Gray is said to be involving mayors in political discussions and ramping up day-to-day engagement.

“In a few short weeks Sue Gray has already started to repair many relationships, involving politicians in decision-making for the first time, bringing Angela [Rayner] closer and reaching out to the mayors and trying to mend bridges,” the insider said.

“Her conciliatory approach is winning her many fans.”

Read more:
A brief history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict
Khan accuses Braverman of ‘posturing’ over pro-Palestinian protests

Another senior Labour source told Sky News: “Her style of leadership is inclusive. She’s a very impressive operator.

“She’s the first person in, she’s the last person to leave and she talks to everyone, even the most junior person in the room. She’s even tackled how some people treat the cleaners.”

But, they said, Ms Gray’s approach might mean she could “step on the toes” of those who have hitherto enjoyed unrivalled authority.

“Sue has asserted herself in the process of political decision-making but she won’t go unchallenged,” the senior source added.

“She’s like a new club manager who faces a dressing room clique with too much power, and she needs to break that if she’s going to deliver results.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Alabama, Minnesota lawmakers join US states pushing for Bitcoin reserves

Published

on

By

Alabama, Minnesota lawmakers join US states pushing for Bitcoin reserves

Alabama, Minnesota lawmakers join US states pushing for Bitcoin reserves

Lawmakers in the US states of Minnesota and Alabama filed companion bills to identical existing bills that if passed into law, would allow each state to buy Bitcoin.

The Minnesota Bitcoin Act, or HF 2946, was introduced to the state’s House by Republican Representative Bernie Perryman on April 1, following an identical bill introduced on March 17 by GOP state Senator Jeremy Miller.

Meanwhile, on the same day in Alabama, Republican state Senator Will Barfoot introduced Senate Bill 283, while a bi-partisan group of representatives led by Republican Mike Shaw filed the identical House Bill 482, which allows for the state to invest in crypto, but essentially limits it to Bitcoin (BTC).

Twin Alabama bills don’t explicitly name Bitcoin

Minnesota’s Bitcoin Act would allow the state’s investment board to invest state assets in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies and permit state employees to add crypto to retirement accounts.

It would also exempt crypto gains from state income taxes and give residents the option to pay state taxes and fees with Bitcoin.

Alabama, Minnesota lawmakers join US states pushing for Bitcoin reserves

Source: Bitcoin Laws

The twin Alabama bills don’t explicitly identify Bitcoin, but would limit the state’s crypto investment into assets that have a minimum market value of $750 billion, a criterion that only Bitcoin currently meets.

26 Bitcoin reserve bills now introduced in the US

Introducing identical bills is not uncommon in the US and is typically done to speed up the bicameral legislative process so laws can pass more quickly.

Bills to create a Bitcoin reserve have been introduced in 26 US states, with Arizona currently the closest to passing a law to make one, according to data from the bill tracking website Bitcoin Laws.

Alabama, Minnesota lawmakers join US states pushing for Bitcoin reserves

Arizona currently leads in the US state Bitcoin reserve race. Source: Bitcoin Laws

Pennsylvania was one of the first US states to introduce a Bitcoin reserve bill, in November 2024. However, the initiative was reportedly eventually rejected, with similar bills also killed in Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming.

Related: North Carolina bills would add crypto to state’s retirement system 

Law, Bitcoin Regulation, United States, Policy, Bitcoin Reserve

Montana, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, South Dakota and Wyoming are the five states thathave rejected Bitcoin reserve initiatives. Source: Bitcoin Laws

According to a March 3 report by Barron’s, “red states” like Montana have faced setbacks to the Bitcoin reserve initiatives amid political confrontations between the Democratic Party and the Republican Party.

Additional reporting by Helen Partz.

Magazine: Financial nihilism in crypto is over — It’s time to dream big again

Continue Reading

Politics

US House committee passes stablecoin-regulating STABLE Act

Published

on

By

US House committee passes stablecoin-regulating STABLE Act

US House committee passes stablecoin-regulating STABLE Act

Update (April 3, 5:43 am UTC): This article has been updated to add information on the STABLE Act and GENIUS Act.

The US House Financial Services Committee has passed a Republican-backed stablecoin framework bill, which will now head to the House floor for a full vote.

The Committee passed the Stablecoin Transparency and Accountability for a Better Ledger Economy, or STABLE Act, with a 32-17 vote on April 2, with six Democrats voting in favor.

The bill was introduced on Feb. 6 by committee Chair French Hill and the chair of its Digital Assets Subcommittee, Bryan Steil — reportedly drafted with the help of the world’s largest stablecoin issue, Tether.

US House committee passes stablecoin-regulating STABLE Act

Source: Financial Services GOP

The bill would provide rules around payment stablecoins, a crypto token tied to a currency such as the US dollar, and aims to ensure issuers give information about their business and how they back their tokens.

During an earlier markup session, the committee’s leading Democrat, Maxine Waters, who later voted against the bill, criticized her Republican peers for “setting an unacceptable and dangerous precedent” with the STABLE Act.

She said President Donald Trump could use the bill to allow his family’s stablecoin to be used in government payments, and argued the bill validates Trump “and his insiders’ efforts to write rules of the road that will enrich themselves at the expense of everyone else.”

In late March, the Trump family’s World Liberty Financial crypto venture launched a stablecoin, World Liberty Financial USD (USD1). Meanwhile, the US Housing Department, which oversees social housing, was reportedly looking to experiment with using stablecoins for some of its functions.

Stablecoin GENIUS Act also weaves through Congress 

Other stablecoin-related bills are also working their way through Congress, including the Republican-led Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins, or GENIUS Act, which lays out oversight and reserve rules for issuers.

Related: Crypto has a regulatory capture problem in Washington — or does it?

The US Senate Banking Committee voted through the GENIUS Act in an 18-6 vote on March 13, after Senator Bill Hagerty, one of the bill’s co-sponsors, updated it following consultation with the Committee’s Democrats.

Before the vote, Democratic Senator Kirsten Gillibrand said the updated GENIUS Act made “significant improvements to a number of important provisions” in areas such as consumer protections and authorized stablecoin issuers.

Both the STABLE Act and GENIUS Act will now wait until debate time on the floor of the House and Senate, respectively, before they head for a floor vote.

Crypto journalist Eleanor Terrett reported on X that two unnamed crypto lobbyists said there is likely to be “a coordinated push behind the scenes over the next few weeks to get the two bills to mirror each other, as there are still some differences between them.”

Doing so would “avoid having to set up a so-called conference committee which is formed so members from both chambers can negotiate to create a final version of the bill everyone agrees on,” she added.

Magazine: How crypto laws are changing across the world in 2025

Continue Reading

Politics

‘My lawyers are ready’ for questions about corruption claims, ex-minister tells Sky News

Published

on

By

'My lawyers are ready' for questions about corruption claims, ex-minister tells Sky News

Tulip Siddiq has told Sky News her “lawyers are ready” to handle any formal questions about allegations she is involved in corruption in Bangladesh.

Asked whether she regrets apparent links with the Bangladeshi Awami League political party, Ms Siddiq said “why don’t you look at my legal letter and see if I have any questions to answer… [the Bangladeshi authorities] have not once contacted me and I’m waiting to hear from them”.

The London MP resigned as a Treasury minister in January after being named in several corruption inquiries in Bangladesh.

In her first public comments since leaving government, Ms Siddiq said “there’s been allegations for months on end and no one has contacted me”.

Last month, the interim leader of Bangladesh told Sky News the MP had “wealth left behind” in the country “and should be made responsible”.

Lawyers acting for Ms Siddiq wrote to the Bangladeshi Anti Corruption Commission (ACC) several weeks ago saying the allegations were “false and vexatious”.

The letter said the ACC must put questions to Ms Siddiq “by no later than 25 March 2025” or “we shall presume that there are no legitimate questions to answer”.

More on Bangladesh

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Staff from the NCA visited Bangladesh as part of initial work to support the interim government in the country.

In a post online today, the former minister said the deadline had expired and the authorities had not replied.

Sky News has approached the Bangladeshi government for comment.

The allegations against Ms Siddiq are focused on links to her aunt Sheikh Hasina – who served as the prime minister of Bangladesh for 20 years.

Ms Hasina was forced to flee the country in August following weeks of deadly protests.

She is accused of becoming an autocrat, with politically-motivated arrests, extra-judicial killings and other abuses allegedly happening on her watch. Hasina claims it’s all a political witch hunt.

Electrocuted on their genitals and mouths sewn up: Inside Bangladesh’s ‘death squad’ jails

Ms Siddiq was found to have lived in several London properties that had links back to the Awami League political party that her aunt still leads.

She referred herself to the prime minister’s standards adviser Sir Laurie Magnus who said he had “not identified evidence of improprieties” but added it was “regrettable” Ms Siddiq had not been more alert to the “potential reputational risks” of the ties to her aunt.

Ms Siddiq said continuing in her role would be “a distraction” for the government but insisted she had done nothing wrong.

Continue Reading

Trending