Published
2 years agoon
By
adminRepresentative Adam Schiff was mingling his way through a friendly crowd at a Democratic barbecue when the hecklers arrivedby boat. Schiff and two other Senate candidates, Representatives Katie Porter and Barbara Lee, convened on the back patio of a country club overlooking the port of Stockton, California. Schiff spoke first. Its such a beautiful evening, he said, thanking the host, local Democratic Representative Josh Harder.
It was hard to know what to make of the protest vessel, except that its seven passengers were yelling things as Schiff began his remarks. And not nice things. Although their words were tough to decipher, the flag flying over the craft made clear where they were coming from: FUCK BIDEN . Notably, of the three candidates, Schiff was the only one I heard singled out by nameor, in one case, by a Donald Trumpinspired epithet (Shifty) and, in another, a four-letter profanity similar to the congressmans surname (clever!).
Schiff is used to such derision and says it proves his bona fides as a worthy Trump adversary. Given the laws of political physics today, it also bodes well for his Senate campaign. The principle is simple: to be despised by the opposition can yield explicit benefits. This is especially true when you belong to the dominant party, as Schiff does in heavily Democratic California. One sides villain is the other sides champion. Adam Schiff embodies this rule as well as any politician in the country.
In recent years, Schiff has had a knack for eliciting loud and at times unhinged reactions from opponents, even though he himself tends to be quite hinged. The 45th president tweeted about Schiff 328 times, as tallied by Schiffs office. Tucker Carlson called the congressman a wild-eyed conspiracy nut. A group of QAnon followers circulated a report in 2021 that U.S. Special Forces had arrested Schiff and that he was in a holding facility awaiting transfer to Guantnamo Bay for trial (the report proved erroneous). Before Schiff had a chance to meet his new Republican colleague Anna Paulina Luna, of Florida, she filed a resolution condemning his Russia hoax investigation and calling for him to potentially be fined $16 million (the resolution failed).
This onslaught has also been good for business, inspiring equal passion in Schiffs favor. A former prosecutor, he became an icon of the left for his emphatic critiques of Trumps behavior in office, including as the lead House manager in Trumps first impeachment trial. You know you cant trust this president to do whats right for this country, Schiff said as part of his closing argument, a speech that became a rallying cry of the anti-Trump resistance. (I am in tears, the actor Debra Messing wrote on Twitter.) Opponents gave grudging respect. They nailed him, Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell told Mitt Romney, according to an account in a new Romney biography by my colleague McKay Coppins. Schiffs own Trump-era memoir, Midnight in Washington, became a No. 1 New York Times best seller.Representative Adam Schiff speaks to supporters at a barbecue hosted by fellow Democratic House member Josh Harder in Stockton, California. (Photographs by Austin Leong for The Atlantic)
You could draw parallel lines charting the levels of vilification that Schiff has encountered and his name recognition and fundraising numbers. Both the good and the grisly have boosted Schiffs media profile, which he has adeptly cultivated. Schiff has come in at or near the top of the polls in the Senate race so far, along with Porter. A Berkeley IGS survey released last week revealed him as the best-known of the candidates vying for the late Dianne Feinsteins job; 69 percent of likely voters said they could render an opinion of him (40 percent favorable, 29 percent unfavorable). He raised $6.4 million in the most recent reporting period, ending the quarter with $32 million cash on hand, or $20 million more than the runner-up, Porter. Thats more than any Senate candidate in the country this election cycle, and a massive advantage in a state populated by about 22 million registered voters covering some of the nations most expensive media markets.
Read: A final chapter unbefitting an extraordinary legacy
Hes become an inspiration and a voice of reason for many of us, Becky Espinoza, of Stockton, told me at the Democratic barbecue.
Or at least the sector of many of us who dont want him dead.
Schiff started getting threats a few months into Trumps presidency. Welcome to the club, Nancy Pelosi, his longtime mentor, told him. He endured anti-Semitic screeds online and actual bullets sent to his office bearing the names of Schiffs two kids. I cant stand the fact that millions of people hate you; they just hate you, Schiffs wife, Eveyes, Adam and Evetold her husband after the abuse started. They just hate you.
No one deserves to be subjected to such menace, and the threats can be particularly chilling for a member of Congress who would not normally have a protective detail. (Schiffs office declined to discuss its security staffing and protocols.) Schiff is not shy about repeating these ugly stories, however. Theres an element of strategic humblebragging to this, as he is plainly aware that being a target of the MAGA minions can be extremely attractive to the Democratic voters he needs.
In June, congressional Republicans led a party-line vote to censure Schiff for his role in investigating Trump. As then-Speaker Kevin McCarthy attempted to preside, Democrats physically rallied around Schiff on the House floor chanting shame at McCarthy. On the day of his censure, Schiff was interviewed on CNN and twice on MSNBC; the next morning he appeared on ABCs The View. Whoever it was that introduced that censure resolution against him probably ensured Adams victory, Representative Mike Thompson, another California Democrat, told me. A few colleagues addressed him that day as Senator Schiff.
I dropped in on Schiff periodically over the past few months as he traversed the chaos of the Capitol, weighed in on Trumps legal travails, and campaigned across California. What did a Senate candidacy look like for a Trump-era cause clbre who is revered and reviled with such vigor? I found it a bit odd to see Schiff out in the political wildglad-handing, granny-hugging, and, at the barbecue in late August, nearly knocking a plate of brisket from the grip of an eager selfie-seeker. He has graduated to a full-on news-fixture status, someone perpetually framed by a screen or viewed behind a podium, as if he emerged from his mothers womb and was dropped straight into a formal courtroom, hearing room, or greenroom setting.
I watched a number of guests in Stockton clutch Schiffs hand and address him in plaintive tones. After I stopped crying a little bit, I just wanted to thank him for all he did during impeachment and to just save our democracy, said Espinoza, following her brief meeting with the candidate.
Nearby, David Hartman, of Tracy, California, put down a paper plate of chicken, pickles, and corn salad and made his way to Schiff. I just want to shake the mans hand and thank him, Hartman told me, which is what he did. So did his wife, Tracy (of Tracy!), who was likewise surprised to find herself in tears.
Im like a human focus group, Schiff told me, describing how strangers approach him at airports. Sometimes I will have two people come up to me simultaneously. One will say, You are Adam Schiff. I just want to shake your hand. Youre a hero. And the other will say, Youre not my hero. Why do you lie all the time?
For his first eight terms in Congress, Schiff, 63, was not much recognized beyond the confines of the U.S. Capitol or the cluster of affluent Los Angelesarea neighborhoods he has represented in the House since 2001. I think, before Trump, if you had to pick one of these big lightning rods or partisan bomb-throwers, you would not pick me, Schiff told me.
Largely true. Schiff speaks in careful, somewhat clipped tones, with a slight remnant of a Boston accent from his childhood in suburban Fraingham, Massachusetts. (His father was in the clothing business and moved the family to Arizona and eventually California.) A Stanford- and Harvard-trained attorney, Schiff gained a reputation as an ambitious but low-key legislator in the House, and a deft communicator in service of his generally liberal positions.A Fox News reporter and other guests at the barbecue in Stockton.(Photographs by Austin Leong for The Atlantic)
After Trumps election, however, Schiffs district effectively became CNN, MSNBC, and the network Sunday shows, along with the scoundrels gallery of right-wing media that pulverized him hourly. This included a certain Twitter feed. The worst abuse Schiff received started after Trumps maiden tweet about him dropped on July 24, 2017. This was back in an era of relative innocence, when it was still something of a novelty for a sitting president to attack a member of Congress by nameSleazy Adam Schiff, in this case.
Schiff tweeted back that Trumps comments and actions are beneath the dignity of the office. Schiff would later reveal that he rejected a less restrained rejoinder suggested by Mike Thompson, his California colleague: Mr. President, when they go low, we go high. Now go fuck yourself. Anyway, that was six years, two impeachments, four indictments, 91 felony counts, and 327 tweets by Donald Trump about Adam Schiff ago.
Adam Schiff: America must stand as a bulwark against autocracy
Adam is one of the least polarizing personalities you will ever find, said another Democratic House colleague, Dan Goldman, of New York. The reason hes become such a bogeyman for the Republican Party is simply that hes so effective. Goldman served as the lead majority counsel during Trumps first impeachment, working closely with Schiff. We originally met in the greenroom of MSNBC in June of 2018, Goldman told me. (Of course they did.)
Schiff understands that some of the rancor directed at him is performative, and likes to point out the quiet compliments he receives from political foes. Trump used to complain on Twitter that Schiff spent too much time on televisionin reality, a source of extreme envy for the then-president. Schiff tells a story about how Jared Kushner, Trumps son-in-law, came to Capitol Hill for a deposition from members of Schiffs Intelligence committee in 2017. Kushner comes up to me to make conversation, and to ingratiate himself, Schiff told me. And he said, You know, you do a great job on television. And I said, Well, apparently your father-in-law doesnt think so, and [Kushner] said, Oh, yes, he does. (Kushner didnt respond to a request for comment.)
One of Trumps most fervent bootlickers, Senator Lindsey Graham, walked up to Schiff in a Capitol hallway during the first impeachment trial and told him how good of a job he was doing. Schiff, who relayed both this and the Kushner stories in his memoir, says he gets that from other Republicans, too, usually House members hes worked withincluding some who lampoon him in front of microphones. A few House Republicans apologized privately to Schiff, he told me, right after they voted to censure him.
The apologies are always accompanied by Youre not going to say anything about this, are you? Schiff said. When I urged Schiff to name names, to call out the hypocrites, he declined.
I asked Schiff if he would prefer the more anonymous, pre-2017 version of himself running in this Senate campaign, as opposed to the more embattled, death-threat-getting version, who nonetheless enjoys so many advantages because of all the attention. He paused. Id rather the country didnt have to go through all this with Donald Trump, he said, skirting a direct answer.
As with many members of Congress seeking a promotion or an exit, Schiff gives off a strong whiff of being done with the place. The House has become kind of a basket case, he told me, citing one historic grandiloquence that he was recently privy tothe episode in which Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene called her colleague Lauren Boebert a little bitch on the House floor.
And I remember thinking to myself, There used to be giants who served in this body, Schiff said. He sighed, as he does.
I met with Schiff at the Capitol in early October, amid the usual swirl of weighty events: Feinstein had died three days earlier; news that Governor Gavin Newsom would appoint the Democratic activist Laphonza Butler as her replacement came the night before. That afternoon, Republican Representative Matt Gaetz had filed his fateful motion to vacate that would result in the demise of McCarthys speakership the next day. Schiff stood just off the House floor, colleagues passing in both directions, Republicans looking especially angry, and reporters gathering around Schiff in a small scrum.
No matter what happens next November, Schiff is not running for reelection in the House. He told me he has long believed that hed be a better fit for the Senate anyway, where he has been coveting a seat for years. Schiff said he considered running in 2016, after the retirement of the incumbent Barbara Boxer (who was eventually succeeded by Kamala Harris).
A Democrat will almost certainly win the 2024 California race. Senate contests in the state follow a two-tiered system in which candidates from both parties compete in a March primary, and then the two top finishers face off in November, regardless of their affiliation. In addition to Schiff, Porter, and Lee, the former baseball star Steve Garvey, known also for his various divorce and paternity scandals, recently entered the race as a Republican. A smattering of long shots are also running, including the requisite former L.A. news anchor and requisite former Silicon Valley executive. Butler announced on October 19 that she would not seek the permanent job.
To varying degrees, all of the three leading Democratic candidates have national profiles. Lee, who has represented her Oakland-area district for nearly 25 years, previously chaired both the Congressional Progressive and Black Caucuses. Porter was elected to Congress in 2018 and has gained a quasi-cult following as a progressive gadfly who has a knack for conducting pointed interrogations of executives and public officials that go rapidly viral. A few of her fans were so excited to meet Porter at the Stockton barbecue that three actually spilled drinks on herthis according to the congresswoman, speaking at an event a few days later.
Ronald Brownstein: Who will replace Dianne Feinstein?
Schiff, Porter, and Lee all identify as progressive Democrats on most issues, though Schiff tends to be more hawkish on national security. He voted to authorize the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and supported the 2011 U.S. missile strikes against Libya. Lee, who opposed all three, recently criticized Schiffs foreign-policy views as part of the status quo thinking in Washington. (Porter was not in office then.) Schiff expressed unequivocal support for the security and the right of Israel to defend itself after last months attacks by Hamas. Lee has been more critical of the Israeli government, and called for a cease-fire immediately after the Hamas attacks. As for Porter, she has been a rare progressive to focus her response on Americas Iran policy, which she called lacking and partly to blame for the attacks.
Although Schiff is best known for his work as a Trump antagonistand happily dines out on thathe is also wary of letting the former president define him entirely. This is bigger than Trump, he reminds people whenever the conversation veers too far in Trumps inevitable direction. Schiff dutifully pivots to more standard campaign themes, namely the two hugely disruptive forces he says have shaped American life: the changes in our economy and the changes in how we get our information. He reels off the number of cities in California that hes visited, events hes done, and endorsements hes received as proof that he is a workmanlike candidate, not just a citizen of the greenroom.A group of hecklers in a boat floats by near the barbecue. (Photographs by AustinLeong for The Atlantic)
Recently, he lamented that many of his Republican colleagues are now driven by a perverse celebrity that he believes the likes of Greene and Boebert have acquired through their Trump-style antics and ties to the former president. I pointed out to Schiff that he, too, has received a lot of Trump-driven recognition. Doesnt being affiliated with Trump, whether as an ally or an adversary, have benefits for both sides?
Well, I dont view it that way at all, Schiff said. I dont view it as having any kind of equivalence. On one hand, were trying to defend our democracy. And on the other hand, we have these aiders and abettors of Trump by these vile performance artists. Its quite different.
Schiffs biggest supporter has been Pelosi, who endorsed him over two other members of her own caucus and delegation. This included Lee, whom Pelosi described to me as like a political sister. I spoke by phone recently with the former speaker, who was effusive about Schiff and scoffed at any suggestion that he benefited from his resistance to Trump and the counter-backlash that ensued. If whats-his-name never existed, Adam Schiff would still be the right person for California, Pelosi said. It was one of two occasions in our interview in which she refused to utter the word Trump.
I just dont want to say his name, she explained. Because I worry that hes going to corrode my phone or something.
In one of my conversations with Schiff, I asked him this multiple-choice question: Who had raised the most money for himAdam Schiff, Nancy Pelosi, or Donald Trump? My goal was to get Schiff to acknowledge that, without Trump, he would be nowhere near as well known, well financed, or well positioned to potentially represent the countrys most populous state in the Senate.
Im not sure how to answer that, he said. After a pause, he picked himself. I am my own biggest fundraiser, he declared. Okay, I said, but wasnt Trump the single biggest motivator for anyone to donate?
Its the whole package, Schiff maintained, ceding nothing. He then made sure to mention the person whos been most formative in helping shape my career and phenomenally helpful in my campaignNancy Pelosi. He was in no rush to give whats-his-name any credit.
You may like
Business
Budget 2025: Three things Rachel Reeves’s speech boils down to – and two tricks the chancellor will fall back on
Published
3 hours agoon
November 25, 2025By
admin

This is going to be a big budget – not to mention a complex budget.
It could, depending on how it lands, determine the fate of this government. And it’s hard to think of many other budgets that have been preceded by quite so much speculation, briefing, and rumour.
All of which is to say, you could be forgiven for feeling rather overwhelmed.
But in practice, what’s happening this week can really be boiled down to three things.
1. Not enough growth
The first is that the economy is not growing as fast as many people had hoped. Or, to put it another way, Britain’s productivity growth is much weaker than it once used to be.
The upshot of that is that there’s less money flowing into the exchequer in the form of tax revenues.
2. Not enough cuts
The second factor is that last year and this, the chancellor promised to make certain cuts to welfare – cuts that would have saved the government billions of pounds of spending a year.
But it has failed to implement those cuts. Put those extra billions together with the shortfall from that weaker productivity, and it’s pretty clear there is a looming hole in the public finances.
3. Not enough levers
The third thing to bear in mind is that Rachel Reeves has pledged to tie her hands in the way she responds to this fiscal hole.
She has fiscal rules that mean she can’t ignore it. She has a manifesto pledge which means she is somewhat limited in the levers she can pull to fill it.
Put it all together, and it adds up to a momentous headache for the chancellor. She needs to raise quite a lot of money and all the “easy” ways of doing it (like raising income tax rates or VAT) seem to be off the table.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

4:24
The Budget Explained – in 60 seconds
So… what will she do?
Quite how she responds remains to be seen – as does the precise size of the fiscal hole. But if the rumours in Westminster are to be believed, she will fall back upon two tricks most of her predecessors have tried at various points.
First, she will deploy “fiscal drag” to squeeze extra income tax and national insurance payments out of families for the coming five years.
What this means in practice is that even though the headline rate of income tax might not go up, the amount of income we end up being taxed on will grow ever higher in the coming years.
Second, the chancellor is expected to squeeze government spending in the distant years for which she doesn’t yet need to provide detailed plans.
Together, these measures may raise somewhere in the region of £10bn. But Reeves’s big problem is that in practice she needs to raise two or three times this amount. So, how will she do that?
Most likely is that she implements a grab-bag of other tax measures: more expensive council tax for high value properties; new CGT rules; new gambling taxes and more.
No return to austerity, but an Osborne-like predicament…
If this summons up a particular memory from history, it’s precisely the same problem George Osborne faced back in 2012. He wanted to raise quite a lot of money but due to agreements with his coalition partners, he was limited in how many big taxes he could raise.
The resulting budget was, at the time at least, the single most complex budget in history. Consider: in the years between 1970 and 2010 the average UK budget contained 14 tax measures. Osborne’s 2012 budget contained a whopping 61 of them.
And not long after he delivered it, the budget started to unravel. You probably recall the pasty tax, and maybe the granny tax and the charity tax. Essentially, he was forced into a series of embarrassing U-turns. If there was a lesson, it was that trying to wodge so many money-raising measures into a single fiscal event was an accident waiting to happen.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

2:34
Can the budget fix economic woes?
Except that… here’s the interesting thing. In the following years, the complexity of budgets didn’t fall – it rose. Osborne broke his own complexity record the next year with the 2013 budget (73 tax measures), and then again in 2016 (86 measures). By 2020 the budget contained a staggering 103 measures. And Reeves’s own first budget, last autumn, very nearly broke this record with 94 measures.
In short, budgets have become more and more complex, chock-full of even more (often microscopic) tax measures.
Read more from Sky News:
What tax measures are expected in budget?
The political jeopardy facing Rachel Reeves in budget
In part, this is a consequence of the fact that, long ago, chancellors seem to have agreed that it would be political suicide to raise the basic rate of income tax or VAT. The consequence is that they have been forced to resort to ever smaller and fiddlier measures to make their numbers add up.
The question is whether this pattern continues this week. Do we end up with yet another astoundingly complex budget? Will that slew of measures backfire as they did for Osborne in 2012? And, more to the point, will they actually benefit the UK economy?
Technology
CNBC Daily Open: Alphabet to omega in AI?
Published
4 hours agoon
November 25, 2025By
admin
A Google logo is at the announcement of Google’s biggest-ever investment in Germany on November 11, 2025 in Berlin, Germany.
Sean Gallup | Getty Images News | Getty Images
Alphabet on Monday resuscitated the artificial intelligence trade, which had been flagging the previous week. Its stock jumped 6.3%, lifting associated AI names such as Broadcom, Micron Technology and AMD. Major indexes rallied, with the Nasdaq Composite posting its best day in six months.
Investors were particularly enthusiastic about Broadcom because it helps to design and manufacture Google-parent Alphabet’s custom AI chips. In other words, the more market share Alphabet’s AI offerings gain, the greater the benefit to Broadcom — rather like Nvidia and the broader AI sector at the moment. Broadcom shares surged 11.1% on this notion, making it the S&P 500’s top gainer.
But while investors may cheer Alphabet’s leadership on Monday, not everyone wants it to have the last word.
“Some investors are petrified that Alphabet will win the AI war due to huge improvements in its Gemini AI model and ongoing benefits from its custom TPU chip,” Melius Research analyst Ben Reitzes wrote to clients in a Monday note. “GOOGL winning would actually hurt several stocks we cover — so prepare for volatility.”
Approaching the market’s moves from another angle, Melissa Brown, managing director of investment decision research at SimCorp, said it’s a concern when just one stock lifts the market. “That just doesn’t seem to me to be a sustainable force behind driving the market higher over the next however many days,” she added.
Alphabet on Monday may have brought about alpha — in the sense of market outperformance and potentially beginning a new phase of AI enthusiasm — but letting it be the omega as well could pose problems for investors.
What you need to know today
U.S. tech stocks roar back. The Nasdaq Composite popped 2.69%, its best day since May 12, on investors enthusiasm over Alphabet. Other major indexes rose in tandem. Asia-Pacific markets were mostly Tuesday as AI-related stocks ticked up.
Record outflows from BlackRock’s bitcoin ETF. The iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF has seen an exodus of $2.2 billion this month as of Monday stateside, according to FactSet data. That’s almost eight times more in losses than last October, or its second-worst month on record.
Sandisk joins the S&P 500. The flash storage vendor will replace marketing company Interpublic Group in the index before trading begins on Nov. 28 stateside. Shares of Sandisk jumped 7% in extended trading on Monday.
Trump has back-to-back calls with Xi and Takaichi. But the Beijing-Tokyo spat is unlikely to be resolved soon. U.S. President Donald Trump has stayed publicly silent, adding uncertainty for Japan and Taiwan at a tense moment.
[PRO] The S&P 500’s dividend yield is looking dismal. For investors who are still looking to hold dividend-paying stocks, however, research firm Trivariate Research has a few suggestions on the top performers.
And finally…
MUMBAI, INDIA – OCTOBER 22: Executive chair at the South Korean automaker Hyundai Motor Group Euisun Chung and managing director and CEO at India’s National Stock Exchange (NSE) Ashish Kumar Chauhan and Jaehoon Chang, Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and President of Hyundai Motor Company pose for a photo during the listing ceremony of Hyundai Motor India for its initial public offering (IPO) at the NSE in Mumbai, India on October 22, 2024.
Anadolu | Anadolu | Getty Images
World
Overnight attacks in Russia and Ukraine as Zelenskyy eyes talks with Trump over peace plan
Published
6 hours agoon
November 25, 2025By
admin

Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelenskyy are set to hold talks over the Ukraine peace plan.
US and Ukrainian officials have held discussions in Geneva about a controversial 28-point proposal drawn up by America and Russia, which has since been countered by an amended deal drawn up by Kyiv’s European allies.
The White House said there were still a “couple of points of disagreement” as of Monday night, but spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said there was a “sense of urgency” to strike an agreement.
“The president wants to see this deal come together, and to see this war end,” she added.
Mr Zelenskyy echoed that message, saying “there is still work for all of us to do to finalise the document”.
“We must do everything with dignity,” he said in his nightly video address, adding: “The sensitive issues, the most delicate points, I will discuss with President Trump.”
Karoline Leavitt speaks with reporters at the White House. Pic: AP
It comes after Mr Trump, who had accused Ukraine of not being grateful enough for US military support while the Geneva talks were under way, suggested the process could be moving in the right direction.
He had earlier given Kyiv until Thursday to agree to the plan, but US Secretary of State Marco Rubio downplayed the deadline, saying officials could keep negotiating.
Moscow, however, has already signalled its opposition to the European version of the peace plan.
It would halt fighting at present front lines, leaving discussions of territory for later, and also include a NATO-style US security guarantee for Ukraine.
Read more:
Trump’s 28-point peace plan in full…
…and Europe’s 28-point counterproposal
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

2:41
Russian drones devastate Kharkiv
The talks in Geneva, Switzerland, had begun with Mr Rubio denying the original plan was written by Russia.
It appeared to include a number of longstanding Kremlin demands that have proved impossible for Kyiv, including sacrificing territory Russian forces have not even seized since the war began.
Ms Leavitt has also insisted the US is not favouring the Russians.
Ukrainian troops fire near the frontline town of Pokrovsk. Pic: Reuters
Starmer to lead talks of Ukraine’s allies
Ukraine’s allies in the so-called “coalition of the willing” will hold a virtual meeting today, chaired by Sir Keir Starmer.
The British prime minister said the alliance was focused on achieving a “just and lasting peace”.
It “matters for all of us, because the conflict in Ukraine has had a direct impact here in the UK”, he added.
Russia and Ukraine report overnight attacks
The talks will begin hours after the governor of Russia’s Rostov region reported three people had been killed and 10 more injured in a Ukrainian attack overnight.
The Russian defence ministry said 249 Ukrainian drones were downed over Russian regions in total.
Meanwhile, Russian drone strikes in Kyiv left at least two dead and triggered fires on residential buildings – forcing evacuations, and leaving several people injured.
Drone strikes rocked Kyiv in the early hours of Tuesday. Pic: Ukrainian emergency services/Telegram
The war was also a topic of discussion in a call between Mr Trump and China’s Xi Jinping on Monday.
Mr Xi urged “all parties” in the conflict to “reduce differences”, according to Chinese state news agency Xinhua.
He reiterated that China supported all efforts conducive to peace.
China has remained a consistent ally of Russia throughout its invasion of Ukraine, and is the top buyer of Russian oil, along with India.
Trending
-
Sports2 years agoStory injured on diving stop, exits Red Sox game
-
Sports3 years ago‘Storybook stuff’: Inside the night Bryce Harper sent the Phillies to the World Series
-
Sports2 years agoGame 1 of WS least-watched in recorded history
-
Sports3 years agoButton battles heat exhaustion in NASCAR debut
-
Sports3 years agoMLB Rank 2023: Ranking baseball’s top 100 players
-
Sports4 years ago
Team Europe easily wins 4th straight Laver Cup
-
Environment3 years agoJapan and South Korea have a lot at stake in a free and open South China Sea
-
Environment1 year agoHere are the best electric bikes you can buy at every price level in October 2024