Benjamin Netanyahu says Israel will have “overall security responsibility” in Gaza for an “indefinite period” after its war with Hamas.
The Israeli prime minister’s comments are the clearest indication of his country’s plans to maintain control over the Gaza Strip, which is home to 2.3 million Palestinians.
Mr Netanyahu told ABC News that Israel should have security responsibility in Gaza “for an indefinite period” because “we’ve seen what happens when we don’t have it,” referring to an “eruption of Hamas terror on a scale that we couldn’t imagine”.
He said Gaza should be governed by “those who don’t want to continue the way of Hamas”.
“I think Israel will, for an indefinite period… have the overall security responsibility because we’ve seen what happens when we don’t have it,” Mr Netanyahu said.
“When we don’t have that security responsibility, what we have is the eruption of Hamas terror on a scale that we couldn’t imagine.”
Israeli’s military says it has split Gaza in twoand encircled Gaza City after more than a week battling Hamas militants inside the territory.
Israeli media reported on Monday that troops are expected to enter the city within 48 hours.
Image: The Israeli military released this image it says shows one of its soldiers in Gaza. Pic: Israeli Defence Forces
Speaking to NBC News, Naim Qassem said Hezbollah “is in the position of resistance and reaction” as he questioned global support for Israel’s military action.
“The one who expands the aggression is Israel and who expands the aggression is America and Europe that supports the Israeli actions,” he said.
“And what expands the aggression is the killing of civilians and children.
“It’s not possible to watch these difficult, painful and dangerous scenes and not get involved because what they do in Palestine they will do later in Lebanon and the region.”
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:52
IDF release footage of ground offensive
Meanwhile, the Lebanese foreign ministertold Sky News that discussions with Hezbollah and its Iranian funders have left him “less pessimistic” about the outbreak of a wider war in the Middle East.
“No one wants war,” Abdallah Bou Habib said from his office in the Lebanese capital Beirut.
“I don’t think they’ll be a war soon in Lebanon – and I think you know even the Iranians and Hezbollah are not assuring us, but saying this in an indirect way.
“When the Iranian foreign minister asks about what’s happening to a ceasefire, that means they don’t want war.”
Image: Palestinians look for survivors at the Khan Younis refugee camp, southern Gaza. Pic: AP
More than 10,000 Palestinians have been killed in the conflict so far, including more than 4,100 children and minors, according to Gaza’s health ministry.
Officials in Israel have said 1,400 people have been killed in the country since 7 October, when Hamas launched its surprise attacks.
On Monday, Mr Netanyahu expressed willingness for “little pauses” in the fighting to facilitate the release of 239 hostages that are believed are still held by Hamas.
But the Israeli PM ruled out any general ceasefire without the release of all those held captive.
Spreaker
This content is provided by Spreaker, which may be using cookies and other technologies.
To show you this content, we need your permission to use cookies.
You can use the buttons below to amend your preferences to enable Spreaker cookies or to allow those cookies just once.
You can change your settings at any time via the Privacy Options.
Unfortunately we have been unable to verify if you have consented to Spreaker cookies.
To view this content you can use the button below to allow Spreaker cookies for this session only.
US President Joe Biden maintains that a general ceasefire would not be an appropriate step – a stance backed up by Rishi Sunak.
On Monday, White House spokesperson John Kirby said the US and Israeli governments would continue to be in touch regarding potential pauses for humanitarian reasons and possible hostage releases.
Emergency crews in Israel are battling a wildfire that sent smoke drifting over Jerusalem and forced drivers to run from their cars.
About 5,000 acres (20 square kilometres) have been scorched since the blaze started in the hills outside the city on Wednesday.
The ambulance service said at least 12 people had been treated in hospital, mainly for smoke inhalation, but the fire service said “miraculously” no homes had been damaged.
Ten firefighting planes were dropping fire retardant material on Thursday and authorities said eight more were due to arrive.
Image: Pic: Reuters
Image: The fire is now said to be mostly contained. Pic: Reuters
Spain, Italy, France, Croatia, Ukraine and Romania are among those sending aircraft.
People celebrating Israel‘s independence day on Thursday were advised to be exceptionally careful if holding barbecues and told to avoid forests and parks.
Most official celebrations were cancelled as security forces were diverted to the fire effort.
More on Israel
Related Topics:
The blaze is the most significant the country has seen in the past decade, according to Tal Volvovitch, from the fire and rescue authority.
However, an evacuation order for about 12 towns near Jerusalem has been lifted and the main highway linking Jerusalem to Tel Aviv also reopened on Thursday.
A day earlier, drivers had to abandoned their vehicles when flames encroached on the road.
Image: Pic: Reuters
Firefighting is continuing but the blaze has now been mostly contained, said the Jewish National Fund, which manages forests in the country.
It said conditions had been perfect for fires to spread – hot and dry, little rain over winter, and strong, shifting winds.
“Of course when there’s a series of drought years, it’s a fertile ground for fires,” said the fund’s Anat Gold, adding that climate change was the likely cause.
It strengthens ties between Ukraine and the US which have been fraying to the point of disintegration.
But will it increase the chances of a diplomatic breakthrough to find peace? Possibly not. Without that, this agreement will have changed little in this pointless grinding war.
But it does give Donald Trump a personal political investment in a conflict he has always seemed to have regarded as someone else’s fault, someone else’s problem and a money pit for US resources.
On the face of it, it is a purely economic agreement.
Ukraine had wanted to tie in explicit guarantees of continuing US military support. The details are scant but they appear to be absent.
But reaching agreement is a considerable diplomatic achievement on both sides.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:49
Trump and Zelenskyy – it’s complicated?
The idea of a minerals deal was initially proposed by President Zelenskyy but at times he must have regretted it as acrimonious talks threatened to torpedo US support for Ukraine entirely.
It was meant to have been signed in February before the infamous Zelenskyy-Trump-Vance bust up in the Oval Office.
At one point it looked like an act of extortion. Like gangsters running a protection racket, the US seemed to be demanding all Ukraine’s mineral wealth in return for continued support.
But the terms now look less onerous. Most importantly it seems the Trump administration is not asking retrospectively for the return of billions given by the Biden administration, by means of this minerals extraction agreement.
The turning point in negotiations appears to have been the meeting engineered between Mr Trump and Mr Zelenskyy on the sidelines of the Pope’s funeral in Rome on Saturday. Mr Zelenskyy appears to have persuaded Mr Trump it was a deal worth signing.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
10:47
From February: Watch Trump and Zelenskyy clash
The terms are vague and not detailed but the agreement appears to be more of a long term proposal for joint cooperation over Ukraine’s economic future.
America will invest in exploiting Ukraine’s mineral wealth but also share the profits years down the line.
The signing comes at a crucial time for Ukraine. Its forces are losing ground on the battlefield. And Mr Trump’s efforts to broker peace look decidedly one-sided against them.
Falling in line on this deal was essential for Ukrainians. Whether it saves them from President Trump walking away and ending military support for them anyway, is by no means certain.
It was a welcome party of sorts, and it was assembled near arrivals at Heathrow’s Terminal 5.
A few people clutched flowers, others brought presents, while everyone carried a sense of relief.
Two children from Gaza had been given permission to enter Britain for specialist medical care and the pair would arrive on the evening flight from Cairo.
It was a significant moment – the first time UK visas had been granted to children from this war-ravaged enclave – and the product of months of struggle by a small group of British volunteers.
Image: Ghena Abed, five, needs urgent treatment to save the vision in her left eye
As those in attendance offered up a cheer, a five-year-old called Ghena Abed emerged shyly from behind the security gates. With fluid pressing on her optic nerve, she needs urgent treatment to save the vision in her left eye.
Also in this party was a 12-year-old girl called Rama Qudiah. She is weak and malnourished and suffers from incontinence. Medics think she requires an operation on her bowel.
Image: Medics think Rama Qudiah, 12, needs a bowel operation
Her mother, Rana, told us their arrival in Britian “is just a like a dream”.
Her daughter has certainly been fortunate. A small number of children from Gaza have benefited from medical evacuations, with the majority receiving care in countries in the Middle East, Europe, as well as the United States.
Image: Rama’s mother, Rana
In March, the Israelis signed a deal with Jordan which could allow 2,000 children to leave the enclave for treatment of war injuries and conditions like cancer. However, just 29 were allowed to go at first instance.
The process has not been easy
Until now, not a single child from Gaza has entered the UK for medical care since the start of the current conflict, and the process has not been an easy one for the volunteers at Project Pure Hope.
They told Sky News it has taken 17 months to arrange temporary visas for Ghena and Rama.
Image: Dr Farzana Rahman from Project Pure Hope
“A lot of us are health care workers and I think it’s in our DNA that when we see people who are suffering, particularly children, we want to try and do something and that’s what motivated us,” says Dr Farzana Rahman from Project Pure Hope.
When asked why she thinks it has taken so much time to secure their visas, Dr Rahman said: “I don’t know.”
Group argues it has no time to lose to help other children
But it is clear the arrival of children from Gaza is an issue of sensitivity. The British volunteers told us on a number of occasions that all costs would be met by private sources. The children will return to Gaza when the treatment is completed.
Follow The World
Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim every Wednesday
Project Pure Hope is not finished, however – group members have drawn up a list of other children they can help, and argue they have no time to lose.
“One of the hardest parts of trying to make progress in this area is that delays cost lives. A number of children have died who we haven’t been able to help and this is an urgent situation and I think for all of us that’s the hardest part,” says Dr Rahman.