A regulator has outlined concerns about the “intensity of competition” between fuel retailers.
In its first monitoring update since finding that drivers were overcharged by supermarkets last year, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said it was yet to receive crucial data on fuel margins covering September and October.
It said that while margins – the difference between what a supermarket pays for its fuel and what it sells at – had come down between June and August, other data made for worrying reading.
Amid claims from motoring groups that drivers are paying over the odds again, the CMA said the retail spread – the average price that drivers pay at the pump compared to the benchmarked price that retailers buy fuel at – had widened,
“During September and October, the CMA observed significant increases in retail spread for both petrol and diesel,” the watchdog said.
“In both cases, the retail spread at the end of October was significantly higher than the long-term average of 5-10ppl (pence per litre).
“While it is expected that the retail spread will increase and decrease in response to volatility in wholesale prices, over time pump prices should track wholesale prices if retail competition is effective.
More from Business
Image: A big dip in oil prices this week gives hope that pump costs will soon reduce widely
“If retail spreads were to remain at these levels for much longer, this would cause concern about the intensity of retail competition in the sector.”
The CMA also accused Shell and the owner of the Moto motorway service stations network, Moto-Way, of not responding to its requests for data, declaring that this had harmed the analysis it was able to provide.
Advertisement
But it did say that 40% of UK forecourts were now covered by its temporary fuel price comparison scheme which is aimed at boosting transparency ahead of the launch of an official tool which has to be made law by the government.
The regulator noted that prices were currently 11p up for petrol and 13p higher for diesel since May.
Much of that has been down to rising oil prices but motoring groups believe that pump costs are yet to fairly reflect fuel margins.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
3:56
July: Motorists are not getting the best deal
CMA chief executive, Sarah Cardell, said of its findings: “The underlying data shows a mixed picture in terms of what is driving this.
“Over the summer we saw rising wholesale costs, but more recent trends give cause for concern that competition is still not working well in this market to hold down pump prices.
“We will be monitoring and reporting further on this in our next update.”
AA fuel prices spokesman, Luke Bosdet, said: “As the AA has said in the last month, old habits die hard in the road fuel trade.
“Failure to pass on the full savings from lower wholesale costs to hard-pressed motorists, their families and businesses is unacceptable in a cost of living crisis.
“The government needs to speed up the legislation that creates the statutory fuel price transparency scheme.
“The AA has been testing public responses to the profiling of cheapest pump prices across an area or along a route.
“The feedback from drivers is that they want more transparency.”
Britain’s trade deal with India has created a pocket of controversy on taxation.
Under the agreement, Indian workers who have been seconded to Britain temporarily will not have to pay National Insurance (NI) contributions in the UK. Instead, they will continue to pay the Indian exchequer.
The same applies to British workers in India. It avoids workers from being taxed twice for a full suite of benefits they will not receive, such as the state pension.
Politicians of all stripes have leapt to judgement.
Nigel Farage has described it as a “big tax exemption” for Indian workers. He said it was “impossible to say how many will come,” with the Reform Party warning of “more mass immigration, more pressure on the NHS, more pressure on housing.”
But, is this deal really undercutting British workers or is it simply creating a level playing field?
More from Money
Be wary of any hasty conclusions. In the absence of an impact assessment from the government, it is difficult to be precise about any of this. However, at first glance, it is unlikely that some of Reform’s worst fears will play out.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
0:43
Whisky boss toasts India trade deal
Firstly, avoiding double taxation is not the same thing as a “tax break.’ This type of agreement, known as a double contribution convention, is not new.
Britain has similar arrangements with other countries and blocs, including the US, EU, Canada and Japan.
It’s based on the principle that workers shouldn’t be paying twice for social security taxes that they will not benefit from.
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:27
UK-India trade deal explained
Indian workers and businesses will still have to pay the equivalent tax in India, as well as sponsorship fees and the NHS surcharge.
Crucially, the deal only applies to workers being sent over by Indian companies on a temporary basis.
Those workers are on Indian payroll. It does not apply to Indian workers more generally. That means businesses in the UK can’t (and won’t) suddenly be replacing all their workers with Indians.
The conditions for a company to send over a secondee on a work visa are restrictive. It means it’s unlikely that these workers will be replacing British workers.
However, It does mean that the exchequer will not capture the extra national insurance tax from those who come over on this route.
The government has not shared its impact assessment for how many extra Indians they expect to come over on this route, how much NI they will escape, or how much this will be offset by extra income tax from those Indians. The net financial position is therefore murky.
The little-known investor cutting a swathe through the British high street has made it onto a shortlist of bidders vying to buy Poundland, the struggling discounter.
Sky News has learnt that Modella is among a handful of bidders notified in recent days that they have made it through to a second stage of the auction of Poundland.
Its progress in the sale process raises the prospect of Modella taking ownership of its fourth major British retailer in less than nine months.
The investment firm already owns Hobbycraft and The Original Factory Shop, where it has in recent weeks launched company voluntary arrangements – court-sanctioned restructuring deals which allow it to close loss-making stores and slash rent payments.
That deal has yet to close, and Sky News reported at the weekend that Modella will effectively be prohibited from launching a CVA there for at least a year under the terms of its deal with WH Smith.
Among the other suitors for Poundland are Endless, the turnaround investor, and Hilco Capital, the new owner of Lakeland.
Poundland has been put up for sale by Pepco Group, its Warsaw-listed owner, amid mounting losses and a struggle to turn the company around.
Pepco confirmed in March that it planned to explore a sale of the business, with Teneo hired to advise on an auction.
Last year, Poundland, which employs about 18,000 people, recorded roughly €2bn of sales.
Earlier this year, Pepco, which also trades as Pepco and Dealz in Europe, said Poundland had seen a like-for-like sales slump of 7.3% during the Christmas trading period.
In an accompanying trading statement, Pepco said that Poundland had suffered “a more difficult sales environment and consumer backdrop in the UK, alongside margin pressure and an increasingly higher operating cost environment”.
Recent tax hikes announced by Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, in last autumn’s Budget have also increased the financial pressure on high street retailers.
Modella declined to comment on its interest in Poundland.
China has revealed a series of measures designed to help its economy navigate the effects of the escalating trade war with the United States, hours after exploratory peace talks were announced.
Senior officials from both sides are to meet in Switzerland this weekend for what are understood to be the first face-to-face meeting between the world’s two largest economies in months.
The Trump administration has raised tariffs on Chinese goods to 145% while Beijing has responded with levies of 125% in recent weeks.
The effects are starting to be felt in both countries in respect of price, supply and business sentiment.
China’s export-dominated economy is showing strain in terms of factory order books while official figures recently revealed that the US economy contracted between January and March.
US Treasury secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese vice premier He Lifeng will lead their respective delegations.
President Trump had previously suggested that any talks would look to lower tariffs but China has demanded the US moves first.
More on China
Related Topics:
Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player
1:08
Trump: Chinese factories are closing
A Commerce Ministry spokesperson said: “The Chinese side carefully evaluated the information from the US side and decided to agree to have contact with the US side after fully considering global expectations, Chinese interests and calls from US businesses and consumers.”
Commentators said it was impossible to know what could be achieved at the talks in Geneva but cautioned that any meaningful truce would take months to fully iron out.
Official Chinese economic data is yet to show the extent of the harm the trade war is causing but a coordinated stimulus effort was revealed by the authorities on Wednesday.
Officials from the country’s central bank outlined plans to cut interest rates and reduce bank reserve requirements to help free up more funding for lending.
It will be hoped that bolstering activity in the economy will help lift prices generally as the country battles deflation.
Other help included government funding for factory upgrades.