A screenshot of the Tesla Cybertruck’s specs has been leaked ahead of the truck’s first deliveries coming at the end of this month, and now we know just about everything there is to know about the size of the truck, along with some other surprising capabilities.
The Tesla Cybertruck is finally hitting the road at the end of this month, after being pushed back several times from its original date of late 2021. But there’s still a lot we don’t know about the truck.
But today a youtube video by TFLEV purports to have been sent leaked specs by an unnamed Tesla insider, along with a couple photos photo showing that the truck will include not just standard 120v outlets in the bed, but a NEMA 14-50 240v outlet as well.
The video goes through the specs and a comparison to some other trucks on the road, concluding that the Cybertruck is “just shy” of the size of full-size trucks on the road today.
Below are the specs shown in the video. While we can’t confirm that the specs are true and we don’t know the source that TFLEV got them from, they do seem to fit pretty well with what we already knew about the truck. And it is common for specs like these to be published internally to help train service techs or prepare marketing material this close to release of the vehicle.
Overall length: 18.6 feet
Overall width (no mirrors): 79.9″
Overall height (medium setting): 70.5″
Wheelbase: 143″
Curb weights: 2 motor 6,670 Ibs, 3 motor 6,890 Ibs
Tow rating: 11,000lbs
Max tongue: 1,110lbs
Bed length: 72.8″
Bed Width: 51″
Frunk volume: 7.1 cubic feet
Weight capacity of frunk: 420lbs
Headroom: 41.6″ front, 39″ rear
Legroom: 41″ front, 40.9″ rear
Shoulder room: 63″ front, 62″ rear
Hip room front/rear: 57.2″
No outlets in front, one outlet in rear. 110v x 2, 220v x 1
First off, the length, width and bed length are all about what we’ve seen before, and none of the numbers stand out as being really impossible. And the photo included of a 14-50 outlet in the bed of the truck does match other photos we’ve seen of the bed. So it’s likely enough to be real to at least discuss these leaks.
A helpful graphic showing the exterior dimensions, compared to other trucks, was produced by forum user cvalue13 over at cybertruckownersclub, which we’ve used here with permission
At 18.6 feet, or 223 inches long, this is significantly shorter than many trucks on the road. The full-size Ram 1500 and F-150 Lightning are around 230 inches long. The mid-size Toyota Tacoma base model is shorter, but with the 6-foot bed configuration, it’s slightly longer at 225 inches. The Rivian R1T with its small bed is 217 inches long, but that’s more of an “adventure truck” and benefits from more nimbleness. This all matches with TFLEV’s analysis of the Cybertruck as being somewhere between mid and full size.
Moving down the list, width is just under 80″, which seems an intentional choice to avoid regulations that kick in at 80″. After this size, trucks are required to have additional lighting for safety reasons.
At 70.5″ in height, the Cybertrucktruck is actually quite short compared to today’s monster trucks. In videos we’ve seen of the truck next to people or other vehicles, it has seemed a little shorter at the “peak of the triangle” than other trucks. In comparison, the F-150 Lightning is 77 inches tall, making the Cybertruck a half-foot shorter. And the wheelbase is about 2 inches shorter, so the Cybertruck should be slightly more nimble.
Now we get into something quite interesting: curb weight. Despite being smaller than full-size trucks, the Cybertruck is actually a fair chunk heavier than most F-150 Lightning trims. The base trim of the Lightning is about 6k lbs, but the top trim goes up to 6,893lbs – just 3 pounds above the Cybertruck’s top trim of 6,890lbs. It is still lighter than the Rivian R1T’s 7,148lb weight, though.
There are some factors are play here other than size. The Cybertruck has a heavier steel body than the F-150 Lightning’s aluminum, and we don’t yet know the size of its battery. Battery weight is a big contributor to the weight of EVs, and if Cybertruck comes in multiple battery configurations, their weights are likely to differ. We don’t know if the numbers listed are from the “large” or “small” battery, or if there will even be battery options at all.
At Tesla’s original unveiling event, a graphic during the presentation suggested there would be at least two battery sizes, possibly three. But that graphic also included a single-motor variant, which seems not to be in the cards any longer.
At 11,000lbs, tow rating is middling. F-150 Lightning has a tow rating of 7,700 or 10,000lbs depending on trim, R1T can tow 11,000, and the newly-announced Ramcharger hybrid can tow 14,000lbs. But most interesting is that Tesla’s website still says, today, that it will have a tow capacity of 14,000lbs. This may differ between option levels (dual- vs. tri-motor), but the curb weight spec lists multiple entries, so it would be strange if the other specs do not.
One of the first pieces of marketing which Tesla released for the Cybertruck was a video of a “tug-of-war” with a gas F-150. The best F-150s have a towing capacity of up to 14k lbs, which is significantly more than the Cybertruck has. But other trims have lower capacity, and Tesla probably wasn’t using the peak-trim Ford. That said, the whole stunt was silly and doesn’t really tell much of anything, but if the Cybertruck comes in with less towing capacity than promised and less than what the model it pit itself against can do, that would be a disappointment.
Cybertruck’s bed length and width are substantial, at over six feet long, and about as wide as other trucks on the road at 51 inches. An over six foot long bed is impressive with the shorter length of the Cybertruck, though we don’t know if it still includes a mid-gate as originally planned. Also, we know from recent photos that the Cybertruck’s bed has angled sides instead of vertical ones, so if they’re measuring from the top instead of the bottom, they’re cheating each of these numbers a bit.
In terms of total capacity, 7.1 cubic feet is quite a bit smaller than other truck frunks. The Lightning has a 14.1 cubic foot frunk and the Hummer and Rivian have 11 cubic foot frunks – and the latter has additional covered storage in its “gear tunnel” between the passenger compartment and the bed.
However, Cybertruck’s frunk is quite wide, running basically the full width of the vehicle, and has a relatively small lip at the front, meaning easier potentially easier access for heavy or wide items that don’t need to be dropped in from above. It also looks like it might work as a bench, but, the hood might get in the way of that.
For interior dimensions, forum user cvalue13 over at cybertruckownersclub created a great graphic showing comparisons of various interior specs against other trucks on the road today.
Again here the Cybertruck seems to be inbetween full and mid size trucks. This may be more of a “four adult” truck than a “five adult” one, but the Cybertruck still manages to lead in headroom when compared to everything else in the field. This is interesting in relation to its relatively lower overall height, and the fact that Cybertruck’s height only peaks at one point, the peak of the triangle, rather than having a flat roof. Yet rear headroom is still quite good despite the angle in question.
This is a point where we actually have some subjective experience, as we got a short ride-along at the Cybertruck’s unveiling event. While the ride was quite a blur and just went up and down Jack Northrop Blvd. outside Tesla’s design center in Hawthorne, the interior did feel positively cavernous in that ride. The truck surely has changed some since that first event, but we would believe the high headroom number.
Finally, TFLEV showed photos they received from their internal source, of particular interest is one showing the outlets in the bed.
This photo looks real, because the rail at the top matches with others we’ve seen of the Cybertruck with the bed open. You can also see the geometric design of the side of the bed, including the aforementioned angle/slope to it.
The bed has two NEMA 5-20 outlets, a 120v plug, which is fewer than the R1T’s three outlets in the bed. The Lightning has two outlets in base trim, but can be upgraded to four outlets with the Pro Power Onboard package.
But Cybertruck also has a 240V NEMA 14-50 plug, which has become the “standard” plug for EV charging. Tesla has included NEMA 14-50 adapters with the purchase of its vehicles in the past, and has recommended that owners charge from 14-50 outlets.
Lightning’s Pro Power Onboard package also includes a 240V outlet, but it uses the locking L14-30 outlet type, rather than the 14-50. Lightning also includes outlets in the frunk and interior of the truck (as does Rivian – and also in the gear tunnel), but Cybertruck seems to only have outlets in the bed, as far as we’ve seen.
A 14-50 outlet is also interesting because this suggests that the Cybertruck will be capable of putting out 12kW worth of power, which is a lot more than either of the other electric trucks we’ve been comparing against, even with Ford’s upgraded package that brings total output from 2.4kW to 9.6kW. You can run a house on the power from an F-150 Lightning, so the Cybertruck should be able to do the same – if Tesla decides to sell the additional devices that would be necessary for that (given Tesla already sells similar units for its Powerwall, this seems like something they could do, but Tesla has waffled on bidirectional support for its vehicles).
What do you think about the Cybertruck spec leak? Is it legit? See anything you think is interesting that we missed? Or any specs that are missing that you’re still waiting for (kWh, horsepower, price…)? Let us know in the comments.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
The Dahon K-Feather is one of those electric bikes that makes a lot more sense the longer you ride it. On paper, it looks rather low-power and low-capacity compared to the spec sheets for most e-bikes. In practice, especially when used exactly as intended, it turns out to be a remarkably well-executed urban commuter that still feels refreshingly different years after its release.
Launched earlier this year by Dahon, a brand best known for decades of folding bike experience, the K-Feather was never meant to compete with high-power folding e-bikes loaded with throttles, suspension, and giant batteries.
Instead, it aims for something far simpler: a super lightweight folding bike that just happens to have electric assist.
A lightweight e-bike, even by light e-bike standards
At around 26 lb (11.8 kg), the K-Feather is shockingly light for an electric bike, even by today’s standards. Pick it up and it barely registers as an e-bike at all. That’s largely thanks to its extremely minimalist design, highlighted by the cleverly hidden battery integrated into the seatpost.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
The 24V 5Ah battery offers roughly 120 Wh of capacity, which is undeniably small, but it also avoids the bulky look and awkward weight distribution that many early e-bikes suffered from.
The result is a bike that feels balanced, easy to carry, and genuinely pleasant to live with in an urban environment. Folding it up is quick and intuitive, and carrying it up stairs or onto public transport doesn’t feel like a chore. For apartment dwellers, train commuters, or anyone combining cycling with other forms of transportation, this matters a lot.
I’m not sure how else to say this without beating a dead horse, but it is just incredibly lightweight. When you pick it up, your brain just sort of short-circuits as it fails to compute that this is still an electric bike.
Simple, subtle electric assist
Power comes from a 250W rear hub motor that provides pedal assist only. There’s no throttle, no complex display, and no attempt to turn the K-Feather into something it isn’t. The assist tops out around 15.5 mph (25 km/h), aligning more with European-style pedelec limits than US Class 2 or Class 3 expectations.
For those accustomed to American-style electric bikes, that may sound quite slow. And if you’re trying to keep up with traffic on the shoulder of a busy road, it is slow. But this e-bike is more designed for bike lane cruising, where 15 mph means you’re easily keeping up with, or passing, most pedal bike riders.
The assist itself is quiet and unobtrusive. It doesn’t leap forward when you start pedaling, and it doesn’t overpower the ride. Instead, it feels like a gentle push that smooths out stop-and-go city riding and takes the edge off short climbs and headwinds. You still feel like you’re riding a bike, just a slightly stronger version of yourself.
The torque sensor definitely does its job, coming on quickly and effectively without being lurchy, though it’s hard for a 250W motor to feel lurchy anyway. But with an effective torque sensor instead of a laggy pedal assist sensor, the minimal assist still feels nice and natural, as if you’re simply always pedaling with a tailwind.
That riding feel is a big part of the K-Feather’s charm. It doesn’t try to impress you with acceleration or brute force. It simply makes urban cycling easier, calmer, and more approachable. It’s not a powerhouse, but rather a sensible commuter.
Where the limitations show up
There’s no getting around the fact that the K-Feather’s small battery and modest motor define its limits. Range is typically quoted at around 15 to 20 miles (25 to 40 km), and that’s realistic if you’re riding on relatively flat terrain and contributing a reasonable amount of pedal effort. Start pushing hills hard or riding aggressively, and that number will drop.
There aren’t multiple pedal assist levels, so it’s not like you can drop it into lower pedal assist power to save battery. Instead, range largely comes down to your weight, your riding, speed, and how hilly your terrain proves to be.
Similarly, steep climbs will quickly reveal the bike’s low power output. This is not a hill crusher, and it’s not pretending to be one. The single-speed drivetrain reinforces that reality, keeping things simple and low maintenance but limiting flexibility when terrain gets demanding.
The V-brakes look old-school, sure. But I wouldn’t actually ding them here because they seem to work great. I had rim brakes for a long, long time. And while I enjoy the stopping power and low maintenance of hydraulic disc brakes, I can’t ignore the fact that when I yank on these stoppers, I quickly find myself stationary. So yeah, pooh-pooh them all you want for being older tech, but they work.
And lastly, I do wish the tail light and headlight were powered by the main e-bike battery. Instead, they have their own dedicated rechargeable batteries. It works, but it’s one more thing to remember to charge every now and again.
For riders coming from American-style, high-powered e-bikes, these constraints might feel significant. But context matters here, and that’s the thing to keep in mind for anyone considering an ultra-lightweight e-bike like this. The K-Feather isn’t trying to replace a car or handle long suburban commutes. It’s designed for short urban trips, last-mile riding, and compact living situations, and in that role, its limitations feel more like trade-offs than flaws.
In its element: city commuting
The key takeaway for me is that the K-Feather works best as a runabout in a dense city environment, which is where it makes perfect sense. Short trips between neighborhoods, errands, commuting a few miles to work, or riding to a train station are exactly what it excels at. Its light weight makes it easy to carry inside rather than locking up outside, and its discreet appearance doesn’t scream “expensive e-bike.”
In fact, at around US $1,299 depending on current pricing and sales, that’s a pretty darn good price for an ultra-lightweight e-bike. We’re used to seeing e-bikes in this price range fetch higher figures in the $3,000 to $4,000 range (and sometimes even much more) from exotic frame materials and obscure drivetrains. But the K-Feather just uses clever engineering that tracks with Dahon’s decades of design legacy to create something light yet stiff, and without breaking the bank.
The small wheels and compact geometry make it nimble in traffic, and the assist smooths out frequent starts and stops at intersections. You arrive less sweaty and less fatigued, but still feel like you actually rode a bike rather than being carried by a motor.
This is also a bike that appeals to riders who want electric help without fully committing to the idea of an e-bike. It’s unintimidating, visually understated, and mechanically simple. For many people, that’s a feature, not a drawback.
Final thoughts
The Dahon K-Feather isn’t for everyone, and it certainly isn’t trying to be. If you want high speed, long range, or hill-dominating power, this is not the bike for you. I’d recommend that you look elsewhere (and be prepared to lift several more kilos).
But if you want a genuinely lightweight folding e-bike that integrates electric assist in a subtle, elegant way, it still holds up remarkably well. And folds up remarkably well, too.
Used in its intended environment as a city-focused commuter and last-mile bike, the K-Feather works exactly as promised. It’s simple, refined, and quietly effective, and that’s a combination that remains surprisingly rare in the e-bike world.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
BYD is taking a page from the Airbnb playbook by launching a home charger sharing system that lets EV owners open up their personal charging equipment to other BYD drivers — and get paid for the convenience.
Instead of waiting for utilities or charging networks to build out more public infrastructure, BYD is effectively crowdsourcing existing capacity from home chargers its customers have already installed, turning underused residential charging equipment into a shared resource while its owner is at work or away.
Also like Airbnb, the app allows the charger’s owner and user to settle the pricing and availability and other transaction details between themselves, with contact information and messaging also going through the app.
Great, if not totally unique idea
XPeng home charging; via CarNewsChina.
BYD’s system seems to be more polished and, thanks to the integrated card reader, a bit more accessible than similar concepts from Nio and XPeng. XPeng’s system allows charger owners to set different electricity prices at different times (ex.: off-peak electricity at 0.35 yuan/kWh, significantly lower than peak), to cover their electricity costs.
Advertisement – scroll for more content
The XPeng system also only seems to support automatic payment through the app, as opposed to the BYD system that bakes a card reader right in.
Electrek’s Take
Atto 1, via BYD.
I don’t know enough about the public charging scene throughout China – a massive country half a world away – to know how much of a need this is serving, but here in the US, I seem to recall that this was more or less PlugShare’s original concept, and could easily imagine a half-dozen scenarios outside of an Airbnb where a simple, app-based system like this could play out positively for both the EV driver and the equipment owner.
Multifamily apartments or condos with deeded spaces, churches, schools, municipal buildings, or other spaces that sit empty most days could be great uses for this, and I bet you guys could think of two or three more. I look forward to hearing about them, and whether or not a brand-specific network could help move the needle for a brand like Harley or Jeep that’s struggling with its EVs, in the comments.
If you’re considering going solar, it’s always a good idea to get quotes from a few installers. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.
Even without clean fleet tax credits and cash-on-the-hood incentives, fleet managers are working hard to maximize their ROI on vehicle assets and reduce their total cost of ownership – and they’re increasingly turning to data‑driven telematics solutions to help.
Telematics use data gathered from sensors embedded in a vehicle to monitor its operations. When collected and interpreted correctly, that data can be used to improve fleet safety, boost operational efficiency, and enable predictive maintenance that reduces (if not eliminates) unexpected downtime. Those are real benefits, with some analysts showing up to 30% savings in repair costs even before you factor in the fuel savings from EVs that, according to MAN CEO Alexander Vlaskamp, will cover the added cost of a BEV in less than three years.
We originally covered these topics back in February, ahead of the ACT Expo. You can read that original article, below, and let us know what you think of the OEMs’ telematics’
Advertisement – scroll for more content
Image via Einride.
Last month, Geotab signed a deal with Volvo Group to integrate the manufacturer’s vehicle data API into Geotab’s telematics platform. It’s the latest in a recent onslaught of such deals between telematics providers and OEMs that begs the question: what’s in it for the OEMs?
“Smart tools informed by data like E-Switch Assist are opening up many new conversations with our commercial customers large and small about EV readiness; we’re already using E-Switch Assist regularly in consultations to help organizations determine if electric trucks and vans are right for them,” says Nate McDonald, EV strategy and cross vehicle brand manager at Ford Pro. “The importance of these tools and technologies goes beyond selling a customer a new vehicle—it changes mindsets about whether electric vehicles will work for their business while potentially saving them time and money.”
So, it makes sense for manufacturers to build that connectivity into their vehicles and makes even more sense to use that data connection to populate a fleet management dashboard that makes it painless for fleet managers to monitor their assets within a trusted ecosystem. Think Android vs. iPhone, and the pain that would go into switching from one to the other after a decade or so of constant interaction – because that’s how the OEMs are looking at it.
Why, then, would an OEM open up that data stream to a third party like Geotab?
The answer, presumably, is that that data sharing is a two-way street: the manufacturer’s are opening up their APIs to Geotab, and Geotab is sharing at least some of the data from other manufacturers with their industry partners.
And Geotab has a lot of partners:
In 2019, Geotab began working with Ford to integrate Ford’s telematics data into its fleet management platform
In 2022, Geotab began partnering with Stellantis’ Free2move car sharing brand, providing full telematics integration into the MyGeotab platform in North America
In April of 2024, Geotab partnered with Mobilisights to integrate data from Stellantis’ European brands, including Opel, Fiat, Alfa Romeo, Citroën, and Peugeot
In September of 2024, Geotab announced a new partnership with VW Group Info Services aimed at improving the company’s data integration across its brands
All of those players are convinced that the data coming from their vehicles can produce enough value to seriously impact fleet ROI.
Fleet managers seem convinced, too. In a recent McKinsey survey, nearly 57% of EV buyers said they were willing to switch brands in order to get better connectivity features. And, if you’ve ever worked in “a Ford shop” or “a Chevy shop” you already know what a huge that deal that number might be to an OEM.
McKinsey connectivity survey
BEV buyers’ willingness to switch brands; via McKinsey.
In that point of view, working with a trusted, universal platform like Geotab who doesn’t have a dog in the vehicle sales fight makes sense. If the Ford Transit the fleet buyer is looking at plays well with their fleet auditing software and systems and the Nissan NV doesn’t – well, it doesn’t really matter if Nissan’s fleetail guy is giving you a better deal at that point. It’s just too painful to operate a second dashboard for one subset of assets.
The man-hours saved with a universal and brand agnostic fleet management platform may not be the easiest to trace all the way to the bottom line, but they’re there.
Geotab research shows that EV batteries could last 20 years or more if they degrade at an average rate of 1.8% per year, as we have observed.
According to our data, the simple answer is that the vast majority of batteries will outlast the usable life of the vehicle and will never need to be replaced. If an average EV battery degrades at 1.8% per year, it will still have over 80% state of health after 12 years, generally beyond the usual life of a fleet vehicle.
Telematics integrations can also help optimize a fleet’s charging schedules, both by scheduling EV charging for lower priced, off-peak hours and by identifying the most dependable high-speed charging stations along regular routes to minimize down time for both vehicles and drivers.
If you’re considering going solar, it’s always a good idea to get quotes from a few installers. To make sure you find a trusted, reliable solar installer near you that offers competitive pricing, check out EnergySage, a free service that makes it easy for you to go solar. It has hundreds of pre-vetted solar installers competing for your business, ensuring you get high-quality solutions and save 20-30% compared to going it alone. Plus, it’s free to use, and you won’t get sales calls until you select an installer and share your phone number with them.
Your personalized solar quotes are easy to compare online and you’ll get access to unbiased Energy Advisors to help you every step of the way. Get started here.
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links.More.