‘Freedom is the right to peacefully protest’: PM accepts pro-Palestine march will go ahead on Armistice Day

Published

1 year ago

November 8, 2023

admin

Rishi Sunak has described a planned pro-Palestinian march in London on Armistice Day as “disrespectful” – but has accepted the protest will go ahead.

The prime minister met with the chief of the Metropolitan Police Sir Mark Rowley for a crisis meeting this afternoon – and had vowed to hold him “accountable” for the commissioner’s decision to greenlight the demonstration on 11 November.

Sir Mark had resisted calls to try and block a march taking place – and said, after looking at intelligence, the legal threshold for a ban had not been met.

Israel-Gaza latest: ‘Hamas head of weapons killed’

In a statement, the prime minister said: “Freedom is the right to peacefully protest. And the test of that freedom is whether our commitment to it can survive the discomfort and frustration of those who seek to use it, even if we disagree with them. We will meet that test and remain true to our principles.”

He added: “It’s welcome that the police have confirmed that the march will be away from the Cenotaph and they will ensure that the timings do not conflict with any remembrance events.

“There remains the risk of those who seek to divide society using this weekend as a platform to do so. That is what I discussed with the Metropolitan Police Commissioner in our meeting.

“The commissioner has committed to keep the Met Police’s posture under constant review based on the latest intelligence about the nature of the protests.”

Sir Mark Rowley has interpreted the law correctly

By Graham Wettone, policing analyst

Sir Mark Rowley was very careful with his words about why the pro-Palestinian protest this Saturday has not been banned.

He spoke about the legal issues around banning a gathering and then explained the possible options for a ban.

He has interpreted the law correctly and some in government appear to have misunderstood or misinterpreted it, and forgotten the police have operational independence.

Section 12 of the Public Order Act 1986 allows for marches and processions to have conditions placed on them if the senior officer “reasonably believes” it may result in serious disorder, damage or disruption.

The Met can impose conditions relating to the duration and route of a march, as placing a number restriction is totally unworkable. That is what they will be doing with the organisers this Saturday, as the organising groups have refused to cancel the protest.

Section 13 of the Public Order Act relates to banning a march. This is only applicable if the commissioner reasonably believes that the powers under Section 12 – any conditions he imposes on the procession – will not be sufficient to prevent serious disorder.

Sir Mark clearly stated that, at the moment, the intelligence does not support the “reasonable belief” that serious disorder is likely, hence he cannot legally apply for a ban under Section 13. I would agree that is probably the case – but intelligence will be developing over the next few days, and the commissioner did not rule out the situation may change before Saturday.

Sir Mark then explained the law around gatherings or assemblies. Police can impose conditions on these under Section 14 of Public Order Act, which is similar to Section 12 in that there needs to be a “reasonable belief” of “serious disorder”.

However a key difference is that Section 13 only applies to processions or marches under Section 12 – and not gatherings under Section 14. There are no legal powers to ban people gathering.

The Met tried to prevent unlawful assemblies using Section 14 across London a few years ago with Just Stop Oil, but the High Court ruled it was unlawful and that gatherings cannot be legally banned.

The likely scenario as it stands is that if a ban went in for the march, the organising groups would still have people attend a “gathering” – and the fact a ban is in place may well increase numbers. If groups then decide to separate off in different directions, and if there are significant numbers in the thousands, then arresting all is impossible.

PM ‘picking a fight with police’

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer had accused Mr Sunak of “cowardice” for “picking a fight” with the police.

He tweeted: “Remembrance events must be respected. Full stop.

“But the person the PM needs to hold accountable is his home secretary. Picking a fight with the police instead of working with them is cowardice.”

Home Secretary Suella Braverman had called the pro-Palestinian demonstrations “hate marches” and said anyone who vandalised the Cenotaph on Armistice Day “must be put into a jail cell faster than their feet can touch the ground”.

No 10 denies putting pressure on Met

Downing Street denied seeking to put pressure on the Met, which is operationally independent, and insisted the meeting was about “seeking assurances” that their approach is “robust”.

The Met has said its officers were already preparing for remembrance events over the weekend and “we will do everything in our power to ensure that people who want to mark the occasion can do so safely and without disruption.”

In a statement on Tuesday, Sir Mark said: “The laws created by Parliament are clear. There is no absolute power to ban protest, therefore there will be a protest this weekend.”

He added that the use of the power to block moving protests is “incredibly rare” and must be reserved for cases where there is intelligence to suggest a “real threat” of serious disorder.

He said organisers of Saturday’s rally have shown “complete willingness to stay away from the Cenotaph and Whitehall and have no intention of disrupting the nation’s remembrance events”.

“Should this change, we’ve been clear we will use powers and conditions available to us to protect locations and events of national importance at all costs.”

Click to subscribe to the Sky News Daily wherever you get your podcasts

Organisers say protest will be ‘well away’ from Cenotaph

Tens of thousands have demonstrated in London in recent weeks over Palestinian deaths in the Israel-Hamas war, with 29 arrested during a fourth week of protests last Saturday, during which fireworks were thrown.

Organisers of the protest next Saturday say it will be “well away” from the Cenotaph – going from Hyde Park, around a mile from the war memorial in Whitehall, to the US embassy – and won’t start until after the 11am silence.

The Met chief will likely come under further pressure to change his mind in the coming days, with Cabinet ministers stressing discussions are ongoing.

Health Secretary Steve Barclay told Sky News that 11 November was the “wrong day” for protest action in London and “there’ll be ongoing discussions on this”.

He said: “There is a legal threshold and the Commissioner is of the view that that legal threshold has not been met.

“Obviously, the Home Office and colleagues will discuss that over the course of the day.”

Politics

Britain must ‘lead from the front’ in Ukraine and ‘tough choices to come’, says Sir Keir Starmer

Published

49 mins ago

March 3, 2025

admin

Britain must 'lead from the front' in Ukraine and 'tough choices to come', says Sir Keir Starmer

There are more tough choices to come on Ukraine and Britain must “lead from the front”, Sir Keir Starmer has said.

The prime minister gave a statement in parliament after he unveiled proposals for a “coalition of the willing” to enforce any peace deal in the war-torn country, and announced a plan for Kyiv to use £1.6bn of UK export finance to buy 5,000 more air defence missiles.

Politics latest: Farage says Zelenskyy ‘rude’ to Trump

He said the “tough choices that we made last week are not done” and a “lasting peace” in Ukraine “has to be our goal”.

“Britain will lead from the front for the security of our continent, the security of our country, and the security of the British people,” he said.

It follows a hectic week of diplomacy for Sir Keir, during which he held talks with Donald Trump in the White House on Thursday, hosted Ukraine’s president in Downing Street on Saturday and then a wider summit of world leaders on Sunday.

Sandwiched in between his Washington DC trip and busy weekend back home was Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s extraordinary row with the US president in the Oval Office, which cast more doubt on America’s support for Kyiv.

Sir Keir said the showdown is something “nobody wants to see” but he would not pick a side.

He called America an “indispensable” ally, adding: “We will never choose between either side of the Atlantic

“In fact, if anything, the past week has shown that that idea is totally unserious because while some people may enjoy the simplicity of taking a side, this week has shown with total clarity that the US is vital in securing the peace we all want to see in Ukraine.”

In front of the world’s cameras on Friday, Mr Trump accused the Ukrainian president of “disrespecting” the United States and “gambling with World War Three” after he expressed scepticism that Vladimir Putin could be trusted to honour ceasefire agreements.

It has intensified fears among some Western leaders that the US cannot be relied upon to continue supporting Ukraine, or provide a security guarantee to deter the Russian leader if a peace deal is struck.

After the PM’s statement, Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey said the UK needs to “reduce our dependency on the United States” as he fears President Trump is “not a reliable ally with respect to Russia”.

However, many other opposition politicians have praised Sir Keir’s diplomacy this week, with Tory leader Kemi Badenoch backing the prime minister for “working with allies in Europe and with the United States to bring peace to Ukraine and not a surrender to Russia”.

Sir Keir has been positioning himself as a peace broker between the US and Europe following Mr Trump’s ascension to the White House and his clear indication he no longer wants to bankroll NATO’s defence.

He has suggested a coalition of European allies could step up and defend a potential deal for Ukraine to “guarantee the peace” and indicated some EU nations could follow in the UK’s footsteps and increase defence spending.

However, he argues that while a security guarantee should be led by Europe, it needs US backing.

Mr Trump has not committed to such a guarantee and previously suggested a minerals deal between the US and Ukraine could act as one.

In response to a question from Reform UK leader Nigel Farage, Sir Keir told the Commons this would “not be enough on its own”.

In any case, the deal has been put on hold following Mr Trump’s row with the Ukrainian president.

Shortly after the PM finished speaking, Mr Trump hit out at Mr Zelenskyy once again, saying the US would “not put up with him” for much longer after he said the end of the war with Russia is “very far away”.